April 05, 2006, 5:46 PM PDT
April 05, 2006, 4:27 PM PDT
April 05, 2006, 3:14 PM PDTOn the other hand, the company seems to run through model numbers like crazy, and we'll never understand the up-and-down naming system--the T6524 was followed by the T6420, which was followed by the T6532.
Today, Gateway has announced four new eMachines systems, replacing the four current ones. The only one worth looking at is the top-of-the-line T6532, which redefines top-of-the-line by clocking in at $529 after a $50 rebate. For $500 and change, you get an AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1GB of RAM, a DVD burner, and a generous 200GB hard drive.
Sure the onboard graphics are lame, but with an empty x16 PCIe slot, you can save up and throw a decent video card in later on. Not too shabby for less than dinner for two at Per Se.
Permalink | 3 comments
April 05, 2006, 2:24 PM PDT
April 05, 2006, 1:57 PM PDT
April 05, 2006, 1:37 PM PDTIt is very easy to get absorbed in browsing this system, surfing for average mortgage prices in your community, tax return information, the proportion of single-parent families, and so on. There are also nonmap ways to slice and compare the data. It's a treasure trove of information for anybody who's interested in marketing their products or services. It's also great fun to play with.
While the base maps the system uses look just like Google's maps, they are not. Instead, they are built by the mapping tools company Placebase, which, if you're looking to build out a commercial mapping system, offers better options. For example, you don't have to run the Google logo on Placebase maps, you won't suffer from the bandwidth limitations Google puts on maps used in mashups, and the company layers data in a way that makes zone maps (like DataPlace) possible. Yet the end user controls are exactly the same as Google Maps, so users don't have to learn a new way of moving around their maps. The downside: Unlike Google Maps, Placebase tools and services are not free.
Permalink | Post a comment
April 05, 2006, 11:51 AM PDTWiki pioneer SocialText today released a version that's smart-phone friendly. I tried it on my Treo and found reading wikis much easier on the small screen than it was when I used the Treo to access the full PC-size SocialText interface. Unfortunately, the editing window was about four lines high by 20 characters wide, far too small to use--it's like looking through a soda straw while painting a landscape on a full-size canvas. CEO Ross Mayfield (video link) showed me the same site on his BlackBerry, where it looked and worked much better. And as he says, most of SocialText's corporate customers are "crackberry heads."
Permalink | Post a comment
April 05, 2006, 11:42 AM PDT
April 05, 2006, 10:37 AM PDTThe $400 player sports a color screen, pulls in all of XM's more than 170 channels, and lets you record as much as 50 hours of live programming. And while we'll reserve judgment for the full review, the Inno made a great first impression--its slick compact design is much more reminiscent of the iPod than of the previous generation of XM2go devices, which were much bulkier and lacked the ability to play back MP3 and WMA files.
As far as what's lacking on the Inno/Helix, its biggest sticking points are the 1GB of unexpandable memory (an SD slot would've been great) and its somewhat anemic rated battery life of 15 hours. And while the bundled XM+Napster software lets you transfer your own digital music to the Inno and buy new tracks on Napster for 99 cents a pop, those with an all-you-can-eat Napster To Go subscription won't be able to transfer their rented music to the Inno.
Those initial issues notwithstanding, the Pioneer Inno and the Samsung Helix are two of the coolest satellite radio products we've seen yet. Sirius, on the other hand, continues to lag on the portable front, with merely the S50--which can receive live satellite programming only when it's docked in a car or home cradle.
The Inno and the Helix should begin shipping by May 1, according to XM. Look for CNET's full review of the Pioneer Inno within the next few days.
Permalink | Post a comment
April 05, 2006, 8:46 AM PDT