• On GameSpot: $299 PS3 Slim and price cut announced!
October 8, 2009 4:00 AM PDT

The Google Android party has begun

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 78 comments
Share

Samsung announced its second Google Android Phone, the Samsung Moment at the CTIA Fall Show.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET)

SAN DIEGO--After two years of waiting, Google Android phones are finally hitting the market en masse.

In the past couple of months, nine devices using Google's mobile operating system have been announced, including the Motorola Cliq, which goes on sale in November, and the new Samsung Moment, which was announced Wednesday at the CTIA Fall 2009 trade show here. The pipeline is full of more Android devices, some of which have been confirmed and some that are still rumored to be in development.

"We are seeing a lot of interest in Android here," Kim Titus, a spokesman for Samsung, said Wednesday at the CTIA trade show, where the company is showing off its two Google Android handsets--the Samsung Moment and the Samsung Behold II. "I think these devices have an opportunity to become strong cross-over devices appealing both to business customers as well as to consumers and prosumers."

U.S. wireless operators are also jumping on the Google Android bandwagon. So far, T-Mobile USA, the smallest of the four nationwide carriers, has been the only U.S. wireless operator to offer Android devices. Once the Motorola Cliq and the Samsung Bold II launch, T-Mobile will be offering four different Google Android devices on its network.

But T-Mobile won't be the only Android carrier in the U.S. for much longer. Starting next week, Sprint Nextel will introduce its first Android phone, the HTC Hero. And a couple of weeks later on November 1, it will begin selling the newly announced Samsung Moment.

Verizon Wireless, the nation's largest wireless operator, will also be getting two new Google Android phones in the coming weeks. Verizon executives wouldn't provide specifics about the devices, but one of the devices is expected to be from Motorola. Verizon and Google said Tuesday that they will be working closely to introduce new Google Android phones.

Even AT&T, the second largest wireless provider in the U.S. and the exclusive U.S. carrier for the iPhone, is expected to have a Google Android phone soon. On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal published a report stating that AT&T will be offering Dell's soon-to-be announced Google Android phone.

Device makers see Android as their biggest hope to compete against Apple's iPhone and Research in Motion's BlackBerry devices in the smartphone market. Both Apple and RIM develop their own software that is proprietary to their homegrown hardware.

The Samsung Moment up close at the CTIA Fall 2009 Show.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET)

Like the Google Android operating system, Microsoft's Windows Mobile platform can also be used on different hardware. But as Microsoft struggles to keep pace with the rapidly changing mobile market, some device makers, such as Motorola, are gravitating toward Android. This is not to say that Microsoft is out of the game. In fact, the company just announced Windows Mobile 6.5 this week at CTIA, but experts, such as CNET's own Bonnie Cha, believe the upgrade is incremental with a bigger overhaul of the software not expected until next year.

Meanwhile, momentum is growing for Google Android phones.

Google unveiled its Android open development operating system in the fall of 2007. It took a year before the first Android phone, the HTC G1 sold by T-Mobile, was introduced. Many industry watchers had expected other handset makers to start announcing their own Android devices in February 2009 at the GSMA World Congress trade show in Barcelona. But the show came and went with few mentions of Android.

Later that spring, people were expecting Android announcements at the CTIA's spring trade show in Las Vegas. But device makers kept mum. In June, T-Mobile USA and HTC introduced the second Android handset into the U.S. market, the MyTouch. This phone was supposed to be a more refined version of the G1 and was designed to appeal to the mainstream wireless consumer.

Now as Android is about to hit its second birthday, the much anticipated flood of Android device announcements is beginning. Manufacturers, such as Samsung, Motorola, LG and HTC are announcing multiple Google Android devices. Motorola's co-CEO Sanjay Jha said this week that he expects his company to introduce "multiple tens of products" using the Android operating system.

Even phone makers Sony Ericsson and Nokia, which historically have built phones using the Symbian operating system, are rumored to be working on Android handsets. The operating system has even appealed to companies not traditionally in the cell phone business, such as laptop makers Lenovo and Dell and Chinese telecom equipment maker Huawei.

While Google Android may give device makers, such as Samsung and Motorola, a way to compete with the iPhone, it could be difficult for them to differentiate their products. So far, the Android devices that have been announced look very similar. All of them sport a touch screen that takes much of the face of the phone. Some, like the Motorola Cliq and the Samsung Moment, also have QWERTY keypads that slides out for consumers who like the feel of real keys.

Samsung's Titus said there are subtle differences in the hardware. For example, the Samsung Moment uses a bright OLED screen that makes images sharper and colors more vibrant. The screen is also designed to be more energy efficient. And the Moment uses much faster processors that most other cell phones. But he conceded that because all the devices use a touch screen that they look very much alike.

"When you have a screen that takes up so much of the landscape, it's not surprising that they look somewhat similar," he said.

Since the Android platform is completely open, the real customization will likely be software based. For example, the Samsung Moment, which will be sold on Sprint's network, comes preloaded with applications and features specific to Sprint's network. These applications include Sprint's navigation service and applications for NFL and Nascar, two organizations which have special relationships with Sprint.

Motorola has also customized the user interface for its Cliq phone and it has introduced Motoblur, a social-networking-optimized version of the user interface. Motorola executives told developers at its conference this week that it expects some but not all of its new Android phones to come with Motoblur installed.

While handset makers and wireless operators may be tempted to further customize the Android software, doing so is risky since the promise of an operating system such as Android is to provide developers with an easy and open way to develop applications that can be downloaded across multiple devices.

So far developers have already created more than 10,000 applications for Google Android devices. These apps can be accessed through the Google Android Market. Big developers, such as Facebook, have already begun developing Android specific applications. And at its developer conference, Motorola announced a series of new apps available for the new Cliq, including Accuweather, the Barnes & Noble eReader, MySpace, and QuickOffice, the company said.

But as new devices are introduced on different carrier networks, it will be interesting to see if these applications in the Android Market will work across all the different hardware. If they do, they could drive more Android device development, which could lead to the Android mobile platform actually living up to the hype that was promised nearly two years ago. And if they don't, then Android will likely become just another mobile operating system that further fragments the market.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from CTIA Fall show
Windows Marketplace for Mobile: First Look
iZUP app locks out texting while driving
Snac: Bite-size widgets for Java phones
Samsung Omnia 2, up close and personal
Qualcomm execs: Wireless spectrum is maxed out
Speed test: Bolt Mobile browser vs. Opera Mini
AT&T's CTO defends wireless network
Hands on with the HTC HD2
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (78 Comments)
by markdoiron October 8, 2009 5:41 AM PDT
My son has a T-Mobile MyTouch Android phone and it's very impressive. He has downloaded a ton of app's, all free, that let him do some very practical and neat things. These include a real-time sky map, a song identifier, a UPC symbol reader and look-up that tells driving distance and price for that same item at other stores, and on and on. Personally, I hope that Apple's proprietary, closed-end attitude towards their products takes an earnings beating because of this. One small nit: There is no multi-touch on his phone. But that's a very small nit. --mark d.
Reply to this comment
by mathcreative October 8, 2009 11:44 AM PDT
yeah but the cellular providers are probably going to add it's own proprietary extensions to android.
by 0wnz October 8, 2009 3:30 PM PDT
Actually, they nytouch has multi-touch but android doesn't support the capability yet...wait for donut or maybe the next upgrade. The sprint hero, which has similar components, comes with multitouch active through htc sense.
by censorshipblows October 8, 2009 4:01 PM PDT
Technically Android does support multi-touch, however, it isn't enabled yet at this time due to patent violation concerns.
by tpbzdw October 20, 2009 7:07 AM PDT
Multi-touch is coming, but if your son can't wait, there are a few Android mods that add it now. http://www.amazon.com/Web-Geeks-Guide-Android-Enabled-Phone/dp/0789739720 / http://www.google.com/cse?cx=000825531964825142534%3Acqr2sjirilw&q=multi-touch&sa=Search&cof=FORID%3A0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
by iceman721 October 8, 2009 6:19 AM PDT
I have had a G1 since its debut and will be upgrading to a Motorola Cliq when the pre-order begins. I have enjoyed my G1 although there are several things I am ready to upgrade. The memory doesn't allow me to store as many applications as I would like. The phone lacks a standard headphone jack, I don't have great battery life, the camera could be better. That said the call quality is great. Android marketplace has grown quickly and has a ton of usable applications for free. I like my touch screen and I can view regular web pages in a reasonable speed on T-mob 3g coverage which is getting better and better.

Android has like 2-3% market share right now but that is expected to jump up to 10-15% by 2012. I just received another over air update taking my device up to "Cupcake 1.6". Android will prove to be a formidable alternative to Apple Iphone in the coming years as there are more and more hardware selections to run Android.
Reply to this comment
by sailinganfd October 8, 2009 7:27 AM PDT
I think there is a way to install apps on the sd card, I think I saw it on one of the unofficial t mobile forums.
by xmaster_dosx October 8, 2009 12:04 PM PDT
same here, ive had my G1 since day one and i love it. im just waiting for another touch screen with a real keyboard thats not as massive as the G1. And since android is moving to other phones i might get that now.
by BrujoSalazar October 8, 2009 4:58 PM PDT
like really? wow in my view the camera was pretty weak, web viewing was mediocre at best, and lack of 3.5mm jack sucks fidel catstro! the g1 is fine however if you are or have a teen age daughter. the newer androids will no doubt be much more pleasant as long as you have ready money! in the meantime the apple iphone 3g suites neatly.
by Milind Rao October 9, 2009 12:02 AM PDT
Really, you thought web viewing was mediocre? Why? IMO, the G1 browser is better than the iPhone browser. It doesn't support multitouch (off-the-shelf), but it loads faster and it loads the full page. I don't see annoying tiles as I scroll around the page that I see on the iPhone while it's loading that part of the page. And it reflows when I zoom in so I don't have to do horizontal scrolling. I don't understand why, with the same Webkit base, the iPhone browser is so lacking.
by joetesta70 October 8, 2009 6:54 AM PDT
Let's face it: $teve Job$ got greedy and the iPhone's days are numbered.

No one is buying $teve Job$ and his "big brother" phone. He censors apps we want to have and is sure to do the same in China, helping the Communist government suppress its people for a quick buck he doesn't even need. Gutless and greedy.

Go Linux! Apple is overpriced. Buh-buy!
Reply to this comment
by ngngokkiu October 8, 2009 7:55 AM PDT
*No one* is buying the iPhone? Really???
by mathcreative October 8, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
the iphone is overpriced? The service w At&t may be overpriced but iphones start at $99
by BrujoSalazar October 8, 2009 4:54 PM PDT
I doubt censor is apropos as you imply. imagine you as the leader of a company, how would you decide? im an apple fan, and i do not see anything wrong whatsoever with their offerings. Yes i own an iphone 3g, and i have owned previous phones, including a g1,nokia 95-4 and so on. And I must say that the iphone offers very nice features. capacitive screen, plenty of processor for my need, and a 3.5mm jack among plenty of other useful settings! in my opinion apple is very capitalist as compared to say google and so on. apple doesnt stuff freebies at you in ordr to win your loyalty. they do offer things that you must buy! how dreadful!
by atish505 October 8, 2009 11:32 PM PDT
iPhone is a dud in India (the world's second largest mobile phone market) sold only 20,000 handsets in two years, a joke.

It is a dud in many other countries as well. In fact outside USA/Canada/UK iPhone is a non entity.
by Milind Rao October 9, 2009 12:08 AM PDT
@mathcreative
While I don't agree with the OP about no one buying the iPhone, there is no denying that the iPhone is certainly overpriced - as are most smart phones. I never cease getting amazed at people who think their phones cost $100 or $200 - when they are signing 2 year contracts and shelling out over $2K on the phone with the cheapest plan!

In countries where there are no subsidies, you see the true price. Hence the lack of success for the iPhone in most of Asia which doesn't take too kindly to locked phones. In India, the iPhone is more expensive than the Nokia, SE and Android smartphones. And there are no takers since when you compare the phones at the real prices, apart from the cool factor, the iPhone fails to justify the premium one has to pay for it.
by jpg27 October 9, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
@ atish505 the iPhones aren't selling in India because of its price. Most ppl in India are working class and poor. Even the middle class cant seem to afford it. I read the article on Newsweek. Apple makes the iPhone for 175 and together with the local carriers sells them at 800. Terrible pricing... especially when three iPhones can buy a brand new TATA car in India. Let me see... would 3 iPhones sold in the US equate to a brand new sedan? Apple needs to drop the price a bit and make it affordable. Its still a great phone just terrible entry strategy.
by windooor7 October 11, 2009 4:23 PM PDT
At the end of the day, no one will ever touch iphone OS ever .they have slowly but surely made their os better everyday. by 5 years from now it will be a masterpice.. on the other hand HTC, has become the CHINA of us flooding the market with overprice ,extremly heavy handsets, dont know how folks get energy to hold those extremly heavy stuff around their face for so long. runnnig very funny named os."android". ITs quality over quantity and most evnetually choose quality no matter what. Dont forget windows 7 mobile .very soon.
by mathcreative October 11, 2009 7:36 PM PDT
@Milind Rao I believe the iphone data rates are the same for any phone on AT&T that has that package. The package is the same pricing no matter the phone the package is used on.
by eeee October 8, 2009 7:31 AM PDT
Competition is great and both Apple and Android are from American firms so good for us and our technology here in the USA.
The whole concept of the cellular phone was developed and invented here also and let's not forget that (thanks Motorola engineers).
Reply to this comment
by mathcreative October 8, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
yay! competition
by JavaMan09 October 8, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
Here here!! Even thought we have a government against it, and Michael Moore is again on the war path. Capitalism once again is triumphing by giving us better devices!!

Although from a programmer's viewpoint the Android libraries are very complex, not easy to learn.
by pickles319 October 8, 2009 7:16 PM PDT
Competition is epic win. I'm glad that there is finally something that can compete with the iPhone. I'm sure that even better advances in technology will arrive soon.
by avsgsv October 9, 2009 8:06 AM PDT
There's nothing inherently capitalist about competition. Adam Smith, the father of capitalism, thought the market needed to be heavily regulated in order for proper competition to occur (i.e. modern-day socialism). Competition can happen in any political environment, and can be both productive and destructive.

This "success", if it turns out to be one on the long term, will be more the result of the collaborative, open-source nature of Android, not any competition among these companies, which so far have failed to create any real alternatives to the iPhone/Blackberry duopoly, left to their corporate, competitive natures. Recall from that article that one of their main issues is the lack of *differentiation* between the phones! The real issue is critical mass: the iPhone and Blackberry created it by locking in users to something that is desirable for certain uses; Android phones will do it by making any phone useful for any use.
by Chao_Sama October 8, 2009 7:47 AM PDT
Android is looking up...alot of great phones being released....
Reply to this comment
by claeshag October 8, 2009 7:49 AM PDT
I agree with Marguerite that the phone manufacturers will make a BIG mistake if they prevent applications to work on ALL Android phones. If they believe they will sell more phones this way they are as wrong as the crazy DVD companies were when making 5 regions in the world so you can't play a DVD you bought in another region as you can with a CD (since I travel often I don't buy any DVD as a result but only rent)! I will switch from my iPhone if they don't screw this up since I am not happy that I can't use the Adobe Flashplayer, Google Voice, etc. on the iPhone and I understand Google won't play God and collect extra income from it's apps.
Reply to this comment
by dbloyd October 8, 2009 8:15 AM PDT
I am glad Google's phone concept is gaining steam. This is from an iPhone user. It will make the phone market healthy. Blackberries will probably die out eventually. Businesses can't change phones on a dime so RIM probably have a good 5 years left in the industry. I don't know what to think of Microsoft and their mobile phone plans. Maybe they will try hard and make something people will want.
Reply to this comment
by mbenedict October 8, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
One thing about Microsoft is they're a competitor and wont back down. iSupply is predicting the WinMo base will triple by 2013 and Microsoft will regain its 2nd position in the global smartphone market, ahead of the iPhone, Android, Blackberry and Palm:

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138772/Windows_Mobile_s_demise_greatly_exaggerated_iSuppli_says

"Windows Mobile is not dead and, in fact, its use on smartphones will nearly triple by 2013, according to analyst firm iSuppli Corp.

Windows Mobile now runs on 27.7 million smartphones, and is projected to be in use on some 67.9 million smartphones in 2013, iSuppli said today. The 2013 forecast means that Windows Mobile would have a 15% share of the global smartphone market by then, second to the Symbian OS, which would have a 47% market share.

In 2008, Windows Mobile commanded second position although it dropped a notch to third place in 2009, iSuppli noted."
by censorshipblows October 8, 2009 4:02 PM PDT
Give up fool, Windows Mobile is a complete failure.
by MastrCake October 8, 2009 9:39 PM PDT
censorshipblows, WinMo is not a complete failure. In fact, it is still doing relatively well. One of the latest WinMo phones, the Imagio, had me looking away from my iPhone 3G S for a while. But then I realized that I've already had WinMo, and I wasn't a fan of the slowness. I like things snappy, but I like the interface and relative "openess" of WinMo software. It works for many people, and if Microsoft can deliver better responsiveness with WinMo 7, I may switch back. But for now, it's me and my iPhone.

It's all a matter of what people like, and it seems like people still like WinMo. But some people like Android, some people like Symbian, and some people like iPhone OS as well. It's all a matter of personal preference.

As for WinMo going on top of sales? Unless Microsoft pulls a miracleOS out of their behinds, I don't see it happening. But it could... Microsoft has surprised me before (rarely, but they have).
by make_or_break October 9, 2009 1:02 AM PDT
If MSFT can take the UI ideas from the Zune HD and integrate the construct concepts into Windows Mobile, then it could stand a chance at gaining traction in the smartphone wars. As it is now, it's not going anywhere but downward. 6.5 looks and feels like a sad, outdated joke...one that's on Microsoft. Spinning one's wheels in place doesn't get us anywhere, unless perhaps we were in drag racing. But then again, there's multiple meanings to the word "burnout".
by atish505 October 9, 2009 2:08 AM PDT
WinMo is a dead corpse. No use trying to revive it. Microsoft and its supporters are in denial. It will be iPhone vs Android. Everyone else is history.
by sartor1 October 8, 2009 8:36 AM PDT
I agree with dbloyd, that Google's phone concept is gaining steam, and that it will make the phone market healthy. My take also is that it is Great competition for Apple, and they may now be pressured to make upgrades/improvements to their iPhone/iPod touch faster..
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 8, 2009 8:52 AM PDT
The Samsung Moment looks great. AMOLED/800megahertz processor.
i-WHO ? LOL
Android and it`s many choices it offers will kill off the iPud in a few years.
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break October 9, 2009 1:12 AM PDT
Android and its many CARRIERS will beat down Apple. As long as Apple keeps its best iPhone deals exclusive to a single carrier in any given market, they're not going to keep up the sort of growth that they initially saw with the iPhone's introduction. There's only so far that their brand's cache can go; they realize that no matter how neat their phone is, there's only so much they can do to obscure and cover up the failings of their existing wireless partners, case in point, AT&T. Certainly by now they know that many wireless consumers are swayed as much by the carrier's abilities as much if not more than anything "kewl" that any phone--even an iPhone--can do.
by AppleSuxLeo October 8, 2009 8:55 AM PDT
If you look at a chart Cnet posted a few days ago , you would have noticed ANDROID phones are the fastest growing by far.
The Android Avalanche has begun. All sorts of net connected devices to choose from , not just phones.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 8, 2009 9:03 AM PDT
I`m drinking the GOOGLE kool-aid and it tastes great !
Reply to this comment
by censorshipblows October 8, 2009 4:04 PM PDT
Actually, judging by the overwhelming majority of your post in Cnet, it seems more like your drinking from a giant pitcher of stupid.
by pickles319 October 8, 2009 7:17 PM PDT
Jeez cesorshipblows, dont be a troll. If he likes it then he likes it. Keep your own damn opinion to yourself.
by censorshipblows October 8, 2009 9:15 PM PDT
Apparently you have no idea who that prick is.
by plarsen111 October 8, 2009 9:27 AM PDT
I have an unlocked iPhone now. Got the famous text message saying I better get on their overpriced data plan. When there is an Android phone from a carrier that doesn't have the overpriced data plan, I am all over it.
Reply to this comment
by vgsantiago October 8, 2009 10:17 AM PDT
One word, "Sprint"
by mgmchan October 8, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
For a long time, USA has been deprived of the best or newest phones. In Android's case, take a look at HTC's Hero!
Reply to this comment
by mgmchan October 8, 2009 10:29 AM PDT
For a long time, USA has been deprived of the best or newest phones. In Android's case, take a look at HTC's Hero!
Reply to this comment
by atish505 October 9, 2009 2:05 AM PDT
HTC Hero arrives in USA a full six months behind its release in Asian Markets. The time lag still stays. And the HTC being sold in USA is not the same cool looking gadget sold in Asia and Europe.
by tdlucas October 8, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
Buying WAVE on this news. ?
(NextWave Wireless)
Reply to this comment
by dougbugl October 8, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
good to see so many new phones showing up on the market but as the author pointed out, it is very strange that Google is holding these companies back from any public announcements about product releases until weeks or days before the release. There are almost all brand new phones and nobody had made any public statements about them. So very weird. Is it Google doing this or are they afraid of someone else?

One thing about the Android phones, none of them so far are shipping with the processing power of the iPhone 3Gs. I wonder what gives there, that was a nice performance boost for the iPhone so it would seem to make sense that new Android phones would hit the ground running that too.
Reply to this comment
by noesnoesnoes October 8, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
Android is basically a computer in your pocket, a lot more convenient than a netbook and always has a connection to the Internet.
Reply to this comment
by Norseman October 8, 2009 11:59 AM PDT
Just read an interesting blog about Android being a two-edged sword. On one hand--yes, Android is very flexible. It allows suppliers to make hundreds of different phones, all of which have a different UI. Lots of people would say that's a good thing, but it has its downside, too. It makes finding just the "right" phone more of a hassle. And not everyone would want to buy a different "Android phone" at some point and have to re-learn the UI all over again.

On the other hand--if UIs are standardized to the point of having consistency across a variety of hardware, what's to differentiate them from each other? They essentially become a bunch of clones with the same UI, and nothing unique about each one. Not a good situation for the suppliers.

"Open systems" may have a lot of +s, but there are some -s in there, too.
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break October 9, 2009 1:18 AM PDT
At least with such a wide variety, the ability to choose a carrier that fits is back into the equation. It's not to say that we don't have that with other options, but Android does seem to have the strongest legs in the race at this point.
by ArtInvent October 8, 2009 12:24 PM PDT
The iPhone has really given Verizon a kick in the pants. Hopefully Android will kick Apple and AT&T in the pants to open up a little. It's already seeming to force them to be a teensy bit more open, as with their recent okaying of Skype on the iPhone.

Competition is truly great.
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break October 9, 2009 1:22 AM PDT
AT&T doesn't need Android to give it a kick in the pants. AT&T already has the ability to kick ITSELF in the pants (actually more like in its own face as their widely publicized, ongoing problems with 3G reliability and persistent dropped calls certainly attest).
by cp256 October 11, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
I despise AT&T and I'm certainly no fan of Apple's proprietary hardware/software/carrier game. We need free CHOICE of what we do with our gadgets and how we do it. All the cell phone carriers suck in one way or another and are greedy as hell. We ought to at least be able to choose the least sucky one to use with whatever hardware we want. GO ANDROID!
by Ssx3000 October 8, 2009 12:31 PM PDT
I cannot wait for the Samsung Behold II. Finally, a good Google Android phone being put to good use!
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 3 pages (78 Comments)
advertisement

About CTIA Fall show

The CTIA show highlights the latest in hot cell phones, accessories, and services. CNET brings you the top wireless news from the conference.

Add this feed to your online news reader

CTIA Fall show topics