• On BNET: Apple Nixes Nudes in Playboy iPad
advertisement
June 3, 2009 4:38 PM PDT

Tip: Double-up the backups instead of backing up the backups.

by CNET staff

Backups have always been a cumbersome thing for most home computer users to take the time to set up and maintain. Before Leopard, you had to install a third-party backup program and deal with proprietary formats, data structure, and compression. Apple recognized these problems with the implementation of Time Machine, and the easy "set it and forget it" method of backing up has been a great option for most home users. However, there are still times when Time Machine will not work properly. It will stop backing up certain items, give frequent errors, or have odd behavior that has the user question whether the backups are working properly.

Since errors and failure can happen in any backup system, we recommend that if you have the available resources (namely, spare external hard drives) that you set up dual, independent backups, and, in doing so, take advantage of more than one way of backing up your system. This will prevent any errors in a backup system from propagating to subsequent backups.

One strongly recommended solution that we advocate is to have both a snapshot-based system such as Time Machine in addition to a bootable clone system as well using a software package such as SuperDuper or Carbon Copy Cloner. Doing this will ensure you can both boot and access your most recently changed files in the event of either data loss or hardware failure.

Keep in mind that this is not the same as making a duplicate of your current backup. Doing that may be beneficial in the event of hardware failure, but does not protect against problems happening with your backup software and propagating through additional backups. Instead, having two systems that run separately will ensure that no problems in one backup system are carried over to the other in addition to providing a security measure in case one backup system experiences a hardware failure. External drives are cheap these days, and it pays to have a robust backup scheme that will ensure both hardware and software failures are taken into account.

It's worth noting that with multiple backups, in many instances one system may attempt to back up another one that you are trying to keep independent. For instance, Time Machine will automatically include all locally mounted volumes in its backups unless you explicitly have it ignore a specific volume (on a related side note if you're having problems with Time Machine not including some drives, check out our recent article on ensuring drives get included with your Time Machine backups). To keep backup solutions independent, be sure the drives for each backup are not included in the other one. Otherwise, in a scenario where you're set up to have a cloned drive and a Time Machine backup, the cloned drive will be again backed up to the Time Machine drive, redundantly filling it up.

Resources

  • article
  • More from Late-Breakers
  • Recent posts from MacFixIt
    iTunes 10 user interface sees some minor changes
    Apple seeds iOS 4.1 Gold Master to developers
    Possible fix for Harman Kardon iSub problems with PowerPC Macs
    Precautions to take before installing iTunes 10
    A reminder on how to reset your Mac's system password
    Mail messages appearing blank
    Adobe Lightroom update brings direct Facebook publishing; Camera Raw 6.2 released
    Weekly troubleshooting utilities update
    Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
    • prev
    • next
    by DITSS June 3, 2009 5:47 PM PDT
    Also:
    1) Have off site backup (in case your house floods or burns down)
    2) Test the restore function of your backup system. With something like SuperDuper this is easy. Just boot off that drive and poke around and see if your critical stuff works.
    Reply to this comment
    by jhc June 3, 2009 5:47 PM PDT
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by DITSS</i></div></class><br />
    My Mac Pro has 4 1 TB internal discs. The first disc is the system disc. The second is the backup system disc. The third disc contains my home folder with all my user data and the fourth is set up in mirrored RAID configuration with the third disc.

    I use SuperDuper to smart copy my system disc to the backup system disc every Monday morning. I check periodically that I can boot from the backup system disc. I also perform a smart copy of my RAID to an external disc every Monday morning. SuperDuper is an excellent product and a smart copy is really quick.

    Time Machine is set up to backup up the RAID - i.e. my user data.

    I completely agree that having different types of backup makes a lot of sense. In my professional work I have come across a number of customers over the years who find out that their backup strategy is fundamentally flawed only when they get a disc failure and try to recover their data!
    Reply to this comment
    by colomon June 3, 2009 5:47 PM PDT
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by DITSS</i></div></class><br />
    Is there an easy way to test your Time Machine backup for correctness?
    Reply to this comment
    by rkshaw June 3, 2009 5:47 PM PDT
    <class="merchant"><span>&#62;</span><div class="datestamp"><i>This is a reply to a previous comment by DITSS</i></div></class><br />
    I think the important reason for off site backups is redundancy. The off site services have multiple servers and built in redundancy. Home disasters like fire and theft are real but not as common as a crashed hard disk!
    Reply to this comment
    by Tracy Valleau June 4, 2009 7:48 AM PDT
    I'm a happy user of both SuperDuper and DataBackup. Folks might like to take a look at DataBackup (from Prosoft) since it offer both cloning and several other types backup capability. Seems to work just fine for me.
    Reply to this comment
    by Fingal June 4, 2009 10:45 AM PDT
    There has always been backup software built into OS X in the UNIX environment. It's just that writing scripts for tools like rsync is beyond the average user. Once you have a script, however, it's easy to manage the schedule by running it as an alarm in iCal. It's still useful to do that sort of thing in some circumstances because Time Machine has its limitations.
    Reply to this comment
    by macsterguy June 5, 2009 6:42 AM PDT
    Though not free, SuperDuper is, with out a doubt, the best backup tool for the Mac on the planet. Support is nearly perfect...

    ---
    Chris Jones
    Reply to this comment
    (7 Comments)
    • prev
    • next