![]() |
| How the iPod will change computing Last week, I drove down to Cupertino to attend a press conference at Apple, although no one from the company would tell me why I was going or what I would see when I got there. All I had was a cryptic piece of paper telling me that Apple was launching some sort of product that wasn't a computer. I have to admit, the air of mystery surrounding the announcement was both annoying and intriguing. I picked up my badge and walked into Apple's town hall meeting room a little late. A scruffy Steve Jobs was already talking about the device, which we now know as the iPod, a portable MP3 player with a 5GB hard drive (see our First Take preview). The iPod was the first Apple product that I've ever covered, and I was looking forward to seeing whether the company's employees were really as loyal to Jobs as I had heard. Sure enough, when a fellow journalist asked when the device would work with Windows, I got my wish: an Apple employee snorted with derision, as if to say, "Why on earth would we want to lower ourselves to selling to just anyone when we could pick the elite 4 percent of people that are Mac users?" Jobs said that Apple would add Windows support at some point in the future but not before the holiday season. I know that Mac-only compatibility is just one of the things that people will complain about in reference to this device. But the naysayers have it wrong, and I'll tell you why: The iPod is revolutionary in a number of ways, and its descendents will replace the PC. First, the allegations
Exclusive
First, there's the vexing issue of the iPod's lack of compatibility with any operating system other than Mac OS 9.2 and 10.1. This argument is the strongest of the three levied against the iPod. But I truly do believe Jobs about the player's eventual Windows (and hopefully Linux) support. One thing that none of these critics bring up is that most Windows PCs don't support FireWire, which the iPod requires. Also, even if Apple never gets its act together with the Windows version, the Internet will soon be full of various hacks to allow Windows and Linux compatibility (after installation of a FireWire card).
Pricey
The second problem that people have with the iPod is the price--$400. Critics have said that this is too much to charge when there are other perfectly good MP3 players hovering around the $100 mark. But I doubt that these faultfinders have actually held one of these devices in their hand. If you consider the iPod's design and features and the fact that other hard drive-based players are almost as expensive, $400 is a fair price.
Bare bones
Finally, people criticize the lack of bundled accessories (no carrying case, belt clip, car adapter, FM radio, voice recorder, or onboard equalization). I voiced that concern to Apple when I was in Cupertino, and representatives said that the company isn't worried about it since there are a slew of companies that make carrying cases for Apple products. As for the lack of extras such as an FM radio, I think that adding too many of those features would drive up the price and ruin the simple interface.
A subtle revolution
If you add all of these disparate facts together and look at the whole picture, you'll see where I'm going with this. The iPod (and the Terapin Mine, for that matter) is more than an MP3 player; it's a prototype of the data wallets that we'll all carry around within the decade. These devices will sync info between multiple machines and allow for music and video collections to be carried around everywhere. They won't have a complicated interface, but they will include a variety of ports for connection to keyboards, Webcams, monitors, networks, cell phones, PDAs, stereos, headphones, video goggles, GPS modules--whatever peripheral you can think of.
In addition, I predict that this trend might finally make Larry Ellison's dream of thin, cheap network PCs a reality. The iPod descendant will include the hard drive and possibly the processor and OS for running a network PC. There would be no security concerns because each user would be authenticated via possession of the hard drive (combined with passwords or biometrics). If a more secure identification technology were added, the device could even act as some sort of secure digital ID for activities such as boarding planes or filling prescriptions.
Gadget debate resolved at last |
| Next steps | |||||
|
| MP3 Insider archive |
