Prizefight (week of November 24)

Apple iPad vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab

Previous Round Next Round

Apple iPad vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab

With the iPad tablet computer, Apple is poised to dominate yet another tech category (remember MP3 players) before the competition has a chance to react. For Apple's devotees, the iPad is nothing less than a slam dunk.


Samsung begs to differ. Its Galaxy Tab tablet is a clear threat to the iPad and a worthy consideration to anyone shopping around for a tablet. The Tab offers a smaller, more convenient size, Adobe Flash support, front and rear cameras, and the fastest growing mobile OS: Google's Android 2.2.


But can the Tab unseat the incumbent Apple iPad as the king of tablets? We're about to find out, as these two touch-screen titans square off in five rounds, and our CNET editors get real about which tablet has the goods.

Round 1: Design

When you carry around a tablet, you're going to draw attention to yourself. Design and looks count for a lot when you're shopping for a tablet, so here's where we examine the look, size, feel, and sex appeal of the devices.
player Donald Jessica Brian the winner
Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G)Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G) 5The iPad feels like a million bucks. It's big without being bulky. The fit and finish of the aluminum and glass is first class. For better or worse, it's become a status symbol. 5The iPad's thinness and large, sophisticated body add up to a stunner; but its slippery, convex silver backing make it breakable if you don't have a cover. 5The iPad brings Apple's high level of classy, sleek, and sturdy design. It's a little heavier than you'd like, but it feels solid and worth every penny you paid. 5

Round 2: Controls and user interface

Sexiness is one thing, but are the tablets easy to use? In Round 2, we examine the design and usability of their user interfaces, onscreen keyboards, and navigation controls.
player Donald Jessica Brian the winner
Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G)Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G) 5My 2-year-old can use the iPad. It's almost unnerving how intuitive the UI is. Also, the onscreen keyboard is larger, more accurate, and responsive than the Tab's, which is a big deal for e-mail and Web browsing 5iPhone users will know exactly how to get around the iPad. The giant dimple control is conveniently placed and makes it simple for first-timers to pick up and handle right away. 5It doesn't matter if you've used an iPhone or an iPod. The OS on the iPad is so simple that my nieces and nephews who are almost 2 years old and older know how to use it. The performance was also snappier and more responsive overall. 5

Round 3: Features and performance

What do these tablets offer under the hood? Here we examine the features in each device and rate which tablet offers more.
player Donald Jessica Brian the winner
Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G)Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G) 4The iPad would be cooler if it included a few cameras, especially with Apple's FaceTime video chat. Still, nothing can compare with the selection of music, movies, TV shows, apps, and games available through iTunes. Battery life exceeds expectations. 3Apps have to be specially developed for the iPad's large format. iTunes works seamlessly, but it's missing extra hardware features like a camera that would give the iPad more purpose. 3It lacks some of the hardware features, but this is the snappiest tablet that we've seen, with a longer battery life to boot. Apps are built specifically for the iPad, taking advantage of the larger size, and it makes a difference, but the Galaxy gets the edge here. 3.3

Round 4: Web browsing and multimedia

The core features of any tablet are Web browsing and multimedia playback. Here, we'll tell you which tablet executes best on these bedrock features.
player Donald Jessica Brian the winner
Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G)Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G) 5Great browser? Check. Movie and TV rentals? Check. Largest online music store? Check. Subscription music support? Surprisingly, yes. Netflix streaming? Check. Killer games? Tons. Big screen to enjoy them on? Yep. 4Its larger screen makes browsing extremely easy, although a lack of Flash support hampers its usefulness. Streaming videos look great on the iPad. 5Safari plays like a desktop browser with multitouch. There's no Flash support, but having a larger screen is advantageous. The multimedia experience is amazing with its deep library of content from iTunes, polished media player, and a screen that enhances the experience. 4.7

Round 5: Value

It all comes down to dollars and sense (sic).
player Donald Jessica Brian the winner
Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G)Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G) 4Apple and AT&T broke new ground with their affordable, contract-free cellular data plans. Also, with Apple you know it's only going to release one iPad each year and lavish it with support. Also, Apple products historically hold their resale value well. 4A cheaper Wi-Fi-only model gives you options for keeping costs down. Its gorgeous, large screen is ideal for media hounds who can overlook the limited feature set. 4You'll start at $629 for a 3G/Wi-Fi iPad with 16GB and no contract obligations. The iPad's Wi-Fi-only model gives you more price flexibility. Tablets will eventually come down in price, but the iPad is the better bang for your buck. 4

The winner is...

Winner

Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G) (4.4 pts)

Apple iPad (16GB, AT&T, 3G)

Runner-Up

The bad news isn't just that the Galaxy Tab lost--it's that the Tab lost in spite of being the best Android tablet we've seen yet. We really thought Samsung had a fighting chance with this one. Hopefully these tablet wars will start heating up soon. The iPad is cool, but it seems downright un-American not to have a Pepsi to its Coke.


To Samsung's credit, the Tab nobly paves its own road without copying the iPad. With time, the 7-inch screen may feel more natural for everyday use, and the apps for Android will likely evolve to make better use of the space. Until then, however, the iPad remains our top tablet pick.

Previous Round Next Round

60 comments

Join the conversation! Add your comment
I still feel sometimes this whole site is weighted towards Apple products sumetimes, like, for example, some of the only bad things you said about the iPad here is that it doesn't have some of the hardware features and the stupid little screen lock button changing to a mute switch.

Why not compare the iPad to other tablets Cnet has been completely ignoring, like the weTab (I'm not sure that even review sites in the US can get it yet), or its Win7, sibling, the ExoPC. I've heard both tablets are extremely good
Posted by CheddarBlocks (23 comments )
Reply Link Flag
The iPad has sold something like ten times the number of tablets as all it's other competitors put together since its introduction in April. People who love it, really love it. It is without question the most significant consumer electronics product of 1010
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
Typo: 2010
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
You must not read or watch enough content with any depth on here. You can tell that all the staff is tired of everything being Apple, Apple, Apple....
But Apple is a lot more than just a Hype Machine (that's kinda of Microsoft actually.) Apple puts out great and often the best in class products of their categories. Competitors are trying hard to knock them down.

The Win7 Tablets aren't prime time ready. Battery life, ease of use (not touch friendly at all). I nudge you to check out one in action and you'll see. But I'm sure every tech news person out there is dying to write something that isn't i-something. Oh, and maybe those were the only negatives they said because it's actually a good device Eyore.
Posted by pghcraig1 (1281 comments )
Link Flag
@ FredC1212 - The fact that the iPad has outsold other tablets proves nothing since, until recently, it has been the only real player in the consumer tablet game since it was introduced. When one has no real competition it is very easy to achieve the top spot.
Posted by genericusername234234231 (33 comments )
Link Flag
Really??? You wish CNET would compare a couple of no-name brand tablets that would never gain traction in America without a big name and big dollars spent on marketing in order to make sales??? I'm not the type to think that America is the only country in the world, but I must say this comment is way off the mark. This is an American site reviewing major names in the industry. Although I agree with your premise (that Apple got off a bit too easy and should have received a few more negatives), your argument didn't give it credence...
Posted by coolihigh (75 comments )
Link Flag
I've said it before I have said it again cnet is run by apple fanboys. Android users dont bother coming here and expecting anything that remotely resembling ubiased tech journalism, I mean why should things like being able to load content or files from any computer matter, or NOT having to completely exit a program dive through three or four levels of settings to change something and then exit out again and reenter the program having lost all your changes be important be a factor when considering controls or usabilty. Why should being able to have your tablet set up the way you want (custiomisation) and operate how you like it (choice of replacing any program with one you like better) to even come into consideration at all. No and the whole thing about playing well with other devices in your home (dlna) or being able to as it is mostly a media consumption device play lots and lots of files without time consuming and unweildly (not to mention quality loss) cionversions that doesnt really matter when taking into consideration why one tablet may be better than another. No...fair and balanced reporting isnt on their agenda or even in their vocabulary, it's alll about picking apple as the winner.
When the people doing the reviewing define everything apple does as right and good and everything Android does as wrong or bad (out of either blind love for apple or reverence/fear of steve jobs) of course Android will come out the loser in every prize fight. In fact I think they should stop calling it prize fight and start calling it apple wins no matter what.
So faithful readers dont come here for anything BUT apple love because thats what this site is all about...in fact better yet dont bother coming here at all
Posted by Vorostatz (94 comments )
Reply Link Flag
So the fact the Apple iPad is a better consumer experience, a higher quality product, and a better deal than the Samsung Galaxy Tab should be ignored in favor of swilling some techie spec Goole-Aid? And anyone who disagrees shouldn't be paid any attention too? Some fandroids make no sense.
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
I totally aggreed! Go away!
Posted by alvpkl (1 comment )
Link Flag
Aww is somebody upset because somebody said an apple product is a better value than an Android product? Are you in disagreement with anything that was said. The galaxy tab just looks like a phone blown up on a bigger screen, while the iPad offers an unique experience... Stop being babies, right now the iPad is the best tablet, I'm sure that won't be the case for long, just like the iPhone is no longer the best phone. Just suck it up and for the time being give Apple its due.
Posted by srnlx01 (81 comments )
Link Flag
What some people can not get over... it's not fanboys, It is a fact. Apple does have the best products a lot of the time. It is not always which product has the most RAM. More to it than that. I am not part of the cult of MAC. Computers are a tool. Apple just has the best tools. Period.
Posted by dswhite3222 (5 comments )
Link Flag
While I agree that cnet has been generally biased towards Apple products, in this case I feel that most of the reviewers comments were spot on. Even though I feel that the iPad is missing several key features (cameras, usb, etc.), because of Apples head start in development they still have a more polished product at this time. That said, by this time next year I expect that the choice wont be so clear cut. Think of it this way, a couple years ago you could have the iPhone or the TMo G1, with the iPhone being clearly superior. Now you can choose between many different Android phones and the iPhone, and many people feel that the top end Android phones are superior and chose to buy those over the iPhone. Apple still has a strong offering with the iPhone, but has much more competition from Android, and the same will happen with tablets.
Posted by genericusername234234231 (33 comments )
Link Flag
I have to agree. CNET is way too often acting as an Apple promotion rag.
Posted by JimPratt3 (339 comments )
Reply Link Flag
get your facts straight. Poor Window's and Android tablets, they lose because they suck. Google doesn't even want Android to be used on tablets, wonder why? Molly Wood consistently rips on Apple, and Cnet just had a piece - Top 5 reasons why Android is better than iPhone 4 where they mock Apple saying they treat their users like kindergarden kids. I don't know any apple fan boys that do that
Posted by busenheimer (1 comment )
Link Flag
The ipud sold about half of what the appholes predicted. In my book that makes it a failure. There are two possible scenarios in the holiday tablet battle. Scenario 1, the galaxy tab and other android tablet mop the floor with the ipud just as android did in the smartphone market. Then there is scenario 2, apple pulls out a victory and proves that all appholes are idiots because the new ipud will be released just months after the holiday season.
Posted by apphole1 (636 comments )
Link Flag
They promote all the great products from all tech companies. That's their job.
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
"RIM Playbook" anyone? : )...........not to mention the best OS (I M O) soon to come Palm's WebOS tablet.
Posted by tristan536 (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I would have to disagree with you. I really appreciate the interface of WebOS, but I think it has a long way to go before it's ready for prime time. One major flaw in its design is the lack of emphasis placed on software keyboards. Because of this, they haven't had the proper time to perfect this feature, which is crucial for tablets. Although I think the interface is leaps and bounds above the rest, Palm has missed the mark one too many times. This will make things very difficult for them if they ever do bring one to market. I say this because they have to overcome the most significant hurdle in the table space, which is developer support. There are hardly any "useful" apps in the Palm market that I know of (and I had both the Sprint and Verizon versions of the Pre). I just couldn't justify keeping it over either Android or iOS. Judging by the pending release of the Pre 2, I am not sure they get it. Palm didn't upgrade the screen size or resolution. They didn't add very many new features that are noteworthy (considering all the things on many users' wishlists - on screen keyboard). I mean, they didn't even add an autofocus camera.
Posted by coolihigh (75 comments )
Link Flag
The Playbook is not out yet, and Palm's efforts have been shielded from our eyes.

I hate the whiners that since the iPad won, it was chosen by 'fanboys.' Let's see, Apple's iOS system is more mature than Android, and they designed things specifically for this form factor. Google doesn't even really want people to run Android on anything other than a smartphone (it should be unreleased Chrome) and only gave Samsung Marketplace out of respect for their smartphone production.

The Galaxy Tab came close in this test, but it had its hands tied behind its back by Google not prepared for the tablet movement, and Samsung not being able to reduce the cost of this thing without forcing you to get a contract.

Until Android fragmentation/Chrome gold release happens, I feel Android tablets will either have to be specialized (Nook Color) or skinned for them to be competitive. And developers will not want to make new code if one day there is a 7-incher, and then the next there is a 10 too. Google really needs to define resolution and size to signal developers and manufacturers what will be allowed.
Posted by daedbird (160 comments )
Link Flag
How come anytime an apple product gets a favorable review anymore, people come out and say it was from an "apple fanboy"? Can an apple product simply not be better designed and implemented than the competition? I'm going to have to call BS on android users not being vocal as well. Read ANY review for an apple product and you will have multiple people on there ranting about something with it and how android or another competitor is better for X reason.

Lets get realistic. A product may be technically better than much of the stuff apple churns out, but what has made the apple products so much better is their consistency. They are consistently well designed and have a simple and easy to use interface. It really doesn't take much to figure their products out.

The best review is to go out and use both products. Make the decision for yourself. Who cares what reviewers think? It is good just to get another viewpoint of the products. The review doesn't take your credit card, deduct x amount of dollars and send you that product based on its verdict. If you used both and truly enjoy the Samsung product more, then go buy it.

No, I'm not an apple fanboy. I do have apple products, but I also have windows/microsoft products and even have linux boxes at home. I'm typing this from my Windows 7 tablet. I'm growing tired of this hatred over products that many people I talk to haven't even given a chance.
Posted by mosspoh (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
It's not hatred of a product, its the people. Appholes are weird!
Posted by apphole1 (636 comments )
Link Flag
Yep, Apphole bias! When they were accidentally truthful and showed the EVO kick the crap out of the iphone 4 they made certain that nothing beat the EVO in these so called prize fights. The EVo is the 3rd or 4th best Android phone but now cnet can never admit it. Then there was the face-off between the acer timeline and the crapbook air, come on!
Posted by apphole1 (636 comments )
Reply Link Flag
So, who are you betting your allowance on in the Super Bowl?
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
Android is a pain to use, though it's getting better. It's not intuitive but Apple has a couple of years lead in mobile, touch screen devices. I'd love for my LG Optimus (or any other Android-based device) to work as well as my 2 year old iPod touch, but it's going to take time and someone at Google with a clear vision of UI integrity.
Posted by bousozoku (584 comments )
Link Flag
Agreed, this site is very Apple bias. I appreciate great hardware and software no matter what the design, but my God CNET, enough with the slobbering over Apple products.
Posted by Susanoo (27 comments )
Reply Link Flag
CNET is a tech website. Why shouldn't they slobber over great hardware and software? Doesn't Road&Track slobber over great sports cars, Vogue slobber over great fashion, and Sports Illustrated slobber over great teams, to cite just three examples among many?
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
The mighty funny thing about all Tab reviews it that they state that the screen is smaller than the iPod at 7".. it is the whole idea.. lighter and smaller instead of the heavy and bulky iPad. The iPad is cool enough but it really does not replace anything and is mostly left at home due to the size..the Tab goes everywhere....
Posted by MightyB69 (25 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Isn't calling a 1.5 pound tablet that is half an inch thick "heavy" and or 'bulky" just silly?
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
Well I have a Galaxy Tab and I looked at the ipad at AT&T when I got the Galaxy Tab and it was like twice as heavy and very cumbersom as for the Galaxy Tab was just the right size and works well with my HTC Desire when i want to use AT&T 3G, I just put my Desire into hotspot mode and the Tab hooks up with it right away!!!! No high priced plans for me I am still on my old $15.00 unlimited data that I have had for years!!!

As for Cnet they cannot help that they are shills for the almighty stevie jobs, but they someday will have to admit the apple is getting the crap kicked out of it by Andy the Android!!!!!
Posted by moe3754 (120 comments )
Reply Link Flag
You were doing fine until you called CNET "shills" and Steve Jobs, "almighty" just like some teen fanboi.
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
Wow, thanks for pointing out the hotspot option. I'm an iPad owner thinking of switching to the Galaxy. What's the battery hours duration you get?
Posted by zanetti2000 (5 comments )
Link Flag
they really are comparing 2 different devices here...
android tab is closer to the phone realm than the tablet world
and as for cnet being partial to apple, i don't think that's true at all.
apple makes quality products for sure, but if you've seen any of the prize fights between the iphone and any android phone, the android phone wins nearly every time (rightfully so).
so it really is a case of who has made the better product.
android tabs still need some more time to grow and develop. apple ipad has come out as a polished product that gives the user a different experience all together.
Posted by gtmaster303 (13 comments )
Reply Link Flag
mantafffff
Posted by hadyabulake (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
I am not sure how Apple wins the value department.

$399 3g Galaxy Tab with data or
$629 iPad with data

At least with the Galaxy Tab you are getting basically 2 years of free data. You get no subsidized price for iPad. If you buy a 3g iPad, you are going to want to use a data package. Therefore, you will be spending much more.
Posted by jrself (98 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Wrong. You have to sign a two year contract you have to pay for in order to get the Galaxy Tab with data/3G. You must buy the two years in addition to buying the Tab. There's nothing free with the data plan, any more than there is for a cell phone contract with an expensive phone you must pay extra for. So the cost is $399 for the Tab, plus the cost of the two year plan. 3G is available on a month to month basis without any contract on the iPad. You only have to pay for it on the months you actually want to use it.
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Link Flag
Please tell us which carriers sells Galaxy tab for $399 and gives you two years of **free** data plan?
Posted by saiyan (53 comments )
Link Flag
I love my ipad, but come on guys....a 5 in design?
Really? Sure, cosmetically and form factor wise, it has the traditional apple good looks...but hardware design...well, its rough, very rough.

The ipad reeks of built in obsolescence, just to help with product differentiation between it and the expected ipad 2. That and to sell more expensive models.

Someone asked me why the ipad does not have a memory slot...the answer is obviously so they can sell models with more memory. This is plain as day to anyone who works in technology marketing.

For value, how about we compare a 32gb tab to a 32 gb ipad with wi fi service for a year including data plans (a 16gb sd card for the tab is $30).

I love the ipad, I really do...but lets be a bit more realistic here. Also, sure, the software is easy to use...as long as you use it exactly how uncle steve wants you to.
Posted by davethepak (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I appreciate your candor. Apple's MO has been so blatantly apparent for so long, I've wondered why this hasn't been mentioned more often?
Hold back on key components to the device, add them to the next iteration (or the next, or the next) - add some 'sparkle' words and have a select group of acolytes drooling. Rather, they should be taking Apple to task for leeching them of every dollar they can get.
Posted by schlomson (5 comments )
Link Flag
McDonalds, Walmart, Apple... people will start to rag on anything that is extremely successful.
Posted by MagicDrumSticks (29 comments )
Reply Link Flag
hey I love McDonalds!
Posted by weebnuts (8 comments )
Link Flag
You still eat at McDonalds?
Posted by Seaspray0 (9718 comments )
Link Flag
Just a selection of some of my favourite comments from the prize fight:


"widgets dont align with icons"
-- Excuse me? What does this even mean...

"hitting the menu button to access app features bugged donald."
-- LOL? Can't be having that can we. I'd much prefer to close the app and go all the way deep into a central settings menu...

2ipad is so simple to use, our judges nieces and nephews 1 and a half years old can use the ipad"
-- VERY important. If a 1 year old baby can't use the Tab, how do you expect ME, a TWENTY-FIVE YEAR OLD to be able to use it????
Posted by leking (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Yep. If it was true, our houses would be built out of legos.
Posted by Seaspray0 (9718 comments )
Link Flag
CNET, you should be ashamed of yourselves for being shameless Apple-shills. Your bias shines through in every comment in this article.
Posted by 1812dave (685 comments )
Reply Link Flag
There's no reason to get worked up over someone's personal bias/preference. I would wager that the reviewers own the iPad and have spent many hours using one and must less time using the Tab.

I went shopping for a tablet last week. I spend two hours comparing the iPad and a Galaxy Tab at two different retailers (Best Buy and the AT&T store) over the course of two days. Both devices had strengths and, in the end, I decided the Galaxy Tab was more of a mobile/portable device. For me, yyping while holding the iPad was not as easy or convenient as the Galaxy Tab.

There is no clear winner on cost in my opinion. Look at the non-contract price of an iPhone 4G in comparison. Screen size has very little to do with higher/lower cost. Considering the Galaxy Tab has dual cameras along with a MicroSD expansion slot, I personally feel the Tab has more value.
Posted by zerodrag (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Of course, if the Galaxy Tab had won the, "prizefight" all the fandroids, now pooh poohing Apple for winning, would be declaring their utter delight with CNET, while of course also pooh-poohing Apple for losing.
Posted by FredC1212 (3447 comments )
Reply Link Flag
You can make phone calls with the Galaxy Tab... maybe mention that feature too!

How strange to try to compare two such different products. Fully specced hardware with Android vs. the gorgeous walled garden.
Posted by edwardborland (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
The Galaxy is overpriced.
Posted by markcusdd (220 comments )
Reply Link Flag
They totally breezed over the fact that the tab has expandable memory, which i think is a huge plus. Plus, you can send text messages right out of the box and have a video chat! And what about the data plans? Go with tmobile and you can get 5GB of data/month without any overage charges. Can't get trust with the ipad on AT&T. They're both nice devices, but the Galaxy tab works better for me.
Posted by LouFace (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Yes. I admit that I am an apple fan. However, the iPad doesn't do everything that I need it too. The problem is that all other tablets are junk. Just go into a Bestbuy and try them all side by side. The iPad with all of its faults blows away all other options.

Maybe someday the field will catch up, but right now, the iPad is by far the best overall option.
Posted by Grovemorton (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
All other tablets are junk? Have you actually tried the Galaxy tab, or are you just lumping it into the general "all others" category? It's made quite well and doesn't feel at all cheap to me. Does it also not do what you need like your ipad, or is it better to have what you consider to be a well made tablet that sort of meets your needs?
Posted by LouFace (3 comments )
Link Flag
Yes. I tried them all side by side. I really wanted to like the galaxy, but I found it unbearable compared to an iPad. Yes. I'm spoiled by the iPad and I'm sure tablet virgins may find the galaxy more tolerable. I was hoping the at least one of the tablets could handle java, but unfortunately not a single one could handle a wysiwyg HTML editor.

So, for now I will stick with my iPad until someone figures this out.
Posted by Grovemorton (3 comments )
Link Flag
It's very clear from the reactionary comments that no Apple product can ever get a good review that will satisfy the fandroids. Your comments would hold more weight if you could show point for point how the review was wrong instead of a blanket vilification of cnet. The bickering is useless noise. The market will decide, right or wrong (Wii vs. xbox vs ps3?) which the most desirable platform is, and the reasons may not jibe with anyone's opinions of the products.
Posted by DENOBIN (561 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Two cameras, expandable memory, adobe flash, gorilla glass screen, more portable...are these not considered valid points? And that dreck about not looking sexy is totally subjective.
Posted by LouFace (3 comments )
Link Flag
They forgot to mention that for iPad to look nice on that video they needed that pretty little silver stand coz they wouldn't be able to make all those elegant swipes otherwise.
I watched that video on my Android phone with flash in full version of the site. Couldn't even find it on the iPhone version, neither could I open the full version on iPhone. Great.
Posted by iRomandroid (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Played with both extensively and decided on the Samsung Galaxy Tab. I have many reasons, most of which have already been commented on. Mainly the size was the selling point for me. It's fits nicely in my handbag.
Posted by Arasiam11 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

About Prizefight

CNET judges put the Apple iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab through their paces, pitting the tablets head-to-head in five bone-shaking rounds. See who comes out on top in this subjective battle.

Add this feed to your online news reader

ie8 fix

About the judges

Donald Bell Donald Bell: is CNET's senior editor for portable entertainment. He wrote CNET's rated reviews for both the iPad and Samsung Galaxy Tab.
Jessica Dolcourt Jessica Dolcourt: is an intrepid CNET cell phone reviewer. No mobile device is too simple or advanced for her scrutiny.
Brian Tong Brian Tong: hosts Prizefight and other shows on CNET TV. He's ready to face off two gadgets at any place, any time.