Both the iPod Touch and Archos 605 WiFi use futuristic touch screens for menu navigation and playback control. While the iPod Touch is controlled strictly by Apple's patented multi-touch-screen technology, the Archos 605 WiFi can be controlled by both the screen and a set of tactile navigation controls that line the side of the device. Which navigation system works better? Our individual judge's ratings are based on a zero- to five-point scale, which results in a final score of 0 to 15 per round.
| Player | Jasmine | Donald | Nicole | Total |
|
Archos 605 WiFi |
4 The combination of a touch screen and tactile controls is nice, but the buttons lining the side take some getting used to. |
4 There's something reassuring about the Archos 605's deliberately redundant set of tactile controls--especially when you need to turn the volume down. The Archos' touch-screen control is not quite as responsive as Apple's. |
3 Though I liked the Archos's multiple switches and touch-screen interface, I just wasn't wowed by the menu layout and the unusual placing of the controls. |
11 |
|
Apple iPod Touch |
4 It's definitely fun--and easy to use. Plus, I dig the icon-driven interface. However, I personally still prefer buttons. |
4 If nothing else, the iPod Touch and iPhone have demonstrated that you can make an exceptional portable device using only a touch-screen interface. This is also the only iPod Apple makes where their Cover Flow navigation is actually useful. |
4 We do miss having buttons on the iPod Touch, but its menu interface is far easier than the Archos', and the layout makes a lot more sense. |
12 |