October 16, 2006, 4:26 PM PDTPure Digital has upgraded the el cheapo flash memory camcorder it's been selling since May through retail stores, such as Target. See our previous blog post and review. The new version, which sells for the same price ($129 for a unit that will record 30 minutes; a 60-minute version is also available), has improved audio and video quality and longer battery life, company reps told me. The external hardware is the same: a generic-looking white case with one very interesting feature: a USB port that swings out to transfer data.
The real news is the improved software. Once you plug the device into your PC, it will automatically launch software that's stored on the camcorder to upload your videos directly to Grouper. Here's my first video made with the product.
There is no easier way to shoot and post a video. You can also take the device into a store (such as Target) and have a DVD of your videos pressed in about an hour.
There are downsides, though. The product is supposed to make it easy to upload to Google Video as well as Grouper, but for Google, all it does is put your videos on your desktop and open the upload page on the Google Video site. And it doesn't do anything at all for YouTube, although given the Google acquisition of YouTube, that may change. The software does make it easy to get videos off the device so that you can upload them wherever your want, but the lack of interactivity with other services is bothersome.
More snags: The software crashes if the unit powers down while it's plugged in, which it does automatically after a few minutes, and you will probably need to buy a USB extender cable, since when the device is connected, it is likely to interfere with cables or the table your computer is sitting on. And despite the cult-of-Mac glossy white case, its software doesn't automatically launch when you plug it into a Macintosh. Finally, the camcorder will not recharge when plugged in; even the lowliest $79 iPod Shuffle recharges when docked.
Power users and those who are bothered by products that seem to be not quite done will be better off shooting video with a real camcorder or with any modern point-and-shoot digital camera. But Pure Digital's device is still about the simplest tapeless video camcorder you can get by a wide margin, and it gets big points in my book for that. I also really like that the device contains its own software and can run it automatically when it's plugged in.
Permalink | Post a comment
September 19, 2006, 6:50 AM PDTThe biggest feature you pay for with the extra $1,300--the V1U will run $4,800 when it ships in December--is progressive-scan support. That's for 1080 24p recording, however, not 720p or 1080p; like the FX7, the V1U records HDV 1080i footage.
The V1U also offers far more extensive audio controls, plus two XLR inputs and a bundled shotgun microphone. It also allows you to save custom settings to a Memory Stick for transfer to another camcorder; the FX7 can save them only to internal memory.
At its price, the V1U faces some interesting competition: the forthcoming, less expensive Canon XH A1 and the slightly more expensive but 1080p-capable Panasonic Panasonic AG-HVX200 . Sony also plans to ship the HVR-DR60, an optional, $1,800 60GB add-on for recording directly to a hard disk.
Permalink | 2 comments
August 21, 2006, 7:39 AM PDTThat is all.
Permalink | Post a comment
August 02, 2006, 7:31 AM PDTOh yeah, the company also announced what promises to be a hot new HDV camcorder, the HV10. Or perhaps I should say "cool" new camcorder, given the tape-melting heat here in NYC.
Permalink | Post a comment
July 26, 2006, 4:48 AM PDT
July 18, 2006, 4:21 PM PDTThe HDR-SR1 1080i uses Sony's ClearVid sensor and records on a 30GB hard drive, outputs HDMI to an HDTV for best quality, and includes built-in Dolby 5.1 recording. It's slated to ship in October for $1,500. Based on what I've seen with the SR100, I expect the SR1 to be a killer model.
On the flip side, the HDR-UX1 is the same camcorder, but DVD-based. As I've mentioned before, I'm not really fond of the idea of AVCHD recording on mini DVDs--it just seems like too many transition technologies piled into one product. At least the $1,400 camcoder will support dual-layer discs, for a total of about 60 minutes of recording time, when it ships in September.
Two of the low-end HDD camcorders, the DCR-SR80 and -SR60, will use a 1-megapixel sensor, which may be a bit too low resolution for decent MPEG-2 recording; I'm almost sure the 680K sensor in the SR40 is. The first two have 12X zoom lenses, while the third tries to compensate with a 20X zoom. They all have 30GB hard drives. All three ship next month, for $800 (SR80), $700 (SR60), and $600 (SR40).
Permalink | 4 comments
June 08, 2006, 12:53 PM PDTThe 4GB card is the first to bear the SDHC logo: SD High Capacity. In reality, the logo is more important for the read/write hardware, such as digital cameras; basically, it says, "FAT32 spoken here." The other aspect of the latest iteration of the SD spec also clarifies--and I use the term loosely--card performance by clumping them into groups by minimum sustained data transfer rate (MSDTR): Class 2 equals 2MB per second, Class 4 equals 4MB per second, and Class 6 equals 6MB per second.
The only possible rationale I can see for this system is to allow marketers to snow consumers with ambiguous performance claims. To wit: a card with a 3.5MB-per-second MSDTR and one with a 2MB-per-second MSDTR both become Class 2 cards, despite the fact that the former's performance is closer to that of a Class 4 card than of Class 2. Why can't they just report the actual MSDTR or translate the performance to some sort of normalized scale (along the lines of the older x ratings) if people are scared of the real rates?
Permalink | Post a comment
May 11, 2006, 8:19 AM PDTIn contrast, SD cards today can handle 22MB per second, and the current controller interface can handle 66MB per second. And manufacturers can ramp up capacities far faster than with optical formats. In addition, obtaining the higher transfer rate with an optical drive requires spinning the disc faster, which results in a noisier mechanism. I bet a camcorder microphone is bound to pick that up. Plus, SD is more durable and easier to work with, especially in the field, and I believe it's cheaper to implement an SD solution than an optical-based one.
But...alas, there's always a but. In conjunction with the SD work, the two companies are also plowing ahead with promoting a recording format that can fit HD on mini DVD discs. AVCHD, which stands for the marriage of the MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding (a.k.a. H.264) and HD, has a maximum transfer rate of 2.3MB per second. That's not bad. But even though AVC is a high-quality MPEG-4 codec, it's designed to produce a high-quality playback stream from high-quality source material that's passed through complex, iterated, variable-bit-rate compression--not real-time compression from iffy source video.
Furthermore, they're imposing this suboptimal encoding solution on SD-based recording, rather than aiming higher and taking advantage of the format's available bandwidth.
I dunno. Maybe they have some magic algorithms up their sleeves that can produce silk playback out of a sow's video. Or maybe I'm just seen too much bad MPEG-4 and MPEG-2 video come out of camcorders, despite the occasional exception in a higher-end model.
Guess I'll just have to wait and see.
Permalink | 7 comments
May 09, 2006, 8:45 AM PDTThough it lacks the long zoom lens of the lower-end Everios, the GZ-MG505's 10X zoom offers a relatively wide-angle view--for a camcorder--of 41.2mm in 16:9 aspect-ratio mode (35mm equivalent). As with many of its camcorders, JVC uses its Megabrid engine to capture 5-megapixel (interpolated) still photos.
It looks as if JVC is attempting to address some of the problems we had with the last model--it now has a microphone jack and accessory shoe, plus a larger, low-res, 2.7-inch wide-screen LCD--but it still lacks manual controls. And with the same sensor and noise-reduction algorithms, the GZ-MG505's low-light performance most likely won't see much improvement. The addition of variable-bit-rate encoding may help general video quality, however.
At least when it ships, slated for July, it will be cheaper than its predecessor at $1,399.
Permalink | 2 comments
May 02, 2006, 9:10 AM PDTThe camera stores as much as 30 minutes of VGA-quality video on internal flash memory, so capacity and quality are limited. But it has a 1.4-inch LCD screen on back for instant review, so you can delete any clips right away that you decide you don't want, and it has a video output, so you can view clips on any TV with a composite-video input. It seems a bit pricey for video that you could probably capture with most of the still cameras being sold today, but it may come in handy for situations where you're afraid you might break your fancy little point-and-shoot. Plus, if the plug-and-play interface turns out to be as simple as claimed, it might be useful for the technologically illiterate. If you're really lazy, you can bring the Pure Digital to any CVS, Rite-Aid, or Ritz/Wolf Camera store that processes the single-use version; for a $10 fee and a 1-hour wait, they'll make a DVD of any footage stored on the camera.
Interestingly, Pure Digital has licensed the camera to RCA, which will market them for the same price under the name RCA Small Wonder camcorders. We expect a working sample to arrive today and will report back here tomorrow to let you know what we think of it.
Permalink | 1 comment