On BNET: IE users envy Firefox no more

Search:
Go!


Alpha Blog: CNET's gadget & tech news and opinions blogged by our editors
July 18, 2006, 12:20 PM PDT
Sizing up an SSD system
Posted by: Dan Ackerman

The DV Nation Mini PC includes a 16GB SSD drive
The DV Nation Mini PC includes a 16GB SSD drive
[+] Enlarge photo
Hard drives are almost a commodity item these days, with people stacking together several 250GB or 300GB drives in RAID arrays or just adding an extra drive when they run out of room. Sure, there are a handful or 10,000rpm drives out there, but is that a game changer? Not really.

One of the more interesting developments in the pipeline is a new use for a technology that's been around for years. SSD desktop hard drives are not exactly ready for prime time but could eventually radically change the way we think about storage. A small vendor from San Antonio, Texas contacted us recently, asking if we'd be interested in checking out a system with an SSD hard drive. SSD stands for Solid State Disk, and an SSD hard drive basically uses flash memory instead of spinning platters--kind of like a USB key.

The DV Nation Mini PC is based on AOpen's Pandora Mini PC bare-bones system, a small-form-factor PC that apes Apple's popular Mac Mini. The basic specs were a little dated--a 1.7GHz Intel Pentium M CPU along with 1GB of RAM and an integrated Mobile Intel 915 Xpress graphics chip. The unique thing about this system was the 16GB Samsung SSD drive that took the place of a regular hard drive.

With only 16GB of storage space, there isn't a lot we see doing with the system on a day-to-day basis, but we ran our standard benchmarks to see if the extremely fast performance promised by the SSD drive had a positive impact on everyday computing tasks.

Photoshop CS2 image-processing test
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Note: In seconds

iTunes encoding test
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Note: In seconds

Multitasking test
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Note: In seconds

As you can see, the SSD drive didn't help us in out Multitasking, Photoshop, or iTunes tests--but, to be fair, these are not hard-drive-intensive tests. Additionally, the older Pentium M CPU put the system at a distinct disadvantage when compared to more modern PCs.

We expected to see an impressively fast bootup time, but at 56 seconds from power-on until Windows was fully loaded, the DV Nation was no faster than a standard desktop, such as the Cyberpower Back to School 2006.

There are some advantages to SSD drives. They consume very little power, they run cooler than normal hard drives, they're quieter, and they have a longer potential life span, with no moving parts to wear out or break down (SSD drives are generally considered to be good for 1,000,000 write cycles).

At the moment, SSD systems are very expensive--the 16GB drive in this system cost $1,199 alone, for a total price of $1,738, but prices will fall as capacities increase. Right now, we can't see this as a practical solution for consumers, but in a year or two we might very well see more systems that include an SSD drive, although more likely as a companion to a regular hard drive rather than a replacement.

TalkBack
2 messages

Comparisons must be equal for validity

If you guys are going to utilize current processors (including an AMD64) in your comparison against a measly little Pentium M 1.7GHz CPU, you need to realize your results cannot be correct.

Perhaps we should refer to <a href="http://www.zdnetindia.com/reviews/hardware/computers/stories/126667.html" >your review of the Toshiba Portege S100</a>, utilizing the same processor, you could use the Mobile Application performance benchmark test (2002) as a quality comparision.

Better yet, wouldn't the best test, to show the performance of the drive itself be to copy an image of the SSD drive to a standard drive, testing the two against one another.

As to boot time, I'll refer you back to the Portege. It's an old CPU and all corresponding technology does not provide the added performance benefits of modern processors and the like.

CNET, c'mon guys, you know better than to do something like this. This entire benchmark comparison at least shows a performance gain over such a low-powered, overprice system without any real-world benefit, at that price and performance.

Lonny Paul
http://www.lonnypaul.com
me@lonnypaul.com
by lonny paul (See profile) - July 19, 2006 10:42 AM PDT

Tests must be fair - C

Using a Pentium M 1.7GHz Processor in the test system with the SSD drive in place against AMD64 processors and other current models is not the best comparison to show the speed of the drive.

Based upon the content of your article, you fully believe that these SSD drives will provide a speed benefit due to their solid-state nature - it's just like any other flash drive.

Now, as we have all see with our experience with the various speeds of compact flash for our digital cameras of 5 years ago, flash write speed can vary widely.

Wouldn't a better performance example on this specific test been to copy the SSD image to a standard hard drive, then swap them in the test system itself and remeasure performance?

You guys have thousands of results to test against.
by lonny paul (See profile) - July 19, 2006 10:37 AM PDT

July 2006 archive

S M Tu W Th F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

for Alpha.CNET.com

1x1
 

advertisement



Copyright ©2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy policy|Terms of use