September 13, 2006, 11:04 PM PDTGame Center: Hosted by James Brown (of Fox Sports and now CBS fame). Preview of day's games with brief analysis.
The Mobile Fix: Entertainment and hot gossip.
Daily Dose: Hosted by Ryan McDonough from the Fox Soccer Channel. Preview and recap of matchups.
We got to check out the service, and though we're not completely sold on the idea of watching TV on a cell phone, we have to admit, it was pretty cool. Power View is free to Sprint Vision and Power Vision subscribers and is available now as a downloadable Java app. You can find more information and check for compatible phones here.
Permalink | Post a comment
September 13, 2006, 10:55 PM PDTLike the Hy-wire, the Sequel is based on a skateboard-style platform, with all major propulsion, braking, and chassis components contained in the car's underbelly. All throttle and braking inputs for the Sequel use drive-by-wire technology, meaning that electronic--rather than mechanical--connections link the accelerator and the brake pedal to their respective functions.
According to GM, the Sequel has a range of 300 miles, a top speed of 90mph, and will go to 60mph from standing in less than 10 seconds--not spectacular by modern standards until you remember that the only emission produced is water vapor. At a press event in San Diego tonight, GM's vice president of R&D, Larry Burns, told a group of auto journalists that the Sequel heralds the "reinvention of the automobile."
We'll have to reserve judgment until tomorrow when we get a chance to actually drive one here in the desert of Southern California. Stay tuned to Car Tech for our first-hand impressions of the car of the future.
Source: Images: GM press photos
Permalink | 13 comments
September 13, 2006, 8:45 PM PDT
September 13, 2006, 7:43 PM PDT
September 13, 2006, 6:00 PM PDTCingular also revealed it would offer a 3G smart phone by the end of 2006 and that it remains very bullish on its relationship with Windows Mobile. And concerning its HSDPA rollout, the carrier plans to have 87 cities and more than 100 million people covered by the end of the year.
Permalink | 3 comments
September 13, 2006, 4:25 PM PDTI got waylaid at the Future of Web Apps conference today by the folks from Zapr. They make a free peer-to-peer file-sharing utility that's not just targeted at real people (as opposed to geeks; see AllPeers) but that I think they could actually use. Sharing a file or a directory does require a download, but unlike most other peer-to-peer sharing systems, receiving a shared file does not. It works through Web links: The application gives a shared asset a URL, which you can e-mail to your friends or post on the Web. People who go to the URL get a Web page served up by your PC, which then allows them access to the files you're sharing.
A big advantage of this concept is that once you share a directory, anything you put in that directory is easily accessible by anybody who has the link. And as long as the files are on your PC, they remain shareable. Free hosted sharing access to your files usually expires after a few days.
The major downside to Zapr is that you have to leave your computer on, although a future enhancement of the product will include paid, Web-based storage. Another big downer: No security, at least not in the current product. If the URL of a shared asset gets out onto the Web, anybody can download directly from your PC. Again, future releases will have security.
If you don't want to run an application to share large files, you might want to check out YouSendIt, which, like Zapr, allows receivers to get files by clicking on standard links. Since YouSendIt stores files on its own servers, you have to upload what you want to share, but then you don't have to leave your PC to allow people to pick it up. The hosted transfer model isn't as flexible as peer-to-peer sharing, but it is easier to use for both senders and receivers.
Permalink | 0 comments
September 13, 2006, 4:00 PM PDTJudging from the specs, the main difference between the two lies in the lamps: the physically much smaller Pearl has a conventional 200-watt UHP lamp as opposed to the bulky Ruby's exotic 400-watt Xenon lamp. One of our few criticisms of the Ruby was the price of replacement lamps ($1,000 a pop, so to speak) and the fact that, at its quoted brightness of 800 ANSI lumen, screen sizes are practically limited to 100 inches diagonal or less. According to its specs, the Pearl has a 900 lumen lamp, so it should be a bit brighter than its big brother. Other than that, we can't really speculate on its image quality, but we expect to have a full review in the next month. And in case you're wondering, the VPL-VW50 is not the least expensive 1080p projector announced at the show. That honor belongs to the Mitsubishi HC5000, at least for now.
Speaking of screens, Sony and Stewart Filmscreen also announced a specialized screen that's supposedly designed with the Pearl in mind. No word on pricing yet, but the new screens have a catchy abbreviation: Stewart Firehawk SST, for Sony/Stewart Theater, and will be available this month in a variety of sizes.
Update: I attended Sony's VPL-VW50 demo and learned a few new pieces of information. First off, the new projector looked pretty darn good, although some of the footage appeared a bit soft to my eyes. That could be due to any number of factors, such as setup or source, but either way I'm looking forward to seeing one in a real lab environment. Sony had one of the new screens in use and the rep claimed that it cost about $2000 for the 100-inch wide version. Replacement bulbs cost around $300 and should last 2,000 to 3,000 hours, depending on which setting you choose. We'll have a full review as soon as possible.
Permalink | Post a comment
September 13, 2006, 4:00 PM PDTThe new LCDs include the company's first 52-inch models: the KDL-52XBR2 (November, $6,500) and the KDL-52XBR3 (November, $6,800). Both join their smaller cousins in Sony's lineup and offer similar feature sets and styling, although the XBR2 model doesn't have the option to swap out its silver bezel for another color. Both 52-inch sets deliver 1,920x1,080 pixels, or 1080p native resolution, as well as the same picture-quality enhancements found on the smaller models. Given the picture quality evinced by the KDL-40XBR2, we expect these larger LCDs to be among the best-performing LCDs on the market.
Apparently unsatisfied by the depth of its relatively affordable S2000 line, the company also announced two other LCDs, the 32-inch KDL-32S2400 (October, $2,600) and the 40-inch KDL-40S2400 (October, $1,700). Aside from price, the main difference between the new sets and the S2000 models is color: the S2400s have a black bezel instead of a silver one.
We expect to review one of the 52-inch models when it becomes available, but we probably won't review either of the S2400 sets. Check out our review of the KDL-32S2000 for an idea of how the S2400 series may perform.
Permalink | 1 comment
September 13, 2006, 4:00 PM PDTBoth receivers are specifically designed to dovetail with Sony's forthcoming Blu-ray standard bearers, the BDP-S1 and the PlayStation 3. As such, their HDMI inputs and outputs support HD resolution as high as 1080p, as well as uncompressed (linear PCM) 7.1-channel audio. In addition to its unique onscreen interface, the DA5200ES also boasts Faroudja's DCDi video-processing chip, which enables such abilities as scaling incoming analog video sources (for instance, composite and S-Video) to HD resolutions including 1080p, as well as offering picture-in-picture modes (a standard-definition source windowed over an HD one).
Both receivers will be available in October. The Sony STR-DA5200ES will cost $1,500 and the Sony STR-DA3200ES will retail for $900.
Permalink | Post a comment
September 13, 2006, 3:10 PM PDT