• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
October 8, 2009 1:36 PM PDT

AT&T's CTO defends wireless network

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 93 comments

SAN DIEGO--AT&T's chief technology officer, John Donovan, is defending his company's wireless network, despite complaints about dropped calls and slow Internet access from frustrated iPhone users.

Donovan, who gave a keynote speech here at the CTIA Fall 2009 trade show Thursday, said that despite what people might be saying about problems on AT&T's network, his company is focused on providing customers with an excellent wireless experience.

John Donovan, AT&T CTO

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET)

"I'm not ignoring the criticism of our network," he told the audience. "I'm well aware of what's being said in the press, in blogs, and on Twitter. But I don't base my network plans on what I read on blogs. No one knows more about the wireless data customer experience than AT&T."

Since Apple's iPhone launched exclusively on AT&T's network over two years ago, customers have been complaining about dropped calls and slow data connections. The problems only seemed to get worse when AT&T and Apple began selling the iPhone 3G. In many cities, such as San Francisco, customers have complained that their iPhone 3G devices operate more on the slower 2.5G EDGE network than on the 3G network. And still others say that dropped calls have gotten worse.

Donovan and Ralph de la Vega, president and CEO of AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets, whom I talked to after the keynote, each acknowledged that they have heard the complaints. But they wouldn't go so far as to admit that there is an actual problem. Instead they pointed to the rapid growth of data usage on their wireless network and the change in customer usage patterns. They also said that AT&T is doing everything it can to stay ahead of customer demand.

Surprisingly, Donovan and de la Vega downplayed the iPhone's role in this rapid increase in data usage on the AT&T network. Instead they pointed to the entire category of "integrated devices," which are mobile devices that can connect to the Internet. This category of phone includes smartphones, like the iPhone, as well as quick-messaging devices like the LG Neon.

Donovan said that AT&T has more customers using "integrated devices" than any other carrier in the U.S. In fact, in the second quarter of 2009 nearly 60 percent of AT&T's wireless subscribers bought an integrated Web device, he said. He said that wireless packet data has increased more than 18 times in the last two and a half years. And voice traffic on the AT&T wireless network has nearly doubled in that time.

Out with the old planning models
These customers and the increase in data traffic are putting strains on the network. Because data traffic tends to come in bursts and because it's often difficult to predict when and where subscribers will flood a given cell site with mobile Web usage, AT&T has had to rethink how it plans its network.

"There is nothing I look at more than customer usage patterns," he said. "There have been big changes in usage, which has forced us to throw our traditional planning models out the window."

"There have been big changes in usage, which has forced us to throw our traditional planning models out the window."
--John Donovan, CTO, AT&T

While most people would assume that most of the wireless data traffic growth on AT&T's network comes from the iPhone, AT&T's executives said that isn't the case. De la Vega said that quick-messaging devices are actually driving a significant portion of data usage on the network.

"We have seen unprecedented growth on our network in the past couple of years," he said during an interview on the sidelines of the conference. "And the iPhone has certainly played a role. But it's not the only device driving growth. We have a lot of people going from basic feature phones to quick-messaging devices and other smartphones, which is driving data usage."

Donovan said that quick-messaging devices are the fastest growing category of device on AT&T's network.

In an effort to keep ahead of customer demand, AT&T has been spending billions of dollars on upgrading its network. Donovan said that AT&T spent more money in 2008 on its network than in previous years. The company's annual report indicates it spent about $20 billion in capital expenditures for its wireless and wireline networks in 2008. And this year AT&T is estimating it will spend between $17 billion and $18 billion on its wireless and wireline networks.

"We have been upgrading our network for two years," de la Vega said. "We are putting more of our 3G traffic onto our 850MHz spectrum, which will improve coverage and the quality of our network. We are down to the end of that process with only a few cities, like San Francisco, left."

Donovan said during his speech that AT&T has completed 90 percent of its 850MHz upgrade, with cities such as New York, Atlanta, Houston, and Denver already done. He said six major cities will get the faster network speeds this year, including Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, and Miami. And the company will have the HSPA 7.2 network up and running in 25 to 30 markets by mid-2010 with the goal of reaching 90 percent of its current 3G wireless footprint in 2011.

Looking ahead to 4G
Donovan also mentioned the company's plans for its 4G wireless network, which will use a technology called LTE, or Long Term Evolution. It's the same technology that AT&T's rival Verizon Wireless is using to build its 4G wireless network. Verizon has already begun building its LTE network and expects to launch the network commercially in 2010.

AT&T is testing LTE this year and will begin commercial deployments sometime in 2011. Donovan defended his company's plan to upgrade to HSPA 7.2 (for High Speed Packet Access) first rather than going straight to a 4G wireless technology, as its competitors are doing.

AT&T's slide showing growth projections for LTE devices.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET )

"If you're questioning whether AT&T will be left by its competitors who are in a rush, the answer is no," he said. "Succeeding in this market isn't just about fast speeds, but wide coverage. And it's not just about a device or two, but an entire portfolio of products."

Even though he didn't cite Verizon Wireless by name, it was clear which carrier he was targeting with his sharp comments. He showed a chart indicating how many LTE devices will be on the market in 2010, the year that Verizon is launching its LTE network, and it showed a very small number, with the curve indicating a rapid increase in LTE devices a few years from now.

"A rich network without devices is not the best of use of capital," he said. "AT&T's market timing will be right."

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from CTIA Fall show
Windows Marketplace for Mobile: First Look
iZUP app locks out texting while driving
Snac: Bite-size widgets for Java phones
Samsung Omnia 2, up close and personal
Qualcomm execs: Wireless spectrum is maxed out
Speed test: Bolt Mobile browser vs. Opera Mini
AT&T's CTO defends wireless network
Hands on with the HTC HD2
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 4 pages (93 Comments)
by j2davis5 October 8, 2009 2:14 PM PDT
I don't know what this guy is talking about. AT&T is the worst service provider I have ever had, and I have been with T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon. Yesterday, in what my phone registered as a 5 bar zone, I tried calling a friend 11 times, no kidding I counted, before the call stopped dropping and I was able to say more than two words. I love my iphone, but once my contract is up, I'm gone.
Reply to this comment
by techman21 October 8, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
I don't have any problems like this with my Blackjack II - I wonder what makes the difference?
by sharmajunior October 8, 2009 2:40 PM PDT
I have tried 3 different phones on AT&T and once I dropped a call right in AT&T's own store....the irony...I was there complaining about their network and just proved it on the spot...LOL
by mrcockrell October 8, 2009 3:03 PM PDT
@ techman21

I don't know if you are insinuating its the iPhone or not.... i know a lot of people who don't have iPhones quickly make that claim but my iPhone works amazing whenever i am roaming on any other network around the world, it will make calls quickly and clearly but when its on at&t's network i get this same problem where i will have 4-5 bars and 3G and then i dial a number then wait for literally 10 seconds before i even get a ring and then half the time it doesn't connect or sounds someone dragging a rake on the concrete in my ear while i'm trying to talk

i have tracked my at&t service in a few major US cities and it sucks in all of them

its my guess that these few people who seem to claim at&t is great in their area are simply lucky or live under a cell tower and probably never leave their small area much

and everyone i know with a Blackberry has similar complaints on at&t in my area
by PineappleUnderTheSea October 9, 2009 7:28 AM PDT
Oooh, don't yell at the old guy, he's from a generation where Product Planning means underestimating new trends, and not taking into account global trends (i.e. more messaging, etc). So with that veil over his eyes, he's doing a bang-up job of standing in front of an audience and complaining that trends are changing, and how he possibly couldn't predict this. All you can hope for is that once grampa retires, ATT will hopefully replace him with someone who hasn't been brainwashed by the older generation...
by subie09lega October 9, 2009 8:02 AM PDT
@PineappleUnderTheSea
I agree with this. They say that they'll be ready with the right technology but they can't even get it right with what they already have. I can have 3G data coverage and then two minutes later I have nothing even though I haven't moved, the wheel just spins and spins......just to download an email or something simple like that. I switch to EDGE and it works fine (for EDGE speeds). I like the Verizon 'map for that' ad, as I was on Verizon several years ago and their coverage was much better than AT&T's in my area today. They need to improve the coverage and reliability of the 3G network so that we can use what we pay for.
by Renegade Knight October 9, 2009 8:27 AM PDT
@PineappleUnderTheSea

Anyone who project any trends for any reason at any time for any part of their profession knows one thing is true about their projection. They are wrong.

The moment you buy into someone who thinks they are right, you lost..
by Gianni_Simplicio October 9, 2009 8:54 AM PDT
Everyone I know always talks smack about AT&T, but I've never had a problem with their customer service. Sure, I get dropped calls and data blackouts, but whenever I call them up they're willing to take a few bucks off my bill for the inconvenience. And of all the networks, they're clearly running the most data-intensive cell network in the country. The problem is that use grows to fill capacity. If we had blanket wi-max or LTE everywhere, I'm sure someone would complain about the 'lousy' 10mbps data rate they're getting.
by sam99999999 October 9, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
I'd suggest that Donovan and de la Vega get in a car and drive from Los Angeles to San Francisco. I challenge them to even maintain a 2G connection on the ride; forget about 3G. Or even just drive around the bay area and watch their phones continually lose signal.

ATT's advertising claims are truly fraudulent.
by darkpoet25 October 12, 2009 10:25 AM PDT
Why not just pay the ETF and be done with it? I don't get why people complain about a carrier, then say when my contract is up I will leave them. Just pay the ETF and leave them then.
by erock1974 October 8, 2009 2:21 PM PDT
I am at a large convention at McCormick Place in Chicago. My iPhone has not been working, voice or data, and I have full bars. I finally discovered that turning off the 3G "fixes" the problem. Everyone else with an iPhone is having the same problem . . . I've been helping them "fix." People with Verizon phones are having no problems.

I also use an AT&T laptop connect card. The speed has been atrociously slow.

I will say that usually, I don't have any problems, but the last couple of days have been terrible.
Reply to this comment
by mrcockrell October 8, 2009 3:08 PM PDT
i have also noticed if i just plan on using voice that turning off 3G helps a lot because it stops all the constant switching from 3G to EDGE back and fourth all day and adds to battery life as well

My phone seems to lose signal completely every time it changes from EDGE to 3G which is constantly happening

another thing is when i'm in an area and cant get any bars on 3G i can turn off 3G and suddenly i have 2-3 bars on EDGE, which is stupid because the phone could be able to switch to EDGE and get the signal without me turning off 3G
by szettervall October 8, 2009 2:26 PM PDT
2davis5,
AT&T is a victim of their own success. They simply have too much data demand for the technology in use today.
Reply to this comment
by techman21 October 8, 2009 2:29 PM PDT
"No one knows more about the wireless data customer experience than AT&T."
Especially not the customer, huh?
Reply to this comment
by wth31 October 9, 2009 3:44 AM PDT
Exactly! If AT&T wants the customers' opinion, AT&T will give it to them!
by bmccorm2 October 9, 2009 7:54 AM PDT
Completely agree. ATT is in big trouble once the Jesus phone finally goes to other carriers. There will be a mass exodus and for all the reasons that this CTO exudes: they could care less about the customer and the experience on their network; all of these iPhone users are just blowing steam in ATT opinion.
by Renegade Knight October 9, 2009 8:28 AM PDT
Apparently especially not the customer.
by Been_there_Saw_it_before October 14, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
To quote Mr. Donovan, "... don't base my network plans on what I read on blogs." Well, maybe he should.

He also ought to get an iPhone and use it for awhile, see for himself.
by george_goff October 8, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
If they are unable to support the subscriber base why are they allowed to continue adding more latency into the network?
Reply to this comment
by marcsosnick_dotmac October 8, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
Of course, this CTO jerk is stating the obvious. AT&T doesn't listen to customer's twitters or comments, bad press, customer complaints direct to AT&T, PUC complaints, or lawsuits. AT&T is FAIL in ALL aspects of service, including customer service. Typical behavior of an bloated monopolistic corporation in the good ol' USA.

I predict when Apple finally tosses the dead albatross that AT&T will spin off cell service...they can call it Cingular!

I agree with j2davis5...as soon as iPhone opens up carriers, away goes AT&T from my life.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior October 8, 2009 2:38 PM PDT
Looks like he is still in denial of AT&T's horrible network. It works in some places but the rest, the signal bar goes up and down like an equilizer.
Reply to this comment
by mrcockrell October 8, 2009 3:12 PM PDT
lol perfect description

or it will have 4 bars and when you hit send it drops to 0 instantly as if its just messing with me
by mybbsucksasaphone October 8, 2009 2:38 PM PDT
AT&T is notoriously awful in Manhattan many dropped calls followed by repeated failed calls when trying to reconnect. Customer service representatives act completely surprised when one calls to complain about this shoddy service. Data issues are frustrating, but when a phone is no longer a functioning telephone one needs to consider new service providers that actually provide working phone service.
Reply to this comment
by magicmaster October 8, 2009 8:36 PM PDT
The customer representatives have to act surprised, or their lies will be busted very soon as people would question why they sound like it's norm.
by faceless128 October 9, 2009 3:37 AM PDT
AT&T is bad in all of the NYC tri-state area, not just Manhattan. Stick with Verizon or Sprint in those locations...
by RompStar_420 October 8, 2009 2:39 PM PDT
YA, I have AT&T and it does suck, dropped calls all the time, sometimes I have to try 2-3 times to connect, I am leaving too as soon as my contract is up.
Reply to this comment
by Regulator7 October 8, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
My favorite quote... "I'm well aware of what's being said in the press, in blogs, and on Twitter. But I don't base my network plans on what I read on blogs."

Oh really? That attitude should have ended 5 years ago, Mr. Donovan. How much is AT&T paying you again?

One would think that having a diverse group of customers openly complaining about problems would be a welcome source of information for a company like AT&T. Individual whiners perhaps should be ignored, but groups shouldn't be. If AT&T get a significant group of people that are tweeting/blogging about the same problems in the same places, then perhaps it's time they dispatch a network engineer to figure out what the problem is. That kind of information didn't exist 10 years ago. It should not be ignored, it should be embraced.

All fine and dandy to spend $$$ putting up a tower in podunk nowhere, just so AT&T can color in another box on your AT&T vs. Verizon map, but they'd get far better bang for the buck by actually concentrating on the areas that need it. And by checking those blogs/tweets, AT&T should know *exactly* where they need more infrastructure.
Reply to this comment
by VPiPhone October 8, 2009 4:27 PM PDT
"I'm not ignoring the criticism of our network," he told the audience. "I'm well aware of what's being said in the press, in blogs, and on Twitter. But I don't base my network plans on what I read on blogs. No one knows more about the wireless data customer experience than AT&T."

Say what?? Just face it Mr.Big Shot.... Your product sucks... and my iPhone does work better on edge than the 3G which drops all the time, ALL THE TIME!

I left AT&T years ago because their service was horrible. Went to Verizon and had awesome results and .001% of the drop outs i experience on your network. The moment the iPhone migrates to another carrier I am out!! I pay you for a service and you do not provide the service as your company advertises. I am sure I speak for everyone who is subjected to your unfulfilling service you provide.

Time to get up to speed AT&T, no pun intended, if you do not before iPhone opens to another market - you will lose millions of dollars in your "not making sense" customers and investments.

I know i am just another of the 1.5 million voices, so I am sure I am wrong as you so delicately stated in your statement above. But I thought it important to have a voice in this matter, even if it is a worthless blog about YOUR COMPANY.
by The_Last_Scavenger October 9, 2009 10:38 AM PDT
I couldn't agree more, Regulator7. This CTO is a mouthpiece for an antiquated business model. AT&T needs to jettison this stubborn mule for some fresh talent and a fresh perpestive. This is a new era ... the more potential customers read blogs, tweets and complaints on comment sections decrying the shoddy/wonky service that AT&T futilely defends, the more these potential customers (who live in an online, digital, informationally-inundating-and-instantaneous modern era) will be turned off by what they're reading on consumer tech sites EVERYDAY. In order to tout the claim that "no one knows more about the wireless data customer experience than AT&T," Mr. Donovan, you need to actually listen to the customer. That entails keeping a close eye on what they're actually saying. And in this day and age, unfortunately for the model by which you plan a network, that requires a hand on the pulse of the blogosphere, Twitter, tech sites, etc. And ... how could the unprecedented use of "integrated phones" on AT&T's network not have been anticipated? If people have the option of browsing/checking/using the Internet in full HTML on a cellular network through several kinds of messaging and smartphones, then believe me, they will ... even the folks that aren't addicted to online channels of social networking ... and they will use it often, in clusters.
by minter01 October 8, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
iPhone users are not the only ones to suffer from excessive dropped calls and weak signals on the AT&T network. I use a Blackberry Curve.
Reply to this comment
by RyguyMN October 8, 2009 3:13 PM PDT
Until AT&T admits it's own faults, the company will be in decline until they upgrade their networks. Status quo for them will lead to failure. Verizon's network coverage encompasses a broader range. It's not opinion, it's a fact. I use AT&T and on average I get maybe 2 or 3 bars on my iPhone in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. I also use Verizon mobile broadband with my laptop and I can find a very strong signal anywhere I take it.

Well, when AT&T declares bankrupcy, they'll ask the U.S. government for a bailout like every other company that received one that didn't take responsibility for it's own product. When will big companies learn?
Reply to this comment
by killa08 October 9, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
Well sorry to say but AT&T wont go bankrupt because like you said, "I use AT&T...." The fact that you still support a bad company shows how consumers think.
by Chao_Sama October 8, 2009 3:31 PM PDT
Had an I-Phone 3G worked perfect for the first 5 months worked excellent...then it started goin downhill late e-mails, voice mails the whole 9 yards ya and now let's not even talk about safari movin as fast as an infant.....decided to just stop payin tha bill ya digg......itz an fancy i-pod touch now......
Reply to this comment
by clynx October 8, 2009 3:33 PM PDT
With the rest of the world way ahead of the US and using data. Why didn't they know the same data requests would be made here. Dah? Why are they moving like a stuburn mule here and defending their stupidity at the same time. I can't believe these CEO's have a job. Oh thats right we voted for Bush so there is the problem. The US is stupid and slow. We get what we deserve, idiots. It's all a bunch of tubes right? They can only build so many tubes. What an insult to the educated.
Reply to this comment
by October 8, 2009 3:34 PM PDT
I'd be curious to know if Donovan and/or de la Vega actually use AT&T's network.
Reply to this comment
by CrazeOK October 8, 2009 3:57 PM PDT
Haha, there is no defending ATT's network, our contract expired 7 days ago and we went to sprint.... Since we changed... Not one dropped call.... NOT ONE. That is a huge contrast to ATT where if you didn't drop a call a some point in the conversation you were surprised.
Reply to this comment
by kgsbca October 8, 2009 4:07 PM PDT
I have a sprint pre, and I get plenty of dropped calls ... when my wife calls me from her ATT iPhone. I don't think it is my phone that is dropping the call, though.
by neil786 October 8, 2009 4:08 PM PDT
lol..looks like Google has to pay ppl to write comment too now...
Reply to this comment
by shan1944 October 8, 2009 4:12 PM PDT
We don't use iphone; don't need it. We just need a reliable signal that doesn't drop calls constantly. When our contract is up (unfortunately we have another whole year!) we're switching! Oh, yes, I might add that a friend with Verizon can use his phone in many places where we have absolutely no signal. AT&T - Fewer bars in most places!
Reply to this comment
by Bill_I October 9, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
I will stay with Verizon on LG here in SoCal. All I want is a phone that rings when my client calls, and stays connected with decent audio quality.
by ofmyony October 8, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
Android on Verizon with 4G will haunt ATT, ATT has only one thing going for it the iPhone, so come on Apple stop the monopoly-exclusive contract with ATT and put that fantastic phone on a fantastic network, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile or even Cricket, just not ATT
Reply to this comment
by heymikemason October 12, 2009 12:26 AM PDT
People, wake up and spit out the Kool-Aid. Yes, AT&T isn't the best network. We hear you. We understand.

BUT if you think the iPhone's ONLY problem is AT&T, just go ahead and buy one once they end their exclusive contract. If the radio doesn't change, you too can experience the dropped calls, the constant switching down to EDGE, and joy of using that beautiful capacitive touch screen to repeatedly press "redial."

Here's an unscientific example. My wife's work Blackberry was just replaced by a work iPhone. She has called four times from her iPhone (at home) to my AT&T Nokia e71 at work. We have full coverage at both locations. Of the four calls, THREE HAVE DROPPED. This NEVER happened with her Blackberry.

So maybe AT&T sucks. The iPhone's radio definitely sucks. So right now you have suck + suck = 2x suck. Put the iPhone on Verizon. If the radio isn't changed (though I suppose it'd have to) you'd still have suck.

Apple can blame AT&T all they want, but they need to share half of the responsibility. The iPhone is a beautiful piece of technology with a lousy radio. The solution? Buy a Nokia phone and buy an iPod Touch. If you want an all-in-one device, velcro them back to back.
by Pishkado October 8, 2009 4:19 PM PDT
When will AT&T finally realize that stonewalling never pays off?
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 4 pages (93 Comments)
advertisement

About CTIA Fall show

The CTIA show highlights the latest in hot cell phones, accessories, and services. CNET brings you the top wireless news from the conference.

Add this feed to your online news reader

CTIA Fall show topics