• On mySimon: Bacon Soap
October 8, 2009 4:16 PM PDT

Qualcomm execs: Wireless spectrum is maxed out

by Marguerite Reardon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

From left to right: Paul Jacobs, Qualcomm CEO; Irwin Jacobs, chairman and former CEO of Qualcomm; Steve Largent, CTIA president and CEO

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET )

SAN DIEGO--Executives from mobile chipmaker Qualcomm said Thursday at the CTIA Fall 2009 show here that more wireless spectrum is needed to sustain current trends in wireless data traffic. The father-and-son duo who serve as chairman and CEO of the company respectively also warned against stringent Net neutrality regulation.

Irwin Jacobs, Qualcomm's founder, former CEO, and current chairman, and Paul Jacobs, Qualcomm's current chief executive, took the stage at the event with CTIA CEO and President Steve Largent for a conversation about the past and future of the wireless industry. As part of the discussion, both Jacobses said that more wireless spectrum is needed to keep up with the pace of customer demand for wireless Internet services. And they warned against strict regulation that could restrict operators' ability to manage their networks.

The CTIA, which is the lobbying organization for the wireless industry, has been pushing the Federal Communications Commission to allocate more spectrum for auction. The group sent a letter recently asking the FCC to allocate an additional 800 MHz of spectrum.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said during his keynote address here Wednesday that finding more spectrum is the No. 1 priority for the agency. And he promised that the commission would do all it can to encourage more efficient use of spectrum, as well as, reallocate spectrum and find new spectrum to auction off.

Paul Jacobs, Qualcomm's current CEO, said that engineers are at their limit in terms of squeezing out efficiencies within the current bands of spectrum. Qualcomm, which was founded in 1985, has been instrumental in the development of the wireless industry. The company holds hundreds of patents and its engineers have invented technology that is fundamental to most cell phones used throughout the world today.

"We've done what we can in the lab to make mobile devices more efficient," he said. "We will have to use different tricks now to get to the next level."

He said that wireless operators, when building the next generation of 4G wireless networks, will have to build more dense networks with towers spaced closer together. He said managing the interference among these radios will be a challenge but that engineers will be able to figure it out.

The elder Jacobs also suggested using femto cells, which create personal cell sites to boost cellular phone signals in homes or offices.

The younger Jacobs said that wireless operators also need to add more capacity to their backhaul networks. This is the part of the network that connects the wireless tower to the carrier's backbone network. And the problem today is that many connections from the cell towers to the backbone don't have enough capacity to support the traffic coming from within the cell sites.

"With data there are large peak to average ratios," Paul Jacobs said. "Data traffic is very bursty, which means you need more head room in the backhaul network."

But even with increased capacity throughout the network, wireless operators will also have to manage their networks to handle the growing data traffic. Paul Jacobs added that the industry must be careful to avoid overly burdensome regulation that could interfere with this traffic management. He also said strict Net neutrality rules could hamper the development of new business models, such as the one that's used for the e-reader by Amazon Kindle. Customers who buy the Kindle don't sign up to a wireless service. The service is bundled into the cost of the device.

Paul Jacobs' comments echoed sentiments expressed by Ralph de la Vega AT&T's wireless CEO during his speech on Wednesday. De la Vega referenced "broadband hogs," who use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth. And he said it is important, especially with respect to wireless networks, to make sure that a few subscribers don't eat up all the bandwidth so that there is nothing left for other customers.

The comments come as the FCC prepares to make its Net neutrality principles for an open Internet official regulation. Critics of Net neutrality regulation, such as the phone companies, say they don't want to lose the ability to manage their networks. And de la Vega said specifically that he doesn't believe that wireless and wireline networks should follow the same regulations.

But Chairman Genachowski said he understands that Internet providers and wireless operators in particular need to manage their networks.

"We recognize there are differences between wired and wireline network technologies," Genachowski said during a press conference Wednesday. "They are different networks. And because they are different, I have said the rules that are adopted need to allow for reasonable network management. But we need to have clear rules of the road for everyone regardless of how they access the Internet."

Paul Jacobs said Thursday that he thinks Genachowski understands the wireless industry's challenges. But he said that other regulators and politicians may need more of an education.

"During the Internet bubble there was all kind of funding for dark fiber," he said. "And I think people thought carrying those bits was free. But it's not. It's expensive. And I think the regulators may not realize how expensive it could get."

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from CTIA Fall show
Windows Marketplace for Mobile: First Look
iZUP app locks out texting while driving
Snac: Bite-size widgets for Java phones
Samsung Omnia 2, up close and personal
Qualcomm execs: Wireless spectrum is maxed out
Speed test: Bolt Mobile browser vs. Opera Mini
AT&T's CTO defends wireless network
Hands on with the HTC HD2
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ofmyony October 8, 2009 7:12 PM PDT
Consumers pay for a service, they should be able to run whatever apps they want as long as they want. If consumers need more bandwidth offer it, but don't put caps on them.

The wireless companies often use terms like network management which really means limiting services consumers pay for. What network management should really mean is we need more bandwidth lets find ways to offer the bandwidth consumers need.

Most wireless providers say their wireless data plans are unlimited but put you on a 5 gig cap. That is not unlimited, its marketing speak. They do this so they can charge consumers a premium price for unlimited data when in actuality they are only giving you a limited amount of bandwidth which might cost a fraction of what they are charging consumers for. I believe this is wrong.

If the FCC finds that there is a problem then address the problem, but don't try to block legislation that protects consumers and businesses. Companies make money from the mobile market, if you deny consumers access to services you are there by limiting economic growth for every company,

Telecomunicatons companies need to find a solution to their problem, This is not a issue with the consumer its a problem for the wireless industry, Consumers have been suffering and paying for poor service for a long time. It's time for the wireless companies to get their act together and stop blaming conumers for their problems.
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 October 8, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
I can't agree. Companies like Carbonite, for example, charge very little for their service and encourage customers to use a huge amount of bandwidth for backups. In this case, other customers are subsidizing this backup service. And while MagicJack and others don't use huge amount of bandwidth, they again basically shift what might be their costs or the customer's costs to the service provider middle man without compensating them, which means all of us pay.
by PixP October 9, 2009 4:17 AM PDT
I can't agree with you ikramerica. "Heavy, or so called termed, "Bandwith Hogs"." don't subsidize "other" people service. It's simply your provider is not able to offer the service they advertised to you and that you pay for.
by freemarket--2008 October 9, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
Companies like Carbonite and Google already pay for the bandwidth they are using for every one of their customers. Do you think they get on the internet for free?
by PixP October 9, 2009 4:10 AM PDT
The net is not your own personal playground. Either supply a usable service with the net neutral rules, or don't offer the service. I will gladly wait for a service that can do that then let you take control of the net at your own pleasure.
Reply to this comment
by SwissJay October 9, 2009 5:58 AM PDT
"De la Vega referenced "broadband hogs," who use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth. And he said it is important, especially with respect to wireless networks, to make sure that a few subscribers don't eat up all the bandwidth so that there is nothing left for other customers."

Then don't advertise and sell it as a "flat rate"! That would be like 'Golden Corral' telling their customers "OK, you paid $14 for the buffet, but you only get 3 plates tops because we don't want you to splurge at the other patrons' expense!". Yeah, I can really see that work!
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

About CTIA Fall show

The CTIA show highlights the latest in hot cell phones, accessories, and services. CNET brings you the top wireless news from the conference.

Add this feed to your online news reader

CTIA Fall show topics