• On MovieTome: The final word on Arnold and TERMINATOR!
September 6, 2008 5:00 AM PDT

Honda hybrid plan bets big on small cars

by Automotive News

TOKYO--Don't expect large hybrid vehicles from Honda Motor Co. anytime soon.

The company plans to put hybrid systems into compacts and subcompacts because that's where the green technology achieves its greatest efficiencies, said Masaaki Kato, president of Honda R&D Co., the automaker's product development arm.

The strategy differs from that of Honda's rivals, which largely have been installing hybrid drivetrains in luxury sedans and SUVs.

Toyota Motor Corp. is making its next-generation Prius, due for the 2010 model year, bigger than the current one. Toyota also will debut a new Lexus hybrid at the Detroit auto show in January.

Nissan Motor Co.'s first in-house hybrid will go into an Infiniti, and Ford Motor Co. and General Motors have focused on hybrid SUVs and pickups.

Honda's biggest hybrid is the Civic. And in the future, it's all about getting smaller.

Next year, Honda will launch a hybrid that will be smaller than the Civic. After that, an even smaller sports hybrid, the CR-Z, arrives. Around 2012, a hybrid Fit will be added.

Any chance of revisiting the Accord Hybrid or rolling out something bigger?

"Not in the near future," says Kato.

Honda is still stinging from the lackluster sales of its Accord Hybrid, which featured a V-6 gasoline engine and was pulled at the end of the 2007 model year.

Kato says hybrid systems are best used in small cars because small hybrids most often are used for city driving, where regenerative braking constantly recharges the batteries.

"Cars that drive stop-and-go are most suitable to hybrid technology," Kato said.

The first test for its hybrid strategy comes in April, when Honda launches its highly anticipated dedicated hybrid to take on the Prius. The car will be priced below the Prius -- and, not surprisingly, it will be smaller.

(Source: Automotive News)

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
4 versions of Fiat 500 here in '11
One mile, two cars, high speeds
Fisker's good Karma
BMW 7 Series gets xDrive, M Sport package
Bad Ass American Rides Pt. 4: '68 Dodge Charger on a Test Drive
Automakers scrap diesel plans
F-150 jet truck, all it needs is wings
BMW X1 confirmed for United States in 2011
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by the_iceman September 6, 2008 6:59 AM PDT
I'm ok w/ smaller if it means killer mpg's. It's the 21st century now and we Americans need to downsize & think in terms of better efficiency & better for the environment. Gone should be the days of a bus sized SUV that fits 17. Since we consume the most, spend the most, and pollute the most on earth, we will need to change the most. Cleaner tech. & energy independence is of critical importance today.
Reply to this comment
by bigmc6000 September 9, 2008 4:38 AM PDT
Energy independence will only come with electric cars - not hybrids. Hybrids still burn gasoline. We're already independent in terms of electricity but we're going to need more to meet the demands of the electric car (read GM's Volt). While consumer vehicles are switching over to electricity based I'd expect commercial vehicles to begin the switch to LNG or CNG and eventually when the right tech is out there for semi's to run on batteries they'll be switched over as well. Hybrids are, let's face it, the past. If you want to get ahead in this game you need to come out with a vehicle that can get you to work and back without burning a single ounce of gas.

Also, if you need to take 17 people somewhere it's far more efficient to take a bus than it is to take 4 or 5 separate vehicles...
by pjcamp September 6, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
I remember back in the first gas crisis, in the 70's, being able to buy things like the GEO Metro that got 50+ mpg. It is stunning to me that all this sophisticated hybrid technology seems to be unable to top that, or even match it. Even the Prius only gets 44.
Reply to this comment
by kant104 September 7, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
those cars did not have near the safety mechanisms, near the body structure, near the handling, near the power, near the breaking that modern cars have. Nor did they have near the space. Honda could produce a car that got 50+, so could everyone, but it would be a lot less car. It's all about weight and performance.
by solitare_pax September 6, 2008 4:36 PM PDT
Honda is heading in the right direction - most cars have only a driver in them, so may as well make them smaller, more fuel efficient. The trouble is we expect all the luxuries - air conditioning standard, a full car stereo - that takes up weight and power. Maybe Honda should talk to Sony and Apple to cram more bang into their cars electronics-wise?
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo September 7, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
Thank God I got to own a Camaro with a bored/stroked 454 with a blower and dual quads !!! These new cars are SO BORING !
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo September 7, 2008 2:47 PM PDT
Smoke the tires at 80 MPH...Check !
by CallMeMike September 7, 2008 9:39 PM PDT
This story is abysmal for it's lack of details. So allow me to fill in a couple of the most interesting blanks.

The hybrid coming around March/April from Honda is the new Insight. You can check it out on Honda's page under future cars. It's going to start at around $18,500, and here's the best part... word is that it's going to get somewhere along the lines of 60-70 mpg.

Yes, you read that last part correctly.

In other words, hop on that waiting list now folks, because that thing is gonna FLY "off the shelves."
Reply to this comment
by ferretboy88 September 8, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
Thanks for the info. You should have just written the article.
by bigmc6000 September 9, 2008 4:33 AM PDT
Dear Honda,
The future is not in hybrids - the future is in things like the Chevy Volt (and whatever Mitsubishi and Ford are calling their electric cars). I honestly don't care about great gas mileage when in just over a year there's going to be a car out there for about 35k that 350 days of the year isn't going to need a drop of gasoline to run. The hybrids are simply a stop-gap to things like the Volt so I really, really hope you're on top of this because for the first time in a long time if you don't have something to counter the Volt you're going to be behind an American company in terms of embracing technology. Personally, I will never buy another non-electric vehicle. My current vehicle should last me until, at least, 2015 at which point I will be buying the Sport Utility version of the Volt. I don't know what company I'm going to be buying it from but if you're still pushing hybrids it certainly won't be you...
Reply to this comment
by purcell429 September 9, 2008 9:45 AM PDT
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHH..... my god your hilarious!! The Volt? The Volt? Really? My god, when will people realize that this is just a sham marketing ploy. Ok, wow, an electric car that gets a 40 mile range. It takes 10 hours to recharge, so you'll have to use that extra motor if you want to drive for more than an hour. And oh yeah: "The Volt is expected to get 50 mpg (US) (4.7 L/100 km) if the battery is discharged". Wow. I'm soooo impressed.

Oh yeah, also: The Volt was targeted to cost around US$30,000. As of April 2008, General Motors Vice Chairman of Global Product Development Robert Lutz was quoted as saying that the realistic unsubsidised price had risen to US$48,000[46][47], that he reckoned that US$40,000 might be possible, without making any profit, and that only government tax incentives could take the price tag nearer to US$30,000. When asked directly about the price later, Lutz indicated that this was a misquote - and said "The answer is that we don?t know."

And a sport Utility volt?? So what, you'll make it to the end of your driveway before the battery runs out? No thanks. Give me a car that gets 75mpg for the entire time I drive it.

Also: "GM expects ten years of life out of the batteries."
So, good luck with that.

Hell, if you want a real plug in hybrid, get an Aptera. 40-60 mile Range, but better gas milage:

"An asymptotic decaying exponential is an accurate way to describe the fuel mileage of the Typ-1h. For example driving say, 50 miles, one might calculate a MPG number that's 2 or 3 times higher, say, 1000 MPG. As battery energy is depleted, the frequency of the engine duty cycle is increased. More fuel is used at 75 miles, the MPG might be closer to 400 MPG. Again, we're using battery energy mostly, but turning the engine on more and more. Just over 100 miles we're just over 300 MPG, and just beyond 120 miles, we're around 300 MPG."

http://www.aptera.com/

Now don't get me wrong. I agree with you that hybrids are just a stopgap measure. But what i'm saying is that battery technology needs to improve by leaps and bounds before an electric car will be useful for more than driving 10 miles each way to work or picking up groceries. And the Volt isn't going to solve GM's problems when they build 10,000 a year and then sell them at a loss. And as far as the article is concerned, why in god's name don't they take the hybrid drive train they are cramming into GIant Pick up Trucks, and Massive SUV's, and stick them in the Aveo! My god, that little econobox would sell like crazy if it Got 50-60 mpg! Honda has the hybrid strategy right. The shift to smaller cars is happening, and it helps to make the most efficient ones you can. Have fun waiting for that all-electric Suburban.
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics