• On GameFAQs: The top 10 most terrifying PC games
advertisement
February 28, 2006 10:30 AM PST

Apple introduces Mac mini with Intel Core Solo and Core Duo processors; details on new integrated graphics

by CNET staff
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 26 comments

Apple has introduced a new line of Mac minis based around the Intel Core Solo and Core Duo processors.

The new systems are shipping today, and are the first minis to include Apple's Front Row -- the remote control software/hardware combination that allows control and media playback in iTunes, iPhoto and more.

Integrated graphics -- comparison to RADEON 9200 One potentially significant drawback to the new systems is their use of Intel integrated graphics -- specifically the Intel GMA950 graphics processor. This means that the Intel Mac mini shares RAM between the system and the graphics processor, potentially representing a step down in graphics performance (and potentially overall system performance) from the PowerPC-based Mac minis, though benchmarks have yet to be produced.

The GMA950 uses "Dynamic Video Memory Technology" (DVMT) to support up to 224MB of video memory; system memory is allocated where it is needed dynamically. It has 64MB of DDR2 SDRAM of its own, shared with main memory

Still, on paper, the GMA950's specs best those of the Radeon 9200 card used by the PowerPC-based Mac mini. For instance, the GMA950 claims 1.6 billion pixels per second vs. 1.1 billion pixels per second for the Radeon 9200. And the GMA950 includes a 256-bit graphics core running at 400MHz while the Radeon 9200 uses a 400 Mhz 128-bit core.

Again, benchmarks have yet to be recorded, but we wouldn't be surprised if the new Intel-based Mac mini's integrated graphics performance exceeds that of the previous PowerPC-based generation with a separate graphics card for most tasks.

Configurations

A US$599 configuration sports the following specs:

  • 1.5 GHz Intel Core Solo processor;
  • 512MB of 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM, expandable up to 2GB;
  • a slot-load Combo (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) drive;
  • 60GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm;
  • Intel GMA950 graphics processor;
  • built-in AirPort Extreme wireless networking & Bluetooth 2.0 EDR;
  • Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000 BASE-T);
  • four USB 2.0 ports;
  • one audio line in and one audio line out port, each supporting both optical digital and analog;
  • DVI-out port for external display (VGA-out adapter included, Composite/S-Video out adapter sold separately); and
  • the infrared Apple Remote.
A US$799 configuration sports these specs:
  • 1.66 GHz Intel Core Duo processor;
  • 512MB of 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM expandable up to 2GB;
  • a slot-load 8x SuperDrive with double-layer support (DVD R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW);
  • 80GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm;
  • Intel GMA950 graphics processor;
  • built-in AirPort Extreme wireless networking & Bluetooth 2.0 EDR;
  • Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000 BASE-T);
  • four USB 2.0 ports;
  • one audio line in and one audio line out port, each supporting both optical digital and analog;
  • DVI-out port for external display (VGA-out adapter included, Composite/S-Video out adapter sold separately); and
  • the infrared Apple Remote.

The new Mac minis ship with Apple's iLife '06 software.

For more information, see Apple's Mac mini product page.

Resources

  • Mac mini product page
  • More from Late-Breakers
  • Recent posts from MacFixIt
    Manage iCal's automatic e-mail generation for invitations
    CNET TV Apple Byte: Apple faces critics
    Weekly Utilities Update: Net Monitor, MiniUsage, TimeMachineEditor, more...
    Odds and Ends: Essential video codec packs for OS X
    Address Book: Unable to add, view contacts
    Persistent 'Faster Browser Search' overtaking Safari's default search
    Quick tip: Faster Time Machine backups
    MacFixIt Answers
    Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (26 Comments)
    by MacFixItUser February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    I think Apple really has some balls to introduce new "Intel" machines and not
    debug the software ( iLife '06 ) for us PowerPC users.

    I have over $5000 invested in equipment for basic indie video production ..
    and my iMovie is nearly unusable.

    The Plug Ins I need ( and paid for ) .. such as Stabilization and Noise Filters
    don't work ( The 3rd party vendors say the Apple didn't realease a demo to
    them to test in advance ) and the "standard" Quartz Plug - Ins seem to crash
    iMovie nearly every time I apply them.

    Apple make no statement that would ease our minds .. like " We acknoledge
    that there are some issues with iMovie 6.0.1 and are working dillegently to
    resolve them for our faithful PowerPC users."

    I have posted on Apple Disuussions, here on MacFixIt, sent "Crash Reports" to
    Apple, as well as feedback....

    Where is your reply, Apple?

    Are us PowerPC users now second rate to your new "Mactel" cash cow?

    I'm 'disturbed' about this .. to say the very least.
    Reply to this comment
    by strange_days February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by MacFixIt User


    Full video production - Final Cut Pro Studio
    Basic video production - Final Cut Express
    Home movies - iMovie

    You decide.
    Reply to this comment
    by agua_dotmac February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by MacFixIt User


    ANY time there's a major release of your mission critical software, you've got
    to EXPECT 3rd party compatibility issues. Photoshop, Logic (pre and post
    Apple's acquisition), Adobe Premier, Mac platform, Windows platform --
    ANYTHING -- you always must let others test the bleeding edge before you
    adopt. That's just the way it is. Always has been, always will be.

    And what of all those poor souls who bought Macintels who already invested
    in third party plugins that are NOT UNIVERSAL BINARY, yet?? I'm sure you and
    I would both say they were fools to rush in, and I'm afraid that would seem to
    apply to you as well in regards to iLife '06. I bought some Slick plugins, knew
    that there were some problems with iLife '06 by checking their website, but
    took the plunge regardless on account of the better features of iLife '06
    outweighing any compatibility issues I might encounter with my NON-
    MISSION CRITICAL usage:

    http://geethree.com/downloads/slickHD6update.html
    Reply to this comment
    by MacFixItUser February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >>
    This is a reply to a previous comment by agua_dotmac


    I guess my main point is that "iMovie" was a key factor in my purchase, as
    many others... since it 'gets you in the door' to movie making, and the
    equipment allows one to upgrade to FCP.

    I would think that Apple would put iMovie nearly at the top of software
    priorities, just under Mac OS X itself:

    1. Mac OS X
    2. iTunes ( Because of the $$ )
    3. The Basic Suite ( Safari - Mail - iChat - etc. )
    4. iMovie

    Would you not agree?
    Reply to this comment
    by RAngol February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >>>
    This is a reply to a previous comment by MacFixIt User


    Wrong again. You don't shift major numbers of software engineers to a
    different project they've not worked with before.

    And as is elsewhere mentioned you do have two other choices. You took the
    low road and you will never get the specific service needed for a portion of
    the inexpensive iLife. It just doesn't happen in the real world. You'd be
    much happier with FCP or its lighter version anyway as iMovie is barely up to
    any standards for commercial production when it is working.

    This is a real world. I suggest you understand a real world's limitations
    which is what everyone else in this thread has discussed. Something for
    virtually nothing on a new cutting edge product simply does *not* happen
    and it was bound to happen with some new iLife products.

    Like the other writer, I too have experienced little or no problems in making
    "home movies" with the '06 version of iMovie but FCP it ain't. Your mileage
    will vary.
    Reply to this comment
    by JonYo February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by MacFixIt User


    Granted, I don't use any 3rd party plugins with it, but iMovie 6.0.1 has
    absolutely no issues on my system running 10.4.5. I'm not saying you're NOT
    having issues, but I don't think there are massive global problems that
    everyone is having, are there?

    An aside, just because Apple comes out with some new products while you're
    still having problems with some existing products (IE- possible bugs in
    iMovie), certainly doesn't mean that Apple is ignoring the need to fix some
    stuff. Apple's a huge company, with all sorts of subdivisions. It's not like
    when some software bugs come up, they should do some massive internal
    shift and fire some new-hardware dev guys so they can hire some more
    software QA guys and programmers. That's just silly and not how stuff
    works.

    Short version: Apple introducing some new stuff like the Intel Mac Mini and
    updated Front Row has absolutely NOTHING to do with the resources given to
    and timeline for fixing iMovie bugs. So, this is the wrong forum to rant about
    it.

    - JonYo
    Reply to this comment
    by gslusher February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by MacFixIt User


    Perhaps you should just go back to iLife '05, or, better, talk to the developers
    of the plug-ins that don't work. It's their responsibility to make their plug-ins
    work with iMovie, not Apple's responsibilty to make iMovie work with
    umpteen third-party plug-ins.
    Reply to this comment
    by RAngol February 28, 2006 10:51 AM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by MacFixIt User


    For someone that has any idea of the value and feature of computers.....

    How would you feel if you just paid $12,500 for a UMAX s900 clone with
    128MB of RAM, 3 40MB SCSI drives, and 9 or 10 PCI slots you could never
    fill.....

    then dreamed that night of the new high end mini after you did a 15 year
    flash forward with your crystal ball??.... LOL

    Its value on the low end of the Mac world is incredible.

    (And BTW I bought a similar in price Quadra 840AV and the telecomm didn't
    even work. At all. Period. None did. What is an "included Airport Express
    and BlueTooth anyway???? LOL
    Reply to this comment
    by Fingal February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    I think it's a mistake to let the bottom price point on the Mini rise. They should
    keep selling PPC Minis until they can make Intel based ones cheaper.
    Reply to this comment
    by MacFixItUser February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by Fingal


    I totally agree. The typical Mac Mini buyer is focussed on price. If the out-
    going Mac-Mini G4 was capable of satisfying their needs then putting up the
    price of the new entry-level model is bound to deter buyers. Even that would
    not be so bad if the replacement model offered somed signifiacant new
    features - but it doesn't. There's no point comparing an 18 month old system
    with the latest technology and claiming the new stuff offers increased
    performance - that's exactly what we all expect. What we don't expect is a
    price rise for a marginal CPU performance benefit (Intel Core Solo will be
    faster on Universal Binary apps but massively slower on everything else) and a
    complete lack of new features (well ok how many Mac Mini buyers use Gigabit
    Ethernet???). The Intel integrated GPU might be (I stress might be) more
    capable tha the ATI 9200 but by modern standards it's off the bottom of the
    scale when compared to dedicated GPU's.
    Reply to this comment
    by Michelle Steiner February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >>
    This is a reply to a previous comment by null


    It does offer significant new features: It has built-in Bluetooth and Airport
    Extreme. The $499 PowerPC Mac Mini had neither.
    Reply to this comment
    by Carob February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >>>
    This is a reply to a previous comment by Michelle Steiner


    I don't know...
    Those aren't significant in my book.
    Reply to this comment
    by dkmarsh February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >>>
    This is a reply to a previous comment by Michelle Steiner


    It also has combined optical digital audio input/audio line in and combined
    optical digital audio output/headphone out (my PPC mini has only headphone
    out); a faster (5400 RPM vs. 4200 RPM) and larger (60 MB vs. 40 MB) hard drive;
    4 USB ports (twice as many as the PPC version); and 2 memory slots instead of 1.

    That seems easily worth $100, even if you don't make use of the Bluetooth,
    wireless, or Gigabit Ethernet.
    Reply to this comment
    by Michelle Steiner February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by Fingal


    Apple has now included Airport Extreme and Bluetooth with every Mac Mini;
    that's the reason the price has increased $100.
    Reply to this comment
    by JonYo February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by Fingal


    Ugggg, shared memory for graphics..I haaaaaaate that. Ok, SUPPOSEDLY, the
    graphics performance on this Intel chipset should rival a Radeon 9200 even
    with the shared memory, but it's still taking away from system usage of that
    memory.

    I'm not sure I understand this price point. Seems to too pricey in comparison
    to the previous generation of PPC Mac Mini. Sure, it's supposed to perform
    waaaay better CPU-wise, but are prospective Mac Mini owners the kind of
    market that are going to understand that and the caveats about that (rosetta
    slowdown, shared graphics RAM, etc). They are going to look at the price
    first. If they could have dropped the price down $100 by making the
    bluetooth and airport extreme optional (assuming that's how the PPC Mac
    Mini was available? I can't remember), then I think they should have done
    that.

    Ick...that shared video memory thing leaves >such< a bad taste in my mouth,
    for more than the reason of raw performance numbers. Maybe it's just a
    solely emotional response, but it just stinks of the kinds of half-assed
    compromises that the big generic-beige-PC-with-Windows world has
    accepted for years, but the Mac always resisted. Hate it hate it hate it. What's
    next? Phasing out custom power supplies so they can use generic bulky ATX-
    compliant power supplies to cut costs? See where I'm going with this? I'm
    cool with change, and OSX makes most of the Mac experience, sure, but the
    hardware DOES matter, and running OSX on a Mac that starts approaching a
    generic PC under the hood would not give that same experience.

    - JonYo
    Reply to this comment
    by RAngol February 28, 2006 2:20 PM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by Fingal


    I have to disagree. I bought one of the original minis to use for an
    inexpensive
    server and have discovered what a bargain it was. I have no regrets as I look
    at
    the new specs, but clearly for the modest price increases they're an even
    better
    buy than first generation minis.

    To my way of thinking you can't compete with "complete system for $295.
    mentality." The mini remains competitively priced. Try getting some of
    either
    mini's features on a "$295. wintel sooper dooper special" at Best Buy. And it's
    obvious Apple couldn't make a profit with the new features. The new
    machines are much more realistic in terms of video and dynamic RAM and in
    a host of other areas and this is no longer a BTO requirement. The price
    points of the original machines were *artificially* low by the time you added
    Airport Extreme, decent RAM, Bluetooth, et al.

    The new minis are a rock bottom priced super bargain in my mind but I'm
    happy with the deal I got on my own low end mini that's a ball to play around
    with when not using my PowerBook or G5 tower. The mini is just plain fun
    and a bargain at the new price and specs levels IMHO.
    Reply to this comment
    by NO!!!!! February 28, 2006 8:28 PM PST
    Actually Apple are quoting 7200 RPM SATA Drives in these Intel Mini models -
    This makes them much more interesting!
    Reply to this comment
    by NO!!!!! February 28, 2006 8:28 PM PST
    >
    This is a reply to a previous comment by NO!!!!!


    Hard Drive


    The larger the capacity of your hard drive, the more space is available to store
    your files and applications. A typical application today takes 10 to 50
    megabytes (MB); graphics files can occupy more than 100MB; and video files
    are often many gigabytes in size. With files growing larger and hard drives
    becoming bigger, faster, and more affordable, it makes good economic sense
    to buy a hard drive with enough capacity to last. Capacity is typically
    measured in gigabytes (GB).

    A variety of hard drive capacities are available for Mac mini. All Mac mini
    models include standard Serial ATA hard drives featuring data transfers up to
    1.5 Gigabits per second. All hard drives run at 7,200 revolutions per minute
    (rpm).

    Your hard drive will come already formatted with the Mac OS Extended file
    format for efficient storage of your data.

    *For hard drive capacity measurements, 1GB = 1 billion bytes; actual
    formatted capacity less.
    Reply to this comment
    by RAngol February 28, 2006 8:28 PM PST
    >>
    This is a reply to a previous comment by NO!!!!!


    Actually I believe the specs on the mini are 5400 RPM for the drives but
    considering the fact that this is more than adequate for most users of a late
    model PowerBook G4 and the fact that I can even dink around with Photoshop
    CS2 on a mini I'd say that's no real drawback although a 7200 RPM option might
    be nice.
    Reply to this comment
    by NO!!!!! February 28, 2006 11:55 PM PST
    Apple appears to contradict itself - On one page under storage it says 5400
    rpm SATA - http://www.apple.com/au/macmini/whatsinside.html

    On this page where you actually buy it says -

    A variety of hard drive capacities are available for Mac mini. All Mac mini
    models include standard Serial ATA hard drives featuring data transfers up to
    1.5 Gigabits per second. All hard drives run at 7,200 revolutions per minute
    (rpm).

    see it here -

    http://store.apple.com/133-622/WebObjects/australiastore.woa/80105/wo/
    nx3TDXdjDUMb2fqtT7aqy2PB8IQ/9.0.19.7.0.8.3.49.1.1.1.9.0.0.3.1.1.3.0


    Apple Confusion!!!
    Reply to this comment
    Showing 1 of 2 pages (26 Comments)
    advertisement

    About MacFixIt

    MacFixIt is CNET's troubleshooting resource for all things Mac. The information here helps you navigate the ins-and-outs of Mac ownership with how-tos, troubleshooting information, news, reviews, and more.

    Add this feed to your online news reader