ie8 fix

Simple phones with great call quality

Jessica Dolcourt Jessica Dolcourt
Senior Editor October 20, 2010 (updated on: June 3, 2011)

Beyond all the bells and whistles, there's a certain pleasure one derives from a simple cell phone that sounds great. That's the point of a cell phone, after all, but one that manufacturers manage to miss time and again. We periodically round up five fairly simple feature phones whose clear calls shine out.

T-Mobile's Samsung T259 gave us great audio during our test calls, and it has a few extras, like a music player and a camera. Then there's the Samsung Factor for Boost Mobile, which competently delivers on its modest communications promises, but gets in its own way with a low screen resolution. A clean design and all the essentials are what you'll find on U.S. Cellular's Samsung Chrono. Its large dialpad keys reinforce its dedication to being a simple cell phone, although the camera is lacking.

Over at Sprint there's the Samsung SPH-M360. Its speakerphone wasn't the greatest we've heard, but it was satisfying on other fronts and it comes with a few extra features. Lastly, there's the Pantech Laser for AT&T. It makes good calls and it offers a full keyboard for easy messaging.

Product name
Price Check Prices $72.95 $3.99 $24.45 $19.99
CNET editors' rating
Average user rating 0 stars
Release date May 27, 2011 March 09, 2011 November 01, 2010
The Bottom Line A fantastic price and clear call quality make the Samsung Chrono a top pick for U.S. Cellular customers who are looking for just the essentials. The Pantech Laser's generous features and stylish good looks make it one of the better messaging phones in AT&T's lineup. The Samsung T259's intuitive design, excellent call quality, and affordable price make it a good choice for someone in search of a simple handset. The Samsung Factor is an ideal budget phone for basic calling and texting communications. The Samsung SPH-M360 is a great option for anyone who wants an easy-to-use phone for making calls. Accessibility options round out the basic feature set.
Features
Specific absorption rate (SAR)0.9 W/Kg
Info unavailable0.36 W/Kg
0.82 W/Kg
0.82 W/Kg
Cellular technologyCDMA2000 1X
WCDMA (UMTS) / GSM
CDMA2000 1X
CDMA2000 1X
CDMA2000 1X
Weight3.14 oz
4.59 oz
3.25 oz
3.2 oz
3.6 oz
Talk timeUp to 300 min
Up to 300 min
Up to 270 min
Up to 267 min
Up to 372 min
Wireless InterfaceBluetooth 2.1 EDR
Bluetooth 2.0
Bluetooth 2.1 EDR
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Service ProviderU.S. Cellular
AT&T
T-Mobile
Boost Mobile
Sprint Nextel
Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications
Buying choices

13 comments

Join the conversation! Add your comment
I have been reading reviews for a couple of years now looking for a simple phone with great call quality.
With the title of your review, I thought perhaps you were on to something. T-Mobile & US Cellular had 'excellent call quality' while Sprint with the Sanyo Vero 'didn't get the highest call quality marks'. What does that mean? Does Sprint have a phone with 'excellent call quality'?
How far below excellent was the Sprint choice?
Posted by kaukale (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
In the write up you state "Verizon's PCD CDM8635" but in the chart it is "PCD CDM8635 (U.S. Cellular)"
Posted by eaglerico (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
You forgot the Jitterbug. My husband has owned one for sometime and it really IS the simplest, easiest phone on the market. We got it for him through AARP. I have an iPhone 4, which I love, but they are sure 2 extremes as far as simpicity goes.
Sue
Posted by SueMag (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
My Dad had a Jitterbug (not from AARP) but could not find a decent rig tone he could hear. It was returned, and replaced with a 'normal' phone.
Posted by encycloman (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
As eaglerico stated earlier today, you refer to both companies Verizon and US Cellular for the PCD CDM8635 phone. So which company offers it? If it's not Verizon, do you have a selection from Verizon that would fit in the 'simple phones' category? Thanks.
Posted by xcaba (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
For Verizon (or Kitty Wireless) get a Moto W385 refurb on eBay, or a Moto RAZR V3m.
Posted by rtwigg (11 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I purched a windows fone made a big mistake buying it bigest lum of junk ever made , I am now looking for another nokia
Posted by Rustyknockers (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
A Windows phone isn't in the list is it ?....... (Purchased, phone, biggest,) (buying it, (comma or was), what is lum ? lump ?
America ):
Posted by DADSGETNDOWN (270 comments )
Link Flag
I don't think Nokia phones are that much better than WM phones, lol.
Posted by nauj_solrac (1522 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I have a Samsung T139 with T-Mobile which is similar but smaller than the T259 for T-Mobile showed in the chart above, except the T139, to me, is more attractive than the T259 (dark blue front, gray back with diamond shapes on the backside); the phone includes a camera but unlike the T259 above, there is no SD card slot (click on phone above and view video); and reception is clear as a bell, no dropped calls.

I don't have any complaints about the T139 at all, it works, and it has things I don't use like Bluetooth and texting (I don't text). T-Mobile was selling it for $70.00 but I told the salesman that I only had $50.00 and that was good enough. I love T-Mobile, I'm so sad and frustrated that AT&T has bought it, but I hope the merger doesn't go through.
Posted by Lucille7 (17 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Have you tested the HuaWei U8150..... it's a smartphone with the price less than $100.
Posted by dlovep (15 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Some of the reviews of the Pantec Laser at Amazon are less than flattering.
Posted by BrainDead1 (12 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Maybe it is the trend in manufacturing to focus on features and speed, but I bought a Motorola Atrix and I think it's sub-par as far as "earpiece sound quality" (what you hear holding the phone). I've switched the sim card back and forth during several calls and the Nokia earpiece just handles the "static' and the "volume spikes" (which they are all going to have) so much more smoothly than the new Atrix. Most people probably don't notice it but once you do, and you know it could be better, you get annoyed and just want an earpiece that's solidly built. I took the Atrix back and am still using the E71x.
Posted by Warren1128 (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.