advertisement
October 28, 2009 12:19 PM PDT

Mac Mini: Here To Serve

by Topher Kessler
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 14 comments
Share

The Mac Mini is perfect for running a small server for either the home or a small business, and many people have used them for this very purpose, taking advantage of the OS X client's server capabilities in order to do so. Apple has recognized this with the recent release of the Mac Mini server version, which cheaply brings the features of OS X Server to home users. However, despite it's convenience as a highly portable and low power device, the presence of a specifically labeled "server" model for mac minis indicates to some that the other models are not capable of being a server, and some people have wondered about any limitations on the smaller systems, or differences between the server minis and the other available minis.

The mini server is essentially no different than the other Minis in Apple's latest lineup, with the exception that the optical drive has been replaced with a secondary 500GB drive that's in a software-based RAID 0 configuration with the primary drive. The main difference for the server mini is that it comes preinstalled with OS X Server, enabling far more Web and network services than what's offered in the normal OS X client. Regardless of the software you use, all minis are excellent and robust server devices, and hosting companies such as Macminicolo have recognized this and have been housing people's personal minis for years for running Web pages, off-site backups, and other services.

So what are your options for running a home server?

Overall, the answer to this question really depend on what you want the server to do. In many cases the standard OS X client will do just fine for home server uses. It already contains Web sharing, file sharing, and printer sharing. Additionally, you can install third-party or open source servers and have it run those services as well. If you are interested in only using these basic services, then the OS X client will do well; however on the other hand if you would like to tap into client and computer management, contact management, customized Time Machine backups, and more, then the server software will be needed. Apple has made the server easily configurable, which in itself makes it well worth the price. Beyond the capabilities of the client OS, the server gives you a number of additional features:

  • Calendaring Server -- Store calendars on your server that you can access and manage via iCal, a Web interface, or other client software package.

  • Address Book server -- Centralize your contacts and access them from any machine.

  • Wiki Server -- As with many Wikis, this allows for your own personal encyclopedia.

  • iChat Server -- Have a private server to use for establishing iChat connections and conferences.

  • File Sharing -- Set up shared folders for users on your network, including support for Time Machine destinations. Protocols include NFS, AFP, SMB, and FTP.

  • Mail Server -- Have your own highly configurable local email accounts.

  • Web Hosting -- Host your own Web sites, including support for a variety of scripting languages and connection protocols. QuickTime streaming server is also included.

  • Spotlight Server -- Host your spotlight indexes so network resources (i.e., other computers' shared folders) can be easily searched in one location.

  • Client Management -- Manage computers and those who have access to them with Apple's implementation of Open Directory.

  • Network Services -- Use your server as a router, DHCP server, Firewall, and a VPN so you can access your network from remote locations.

  • Other Features -- SQL databases, NetBoot network disk image building, Radius Wi-Fi network administration, Software Update server for your local network, and Xgrid.

These features can be exceptionally useful, even in noncorporate environments by allowing you to do a variety of tasks and centralize your workflow. For instance, if you bind your computers to the server's Open Directory and create an Open Directory account for yourself, you can use that account to log into each computer without having to create a new account on each computer. From there, you can set how that account can access all resources on your network that the server manages, as well as services on the server such as file sharing or Time Machine backups. This kind of resource management is exceptionally useful for laboratories, classrooms, and even homes that have at least a few systems with several users.

For small-scale applications, the built-in services in OS X Server do not demand many computing resources. I run a workgroup of about 10 PCs (Mac and Windows) that authenticate to an XServe, run backups, file distribution, e-mail, iCal calendaring, printing, Web services, VPN, and managing wireless waypoints. The server is a single 2.0GHz G5 and rarely goes above 20% of the CPU. In fact, the majority of the CPU is taken up when the Time Machine backups are indexed.

One benefit of this is that for these and many similar uses you can use any Mac that meets the minimum system requirements, which are a Mac with an Intel processor (for Snow Leopard Server), 2GB RAM, and 10GB of free disk space. The podcast producer feature requires a Quartz Extreme-enabled graphics processor, but this is only mentioned because some servers do not ship with video cards. As such, while Apple offers the current Mini server at a great deal, if you have any Intel Mac you should be able to install and run OS X Server on it (old MacBooks, iMacs, or Mac Pros).

There are a number of services and applications that require faster computing hardware, such as large-scale networking services (hundreds of users), virtual machine distribution, and scientific or technical computation applications, but those would not be used for most home and small business applications. In these cases, you see people clustering XServes together as is the case with Virginia Tech's "System X" supercomputer (similar setups can be done with Minis as well, though not as efficiently without support for the high-throughput fiber channels and wider data buses).

So what are any limitations to the mini?

There are two limitations for running OS X Server on a new Mac Mini. The first is hardware capabilities such as overall computing power and support for features such as error correcting memory, RAID cards, and fiber channels. These hardware resources are exceptionally useful for high-throughput applications (around 2Gb/sec for each fiber channel), but they're overkill in most home or small office situations. While the mini does not contain these devices, you can still make use of quite robust peripheral options through the lower-throughput Firewire and USB connections. Some rather large RAID arrays will connect via Firewire, so in terms of capacity you should still have a fair amount of configurability even though the throughput to the device would be less than if you used a fiber channel.

The second limitation is for all intents and purposes a null issue unless you specifically need it, which is the inability to boot Snow Leopard into 64-bit. While one of the selling points for Snow Leopard and its server variant has been full 64-bit support, even though the Mini has all the capabilities for running 64-bit processes it will not boot the OS X kernel in 64-bit mode. In the past, this limitation has been due in part to firmware limitations such as the computer having 32-bit EFI firmware, but the latest minis should be running a 64-bit capable EFI and since they will run other 64-bit processes just fine, there is no reason why the new minis should not boot into 64-bit mode.

Recent mini firmware updates have enabled support for up to 8GB of RAM on the systems, even though Apple still officially claims a 4GB maximum. This has made people wonder if Apple has enabled support for the 64-bit kernel on the new systems in order to more efficiently use the additional memory, but testing with the new systems as well as with older ones that have the firmware update applied indicates there still is no 64-bit support for the kernel. It's clear that Apple is holding back on full 64-bit support in the mini, despite the capability of the hardware; however, for most uses for which the Mini is targeted the lack of 64-bit support in the kernel will make no difference. Any frustrations with Apple about this are more of why the support just isn't there when it very well could be.

Overall, while Apple advertises the server version of the Mac mini as a "Server," technically any Mac (mini or other) can serve as a server if you install the server software on it. The server software does not require a specific type of Mac, and the only limitations are capability (i.e., minimum RAM requirements and CPU speeds). Therefore if you purchase a copy of OS X server, you can turn any old or new Mini (or other Mac for that matter) into a personal server. However, if you do not have spare hardware to use and are in need of a server, the new mini is an attractive option.



Questions? Comments? Post them below or email us!
Be sure to check us out on Twitter and the CNET Mac forums.

Topher has been an avid Mac user for the past 15 years, and has been a contributing author to MacFixIt since Spring 2008. One of his passions is troubleshooting Mac problems and making the best use of Macs and Apple hardware at home and in the workplace.
Recent posts from MacFixIt
Cleaning and disinfecting your Macs
Magic Mouse misbehaving for Mac users
iTunes Store: Genius feature not updating
FAT32 copy bug in 10.6 Snow Leopard
Troubleshooting the Apple IR remote
Snow Leopard: Sound volume resets after rebooting Mac
System Preferences not opening properly
Managing the user spelling dictionary
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by taylorp--2008 October 28, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
I am successfully using a Mac mini server (2.26 intel, 4 gig ram) to run OS X 10.5 Server. I use it in a University environment as a Portable imaging system using Netboot. I can go to a computer lab and reimage it quickly. Or my favorite was imaging brand new systems in our warehouse which has limited connectivity. Just brought my own switch and cables voila, instant bench. System works great and it was CHEAP! My next agenda will be to remove the optical drive and replace it with a 500 gig drive for increased capacity.
Reply to this comment
by Matthew Hardy October 28, 2009 1:33 PM PDT
How 'bout a FileMaker server?
Reply to this comment
by tkessler October 28, 2009 2:03 PM PDT
FileMaker won't take up many resources either, and should run just fine.

Databases will require more computing resources when you have them running online stores or performing massive data organization tasks. It really depends on the scale of your application.
by tkessler October 28, 2009 2:05 PM PDT
I should add that I've used FileMaker 8 in a corporate environment with it running on a similar 2.0GHz G5 server, and with about a hundred users entering or modifying about 30-50 records per day the load on the server is almost negligible.
by Macnologist October 28, 2009 4:08 PM PDT
The word 'server' generally implies a system in constant use 24/7/365, so the drives, memory, cpu, etc have been tested to that spec (and carry a price tag to match). Where other consumer/prosumer devices don't generally run at load all the time. Servers also typically have redundant things like dual power supplies and fans to help maintain a constant uptime. By these guidelines, the MacMini server would not pass inspection at my company for a corporate server. But for the serious Mac fanatic or small business, I think it's pretty cool.
Reply to this comment
by Infinite_loop October 29, 2009 6:06 AM PDT
I'm pretty sure Apple is not targeting the Corporate World with a MacMini Server. They already make a server for that task, it's called an Xserve. The MacMini Server is designed for home use, which is much less taxing on the system.

And the definition of a Server is "a computer or computer program that manages access to a centralized resource or service in a network."
by tkessler October 29, 2009 8:34 AM PDT
@infinite_loop it's funny because local services on your computer are also technically "servers". For instance, look at the "windowserver" process, which local programs access for displaying GUI elements. It's technically a server because it centralizes tasks, though works solely on the local machine and has no network implementation.
by Apawlowski October 28, 2009 4:51 PM PDT
Except for Bluetooth, I have a macmini runing XP64 really well so Windows Server 64 bit should run. I will be trying 2008 one of these days, if I can tear the XP64 mini away from its current users.

Seems to me the dual drive option does not offer much as neither drive appears to be any more easily replaceable like an external is. In server configuration (which I have tried and like), I would trade an internal supply or additional RAM for the optical drive though.
Reply to this comment
by satcomer October 29, 2009 6:02 AM PDT
why no mention that the Snow Leopard Server can also serve up Active Directory and has unlimited client support?
Reply to this comment
by tkessler October 29, 2009 8:31 AM PDT
OS X Server cannot do Active Directory without a parent AD server to bind to. It can relay AD commands and integrate it's authentication to client computers, but does not serve as a full AD server itself. Apple implements Open Directory for this.
by treefrog October 29, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
A very simple question to all of you: Can I administer and manage the Mac Mini-Server from a remote client using desktop sharing? Hence, will I not need to plug a screen to the Mini?
Thanks
Reply to this comment
by equitek October 30, 2009 6:52 AM PDT
Oh yes, I do that all the time. Who needs to drive to the data center anymore? Only if there's a hardware issue really...
by BrianMarsh October 29, 2009 10:57 AM PDT
as a web server, and some other specific uses, the Mac mini is as fast as the Xserve at a fraction of the price. There is at least one Mac specific hosting/co-location company that almost exclusively uses Mac mini's because of the low cost, low power & heat, and great performance for what they use it for. Plus one of the most reliable mac models ever.
Reply to this comment
by equitek October 30, 2009 7:41 AM PDT
Currently when we run Leopard/Tiger Server on a Mac Mini none of the hardware monitoring works, I wonder if there's some basic support now...
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Navigate MacFixIt

  • Help
  • Archives
  • Utilities
  • Forums
advertisement

About MacFixIt

MacFixIt is CNET's troubleshooting resource for all things Mac. The information here helps you navigate the ins-and-outs of Mac ownership with how-tos, troubleshooting information, news, reviews, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

MacFixIt topics