May 08, 2007, 11:38 AM PDTEntitled "Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Excel Could Allow Remote Code Execution (934233)," this bulletin affects users of Microsoft Office 2000 through 2007, plus Office 2004 for Mac, and addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2007-0215, CVE-2007-1203, and CVE-2007-0214. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Entitled "Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Word Could Allow Remote Code Execution (934232)," this bulletin affects users of Microsoft Office 2000 through 2003, plus Office 2004 for Mac, but does not affect Office 2007. It addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2007-0035, CVE-2007-0870, and 2CVE-007-1202. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Entitled "Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Could Allow Remote Code Execution (934873)," this bulletin affects users of Microsoft Office 2000 through 2003, plus Office 2004 for Mac, but does not affect Office 2007. It addresses the vulnerability detailed in CVE-2007-1747. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Entitled "Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange Could Allow Remote Code Execution (931832)," this bulletin affects users of Windows Exchange 2000, Exchange Server 2003, and Exchange Server 2007, and addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2007-0220, CVE-2007-0039, CVE-2007-1213, and CVE-2007-0221. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Entitled "Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (931768)," this bulletin affects users of Windows 2000 through Vista and Internet Explorer versions 5.01 through 7, and addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2007-0942, CVE-2007-0944, CVE-2007-0945, CVE-2007-0946, CVE-2007-0946, and CVE-2007-2221. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Entitled "Vulnerability in CAPICOM Could Allow Remote Code Execution (931906)," this bulletin affects users of CAPICOM and BizTalk Server 2004, but does not affect BizTalk Server 2000, 2002, and 2006. It addresses the vulnerability detailed in CVE-2007-0940. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Entitled "Vulnerability in Windows DNS RPC Interface Could Allow Remote Code Execution (935966)," this bulletin affects users of Windows Server 2000 and 2003, but does not affect Windows 2000, Windows XP (SP2), and Windows Vista. It addresses the vulnerability detailed in CVE-2007-1748. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Permalink | 2 comments
April 10, 2007, 11:08 AM PDTTitled "Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Content Management Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution (925939)," this bulletin affects users of Microsoft Content Management Server 2001 and 2002, and it addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2007-0938 and CVE-2007-0939. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Titled "Vulnerability in Universal Plug and Play Could Allow Remote Code Execution (931261)," this bulletin affects users of Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 and x64, but does not affect Windows 2000 SP4, Windows Server 2003, or Windows Vista. It addresses the vulnerability detailed in CVE-2007-1204. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Titled "Vulnerability in Microsoft Agent Could Allow Remote Code Execution (932168)," this bulletin affects users of Windows 2000 (SP4), Windows XP (SP2 and x64), and Windows Server 2003 (SP1 and x64), but it does not affect Windows Vista. It addresses the vulnerability detailed in CVE-2007-1215. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Titled "Vulnerabilities in CSRSS Could Allow Remote Code Execution (930178)," this bulletin affects users of Windows 2000 (SP4), Windows XP (SP2 and x64), Windows Server 2003 (SP1 and x64), and Windows Vista. It addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2006-6696, CVE-2006-6797, and CVE-2007-1209. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Titled "Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (931784)," this bulletin affects users of Windows 2000 (SP4), Windows XP (SP2 ), Windows Server 2003 (SP1), but not Windows XP x64, Windows Server 2003 x64, or Windows Vista. It addresses the vulnerability detailed in CVE-2007-1206. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
Permalink | 1 comment
April 04, 2007, 10:42 AM PDTEntitled "Vulnerabilities in GDI Could Allow Remote Code Execution (925902)" this bulletin affects Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP (SP2 and x64), Windows Server 2003 (SP1, 2, Itanium, x64), and Windows Vista, and addresses the vulnerabilities detailed in CVE-2006-5758; CVE-2006-5586; CVE-2007-1212: CVE-2007-0038; CVE-2007-1215; CVE-2007-1213. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution.
For more on the animated cursor flaw and the release of this out-of-cycle patch, see Joris Evers' story on News.com.
Permalink | Post a comment
March 30, 2007, 12:52 PM PDTwsfgfdgrtyhgfd.net
85.255.113.4
uniq-soft.com
fdghewrtewrtyrew.biz
newasp.com.cn
To become infected, visitors must be using Internet Explorer 6 or 7; there is no need to click, just visiting an infected site is enough for an infection. The flaw does not affect Firefox or Opera Internet Browsers. Therefore, until a patch is released, users might want to browse the Internet using a non-Internet Explorer browser.
Additional resources
Microsoft: Advisory 935423
NIST: CVE-2007-1765
Arbor Networks: Any ANI file could infect you
Permalink | 11 comments
March 26, 2007, 10:49 AM PDTThe service, called McAfee OK, works at the provider level and inspects all mobile content such as ring tones, images, video, and even applications that may be uploaded by subscribers onto the network. McAfee OK consists of software and services that can be integrated into existing mobile content delivery infrastructures and is supported by a dedicated mobile research team at McAfee.
Permalink | Post a comment
March 26, 2007, 10:35 AM PDTSymantec beefed up its existing enterprise mobile security suite in response to dualmode (cell and wireless Internet) smart phones that have hit the market. The new suite, designed for corporations to roll out to its employees using Windows Mobile technology, includes an antivirus application; a personal firewall; an anti-SMS spam application; data encryption for both the device itself and memory cards; feature control to disable Bluetooth, wireless, and syncing when not necessary; and an optional virtual private network (VPN), version 2.6, with network access control that can be set to allow only policy-compliant devices.
In May, Symantec plans to release a consumer version, Symantec Mobile Security. The suite will include antivirus protection, a personal firewall, anti-SMS spam protection, a password manager, and data-encryption technology.
Permalink | Post a comment
March 23, 2007, 12:52 PM PDTJones notes that within Windows Vista's first 90 days, Microsoft issued only one security bulletin, MS07-010, which covered the Microsoft Malware Engine, and includes other versions of Windows as well as Windows Live Onecare. (So, what, it's not really a vulnerability within Windows Vista?) However, Microsoft did not issue its March 2007 security bulletin, leading some critics to allege that Microsoft fixed the results. The April 2007 security bulletin, should it be full of Windows Vista vulnerabilities, would certainly support that theory.
Another way to look at the relative security of an operating system is to consult an independent source. We frequently cite vulnerability statistics from security vendor Secunia. They say that, to date, Windows Vista has 67 percent unpatched vulnerabilities (2 of 3 Secunia advisories).
How does that compare to the competition?
Looking at these numbers, one might conclude that Microsoft has a bit more work to do to prove that Windows Vista is more secure than the competition.
Permalink | 1 comment
March 23, 2007, 10:49 AM PDTMost of us take photocopiers for granted, using them in the office, at public libraries, and in local copy shops to make reproductions of driver's licenses, passports, and other personal information. What most people often don't realize is that these large, industrial photocopiers made within the last five years use hard drives. The document data are stored on the drive before a it is copied or printed and remain there until the drive is full, when new data begin to overwrite the old. Home and home-office copiers still use volatile RAM-based memory, meaning that when the unit is turned off, the memory is erased. To date, there have been no reported identity thefts that used a photocopier with a hard drive, but security researchers agree the potential for abuse exists.
Sharp, one of leading manufacturers of industrial photocopiers, issued a press release this week, just in time for tax season. Sharp commissioned a survey of 1,005 adults in January 2007 and found half of those contacted did not realize copiers posed a significant security risk. Additionally, 54 percent of the respondents didn't realize that photocopiers stored images of the documents they had reproduced. And a majority of the 54 percent thought photocopying and mailing sensitive documents was safer than providing similar information over the Internet.
The also survey found that 55 percent of Americans plan to photocopy some portion of their tax returns and other tax-related documents at offices, libraries, and copy shops. Another 13 percent will have tax-related materials photocopied in tax preparers' offices.
Sharp provides a security kit for its printers. The kit encrypts all images stored on the hard drive, then overwrites the printed document with ones and zeros so that they cannot be reconstructed later, a technique known as digitally shredding a document. Sharp advises individuals to ask whether a given printer has security installed. For its printers with Internet connections, Sharp says it uses NICs (network interface cards) with built-in firewall protection.
The Xerox corporation announced last fall that it also would include security features in its industrial photocopiers as well.
Permalink | Post a comment
March 20, 2007, 9:44 PM PDT
March 16, 2007, 2:18 PM PDT