June 08, 2006, 4:42 PM PDTGoogle isn't yet talking about its PowerPoint killer, but a few start-ups, such as Zoho, Structured Data, and ThinkFree, are testing products that show us what a presentation service will look like online.
Zoho's product, ZohoShow, is in closed alpha testing. It is, at the moment, extremely basic. You can create simple text charts and insert graphics, as well as import picture from Flickr, which is cool. There are no transition effects and none of the cool chart-building utilities you get in PowerPoint.
However, each presentation has its own Web address, which makes sharing your work with others extremely easy. In the alpha I tried, the URL isn't displayed anywhere, but it's easy to find. I imagine one of the first features to be added to ZohoShow, hopefully before it goes into public testing, will be a "send to an associate" link (with some security on the presentations as well, since that's also missing). Another feature needed is the capability for the presenter to remotely control which slides another user on the Web is seeing.
Zoho's Rahu Vegesna told me that Skype integration is also coming soon. This is a very powerful idea: From your computer, you'll be able to call a contact and talk them through an onscreen slide show.
Structured Data's service, Thumbstacks, at the moment has a very slightly more refined user experience. It's also in open alpha testing, so you can try it out if you're curious about this breed of online software. You can create simple slide shows and import images from Flickr to spice them up. But like ZohoShow, there are only a few basic templates, and you can't change a show's template once you've started work on the file. Thumbstacks does make it easier to find the URL of your presentation, and it lets you set presentations to "private." It also lets you remotely control a slideshow on up to five other viewers' displays.
The most developed of the presentation tools is ThinkFree Show. It's very much a work-alike to Microsoft Office but without some of the advanced features. It will even open PowerPoint files with fairly good fidelity. But its reliance on Java slows it down, and it too is missing the remote control function that will truly help online slide shows differentiate from traditional software.
A challenge with all these products is that while they will be great for users who can be online to make presentations, things change if you find yourself offline, with nothing but a laptop and a projector between you and your audience. Thumbstacks does let you save a presentation as an HTML file; ThinkFree saves both PowerPoint and PDF files. Zoho plans to add a complete offline version of its suite to handle the situation.
There are still too many features missing from the newest online slide show tools, ZohoShow and Thumbstacks. I hope they add features before they are launched as public betas. Unfortunately, in this software category, advanced features (animations, oddball slide formats, and so on) do matter, since many people think tweaking their presentations makes them better. At the moment, ThinkFree's offering is the closest online competitor to PowerPoint. But I'm going to keep an eye on Zoho. This company, like ThinkFree, is building a suite of solid online applications, including a spreadsheet and a word processor.
It's a bit early to tell any presenter that he or she can live without PowerPoint. ThinkFree is at the leading edge of this space, but I expect Zoho to come along quickly. Soon, many users really won't need to buy an office suite.
This post has been corrected from the original, which said Thumbstacks does not have a remote control function. It does.
Permalink | Post a comment
June 08, 2006, 4:26 PM PDTI thought perhaps the makers hadn't really run into this issue yet, as the service has only been around for a few weeks, and most people probably haven't needed to deauthorize a player in that short time. But a few calls back and forth to my MTV contact and the customer service center yielded even more confusing results. Finally, I got one last call from MTV: deauthorization has not yet been built into the Urge service. It's something that MTV's engineers are working on while the service is in beta, but it will definitely be allowed. Interestingly enough, though, this doesn't really matter. After I got off the phone, I decided to see what would happen if I tried to sync up a third device with Urge...and it worked. Apparently, the two-device restriction is also being built in during beta. Maybe if everything works out, both systems will be put in place simultaneously. In the meantime, I have three MP3 players running smoothly with Urge--sweet.
Permalink | 2 comments
June 08, 2006, 12:53 PM PDTThe 4GB card is the first to bear the SDHC logo: SD High Capacity. In reality, the logo is more important for the read/write hardware, such as digital cameras; basically, it says, "FAT32 spoken here." The other aspect of the latest iteration of the SD spec also clarifies--and I use the term loosely--card performance by clumping them into groups by minimum sustained data transfer rate (MSDTR): Class 2 equals 2MB per second, Class 4 equals 4MB per second, and Class 6 equals 6MB per second.
The only possible rationale I can see for this system is to allow marketers to snow consumers with ambiguous performance claims. To wit: a card with a 3.5MB-per-second MSDTR and one with a 2MB-per-second MSDTR both become Class 2 cards, despite the fact that the former's performance is closer to that of a Class 4 card than of Class 2. Why can't they just report the actual MSDTR or translate the performance to some sort of normalized scale (along the lines of the older x ratings) if people are scared of the real rates?
Permalink | Post a comment
June 08, 2006, 11:48 AM PDTMore of an incremental upgrade than a radical change, Beyond TV 4.3 offers a handful of notable new features. Using the program's ShowSqueeze option (for backing up old shows to save disc space), you can now convert HD recordings to Windows Media and DivX formats, and save even more space by stripping out some extra subchannels from HD recordings. The DivX 6.1 video codec is also supported now, and Snapstream says using that format helps Intel dual-core CPUs encode content faster.
Hot on the heels of ATI's release this week of the new ATI Theater 650 Pro chip for TV tuners, Beyond TV 4.3 is the first DVR app to announce support for the new chip. The Theater 650 gave us the best image quality we've seen from a TV tuner, so we expect it to be popular among DVR fans.
One of the more interesting new features of Beyond TV 4.3 is called Beyond TV Buzz. While it won't improve your image quality or save hard drive space, this community service lets you see what shows are popular with other Beyond TV users. It'll show you the top 100 recorded shows from the previous week and the most popular upcoming recordings, and factor your choices into the stats, if you choose to participate. Currently on top of the list is one of the new Doctor Who episodes on the Sci-Fi Channel.
We loaded up Beyond TV 4.3 on a PC running Windows Media Center Edition. We've had some trouble in the past getting DVR software installed and set up properly, but this time it was a breeze. Our only hitch was getting Media Center to give up control of the TV tuner hardware. (Go to Start > Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Services and right-click Media Center Receiver Service. Go to Properties and set Startup Type to Disabled.)
No one has yet come up with a DVR interface that is as elegant and well-designed as Windows Media Center, but with each iteration, Beyond TV comes closer. It also offers more settings and configuration options and greater control over your recordings than Media Center. Some users will love that; others might prefer the more basic foolproof set of tools in Media Center. Before contemplating a switch, note that unlike MCE, Beyond TV handles only TV recordings, not your entire catalog of photos, videos, and music. You have to add the sister program, called BeyondMedia, to get an all-inclusive package. We'll continue to test Beyond TV 4.3 by recording, playing, and encoding content, and we'll post a full review in the coming days.
Permalink | Post a comment
June 08, 2006, 10:42 AM PDT
June 08, 2006, 10:08 AM PDT
June 08, 2006, 8:35 AM PDT
June 08, 2006, 8:31 AM PDTSource: Reuters
Permalink | 10 comments
June 08, 2006, 7:48 AM PDTMany companies are trying to position themselves as leaders in the geolocation field this week, which makes sense since the sure-to-be-fascinating Where 2.0 conference kicks off next week. My favorite pitch from these companies so far is from Skyhook Wireless, which makes a geolocation system that uses Wi-Fi, not GPS satellites.
Here's how it works: Every Wi-Fi access point (every Internet device, in fact) has a unique, fixed-in-hardware machine identifier, which is transmitted whenever it is on. If you have a database of these AP identifiers and their physical locations, you can use the Wi-Fi radio in your laptop or PDA to triangulate against that data. It's solely a metropolitan solution, since lonely interstates tend not to be populated by access points. But there are big advantages to Wi-Fi over GPS. For one thing, more people have Wi-Fi radios than GPS receivers. Also, Wi-Fi works indoors, where GPS often fails.
Keeping the database of what's where up-to-date is the trick. Skyhook employs a fleet of 200 full-time people who have the job of "wardriving" up and down city streets in cars equipped with GPS receivers and Wi-Fi scanners, mapping the location of hot spots and access points. CEO Ted Morgan told me Skyhook has mapped 8 million access points in the top 100 metro areas.
What's this mean to you? Skyhook has a consumer application, Loki. It's a toolbar add-on for Firefox or Internet Explorer that will pinpoint your physical location on a Google map and, if you want, also connect you to other "geotagged" databases of restaurants, photos, people, and so on. This data will also enable location-focused online advertisements, which might be more relevant than current ads. It might also creep you out to get an advertisement that knows where you are.
Here in San Francisco, Loki nailed my location both at my home and the CNET office. In contrast, Microsoft's Location Finder (part of Windows Live Local) got my house right, but missed the CNET office location entirely, placing me in a residential neighborhood.
At Where 2.0, the company will release its APIs so that even more developers can tap in to the geolocation data the system can gather. Many of the services I've covered recently would benefit from having location data. Etsy could automatically display artisans close to you; SwapTree could coordinate trades with people nearby; and TurnHere could select videos shot close to where you are. Community sites and social networks are also going to eat this up.
Permalink | Post a comment