Forget the iPod. MP3 players for the Long Tail.
After walking the floor of this year's Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES), I've seen the future of MP3 players, and it's dull. In 2008, it seems manufacturers are becoming more content with the idea that they'll never compete with the iPod in the hearts and minds of consumers. Unfortunately, there's still a noticeable lemming effect that keeps manufacturers pumping out Nano clones despite their better judgment. As Apple's own iPod prices keep declining, however, and their iTunes software becomes stronger, the incentive for consumers to buy non-iPod MP3 players will inevitably shrink. In order to adapt (and possibly coexist) with an increasingly iPod world, why don't manufacturers throw out their stale B-grade MP3 players and start seizing the unique opportunities to create niche devices for today's Long Tail marketplace? After all, there are problems to be solved with MP3 players that no one--not even Apple--has been able to figure out yet.
Where's the MP3 player for the real music nerds?
(Credit: Donald Bell/CNET Networks)For instance, here's something that has always puzzled me: Why is it that most of the MP3 players that cross my desk aren't created for the people who truly love music? Almost any off-the-shelf MP3 player is enough to keep a casual music listener entertained--but what about the serious music nerds? What about those die-hard music savants who lurk on Pitchfork or tidy up their favorite band's entry in Wikipedia? These guys shouldn't have to suffer the indignity of being restricted to basic ID3 tag sorting or thumbnail cover art. And yet, among the parade of MP3 players on my desk that are made for joggers, commuters, business travelers, or gadget geeks, not one touts itself as being the superior device for people who consider music central to their lives. In short, most manufacturers are creating gadgets for themselves, catering only to the out-of-touch executives and technically-minded engineering teams that fill their ranks. It's a familiar problem that plagues many industries, but because music lovers are such large and intensely devoted consumer group, ignoring their whims just seems like bad business.
For example:
There's a specialty MP3 player for swimmers, so why not make one for music-loving stoners?
Despite my whining, I understand why these manufacturers are slow to change their strategy. First off, these companies are global in scope and the market for MP3 players in the US is not identical to other parts of the world. Secondly, most of these companies don't simply make MP3 players. Companies such as Philips, Sony, SanDisk, Creative, and Samsung, manufacture everything from cell phones to electric toothbrushes. Not surprisingly, these companies seem to conceive and market their MP3 players the same way they would an LCD TV or an SD memory card. The result is usually an incrementally improved product, with a competitive set of features and a mass-market design. These products make a lot of sense financially. An iPod alternative from any of the previously mentioned manufacturers typically offer retailers healthy markups and easy sales. Unfortunately, marketing an MP3 player made specifically for fans of audiobooks, or techno DJs, takes more than just an endcap display at Best Buy and a listing in the SkyMall catalog.
The Trevor Baylis wind-up EcoMedia player might not be for everyone, but it solves a very real dilemma for one niche of consumers.
The question is: is it worth it for these companies to break away from the product formula they've come to depend on, just to create an MP3 player that may only appeal to a small group of people? Well, it depends who you ask.
There are hundreds of thousands of people, people far more obsessive than I, for whom listening to music is one of the most cherished and enriching experiences in life. For the majority of us, however, music is just entertaining filler. I'm not here to say music savants are better people than casual listeners, I just want to point out that Apple has already made the best MP3 player for casual listeners, so why not chase after the group that's not being served? As the iPod becomes more entrenched in its strictly mainstream appeal, serious music aficionados will want portable music players that distinguish them from the herd and provide a deeper connection to the music and artists they love. If we dig further, beyond the scope of music savants, there are other overlooked opportunities to create devices for people with poor eyesight; weatherproof MP3 players for extreme backpackers; or an MP3 player for people who just want podcasts and newsfeeds.
In terms of numbers of units sold, however, there will always be a place for inexpensive, nondescript MP3 players. After all, the majority of people consume music slowly and passively, using it as an escape from their daily commute or as a distraction from their gym workout. There are far more people looking for a cheap MP3 player to take to the gym than there are indie rock nerds seeking an MP3 player that embeds All Music Guide reviews into their song files. If you can get past the numbers, however, there's incredible power to be won by creating an MP3 player taste makers prefer over the iPod. No one's done it yet, but as Apple's focus shifts to the iPhone and the playing field for music downloads is being leveled by DRM-free content, there's never been a better time to try something risky.
So please, MP3 player manufacturers of the world, make 2008 the year that you rethink your product strategy. Society has all the utility MP3 players it will ever need and the iPod retired its claim to hipness the moment they called themselves "Classic." There's some unexplored opportunities out there worth pursuing. You might not be able to convince big-box retailers to stock it, but you will have made the world a better, more interesting place to live.
If you have an opinion on why I'll never see a stoner MP3 player or if you have a fantasy MP3 player of your own, sound off in the comments section.
Donald Bell is CNET Reviews' senior editor for MP3 players and portable audio, and one half of the MP3 Insider blog and weekly podcast. He also likes getting his hands dirty with digital audio tools for musicians and DJs.

Donald Bell is an electronic musician, a veteran record store employee, and a fearless hardware hacker. He's also CNET's Senior Editor for MP3 and digital audio.
Jasmine France is CNET's resident digital audio doyenne, writing and editing product reviews, crave blogs, and feature stories on all things MP3. And if you need advice on headphones, she's your girl.


Believe it or not, I am still running it using its original firmware! I'll have to "Rockbox" it and see what all the hub-bub is about! You are not alone!
".with a competitive set of features and a mass-market design."
When did the iPod become big? Two years after it was introduced, when Apple decided to make it work with Windows, and appeal to the other 96% of the market they weren't reaching when they were only making them for Macs.
Manufacturers are never going to develop a product from whole cloth that they know going in doesn't have a chance of selling more than 50,000 units. Niche markets are irrelevant in this technology. Sorry.
OTOH, a design that could enable replaceable upgradeable compnents might be the ticket. The niche player might be able to stir some interest with the premise that a year from now they can upgrade firmware and install higher capacity memory or disk space. To the display issues raised in the article, I don't see how these are cpompatible with a portable device: displaying album covers or sheet music.
MP3 players should be for music, and be able to import that music in any of the standard audio formats, preferably without an external program. Videos might be OK if the player can use any video format. FWIW I don't like cell phones that can play music but won't let you fill the player with your own music. In short, no proprietary formats.
A waterproof, shock resistant player (with water resistant earphones, good for anyone that uses their player outdoors, including walkers, hikers, runners, and skiers) would have broad appeal.
A simple MP3 player designed for those that have eyesight problems (same with cell phones), would be good if they could be produced at a reasonable price.
Apple? DRM.
* MP3 player ...to sort ... music by record label and create ... sub-genre tags?
Good idea. Meta-info is poorly supported in all media players, Media Centre onwards.
* ... for stoners who want trippy interactive visuals to accompany a lossless ve rsion of Dark Side of the Moon?
Unncessary: we close our eyes and are transported by the superb headphones on which we spent the money we saved when buying a ****** little MP3 player.
* .. for the indie rock vinyl collector who feels lost without life size album artwork and liner notes?
Would a 12 inch square display count as portable?
* ... for the groupie who wants to know where their favorite band is touring?
Is anyone ever that far from an internet connection these days? If the groupie is that into the band, they'll have the tour shirt already, or be pinged by the latest trendy social network.
* ... the classical music MP3 player that allows you to sort by historical period and display sheet music?
Not many classical fans (sic) play something solely by period. By conductor, recording date - that brings us back to meta-info.
After using the iPod, I realized that the reason it has a dominant market share is because nobody bothers to research what's out there. They just buy what they are told.
Apple understands the sheer stupidity of the buying public and they are getting rich from it.
Tthe competition have been making better players for 3 years now.
Apple has quietly adopted a very "Microsoft" approach to the iPod now; wait until the competition does it and then do the same.
Here's my answers to some of the bullet points in the story:
# Where's the MP3 player for the record store employee who wants to sort his music by record label and create his own sub-genre tags?
--If you need to do this, create a playlist based on these tags and sync it to the player.
# Where's the MP3 player for stoners who want trippy interactive visuals to accompany a lossless version of Dark Side of the Moon?
--Get a player that handles video, buy a pair of video goggles, rip the Floyd DVD into the player and enjoy your trip.
# Where's the MP3 player for the indie rock vinyl collector who feels lost without life size album artwork and liner notes?
--These people wouldn't settle for "digital" in the first place.
# Where's the MP3 player for the groupie who wants to know where their favorite band is touring?
--Use your damn phone for that.
# Where's the classical music MP3 player that allows you to sort by historical period and display sheet music?
--Again, make a specific playlist and sync it to the player.
I don't think *all* hope is lost, however. An MP3 player like the iPod Touch has its interface implemented almost entirely in software; this would make it entirely possible (though I'm not sure how feasible) to do a lot of the specialized players on a single generic hardware platform, doing all the specialized implementation in software. The interface could morph as needed to handle things like extra sorting/classification fields, or special displays like sheet music and interactive visuals. (The Touch does some of this already; it has large album art displays that fill the screen, and with the latest firmware revision it displays song lyrics stored with a file.) Of course, software development is still not trivial, but it's an order of magnitude easier than having to do a specialized hardware interface for each player.
One is called Tap-Tap-Revolution that allows you to tap along to the rhythm of songs in your music library much like the popular Dance-Dance-Revolution. Rhythm patterns for popular songs are downloaded from database. And you can submit your own patterns for songs.
Another is a application called TuneWiki that downloads and synchronizes lyrics to songs in your library.
And this is just the skunkworks, shareware applications. It will be interesting to see what might be possible with using more sophisticated software development tools and methods.
The Karma suffered from two problems though: quality-control and size/shape.
Rio is no more, but the Karma's firmware was adopted for use in the Trekkstor Vibez. The problem with the Vibez though, is that they never gave it much storage space. I'm not even sure that the Vibez is still being made.
You know, for all its faults, the iPod isn't so bad. The touchwheel and lack of graphic EQ are annoying but Apple has a made a few improvements along the way (like gapless playback). I wouldn't consider it the ideal MP3 player by any stretch, but you could definitely do worse. One of the lessons I had to learn the expensive way is that all the features in the world aren't worth a dime if the player is fragile and unreliable.
Last year at my dad's funeral, my mom asked me to handle the song selection for his service. My dad loved his music, so I went to work ripping his favorite songs from his CD collection (which he willed to me, back off RIAA). I decided to use my Rio Karma to create and play different playlists of his favorite songs during the service.
Being all too familiar with Murphy's law, I also loaded the music onto an iPod (just in case). One hour before the funeral service began, my Karma's scrollwheel (which had already been completely replaced) stopped working... again. Long story short, the iPod works fine, and the Karma still sits where it landed when I chucked it (with extreme prejudice) into the closet.
Harriet
Unfortunately, the Vision M died this am at the age of 1 year, 1 month, 25 days. Looks like I'm going to need a replacement, something smaller, or at least lighter.
Any takers out there?
I think the biggest problem for non-iPods isn't the hardware, it's the music management software and the inability to efficiently manage files with DRM encoding. They're hard to move around on a network and several services would only work for certain players if those players supported their flavor of DRM. Couple that with the big fish gobble little fish music download companies and then you also have to keep up with ever changing account names and passwords on top of the DRM - this happened when music match was bought by yahoo (I prefer music match version 7, myself). I also use winamp and windows media player, and even their partner sales companies have undergone several buyouts with different rules, different account info, etc. We've had long car-ride vacations almost ruined because of trouble trying to download ebooks with DRM on supposedly registered, compatible devises.
My kids liked their players (sansa and zen), but I got really tired of having to play tech support to my family every time they wanted new songs. I finally caved and bought them iPod nanos. iTunes works with it and it does what it is supposed to do. It's easy enough for the kids and since the all have iPods, they can listen to each others players and know how to use them already. Usability and standardization are key here.
For myself, I have a 4 year old iRiver mentioned in the first post and it still works great. I primarily download music from emusic because they have a good independent label music offering. Due to historical DRM, I couldn't play any songs downloaded from iTunes or any of the other commercial music sites without burning them and re-ripping them. I'm thinking of getting an iPod for myself so I can take advantage of podcast subscriptions that automatically update when new information is available. I don't think my iRiver can handle this (and it's completely full of music I love).
Back 'in the day' when I used a Sony Walkman to play tapes while I jogged (when I could still do such) I would get three to four years of usage and these units were used outside and under less than ideal circumstances.
Screw the niche market.....build a more reliable device. There isn't any reason that flash or hard-drive based players shouldn't last for years.
-
by x.killeddestiny.x
January 31, 2008 9:13 AM PST
- This article basicaly read my mind. I'd love an amazing sounding mp3 player with ease of use, good id3 tagging ability, trippy visuals, good design and ust a really good mp3 player. I am a bit of a music nerd in the sence that I like to have everything organised and tagged right and usualy I only look at the album art when skipping through tracks because I'm just to lazy to read and it makes it alot faster to find a track. I think what we all need is a really good mp3 player that just works and can do everything, somethin made for the music geek. It'd defenitly make the world a better place.
-
Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (46 Comments)