TODAY'S E-MAIL:
You and your pen are crazy--A student at Oklahoma State
Tom and your pen!
About the deal with the Zune sharing profits with Universal; that is
crazy talk. If you really want to get down to charging the hardware
device that does the illegal duplication or transmission of the files,
they should just go have profit sharing with all PC manufacturers.
However, I was wondering about this part where the Zune can transfer
files to another Zune for three days. I haven't heard anyone talk about
the legality of this, but it sure seems like music companies wouldn't
like it. Could it be that Microsoft is trying to make the record
companies fine with the fact that copyrighted music will be transferred
to someone else's MP3 player?
Just a thought.
Love the show.
Actually, petroleum does not come from Dinosaur dookie--James F.
Petroleum does not come from scat of dinosaur. It is a by-product of
the decomposing bodies of the dinosaurs, plants, and animals. If you
check out
this or
this, it will give you more information, just thought I would let you know. Have a good
great Friday and weekend from UK.
South Africa whooping U.S. in broadband too--Jean
I heard you get depressed about HSDPA in Korea--well, maybe you'd want
to notch up that depression a bit since we in (so called) third world
South Africa have had HSDPA support for a few months already and in
fact are busy upgrading to the next-faster technology, HSUPA, where the
uplink and downlink speeds are equal (HSDPA has downlink being faster--
as is traditionally the case). The cool company making this possible is
called Vodacom and I work for them, but would get no benefit for
selling the name in the U.S. (or anywhere since I'm a kinda-back-office
developer).
Cheers.
Regarding the bogus patent claim--Brandon the attorney but not yet patent attorney
I believe Tom said something to the effect that it was shocking that
the Patent Office didn't catch this little slip-up (or attorney
malpractice, whichever term you'd like to use), and I immediately had
the same reaction. Every Office Action I've ever worked on has been
very, VERY meticulous in pointing out the shortcomings of the patent
application at issue.
It turns out that the Ishihara application was published before an
examiner at the PTO ever looked at it, and this is fairly normal
practice as the PTO is required to (read, "should in most cases")
publish patent applications within 18 months of receiving the
application (not necessarily examine the application). Furthermore, it
appears that the attorneys who wrote the patent application were
listening to BOL as well. On November the 7th, as a preliminary
amendment (attached to this e-mail) was filed canceling claim 9. Check
out page 11 of the amendment where the attorney takes the
responsibility for not removing claim 9 before filing, but then just
swears the preliminary amendment was written just a week after the
application was filed...in 2003?!?!?! A likely story. Thought you might
find this interesting and maybe 'janktastically' humorous. On a
separate note, I love the fact that I am not the only person in the
world using the term jank, or its many variations. I also have used
this phrase since high school (late '90s) and was very relieved to hear
I'm not alone (yeah, Molly).
Not ready for thin clients--Jamie B. in Chicago, Illinois
I listened to your podcast yesterday where Molly was talking about how
much she wanted to have thin clients on my way home. When I got home I
wanted to write and tell her how much I agreed with her. But my cable
was out. Is that ironic or what??