May 10, 2006, 5:12 PM PDTGoogle announced an update to its controversial Desktop app today, along with several new online services. The latest beta download, Google Desktop 4, offers shortcuts to the sites and tools you use the most based on its interpretation of your online habits and hard drive contents. You can use your personalized Google Desktop on multiple PCs and also now synchronize Google Gadgets with more than computer.
Privacy critics worry that Google Desktop gets too personal. To use the most advanced features, you must permit Google to track every step you take on your computer. And users slammed the earlier Google Desktop 3 because it crashed so much. I, for one, uninstalled that version after two months of tinkering, because my work PC had become sluggish and froze daily. Sans Google Desktop, my machine was back to normal. We're curious to explore how the version 4 beta will behave; despite the frustrations, we found its predecessor handy at times.
Today, Mountain View also unwrapped Google Trends, which lets you see what's hot on the Web at a given moment. As with tools like BlogPulse, Trends charts the popularity of your search term among other Google users. It also lists regions where people sought the same query.
Due for public consumption next week, Google Notebook is designed to let you save snippets of search results. The new Google Co-Op enables people to tag, share, and customize their searches.
Permalink | 4 comments
May 10, 2006, 4:14 PM PDTThe beauty of Atlas is that the data from external sources is all presented in a consistent and beautiful user interface. It's not perfect (two gripes: first, the transition between map and bird's-eye view is awkward; and second, why do I have to put in a zip code each time I want to look for local data, when clearly what I want is data from the map area that's already displayed?), but the core of the design is solid and flexible. I would not be surprised to see the interface refined and the number of data sources expanded; the UI could handle it.
With its slick user experience, Atlas competes with the new Yahoo Maps beta, but Atlas offers more data. Both of these products (Yahoo and Atlas) are getting curiously close to the downloadable app Google Earth [download] in power and capability. All the online maps really need right now is a 3D engine. I don't think it will be long before we see that. The Flash-based shooter game Phosphor [blog post] shows us that you can do almost anything--even display moving 3D graphics--in a Web browser.
Permalink | 1 comment
May 10, 2006, 3:35 PM PDTThat's what it's like to drive the 2006 Honda Civic Si.
We just got back from thrashing this latest souped-up iteration of America's most popular car around some of San Francisco's most winding roads, and we have to admit: on first impressions, we're impressed. The Si's zippy two-liter iVTEC in-line four, which redlines at 8,000rpm, delivered more than adequate acceleration off the line and was responsive right through the manual six-speed box, although the car felt happiest when driven above 3,000 revs.
Adding to the driving experience was a small, chrome-topped, leather-wrapped shifter, which allowed us to blaze up through the gears with the minimum of wrist movement. A matching leather-wrapped three-spoke steering wheel, Si-branded bucket seats, and chrome pedals completed the sporty interior ensemble. Outside, a tastefully integrated rear spoiler told the rest of the world that this was no ordinary Civic, while air conditioning and a power moonroof kept us feeling--as well as looking--cool.
Handling and suspension on the Si were solid and well calibrated to our enthusiastic driving style, despite a touch of oversteer and a suggestion of torque steer at takeoff. After a turn behind the wheel, Senior Editor Wayne Cunningham said that this car was even more fun to drive than the 2006 Mini Cooper S--high praise indeed.
If the open road is not entertainment enough, the Si delivers admirably in terms of interior technology features. Its 350-watt Premium Audio System handles CD, WMA and MP3 audio formats, providing detailed ID3 (artist, track, and album) information for the latter. An auxiliary input gives drivers the option to play music directly from a portable MP3 player, and to complete the comprehensive audio lineup, the Si offers XM Satellite Radio as an option. On a first listen, we found the seven-speaker system put out solid bass but let itself down with tinny treble when turned up loud.
Also optional is the same satellite navigation unit that we recently saw in the 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid, although our $20,000 Si test model was not so equipped. Our token gripe is that there is not much room in the backseat.
The 2006 Honda Civic Si has won a raft of awards, including Motor Trend Car of the Year and Kelly Blue Book's Best Redesigned Vehicle of 2006. We can see why.
Permalink | 1 comment
May 10, 2006, 2:35 PM PDT
May 10, 2006, 1:20 PM PDTMore disturbing to Buzz was the entry on May 21 noting that planograms must be submitted. What are Sprint's planograms, and what do they mean for planet Earth?! We must be on guard!
Permalink | 13 comments
May 10, 2006, 12:17 PM PDTThe idea is simple: If you want out of a cellular contract (and who doesn't?) but don't want to pay the early termination fee, CellSwapper will help you find somebody who wants a short-term contract and will take over your plan for the duration.
Downside: It looks like the assignee of your contract gets your phone number, which could be awkward (you can ask the carrier for a new number). On the upside, this is a legal transfer of the contract and the carriers recognize it, so once you sell your cell, you're no longer responsible for the bill at all.
Fees are $14.95 to sell a plan on consignment (you're not charged unless you make the sale) or $9.95 if you pay up front. There is no fee to buy a contract.
This post has been corrected from the original
Permalink | 10 comments
May 10, 2006, 10:58 AM PDT
May 10, 2006, 10:38 AM PDTShutterfly Studio is the latest freeware designed to encourage you to send your photos skipping Shutterfly-ward. It's basically an organizer, which it does pretty well, with barely-there editing capabilities, that provides an easier entrée to the site.
On the upside, Studio's organizer doesn't import or duplicate your files, just maintains a separate list of pointers to them. You can nest keywords and assign them via drag and drop. And it implements a very interesting search interface from its automatically generated lists of searches to an innovative and easy-to-use Boolean (and/or) technique.
Unfortunately, the potentially value-added part of the package, the editing tools, need a lot more work. For example, we've come to think of Auto Fix as, well, a feature that corrects a host of photo problems--exposure, white balance, sharpness, and so on. Studio's only corrects white balance. I suppose that's for the best, because its brightness correction seems to be linear; in other words, it simply brightens the whole image rather than retaining the dark and light portions and brightening only the midtones, which is what you really want it to do.
So why waste so many words on the software? Because it's part of a cautionary tale that I'll probably repeat over and over. It goes like this: as we become increasingly dependent on Web services, we allow ourselves to become increasingly locked into particular solutions. This is especially true of photo-sharing sites. After you've invested so much time organizing, uploading, and keywording your photos, how motivated will you be to switch to another service if you're unhappy or a better option rolls around? There are no migration tools to move all that keyword data from service A to service B.
To bring it back around to Studio: if you're looking for a cute little photo organizer, Studio is as good as any of the other freeware around, and you don't have to use Shutterfly to take advantage of it. And I don't have anything against Shutterfly or its competitors--clearly, they fill a need. But with any software like this, just think before you succumb to the allure of the easy free trial, which is its real purpose.
Paranoid, much?
Permalink | Post a comment
May 10, 2006, 8:02 AM PDT