ie8 fix
Click Here

Which ILC? Interchangeable-lens cameras compared

Lori Grunin Lori Grunin
Senior editor May 19, 2010 (updated on: June 24, 2011)

As befits a youngish product category like interchangeable-lens cameras (ILC), there's enough dissimilarity among them that you really have to think about where your priorities lie before making a choice; there isn't yet the relatively broad commoditization of features, designs, and photo quality that we've come to see in point-and-shoots or entry-level dSLRs, for example. Some are small, some large, some fast, and some slow, and trade-offs abound when it comes to features and photo quality.

That's partly because these cameras try to appeal to two pretty disparate groups of photographers: people dissatisfied with the image quality and performance of point-and-shoot models looking for more, and advanced shooters who want the speed and photo quality of a dSLR without the bulk.

For the best photo quality, the answer depends upon whether you want it good from the get-go or are willing to put in a little work. The Olympus PEN E-PL2 generates the best photos without tweaking, with the most-accurate colors. Image quality is improved over the E-PL1 (sorry, no room in chart), which remains a good--and cheaper, as long as it's available--option. But though they both have a very good noise profile, the Sony Alpha NEX-5 is better for shooting in low light, with excellent high-ISO sensitivity results. The downside is that its white balance needs some work and finding the right settings to deliver neutral colors will take some trial and error.

Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, which makes choosing the camera with the best design a bit daunting. I think it needs to hew to the spirit of the ILC, which is delivering a camera comparable to a dSLR in a relatively compact body, and be both stylish and usable. Panasonic's Lumix DMC-GF2 seems like the best all-around compromise: it's relatively compact and stylish, with a good hybrid traditional and touch-screen interface for both beginners and advanced shooters, and has the built-in flash and an add-on EVF option. It has one big drawback, though, if you shoot with center- or multi-area autofocus modes: it's too easy to accidentally hit the screen and change the areas.

I also consider two cameras very close runners-up, and if you don't care about their specific compromises, they may be more what you're looking for. Sony's Alpha NEX-5 is the most compact and quite attractive, but I find the user interface frustrating for a more advanced user and there's no option for an EVF. The Olympus PEN E-P2 is the most stylish, with an enthusiast-friendly interface, and I like the idea of the bundled-but-add-on EVF, but it lacks a built-in flash (or ultracompact bundled one, like the NEX models).

With the discontinuation of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10, the best value now goes to the Olympus E-PL1. It's one of the cheapest interchangeable-lens models available, but also offers a robust feature set and access to the growing selection of Micro Four Thirds lenses. But if you need an inexpensive model with better performance, the older Panasonic DMC-G2 (sorry, no room in the chart) has a robust feature set, if not the compact silhouette.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 and Sony's Alpha SLT-A55V tie for the best performance, with dSLR-like speeds--the A55 especially for burst shooting, thanks to its translucent-mirror-enabled hybrid design. They're big and relatively expensive, though, so they're not necessarily the ILC solution many people are looking for.

The GH2 also ranks highest for best video features and quality. Because it has decent, quiet autofocus (with the right lenses), it can be a great alternative to a dSLR for interchangeable-lens video.

This isn't to say that the rest of the ILC crowd doesn't measure up; though some have weak aspects, such as slow performance or overly large bodies, there doesn't seem to be any real losers among the entire field. You can find them on our list of best interchangeable-lens cameras. Still to come: Samsung's less-expensive NX100, Sony's latest NEX-C3 and SLT-A35, and Panasonic's compact GF3 and Pentax's tiny Q.

Product name
Price $464.74 $389.99 $349.95 to $699.95 $1,629.07 $535.00 to $996.82 $629.95 to $1,089.38
CNET editors' rating
Average user rating 0 stars 0 stars
Release date March 01, 2010 January 25, 2011 January 31, 2011 December 15, 2010 July 15, 2010 September 21, 2010
The Bottom Line Reasonably priced for an interchangeable-lens model, with the same high-quality photos of its siblings, the E-PL1 nevertheless suffers from slow performance that makes it a poor choice for snapshooters looking to upgrade. A great interchangeable-lens model if you're looking for better photo quality and/or a more advanced feature set than your current point-and-shoot offers, the Olympus PEN E-PL2 still doesn't satisfy for photographing active kids and pets. Though we still really like Panasonic's GF series, there are several trade-offs to take into account before you buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. Its raw-format images look extremely good, but JPEG shooters looking for best-possible photo quality may get frustrated by image artifacts. And while lots of photographers will appreciate its relatively compact but functional design and zippy performance--though still not for action shooting--there's nothing special about its feature set, including underpowered video capture. It's speedy, feature-packed, and an excellent ILC for shooting video, but to consistently get really good photos out of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 requires shooting raw. For a lot of people, the excellent high-sensitivity photo quality, competitive performance, and an ultracompact body will likely outweigh the Sony Alpha NEX-5's quirks and operational annoyances. Expensive and probably a bit large for the typical point-and-shoot upgrader, the Sony Alpha SLT-A55V nevertheless delivers the performance and photo quality boost those shooters are expecting.
Features
TypeLCD display - TFT active matrix - 2.7 in - Color
LCD display - TFT active matrix - 3 in - Color
LCD display - TFT active matrix - 3 in - Color
LCD display - TFT active matrix - 3 in - Color
LCD display - TFT active matrix - 3 in - Color
LCD display - 3 in - Color
Dimensions (W x D x H)4.8 in x 1.4 in x 2.8 in
4.5 in x 1.7 in x 2.9 in
4.4 in x 1.3 in x 2.7 in
4.9 in x 3.1 in x 3.5 in
4.4 in x 1.5 in x 2.3 in
4.9 in x 3.3 in x 3.6 in
Lens System3 x x Zoom lens - 14 mm - 42 mm - F/3.5-5.6 Micro Four Thirds
2 x x
Zoom lens - 14 mm - 42 mm - F/3.5-5.6 Micro Four Thirds
Wide-angle lens - 14 mm - F/2.5 Micro Four Thirds
3 x x Zoom lens - 14 mm - 42 mm - F/3.5-5.6 Micro Four Thirds
3 x x Zoom lens - 18 mm - 55 mm - F/3.5-5.6
3 x x Zoom lens - 18 mm - 55 mm - F/3.5-5.6 DT SAM
Optical sensor typeHigh speed Live MOS
Live MOS
Live MOS
Live MOS
Exmor APS HD CMOS
Exmor APS HD CMOS
Light sensitivityISO 100-3200
ISO auto (200-1600)
ISO 200-6400
ISO auto (200-6400)
ISO 3200
ISO 1600
ISO 800
ISO 100
ISO 200
ISO 6400
ISO 400
ISO auto
ISO 5000
ISO 2000
ISO 3200
ISO 1600
ISO 4000
ISO 2500
ISO 250
ISO 800
ISO 200
ISO 12800
ISO 160
ISO 320
ISO 400
ISO 500
ISO 10000
ISO 8000
ISO auto
ISO 200-12800
ISO auto (200-1600)
ISO auto (100-1600)
ISO 100-12800
Video captureAVI - 1280 x 720 -
AVI - 640 x 480 -
AVI - 1280 x 720 -
AVI - 640 x 480 -
AVCHD - 1920 x 1080 -
AVCHD - 1920 x 1080 -
AVCHD - 1280 x 720 -
AVCHD - 1280 x 720 -
MJPEG - 1280 x 720 -
MJPEG - 848 x 480 -
MJPEG - 640 x 480 -
QuickTime - 320 x 240 -
MPEG - 848 x 480 -
MPEG - 640 x 480 -
MPEG - 320 x 240 -
MPEG - 1280 x 720 -
AVCHD - 1920 x 1080 -
AVCHD - 1920 x 1080 -
AVCHD - 1280 x 720 -
AVCHD - 1920 x 1080 -
MPEG-4 - 1440 x 1080 -
MPEG-4 - 640 x 480 -
AVCHD - 1920 x 1080 -
H.264 - 1440 x 1080 -
H.264 - 640 x 480 -
Weight10.6 oz
11.2 oz
9.3 oz
13.8 oz
8.1 oz
15.6 oz
Product TypeDigital camera - Mirrorless system
Digital camera - Mirrorless system
Digital camera - Mirrorless system
Digital camera - Mirrorless system
Digital camera - Mirrorless system
Digital camera - SLR with Live View mode
with Movie recording
Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications
Buying choices

4 comments

Join the conversation! Add your comment
I have to say thank you for an informative, intiligent assesment, well framed and where the content of what you say is of the upmost importance, not the style in which it has been shot.

A breath of fresh air in the often popvideo media culture of today.
regards
David Abra
Posted by davidabra (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
@David

Seriously?
Posted by QA_Tester (9064 comments )
Link Flag
4 if not 5 of the six cameras should have been bridge cameras with integrated lens
Posted by QA_Tester (9064 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I recently purchased a Sony nex3 on a special which included both kit lens for 499. with no tax or shipping from Amazon. I'm thinking of going through the trouble of returning it for the Pana G3. I like the Sony so far (just two week) but I'm wondering if the Pana is more camera and worth the extra $$$. I also have the Pana ultra zoom dmc pz 35.
cimz
Posted by Cimz (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.