October 03, 2006, 10:55 PM PDTNote: This post has been updated from the original. The third and fourth paragraphs have changed.
I finally got access to SimpleSeating, the Web 2.0 application that helps you create seating diagrams for parties. It's free for guest lists with fewer than 50 people, but the creators plan to charge if you want to use it for larger events. The site is still in private beta but should launch soon.
The site has received a fair bit of press (including on CNET). Why? Because it's cute. It's simple. And it's a great example of what Web 2.0 is all about--it's a cheap and easy way to do something online that previously had to be done manually or with installed software.
I hate to be grumpy about everybody's darling, but the current beta of SimpleSeating is more glitzy than useful. You can't print your seating charts, and since the charts you create don't get static URLs, it's unclear to me how to even share your charts with others, for example, your caterer. The service doesn't do the job you would expect of a computerized version of a seating chart product. It does not automatically juggle seating assignments, placing people important to you in premium seats while simultaneously keeping the right groups together and also making sure that other groupings (such as your divorced parents) don't take place. If I'm going to use a computer for a seating chart, I want it do a better job than I could do myself. If the product would just follow simple dinner party guidelines, I'd be more impressed. SimpleSeating's Steve Swedler told me that the company plans to add printing, sharing, and autoplacement before public launch.
I love Web-based applications, but I think utility is more important than flash. SimpleSeating is a good idea, but it needs the features I mentioned above to make it actually useful.
Permalink | Post a comment
October 03, 2006, 4:08 PM PDTDespite my best efforts, I am in the dark when it comes to understanding my family's medical expenses. I cannot make sense of the multiple bills, statements, and insurance notices that I get. I'm pretty sure I'm getting ripped off fairly frequently. I just can't figure out how.
Intuit makes a product to track medical expenses, but based on its lukewarm user reviews and its $49 price, I've opted to skip it. However, recently I heard from the founder of MedBillManager, a free online service that's trying to do the same thing: give you a place to enter in all your medical billing paperwork so that you can begin to correlate who is billing you and what your insurance companies have paid. Theoretically it should help you spot misbillings and make it much easier to document insurance disputes. The service is in gated testing now; sign up on the site, and you might get a trial password.
The service is certainly simple to use. Or rather, it's as simple as it can be, considering the Byzantine nature of the data it's trying to make sense of. Entering bills, insurance data, provider (doctor, hospital), and Explanation of Benefits statements is straightforward. One small snag, though, is that if you're entering a record (say, a bill), and you need to add a related entry, such as a service provider, clicking the Add Provider link takes you to a new page and erases the data you've already entered into the bill. That problem should be easy to fix as the product matures.
Of course, one big advantage to using PC software vs. a Web application is privacy. Do you really want to post your medical records on a start-up's Web site? MedBillManager execs say they are committed to privacy (and there are federal regulations that govern how they handle the data), but posting this info online may still be a scary prospect for some. I guess as long as the site is free, you can always register under a fake name. Still, with a local app, you'll generally have a better sense of where your data is at all times.
One feature you can't get on stand-alone software, though, is MedBillManager's very interesting social network (of a sort) for medical bill payers. It will let you see aggregate billing and insurance data from other people in your area who are paying for similar medical procedures. This should help you spot bills that are higher than they should be or insurance payments that are too low. I've heard that the health care industry isn't too thrilled about this feature. Good.
MedBillManager is still in development. Some features, such as bill comparison, are not yet live. And I haven't had the time to determine if it's comprehensive enough to handle the actual stream of medical billing paperwork that my family gets. But it looks like a good start, and I am definitely going to try out the system when I get my next batch of incomprehensible medical papers.
Permalink | 0 comments
October 03, 2006, 2:07 PM PDT
October 03, 2006, 11:28 AM PDTCorrection: The CDX-GT110 does not play MP3 CDs, just Redbook CDs. Sony makes an adaptor that adds iPod integration to some of these units.
Permalink | 10 comments
October 03, 2006, 11:21 AM PDTSprint also revealed it would launch its own versions of the Moto Razr and Slvr. Stay tuned for exact details on the devices.
Permalink | 4 comments
October 03, 2006, 9:41 AM PDT
October 03, 2006, 8:12 AM PDTSource: Kotaku
Permalink | 8 comments
October 03, 2006, 7:13 AM PDTSource: Game Informer
Permalink | Post a comment
October 03, 2006, 6:58 AM PDTA few months ago I wrote about a cute little application called OhDontForget, created by UI designer Jason Stirman. I wondered when he was going to do something serious. He has. Here it is: IMSafer, a new service designed to protect children using instant messaging from online predators.
Part of this solution is software that you download to your computer. It monitors IM traffic for text that's likely coming from (or going to) a predator or pedophile and sends an e-mail alert to the person who set up the service. IMSafer does not allow parents to spy on everything their child is saying in IM (who has time to read IM logs anyway?), only the context around words and phrases that it flags as potentially dangerous. Parents should also know that IMSafer is not a totally stealthed application. While the monitor runs very unobtrusively, it can been found and disabled if your child knows how to do such things.
What's clever about the service is that if the software is installed on another computer--say at a friend's house or at your kid's school--alerts generated from your child's IM account at that location will be sent to you, not to the owner of the other PC. Likewise, if a friend of your child sets off an alert at your house, their parent will get the alert. Of course, you do have to get other parents and schools to install the software for this to work, and unfortunately there's no Mac version yet. Also, the program checks IM traffic from only AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo; support for other services (including IM embedded in social networking sites) should be added soon.
Setting up IMSafer is very easy, and you don't have to know the IM screen names your child has; it tracks all conversations on the PCs you install it on, then it watches for those accounts to be used on other PCs that have IMSafer installed. The Web site could have offered parents more control over which accounts are managed, however. For example, if your child first logs on to an IM account at another location, you won't get his or her alerts, and it's unclear to me how you could claim this user ID as your child's even if you knew that it was.
I tried out the system by telling a shopping bot I wanted to meet in the real world. It accurately flagged the text and sent me an e-mail alert. Since IMSafer uses lexical analysis, it can't be perfect, but over time it should get even better at spotting dangerous communication. Brandon Watson, IMSafer's founder, is sure that the system would have flagged the explicit IMs that congressman Mark Foley sent to a former page, had it been installed on the page's PC.
The system lets parents vote on alerts that have been sent to other parents, and if enough parents think the alerts are justified, it marks the accounts of the senders of those messages so that if a person who regularly sends inappropriate messages to other children tries to communicate with yours, you'll get an alert.
IMSafer looks like a good online chaperone, one that will improve as the company tweaks its analysis engine. I don't know of any other system that can keep an eye on kids' IM behavior when they're away from home like this one does.
See also BeNetSafe, which monitors your child's MySpace activity.
Permalink | 5 comments