Subscription music's future, Part 2
Listening to Rhapsody channels on the Haier Ibiza Wi-Fi MP3 player lets you explore and download an all-you-can-eat buffet of music without ever connecting to a computer. The Ibiza won't outsell the iPod anytime soon, but it proves that subscription music discovery and downloads can work on portable, wireless device.
(Credit: Jasmine France)Yesterday, I spoke about the history of the subscription music model, its roadblocks, and the major players committed to its success. In part 2 of this feature, I'm going to outline some areas of growth for subscription music, share some comments from Rob Williams of Rhapsody, and take a closer look at Microsoft's approach with their Zune Marketplace.
So far, we're seeing three music device trends that will shape digital music in coming months and years: digital audio on more device types (cell phones, MP3 players, UMPCs, in-car GPS, car stereos, home stereos, laptops, Squeezeboxes, boomboxes, Chumbys, and even sneakers); greater adoption of wireless technologies including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth; and cheaper, high-capacity flash memory replacing hard drives. Services such as Napster and Rhapsody are betting that while Apple may dominate the MP3 player space for a while, there's plenty of room for subscription music on all the many connected devices in your life that aren't iPods.
The Sony Ericsson 580 is proof that someone other than Apple can create a good music phone. Built-in Napster Mobile software lets users preview and purchase tracks on the go.
(Credit: Corinne Schulze/CNET Networks)In a conversation I had with Rob Williams, senior vice president of music software for Rhapsody, Williams agreed that while wireless internet penetration needs to improve to fulfill the potential of the "celestial jukebox" concept, there are still plenty of opportunities for wireless music delivery. In our conversation, Williams said, "We want to assist people in getting music on devices, on their phone, at home, in their car, and across the Internet. We think that's something users actually want." At the moment, using Rhapsody to discover music while on the subway or in the car is a tricky proposition. A new partnership with Verizon could speed acceptance of on-demand music downloads and streaming radio (presumably using Bluetooth to broadcast to your car). However, despite the popularity of the iPhone, it remains to be seen whether consumers will broadly embrace music phones.
Putting subscription music everywhere the iPod isn't sounds like a tidy divide-and-conquer recipe for long-term success, but will it be enough? Are there other, more human factors contributing to the slow adoption of subscription music services?
Without a doubt--I think Steve Jobs was right on with this--there is an instinctual resistance to subscription music pounded into us by decades of consuming music as a physical medium. Rhapsody's Williams agrees: "There's definitely a hurdle with subscription because it's not an exact replica of the model people are used to in the physical world."
However, as a generation grows up trusting the Internet's infinite shelf space, we may become less concerned about owning an MP3 file. As a former record store employee, I can't tell you how revolutionary it still feels to know that music will never again go "out of print." Just five years ago, I played grief counselor to customers who optimistically walked into my record store asking for the long-out-of-print Travelling Wilburys album, only to walk out empty handed (the album finally saw a revival in 2007). As a reaction to repeat disappointments, many of us still stockpile MP3 files as we do CDs or LPs. It make take a while for the new reality of the Web's infinitely deep catalog to sink in, but when it does, purchasing music files a la carte may seem as quaint as buying VHS movies at Blockbuster--especially for casual music listeners who would enjoy a passive stream of music and risk-free on-demand downloads of whatever Top 40 music they might be enjoying on the radio.
But how does a Rhapsody hook these customers? Attempts to lure them with Rhapsody-branded MP3 players have met with mixed success, but nothing on the scale of the iPod and iTunes. In-home streaming jukeboxes such as the Sonos music system and Logitech Squeezebox, both preconfigured for use with Rhapsody and bundled with a trial subscription, have made some inroads. As Rob Williams stated in my interview, "Anything that has an IP address is a natural place for a subscription service."
Are home-based music systems such as Sonos the next battlefront for subscription music services?
(Credit: Sonos)The other, perhaps more promising hook for Napster and Rhapsody is subscription music content on mobile phones. Personally, I can't stomach the idea of using my phone as an MP3 player, but there's a little gadget out there called the iPhone which is apparently doing quite well, and from a business point of view, an on-demand music service on a mobile phone makes sense. After all, not everybody will buy an MP3 player and even fewer will buy a product such as the Squeezebox, but nearly everyone has a cell phone. With more than 3 billion mobile phone service subscribers worldwide, the market is so huge that luring a mere fraction of customers to Rhapsody or Napster on their handsets could make a real difference for these music providers. If subscription services could tack their charges on the already skillfully obscure cell phone billing statements, their customer base would probably hardly blink. It's a crazy world in which we pay $80 a month in phone charges, but would rather steal a song than pay 99 cents for it, but I think Rhapsody and Napster are smart to take advantage of that particular market quirk.
Microsoft's Zune Marketplace doesn't cast a wide net for users, but instead chases a younger, more savvy demographic.
(Credit: Microsoft)But there's an interesting third approach to the future of subscription music, too. Unlike Rhapsody and Napster, which strive work with a wide swath of consumer electronics, the Microsoft Zune Marketplace subscription music service is a vertical solution intended only for the Zune MP3 player. In an attempt to position the Zune as a hip, more youthful alternative to Apple's now mainstream iPod and iTunes universe, Microsoft has positioned the Zune and its integrated $14.99/mo Zune Marketplace subscription music service toward a smaller, younger, more musically devout demographic. Judging from their well-funded marketing campaign complete with 20-year-olds making deep psychedelic connections to The Shins while riding the subway--they just might get away with it, too.
Historically, the niche interests and voracious appetites of young, money-strapped, die-hard music fans could only be met by the deep, free, and unrestricted catalog of music available illegally through peer-to-peer services. Today, however, as labels of all sizes and genres are increasingly opting for inclusion on subscription music sites (often motivated by marketing and exposure, rather than direct financial gain), the all-you-can-eat buffet of subscription music is considerably better than it was only a few years ago. If properly dressed and curated, there's no reason the more than 3.5 million tracks available on a service such as the Zune Marketplace couldn't satisfy (or at least compliment) the appetites of highly demanding users. However, it's a tough audience to cater to, but Microsoft holds an advantage not shared by Napster or Rhapsody (aside from deep pockets), which is owning a closed vertical system of both the software and the hardware. It may come as no surprise that the Zune MP3 player is not compatible with any other subscription music service beyond the Zune Marketplace, nor is the Zune Marketplace compatible with any other MP3 player (with some rare exceptions).
So what's it all mean? Well the one-sentence conclusion for those of you smart enough to skip to the very end of my rant, is that subscription music service providers are likely to grow stronger over the next five years because of the consolidation of providers, the increasing amount of portable, networked devices, the breakthrough of the mobile music phone, and the generational shift of young music consumers with huge appetites and no hang-ups about owning music because of fears of scarcity. Apple's iPod and iTunes store have stood as the biggest roadblocks to the adoption of subscription music these past 5 years, but they have unwittingly set the stage for subscription music's increased viability as consumer's expectations for deep catalogs of affordable, on-demand music spill over into the areas of mobile phones, home stereos, and worthy iPod alternatives.
Donald Bell is CNET Reviews' senior editor for MP3 players and portable audio, and one half of the MP3 Insider blog and weekly podcast. He also likes getting his hands dirty with digital audio tools for musicians and DJs.


Donald Bell is an electronic musician, a veteran record store employee, and a fearless hardware hacker. He's also CNET's Senior Editor for MP3 and digital audio.
Jasmine France is CNET's resident digital audio doyenne, writing and editing product reviews, crave blogs, and feature stories on all things MP3. And if you need advice on headphones, she's your girl.


"Personally, I can't stomach the idea of using my phone as an MP3 player, but there's a little gadget out there called the iPhone which is apparently doing quite well, and from a business point of view, an on-demand music service on a mobile phone makes sense. After all, not everybody will buy an MP3 player and even fewer will buy a product such as the Squeezebox, but nearly everyone has a cell phone." Taken from article.
What???!!! Why would you want to carry multiple devices around? I use a smartphone, Moto Q, which gives me decent, if not great access to the 'net anywhere, anytime, yahoo/gmail email pushed to me, a pda (which I use even less now due to web apps), a mediocre camera (but I at least I always have a camera/videocam with me), mp3 player, and oh yeah, even a phone with me at all times, in one slim device. Yes, I store mp3 and other data on miniSD, which is actually a plus to me. I don't want to carry all these devices and chargers and transmitters, blah blah blah.
I can go running, biking, etc. with constant contact AND music without cords to my headphones (bluetooth), hell, it's even got a speaker to listen to music, and if I come across an animal or scenic event, I can take a pic.
The device is far from perfect, but I think multi-use devices ARE the future. Great cam, music player, internet access, info management, don't forget the phone, too is what I am yearning for, it's just a matter of time. A dSLR isn't going to be included, but they already make some decent camera phones.
Also, less batteries in the landfill.
Convergence, people.
In reality, the User Interface is really what separates an ipod from a smartphone, I know there are data processors and software aimed specifically at sound reduction, camera noise reduction, etc. trust me, I know, I build my own tube amp and use DSLR's.
Oh, and obviously brand loyalty, as I was a pretty rare user of mp3 on smartphones, until the Sacred One released a phone with an mp3 player. Now these owners think they're bleeding edge cool techies, please, and they have the nerve to complain about paying too much as early adopters of tech. C'mon, you guys weren't pioneers, you were suckers to Marketing and Hype of the Apple Kind.
Yes, there will always be high end, task specific tools, devices, etc,(think Range Rover, Porsche) but for the rest of us, a Toyota, Ford will do just fine, and we'll bank the savings.
Second, I paid $99 for my Q, thank you very much, plus $15 for a 2 GB mini SD. Is it 80 gig, no, but that day is coming, and 2 GB is what you get on a $30 mp3 player, which is plenty. Remember having a glove box full of cassettes? That's all we needed with us then, pretty much the same now unless you need to change tracks every 15 seconds (ADHD?)
Thirdly, look at the physical size of a Moto Q, HTC Touch, Iphone, etc, and tell me if it is so much bigger than a Zune or Ipod, I think not, if anything, the most recent smartphones are smaller than the Great Ipod of last year or so. I have an armband and a holster for a variety of activities, has never let me down and I don't notice it anymore than my old SanDisk Sansa.
Finally, you mention wear and tear as an issue. IT'S AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE. No moving parts, like our old walmans, but that's not the issue. USE YOUR STUFF. My father buys new cars and keeps them in the garage, and drives his older pickup everywhere, where's the logic. Things are going to happen, and I know Ipod / Apple fans think of their machines as art, but those things are no Michaelangelo, your not going to put it in a museum, and your not going to sell it for more later, so if it gets a scratch, don't lose any sleep, just be glad you used your hard earned device, instead of protecting it like some precious piece of plastic.
Rhapsody offers service only in the USA. They won't be seeing those 3 billion customers any time soon.
There's another perk to subscription services - you get to listen to the whole song before committing to a purchase. None of the download stores give you more than a 30-second sample, and you have no control over which part of the song is used as the sample.
The great thing about Yahoo was that they sold songs for 79 cents. The subscription service (with its full length track play) could be used to find the music you wanted, then buy it, burn it to audio CD and rip that CD into iTunes for your iPod.
and better sound it will not be long , we will see mp3 bing replaced with way better sound picture quality on one device that will do it all!! DVR,phone,video,player in one device!.
Microsoft zune is leading the pack and others like Sony will join in down the road!
1). People do and still will want to own music after subscription ends (eMusic model)
2). User interfaces have been lacking and need more work before it becomes attractive
3). Are the current recommendation engines working well enough to truly encapsulate the millions of tracks online with viable and accurate recommendations to the end user?
4) It is easier and takes less time to use P2P services who enable users to get and own music for free, so why would a consumer pay to rent music?
Until the above issues are addressed then I do not see subscription as a viability online.
Whereas, in the mobile realm consumers are already used to a monthly charge fro their mobile service. It would be a lot more palettable for most consumers to bolt an extra charge on for unlimited music listening, although I still believe this will have to be tied in with actual ownership of tracks after the end of the subscription period. Furthermore, their are over 3.2 billion mobile handsets in the world 60% of which are MP3 enabled this really is the iPod killer. I would go further and state that yes the iPhone is great but with such a high price tag and even if apple were to double its sales would only be a pinprick in the MP3 enabled phone world and so iPhone overall mobile phone penetration rate will remain ow for the forceseeable future.
-
by jaywdet
September 28, 2008 3:17 AM PDT
- So many are just clueless on this issue. Even the visionary, Steve Jobs. I love subscription music. I can imagine, that as a teenager, I may have preferred to own because you found out about music from all of your friends. Now days, as a busy adult, (with a credit card and a mortgage, believe me I'm no elitist) I don't have time to "discover" music. I NEED and have no choice, but to rely on services to suggest music. I don't have time to read Rolling Stone, or Pitchfork. And I could CARE LESS about "owning" music. I just want to LISTEN to it. I can listen to just about any album I want too, almost effortlessly. I would guess that many people who are opposed to this have something beyond a will to own standing in their way. Perhaps they don't want to spend 150-200 a year on music.
-
Like this
Reply to this comment
-
(22 Comments)