CNET editors' review
- Reviewed on: 05/01/2008
- Updated on: 11/15/2009
The Velocity Micro Edge E2250 is a well-rounded $1,999 midrange performance PC. What it is not is the best gaming PC at this price, as much as its overclocked quad-core chip and SLI-capable motherboard want you to believe otherwise. The overclocked chip especially helps this system's multimedia performance, but its 3D gaming scores fall to those from less expensive systems. The Edge E2250 is certainly a respectable gaming PC, but don't buy it if you're looking to get the most for your gaming dollar. Instead, we recommend the Edge E2250 if you spend a lot of time converting media files and multitasking, or as a upgrade platform for gamers willing to spend a little bit more.
We awarded Dell's XPS 630 an Editors' Choice back in February, and that system remains the primary competition for Velocity Micro among $1,000-to-$2,000 desktops. The Dell is a configurable model sold online, while the Velocity Micro Edge E2250 is a fixed-configuration sold only at Best Buy.
| Velocity Micro Edge E2250 | Dell XPS 630 | |
| Price | $1,999 | $1,619 |
| CPU | 3.2GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (overclocked from 2.66GHz) | 2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 |
| Memory | 4GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM | 2GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM |
| Graphics | 512MB Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX | Two 512MB Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT |
| Hard drives | 750GB, 7,200 rpm | 500GB, 7,200 rpm |
| Optical drive | Dual-layer DVD burner, DVD-ROM drive | Dual-layer DVD burner |
| Networking | Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11a/b/g wireless | Gigabit Ethernet |
| Operating system | Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit | Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit |
You can reconfigure the Dell so that it matches the Edge E2250 more closely on price and features, but the XPS 630 can't keep up in a few areas. Instead of the Edge E2250's overclocked Core 2 Quad Q9450 quad-core chip, Dell's only quad-core option is Intel's older, slower Core 2 Quad Q6600 running at stock speed. Velocity Micro also has the more recent NForce 750i SLI chipset, and the 64-bit version of Windows Vista. Dell lags on both of those options.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
 |
Rendering multiple CPUs | |
Rendering single CPU |
Of course, our test results reflect the XPS 630 we reviewed, which has less memory than the 4GB of 800MHz DDR2 RAM in the Velocity Micro Edge E2250. Between its larger memory allotment and its overclocked, next-generation Intel quad-core chip, the Velocity Micro system plows through all of our application tests, besting the Dell, the $1,999 Uberclok Ion, and others. Photoshop especially benefits from more memory, so it's obvious why the Velocity Micro is a strong performer there, but Cinebench is processor reliant, and shows similarly compelling results.
The Cinebench multiple CPU rendering test in particular puts all four processing cores to work to render a video image. Although the Velocity Micro and the Uberclok Ion each have a quad-core chip with the same 3.2GHz clock speed, the Uberclok's older Core 2 Quad Q6600 proves no match for the Velocity Micro's newer Core 2 Quad Q9450. The result is much faster multicore processing on the Velocity Micro system. This is why the Velocity Micro earns our admiration as one of the best multimedia performers in its class.
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|
1,920 x 1,200 | |
1,280 x 1,024 |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|
1,600 x 1,200 (high quality) | |
1,280 x 1,024 (medium quality) |
We're less enthused about the Edge E2250's gaming performance. It's definitely fast enough to handle every title currently on the market at a high resolution, with the exception of Crysis. That game continues to vex systems that cost twice as much as this one. The real problem is the Velocity Micro's gaming scores relative to the XPS 630. On our most important gaming benchmarks, namely the high resolution Unreal Tournament 3 test and the low-resolution Crysis test, the Dell system that costs about $300 less beats the Edge E2250 by a small but noticeable margin. The reason is likely because the Dell has two 512MB GeForce 8800 GT cards. One of those by itself would be slower than the Velocity's higher-end GeForce 9800 GTX, but in tandem they're faster. From a bang-for-the-buck perspective, the Dell has a clear advantage here, making the Edge E2250 hard to recommend if you're looking for a relatively affordable gaming system.
Continue readingMost helpful user reviews
-
Average user rating:
0 stars
Not yet available
Back to product review - My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 2 of 2 user reviews
- See all 2 user reviews Write review
Submit your review
