Five reasons Rhapsody really irks me
We don't need no water...
(Credit: Pete Sparrow)A couple weeks back, I strapped on my best convincing boots and had a little lovefest with Rhapsody. But all is not roses in the realm of subscription music, and Rhapsody is definitely no exception to the rule. In fact, I have yet to come across the perfect piece of music software or the perfect online music service. True, I am exceedingly picky and jaded, but I also believe that there is always room for improvement when it comes to technology, be it hardware or software.
Certainly, Rhapsody could use some improvement. As much as I love the service and would have difficulty living without it at this point, there have been multiple occasions when my irritations with it have led to frustrated utterances. Most of the problems I have with Rhapsody are tied directly to the software, but as you need to have that installed to organize your own music and use the service effectively with portable devices, such as the Walkman, I feel these gripes are perfectly justified.
- Software interface issues: The Rhapsody software just looks so...1997. If you don't believe me, open up the software alongside Windows Media Player. See that pretty stacked-album-art view in WMP? Nice, isn't it? I'm not particularly fond of how Rhapsody organizes music, either. You use a drop down to switch between artist, album, and genre views, which are listed on the left, while related songs pop up in the right column; programs such as WMP and iTunes offer more elegant navigation. I also don't like that in the artist, album, or genre window, you can't simply type a letter--say "H"--and be taken directly to the artists that start with that letter.
- Transfer hangups: In my estimation, my portable device transfers hang about 40 percent of the time. For example, I'll be transferring a list of 30 songs and the files will just freeze up at 17. Unplugging the player and reconnecting doesn't help, nor does shutting down and restarting Rhapsody. I just have to wait until the software decides it's "ready" to give me my music to go. It always corrects on its own and the timeline is completely arbitrary. Seriously...what the??
- General bugginess: I've spent a lot of time using a variety of software jukeboxes, and they have all suffered from bugginess from time to time. However, the one that full-on crashes the most--by far--is Rhapsody. And this hasn't been a problem recently, but it suffered from a rather nasty, long-lasting bug that wouldn't let me sign into my account for certain periods...again, completely at the app's whim.
- No music ownership: True, you can buy songs directly from Rhapsody for 99-cents a pop, but how about offering a little incentive for the people who pay a monthly subscription fee? I would love to see 25-cents--heck, even 10-cents--knocked of the price of tracks for subscribers. Or do what Microsoft does with Zune Marketplace and give users a "track pack" each month for outright ownership of a select number of songs (in unprotected MP3 format, of course).
- Not compatible with Mac or iPod: OK, I don't really care that Rhapsody isn't compatible with the iPod, but it would be great if it was, since the majority of MP3 player users own iPods. It would give the service a lot more traction. True, it's a bit unfair for me to put this on a list about Rhapsody when it's really a limitation of the iPod, but there you have it. More unfortunate in my mind is that while you can use the Rhapsody Web streaming service from any system with Internet, the software download is only compatible with Windows. This means that although my Walkman works with my Mac, I can't use the to-go aspect of the subscription service from that computer.
What do you think? Have I hit the nail on the head, or am I just a big whiner who's impossible to please? Please feel free to add your own complaints in the comments section below (or--hey--come to Rhapsody's defense, if you feel so inclined).
For more than five years, Jasmine France has covered a variety of tech products for CNET--from scanners to keyboards to GPS devices--but she's happiest where she is now: sitting atop a pile of MP3 players, "testing" every music service known to man, and jamming a variety of earbuds in every shape and color into her absurdly small ears. E-mail Jasmine.

Donald Bell is an electronic musician, a veteran record store employee, and a fearless hardware hacker. He's also CNET's Senior Editor for MP3 and digital audio.
Jasmine France is CNET's resident digital audio doyenne, writing and editing product reviews, crave blogs, and feature stories on all things MP3. And if you need advice on headphones, she's your girl.


What's even worse is Rhapsody on Tivo. It locks up all the time as well.
That's not to say I didn't like my Rhapsody subscription... but you'd think by now they could have address some of its glaring issues. I'm not normally a fan of stuff Microsoft, but the Zune service (regardless of how you feel about the player) just keeps getting better and better...
If Yahoo Music hadn't gone belly-up, I'd still be a subscriber there. there was a lot to like about Rhapsody, but the buggy, crashy UI and dog-slow device syncronization led me to use it too infrequently to justify the $15/month.
Note that the best way to use the Sonos with Rhapsody is with the Sonos desktop client, or maybe the iPhone -- something with a keyboard for searching.
I'd also like to see sale prices (similar to what Amazon does) or even free tracks like Zune Marketplace.
Still, even with its bugs, I think the positives outweigh the negatives.
http://tinyurl.com/ccfrhs
Hiyo!
Like you, my transfers lock up on a regular basis. I have contacted Rhapsody and worked through all of their technical support stored online (including complete uninstalls and reinstalls of the software and a complete wipe of my hard drive and operating system) to no avail.
This really is a shame because I like the subscription service and the flexibility of having a non-proprietary player. I have my PCs hooked into my network and my Home Entertainment center. I can play Rhapsody throughout my house as a result, EXCEPT when Rhapsody decides to lockup or encounter a bug where it drops connection.
Too bad, really. I hope the issues get fixed before I have finally decided I have had enough of the frustration and take my business elsewhere.
Next I just want to say that Friggin Realplayer blows chunks. I'm not even sure if you have to use it with Rhapsody anymore, but I foolishly installed it on my PC long ago, and it decided to take over my whole computer. I didn't fully got it back off my system until I did a clean OS install. Now every time I see that little Real logo it fills me with rage. Never again!
If you don't already have one I'd suggest getting a stand-alone MP3 player to handle your tunes. If you are going to use a restricted service (which is pretty much all services) go with the service thats controlled by only one company.
Rhapsody offers FULL Plays of 25 songs free a month.
They want you to get used to hearing a whole song or album with one click.
Then you get hooked on their Rhapsody unlimited.
Now I can hear all the music I want for the price of 1 CD.
However, once the Zune had an update that fully supported downloads right to their player without the PC I was strongly tempted to switch, and when they announced the 10 free songs to keep per month, I did switch. While they don't have all the features Rhapsody does (their equivalent of channels is really, really limited for example), their PC software is much, much slicker overall, and I've thought the Zune player was always unfairly underestimated.
So, I still miss some features of Rhapsody, but overall I'm quite happy with my switch over to the Zune.
Up until the other day, I'd been using Windows 7 beta with no problems with Rhapsody -- it seemed to run on par with XP. I spent my Friday night loading Win 7 RC and my apps (geek that I am!), including Rhapsody. Seems to run fine still. I do notice that I have to have my player connected first before launching or Rhapsody won't find it.
Overall, I've been pleased with the depth and breadth of music that I've found on the service, so for me it's a keeper.
-
by rmccabe916
May 5, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
- I have been with Rhapsody for quite a while now, and I agree for the most part with what is said here. The biggest solution to interface problems and transfer issues is to use Windows Media player for everything but downloading music. However, I did see on the service's forums a new interface is coming soon (can't find it now) by what a Rhapsody employee said, and it looks much more up-to-date. Nothing was finalized, but it did look better.
-
Like this
Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (60 Comments)Also, from what I hear on the forums, Rhapsody is very open to new ideas -- they need to be to compete with Microsoft/Apple/Napster. I expect that they will have some new ideas up their sleeves.