• On The Insider: Kim Kardashian Goes Au Natural
advertisement
January 9, 2007 11:55 AM PST

New AirPort Extreme Base station announced: Shared disk access, 802.11n, enabler for 802.11n hardware in some Macs

by CNET staff

Apple has announced a new edition of its AirPort Extreme Base station that takes some styling cues from the Apple TV and includes 802.11n networking. The unit will ship in February for US$179.

Among the salient new features:

  • Connectivity for up to 50 Macs or PCs
  • AirPort Disk turns almost any external USB hard drive into a shared drive.
  • Access control feature -- lets you set which users can access network and during what time periods
  • Built-in firewall
  • 802.11a/b/g, draft 802.11n2 support
  • Three RJ-45 10/100BASE-T Ethernet LAN ports for connecting computers or network devices

UPDATE: The AirPort Extreme also includes 802.11n Enabler for Core 2 Duo and Xeon-based Macintosh computers (except 17-inch 1.83GHz iMac). This will, of course, enable the built-in 802.11n-capable hardware on these Macs.

For further information, see http://www.apple.com/airportextreme/.

Feedback? Late-breakers@macfixit.com.

Resources

  • http://www.apple.com/airpo...
  • Late-breakers@macfixit.com
  • More from Late-Breakers
  • Recent posts from MacFixIt
    iTunes 10 user interface sees some minor changes
    Apple seeds iOS 4.1 Gold Master to developers
    Possible fix for Harman Kardon iSub problems with PowerPC Macs
    Precautions to take before installing iTunes 10
    A reminder on how to reset your Mac's system password
    Mail messages appearing blank
    Adobe Lightroom update brings direct Facebook publishing; Camera Raw 6.2 released
    Weekly troubleshooting utilities update
    Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
    • prev
    • next
    by floogee January 9, 2007 1:12 PM PST
    Wonder if the Airport Express firmware can be upgraded to the "n" (almost) standard like some of the intel mac's can. i doubt it since it means that those of us with "older" technology wouldn't need to pony up for a new base station
    Reply to this comment
    by jtnoble January 9, 2007 1:12 PM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by floogee</i></div></class><br />
    Is there an antenna port on the new AEBS?
    Reply to this comment
    by Michael Clayville January 9, 2007 1:27 PM PST
    Why 10/100 on the LAN ports when every computer they ship has GbE?
    Reply to this comment
    by kucharsk January 9, 2007 1:38 PM PST
    As I mentioned in another thread, they've also dropped the price of the AirPort Express $30 today, from $129 to $99.
    Reply to this comment
    by Dester Wallaboo January 9, 2007 10:03 PM PST
    That is the burning question now isn't it? Why would Apple put a set of measly 10/100BT ports on a 802.11n base station? Optimal throughput is 600Mbps although I realize that real-world will probably be in the 200-400Mbps range. Even then, why create this horrendous bottleneck at the ethernet ports? Maybe someone needs to give their R&amp;D department a new calculator and lessons on bandwidth.
    Reply to this comment
    by mactoeknee January 9, 2007 10:03 PM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by Dester Wallaboo</i></div></class><br />
    Most people and small businesses don't use or a pressing need for gigabit ethernet yet. In fact, for SOHO file sharing and printer sharing, 802.11g works adequately, and actual throughput is way below 100BT (fast ethernet).

    If you have a gigabit network, you probably have a gigabit switch, and if you connect the new Airport Extreme base station to it via one of its WAN ports, transfers between the gigabit capable computers will still be at the higher speeds, and internet traffic going through the AEn base will not even tax the 100BT, as it's very likely well under 10 Mbit/sec.

    The only thing which will fall short of expectations will be file transfers between 802.11n connected clients and gigabit clients connected to the switch... because 802.11n has typical data rates of 200 Mbit/sec, the speeds will be limited by the slower ports.

    It is puzzling to comprehend why Apple did this, however, it's not a deal breaker, and I still think the AEn is a great product at a killer price point (at least compared to earlier AE base stations).
    Reply to this comment
    by Michael Clayville January 9, 2007 10:03 PM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by mactoeknee</i></div></class><br />
    While I don't have a gigbit switch yet, I am ready to get one. My only desire for it right now is to speed up backups across the network (backups go to an iMac with a firewire attached disk). My only wireless clients are laptops, so they can always plug into the switch for backups instead of doing it wirelessly.

    I think that new disk sharing feature on the AEn is just begging for a gigabit connection though :)
    Reply to this comment
    by MacHound January 9, 2007 10:03 PM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;&#62;&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by Michael Clayville</i></div></class><br />
    "I think that new disk sharing feature on the AEn is just begging for a gigabit connection though"

    I totally agree. Absence of Gigabit kills AEBS for me. Setting up a Time Machine volume attached to AEBS is not appealing over 100baseT. A HD video server over 100baseT is equally unappealing.

    Call this just another Apple 'near miss.' I think I'll be getting that 5 port D-Link Gigabit router instead. I've been waiting for 7-8 port Gigabit routers to come down in price, but I'm not sure that's going to happen anytime soon.
    Reply to this comment
    by ToeKnee2 January 9, 2007 10:03 PM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;&#62;&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by Michael Clayville</i></div></class><br />
    "I think that new disk sharing feature on the AEn is just begging for a gigabit connection though :)"

    Excellent point - especially since I just read you can attach a hub to the port and attach multiple drives.

    And if you get one of them new Epson Gigabit Printers, you can print at super high speeds! No... that part was made up. A guy can dream...
    Reply to this comment
    by RobynP January 10, 2007 4:21 AM PST
    Looks like Apple has decided that the days of dial-up internet access are gone. I note that the built-in modem of every previous generation of ABS and ABS Extreme now appears to have gone the way of the dinosaur...
    Reply to this comment
    by January 10, 2007 4:21 AM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by RobynP</i></div></class><br />
    You might be able to hook up Apple's USB modem to it. :)
    Reply to this comment
    by January 10, 2007 11:38 AM PST
    The previous Airport Extreme suffered in one embarrassing way. It's signal strength was among the worst I'd ever seen, less in comparison even to a bargain basement Zyxel, which made the purchase of an external antenna mandatory for two locations that I've put them in.

    The new box has no antenna ports that I can see nor are any in the tech specs.

    Unless Apple took a major lesson in delivering a better antenna, this beast is a wash in any but the most optimum type of locations save for inelegant and warranty-breaking hackage.
    Reply to this comment
    by mozart11 January 10, 2007 2:12 PM PST
    Can it really be possible that the builtin Airport wireless card in the MacBook Pro I bought in August 2006 can not be updated to run the new faster n standard?

    How can this be? Somethingis seriously wrong with Apple if that's the case.
    Reply to this comment
    by singularity January 10, 2007 2:12 PM PST
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by mozart11</i></div></class><br />
    You are insane. You are being critical of Apple because they are not going to be able to somehow change your old computer to be able to run a wireless spec that has not been released yet?

    If you show me some advertising that showed that your MacBook Pro was capable of 802.11n when you bought it in 2006, you would actually have a leg to stand on.

    Guess what - my 12" PowerBook, with an Apple-supplied Airport Extreme card is not going to be able to run 802.11n either. Think I should complain about that?
    Reply to this comment
    by tonydickinson January 10, 2007 4:39 PM PST
    Hi this is interesting as I have a new 24ins iMac and use a Linksys WRT350N router which is a wireless "N" device. Does this mean that I will not have access to the "N" capability on the iMac unless I purchase the new Apple unit?

    regards Tony
    Reply to this comment
    (15 Comments)
    • prev
    • next