• On last.fm: Free iPhone/iTouch Streaming Radio App
October 21, 2008 9:22 AM PDT

Driving the Ford hydrogen fuel cell Focus

by Carey Russ
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments
Share

Last week I had the opportunity to drive Ford's latest hydrogen fuel cell vehicle. Based on a Focus sedan, it was remarkable for being unremarkable in operation during my maybe 5-mile test drive on city streets. The interior was devoid of the obviously added-in cables, specialized instrumentation, and switches of an engineering prototype, and the car was exceptionally smooth in operation--not surprising, considering that with an electric motor, a transmission is not required. It wasn't completely quiet, as the compressor for the fuel cell's hydrogen system made a whine like a jet engine on the taxiway, but that was not particularly loud or annoying, and actually added to the future-tech experience.

The Ford hydrogen fuel cell Focus is based on a Focus sedan.

(Credit: Carey Russ)

An electric motor makes its maximum amount of torque as soon as it starts to rotate, which means excellent acceleration characteristics, especially for city driving. Regenerative braking, also used in hybrids, increases braking efficiency while recharging the battery pack--and yes, fuel-cell vehicles generally use battery packs, both to store excess energy and have an extra source for use when needed. Driving the fuel cell Focus was no different from driving a gasoline-electric hybrid like an Escape Hybrid or Toyota Prius, except, of course, that there was no internal combustion engine starting and stopping at any time. So it was a little smoother, and even quieter. Such a car would make an excellent commute vehicle. There was plenty of power available for any driving necessity at the under-40 mph speeds attained during the test drive.

The fuel cell Focus is the latest in a long line of experimental vehicles.

(Credit: Carey Russ)

If you're wondering when Ford will have a fuel cell vehicle for sale, or even beta-test lease, don't hold your breath. As refined and civilized as the fuel cell Focus sedan was, it's merely the latest in a long line of experimental vehicles. Fuel cells are still expensive items, and the hydrogen storage tank is prohibitively expensive, made of machined aluminum several inches thick, then covered with carbon-fiber mesh for further protection and containment if, somehow, a hole was made in the aluminum. Plus, as the Ford representative said, emergency crews need to be trained to deal with hydrogen-vehicle accidents. Ford is seeing to that, as is the California Fuel Cell Partnership.

Ford is on the conservative end of the fuel cell spectrum while Honda is aggressive, with leased Clarity FCXes running around Los Angeles right now. But while Honda is undoubtedly learning much about the real-world behavior and usefulness of fuel cell vehicles with the Clarity program, the cynic in me would bet that the $600/month lease cost comes nowhere near paying for the production, let alone R&D, costs. When the Toyota FCHV was shown at Challenge Bibendum at Sears Point/Infineon Raceway back in 2003, a company spokesman mentioned that it was a "million-dollar" vehicle. Questioned as to how that figure was arrived at, he candidly replied the the number was essentially pulled out of a hat because "no vehicle accounting system can tell the truth because there are so many variables," according to my notes from that time.

The fuel cell Focus is far from Ford's first attempt. It's not even the first Ford fuel cell vehicle I've driven. That honor goes to a much rougher engineering prototype, based, if I recall correctly, also on a Focus, back when the California Fuel Cell Partnership facility in West Sacramento opened in 2000. That car was chock-full of cables, instrumentation, switches, and Ford engineers. It ran, but the newer model has more power, runs more smoothly, and runs for longer distances. Even then, the most optimistic estimate of fuel cell vehicle availability was eight to ten years, and then for experimental fleet use. And here we are, as the Honda Clarity fleet is really still an experimental one, not the first, and unlikely to be the last. A refueling infrastructure is necessary, and that, too, is slowly developing.

Fuel cells are not exactly new technology. The idea has been around since the 1830s, with functional examples first used more than 100 years later, in the late 1950s. NASA's Gemini and Apollo space capsules had fuel cells for electrical power, as do the space shuttles. NASA's budget is a little bigger than yours...and a fuel cell was the best solution for that application. The water produced as a byproduct is astronaut drinking water.

Will fuel cells be the power of the future, or will new developments in battery technology make them a technological dead end? Interesting times...

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Lincoln MKT proves hard to leave
The 2010 Lotus Evora: An everyday driver?
Sanyo sees big growth in batteries
Top 10 most popular GPS devices of 2009
New Chevy Volt jingle
Taking a 2010 Porsche Boxster Spyder on the road
Lexus boss: LF-Ch hybrid good for U.S.
Top 10 at Car Tech: Readers' choice
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by only_truth October 22, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
Absolutely fuel cells are the future. Battery solutions cannot have the refueling infrastructure that can be ascertained from pumping in liquid gasoline to an empty tank or gaseous hydrogen to be adsorbed in a fuel cell. Electricity requires a charging process that limits it to local commuting vehicles. While that is fine, and most likely an inexpensive version of what's to come and be more realistic, it cannot on its own replace the standard of today's automotive transportation. The only way for gasoline stations to survive the transition is for them to remain in their current locations and adapt to providing a new fuel. No one can wait for hours at a fueling station, therefore hydrogen fuel cells are the most plausible. Despite all the energy losses that necessarily results in a hydrogen economy, it's the only way to maintain the infrastructure of refueling stations and allow cross-country travel of significant distances.
Reply to this comment
by the_iceman October 22, 2008 10:59 AM PDT
Hydrogen & Electric vehicles are the long time solution for sure. They are clean technologies, which our planet needs right now. The main barrier to hydrogen's success will be the necessary infrastructure of getting pumps installed nationwide. I'm happy to see an American car company making progress.

For now however, we should be continuing to improve hybrid technology (plug-in & diesel) & natural gas (CNG), which are the short term solutions for transportation.
Reply to this comment
by tg_iv October 22, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
I have no interest in retaining the inefficient gasoline fueling infrastructure that currently have. Our new energy solution must involve more re-fueling at home (electrical and CNG) and fewer fueling stations on the road. These fewer stations could be much more quickly retro-fitted for bio fuels than hydrogen. We can have a massive infusion of "Plug-in hybrids" similar to the Volt idea that burn bio fuels within this decade. No one believes the Hydrogen revolution will happen in less than 20 years.

It may be necessary for fueling stations to go through a double transition, but we definitely can't wait for Hydrogen to begin transitioning to fewer fueling stations because of increased home fueling.
Reply to this comment
by only_truth October 23, 2008 8:49 AM PDT
Biofuels simply will not work. It is absolutely foolish to assume that we can generate our own fuels by relying on our climate, our soil, and the entire environment. As more and more idiots invest their time and money into researching biofuels, we are destroying valuble sources of food and delusioning ourselves into beleiving we can rely on our crippled environment for energy independence and climate-change reversal. People starve all across the globe every day despite the American government subsidizing farms to grow less food to balance out the economy. As far as developing biofuels from organic wastes and other non-food stores, that will be a valuble assist in the move to energy independence, but it cannot be the sole supplier.
by eglazier October 22, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
i worked at the Direct Energy Conversion Operation at GE-lynn, mass. in the early 1960s. at that time, with the use of the GE fuels cells for gemini, we thought that fuel cells for practical use were just around the corner. it is now 50 years later and still there are none in everyday use. though there are certainly many problems involved in turning this research product into a daily-used item, one would have thought that after all this time the problems would have been solved. i suspect no one really cared.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics