• On BNET: Apple Nixes Nudes in Playboy iPad
advertisement
July 3, 2006 6:33 AM PDT

Odds and Ends: Lack of PGP for Intel-based Macs frustrates users, release soon?; Problems joining segmented files with StuffIt;

by CNET staff

Lack of PGP for Intel-based Macs frustrates users, release soon? MacFixIt reader Paul Derby inquires:

"From the numerous inquiries made to PGP,Inc. that have gone unanswered and no disclosed progress toward any sort of PGP client for the Intel Macs since they were made available to the developer community over 1 year ago, the only conclusion one can draw is that PGP has frozen their Macintosh offerings and has no plans to release any solution for the Intel Mac."

Unfortunately, as noted by Paul, the PGP Corporation has made no announcement regarding the potential release of a Universal Binary edition of PGP Desktop.

However, there is a small post in the PGP support forms from a user named "Rolf" whose profile indicates "Senior Product Manager" and whose Web site is listed as PGP.com, which states:

"PGP plans to release a version of PGP Desktop that supports the Mac Intel in the near future."

We're not sure if this indicates a Universal edition is in the works, but it's the closest PGP Corporation has come to making a statement on the issue.

In the meantime, GnuPG offers a viable, Universal alternative for e-mail encryption.

Problems joining segmented files with StuffIt Some users have reported an issue where StuffIt Deluxe 10.0.2 and StuffIt Expander have problems re-joining files segmented with Drop Stuff 10.0.2.

MacFixIt reader Gabriel Dorado writes:

"The segmented files with DropStuff 10.0.2 are corrupt! For instance, groups of six segments of 100 MB segments each. I discovered it after spending two weeks segmenting files. If you try to expand (join) such segmented files, you get 'Error17514Expanding.pdf'"

If you have experienced a similar issue, please let us know.

Knowledge Base updates

  • #303898 Remote Desktop: Curtain Mode button dimmed when controlling some clients
  • #303955 Remote Desktop 2: "Didn't upgrade to version 2.1"
  • #303959 Mac OS X Server: Mobile Users do not appear in the Login Window
  • #303932 Aperture: Self-printed PDF book appears to have extra blank page
  • #303909 Network Install: Regional locale information does not match default language
  • #303882 Mac OS X 10.4.6 or later: AFP share points may mount as read only
  • #303738 MacBook Pro may not be able to join a closed WPA Personal wireless network

Resources

  • PGP Corporation
  • GnuPG
  • let us know
  • #303898
  • #303955
  • #303959
  • #303932
  • #303909
  • #303882
  • #303738
  • More from Odds and Ends:
  • Recent posts from MacFixIt
    iTunes 10 user interface sees some minor changes
    Apple seeds iOS 4.1 Gold Master to developers
    Possible fix for Harman Kardon iSub problems with PowerPC Macs
    Precautions to take before installing iTunes 10
    A reminder on how to reset your Mac's system password
    Mail messages appearing blank
    Adobe Lightroom update brings direct Facebook publishing; Camera Raw 6.2 released
    Weekly troubleshooting utilities update
    Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
    • prev
    • next
    by macfan21_dotmac July 3, 2006 10:00 AM PDT
    the only email encryption program i would use is gpg. its exactly the same as
    pgp but is free. they have much more frequent updates than pgp corp.
    Reply to this comment
    by Fingal July 3, 2006 12:57 PM PDT
    For the purposes of my institution, the one feature that PGP has which is
    currently absent in GPG (GnuPG) is ADK (Additional Decryption Key). This is a
    sort of master key which can be used by a business or other institution to
    decrypt any message encrypted with any of their user's keys. We want to get
    away from PGP mainly because of the price. Their license fees have become
    excessive. The delay in support for Intel Macs is just one more reason.

    In the meanwhile, since keys are intercompatible between PGP and GPG, you
    can use one central computer with PGP to create keys and then distribute
    them to users with GPG. ADK is specifically a function of the key pair
    (handled during key creation) so once a key is set up with ADK in PGP, it will
    work even for messages encrypted with that key in GPG. Of course that
    process assumes a lot of trust in the institution and the IT people involved.

    I just thought some readers might find that interesting.
    Reply to this comment
    by dbg July 3, 2006 1:30 PM PDT
    I needed PGPdisk for my new MacBook Pro--that's how I protect my private
    memos and email from loss if my laptop gets stolen. No luck. Dustin Halliday,
    PGP customer support team lead, told me there would be a version toward
    the end of this year.

    So I looked for an alternative, and didn't find any I trusted (I don't think
    there's a GPGdisk for the Mac?), so I tried FileVault.
    I'm very impressed--it's done heroic things to save me from screwing up my
    encrypted home directory (like when I told it to recover lost space right
    before my ride to the airport came), and it solves the problem more
    conveniently and comprehensively than PGPdisk did.

    There are occasional complications: Adobe update installers can't find their
    mounted .dmg disks and fail--workaround is to define a new account that
    doesn't use FileVault for doing problem installs; Handling voluminous data
    that doesn't need encryption, like family photos, is awkward--I moved those
    into a Shared user folder, but permissions aren't handled right by the system
    in this situation and it takes a lot of fiddling before I can get access right
    (finally discovered using Touch in the Terminal fixes the failure of permission
    corrections done in Finder Info to be acted upon, i.e. to work); There are
    some slowdowns, but I don't know how to tell how much is FileVault's fault; A
    Better Finder Rename can't rename files in the home directory unless you do a
    special trick.
    Reply to this comment
    by MacFixItUser July 4, 2006 2:40 PM PDT
    A beta version of PGP Desktop that runs natively on Intel Macs will be available
    in the very near future.

    - PGP Corporation
    Reply to this comment
    by halfawake July 4, 2006 11:51 PM PDT
    It's not exactly a press release, but this seems more offical than a forum entry: http://www.pgp.com/products/desktop/professional/techspecs.html The note in there says that support for Intel Macs is planned for later this year.
    Reply to this comment
    by cyphers July 5, 2006 3:03 PM PDT
    See http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20060705101450393
    Reply to this comment
    (6 Comments)
    • prev
    • next