• On MovieTome: The next Marvel mutant movie?
September 16, 2008 5:15 PM PDT

New York offers RFID-embedded driver's licenses

by Antuan Goodwin

File this one under "driver tech" instead of "car tech." The State of New York has started offering driver's licenses embedded with RFID chips, or enhanced driver's licenses (EDLs). The news comes on the heels of New York becoming the second state to offer identification that can be shown at the border in lieu of a U.S. passport (which is also RFID-embedded).

New York Enhanced Driver's License (Credit: New York DMV)

The radio frequency identification chip in the EDL will be able to be scanned by authorities to identify citizens entering the state from Canada, Mexico, or the Caribbean. Intercontinental travelers will still need to produce a passport to enter the country.

Authorities say no personal information will be stored or transmitted by the chip, only an identification number. Those who don't necessarily trust the powers that be can opt for a standard license, which doesn't work as a passport, or look into getting an RFID-blocking wallet and an aluminum foil hat.

The new EDLs will be available at a $30 premium over the standard $50 licensing fee. If you think $80 is a lot for a driver's license, consider that the cost of a standard New York license plus that of a United States passport is about $150.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
143: Ford puts airbags where? Hybrid Humvees, and a ride in the X5 M.
Award-winning tech at the 2009 SEMA Show
Peugeot's funny, little, electric concept
Dartz Kombat T-98 vs. Hummer H-1
Denso eyes standard hybrid parts
Rolls Royce Drophead, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano spotted in Paris
Tuners embrace Hyundai Genesis at SEMA
Matte black Lexus LF-A is stealthy super car
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Dr_Zinj September 17, 2008 7:16 AM PDT
PULEEEEZE!

In order for an ID number to be of use, the border patrol would need a live database of all citizens ID numbers. If that's the ONLY information they have, then anyone could dup the number onto a fake ID and enter the country.

You want to authorize the reentry of people who belong in this country, then take a photo, or fingerprint set as they leave, and store it centrally for live access by any border patrol station. Have them compare with person when they come back and after readmittance, destroy the record. If we could ensure the feds weren't using the record for any other purpose, and once not needed, destroyed, that would preserve everyone's privacy issues.
Reply to this comment
by crusadex September 17, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
You know that every state is being mandated to register drivers in national database and have them checked against terror lists etc.
by archaicforest September 17, 2008 7:39 AM PDT
The comment "look into getting an RFID-blocking wallet and an aluminum foil hat" is highly offensive. Identity theft is rampant; banks and government sites get hacked weekly. It is entirely possible that the RFID signal can be stolen and used by unscrupulous people. This has happened and will continue to happen despite the best efforts of security gurus to try to prevent this.
Reply to this comment
by irfan_bugmenot September 17, 2008 7:59 AM PDT
[sarcasm] Why don't they just the put the ID number into your arm? [/sarcasm]

It doesn't take much to go from homeland security to police state. And I'm not just being paranoid. I have world history on my side. It's happened other places before (still is in some places) and it could happen here too.
Reply to this comment
by irfan_bugmenot September 17, 2008 7:59 AM PDT
[sarcasm] Why don't they just the put the ID number into your arm? [/sarcasm]

It doesn't take much to go from homeland security to police state. And I'm not just being paranoid. I have world history on my side. It's happened other places before (still is in some places) and it could happen here too.
Reply to this comment
by Mr304 September 18, 2008 9:07 AM PDT
your sarcasm is actually right. It's coming soon, well it's already been done but it'll be world wide in a hot minute. WATCH... cuz their watching u
by irfan_bugmenot September 17, 2008 8:00 AM PDT
Sorry about that I clicked back in the browser and then forward again.
Reply to this comment
by mad1111 September 17, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
Let's just give them a fourescent stamp on the tops of the hands like they do at Disneyland!!! hahaha (just warn them not to wash it off!!!)
Reply to this comment
by unquenchablefire September 17, 2008 8:16 AM PDT
I agree. The comment about tinfoil hats ignores something that has been known in the tech world for years: RFID is in no way secure. All the way back in 2005 security researchers were showing how easy it was to clone someone else's RFID Speedpass. With identity theft as it is today, do you really want personal info on something that easily hackable?
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 September 17, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
RFIDshield is what you need. You decide when the shield is on or off. The Manhattan2 Project had this out years ago. Selectable detection. Keep the choice in your hands! Sensible Ventures in energy, safety, and exploration. Email us if you want to learn more.
Reply to this comment
by crusadex September 17, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
I dout it will be long before RFID is deemed a risk and more personal RFID stratgeis are used.There are companies working on RFID infused paint and even RFID infused DNA.Can't get more personal than that.
Lot's of plans for rfid's on cars, toll roads etc....
Here we go.but exactly where is that.
Reply to this comment
by bruceslog September 17, 2008 1:34 PM PDT
"Authorities say no personal information will be stored or transmitted by the chip, only an identification number. "
Are these the same 'authorities' who told us that Iraq attacked us in 2001 ? ( It was Bin Laden )
Or that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction stockpiled to use against us ? ( We never could find them - cause they weren't there )

And you believe every single thing they feed to you without question, don't you ?
No wonder the Nation is in such a crappy shape today.
Reply to this comment
by AnonTip September 17, 2008 5:30 PM PDT
CNET has been one of the most respected sources of information during the most massive build-out of government surveillance in history, especially with the impressively comprehensive and insightful articles from staff members such as Declan McCullagh.

Antuan Goodwin's superficial, moronic comments about "foil hats" are an utterly amazing, amateurish contrast that dimishes the respect for CNET as a whole. The fact that CNET managment apparently supports such trivialzed, whimsical treatment of what many/most of their readers consider to be one of the most compelling issues of our generation only encourages their readers to drop CNET from their list and instead rely on WIRED.

Antuan should go back to operating the slurpee machine at 7-11, which no doubt is probably the crowning achievement of his prior "credentials" as a reporter...
Reply to this comment
by Mr304 September 18, 2008 9:04 AM PDT
what the hell are these people doing can't they see that this is just another way too "track your every move" your not even being identified by name any more " YOUR A NUMBER" no more Mr. or Mrs.... its "Hello 10029896" thats crazy. WAKE UP AMERICA
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics