• On mySimon: Bacon Soap
April 2, 2009 4:00 PM PDT

Test-driving the Nissan EV-02 electric car

by Antuan Goodwin
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 23 comments

Nissan EV-02 (Credit: Antuan Goodwin/CNET)

Nissan invited us out to take a spin in its EV-02 electric car prototype. While we were there, Mark Perry, director of product planning for Nissan North America, chatted us up about Nissan's plans to bring a zero tailpipe emissions electric vehicle to American roads as early as 2010.

Like all automakers, Nissan is under pressure from government regulators to reduce CO2 emissions by 90 percent by 2050. While Perry stated that Nissan does have plans of bringing a hybrid vehicle to the market soon (potentially a plug-in), he also made it clear that Nissan views electric vehicles as the only way to meet emissions requirements. This is where the EV-02 comes in. The key, according to Perry, to making the promise of EV-02 a reality lies in the battery tech and the recharging infrastructure.

EV-02 uses a laminated lithium ion battery tech that crams twice the power and twice the range of more conventional lithium ion batteries into a package that's half the size and half the weight. The battery was developed by Nissan in partnership with semiconductor manufacturer NEC. Nissan will most likely use this same battery tech in its upcoming hybrid.

EV-02 IC

In place of a tachometer, the EV-02 features a big battery meter.

(Credit: Antuan Goodwin/CNET)

The EV-02--and, by extension, the future electric vehicle it will inspire--features an SAE standard charging system that relocates the bulk of the recharging circuitry onboard to allow for simpler, universal charging stations. The charging station utilizes 220-volt power to recharge the EV from 0-100 percent in about 4 hours. The industry-standard charging station will need to be hard-wired to the grid, necessitating an electrician's installation. Nissan is working with the over 3,000 electric utilities providers nationwide to work out the details of how exactly in-home installations will work and at what cost to consumers.

According to Perry, electric vehicles are 60 percent cleaner than gasoline equivalents, even if the grid is 100 percent coal-fired. Since many grids are not completely coal-powered and will see more renewable power sources in the future, as government regulations put the green squeeze on utilities, that 60 percent will only get better.

The EV-02 can be charged at standard 110-volt outlets, but the charge time is considerably longer (about 14 hours) and Nissan sees this as a less-than-ideal emergency-only option. There is also a 480-volt rapid-charge option that can bring the battery up to 80 percent capacity in as little as 26 minutes. Nissan expects roadside service stations to adopt this more expensive--but much more convenient--offering, empowering drivers to take the EV-02 on longer trips. Home users are expected to stick with the 4-hour charging cycle, because of its low cost (about 90 cents per full charge) and low strain on the electrical grid.

Nissan EV-02

The EV-02 is a preview of what we can expect from Nissan's 2010 electric vehicle.

(Credit: Antuan Goodwin/CNET)

Once fully charged, the EV-02 will run for an estimated 100 miles before depleting its battery. The EV-02 mule we tested was a retrofitted right-hand-drive Nissan Cube. The drivetrain was whisper quiet. Nissan tuned the mule for economy and restricted us to a closed course with a Nissan chaperone, so we weren't able shred the tires with instant-on torque. Still, we were quite impressed with the linear acceleration exhibited by the EV-02, and its willingness to move .

Nissan plans to offer a vehicle based on the technology present in the EV-02 within 18 months. The vehicle would be unique in design, compact, and 99-percent recyclable, including the batteries. Perry promised that the vehicle would come at no price premium (sitting somewhere in the $20 to 30,000 price range), seat five passengers, and be available with the full gamut of advanced safety features and premium amenities (including GPS, premium audio, cruise control, heated seats, etc.). The vehicle would be eligible for the $7,500 green car tax credit and, with an operating cost below $0.04 per mile, would be cheaper to run than a gasoline vehicle even if gas drops to $1.10 per gallon.

The sole compromise that Perry let slip is that the vehicles will be optimized for the climate in which they are sold, meaning EVs sold in cold climes will feature boosted heat and crippled air conditioning, with hot climates receiving the opposite treatment. This setup sounds a little weird, but we'll wait and see how it works out.

Nissan hopes a lower entry cost, lower operating cost, and immense green cred will create the perfect storm to push electric-vehicle adoption past that of hybrids and into the mainstream.

The vehicle will be available for purchase by the public in various U.S. markets as early as 2010, depending on the regional adoption of the charging infrastructure. Current partnerships include the State of Tennessee, the State of Oregon, parts of California (Sonoma County and the San Diego metro area) and the Tucson, Ariz. metro area.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
BMW debuts the new 5-series online
GoPro HD Hero Motorsports sacrifices simplicity for flexibility
On the production line with the 2010 Porsche Panamera
Infiniti quality effort features a woman's touch
Xtreme Mustang: Verts in a concrete jungle
Google Maps Navigation arrives for Android 1.6
Some BMWs will get four-cylinder engines
The 2010 Panamera: Porsche goes sedan?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by cjmoisan April 2, 2009 4:46 PM PDT
I am very excited about this car. Hopefully enough 3rd parties will agree to an industry standard for charging stations so other large car manufacturers can easily follow in Nissan's footsteps. I hope the price will be closer to $20,000 so maybe between paying for school, and other expenses I can afford this thing!!!
Reply to this comment
by Sc0rPs April 12, 2009 3:21 AM PDT
Factor in the money you won't need for oil changes & gas. :)
by markb1967 April 3, 2009 7:29 AM PDT
Too bad they are still playing catch up with the 1990's GM EV-1. GM and Toyota could have been the biggest richest car makers in the world today if they would have continued development of their electric vehicles in the 90's. And Consumers today would have electric cars that get 300+ miles per charge instead of this 100+ that is promised. And maybe our country wouldn't be so screwed if we were off the oil and gasoline.
Reply to this comment
by yanchineseguy April 3, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
I just saw one of the EV-1s in an auto museum last week. It is smaller, only seats 2, and the lead-acid batteries are huge, leaving basically no trunk room. Also, due the location of the batteries, the "trunk" is only accessible behind the seats. It was cool to see it, though.
by ppgreat April 3, 2009 8:08 AM PDT
Reducing emissions by 90% by 2050? Try 2020. The technology is available to make this happen in the next 10 years, not the next 40. The government needs to rework its regs, especially in light of the current global economic climate, to make this a priority. It benefits everyone.
Reply to this comment
by cnet-og April 3, 2009 8:57 AM PDT
'Reducing emissions by 90% by 2050? Try 2020. The technology is available to make this happen in the next 10 years, not the next 40...'

This merely displaces CO2 emissions, from the tailpipe to the power plant. Currently, the amount of CO2 emitted per mile for gas cars is similar to that of electric vehicles (don't believe me, do some searching... I did this about a year ago and was disappointed to see that kg of CO2 per mile was nearly equal). The big problem is energy: Where do we get it? Whether it's petro or coal (power plants), both are bad. Other sources are needed: nuclear + wind + hydro + solar + coal + gas... Ideally we will minimize (and eliminate?) coal and gas over time. Until we reduce coal fired power plants, ~green~ electric vehicles are not green at all, just less brown.
by tcr071 April 3, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
No, it is not possible. The US does not currently have the power infrastructure for entire fleets of electric vehicles. Until we make some real headway with renewable energy we will just be shifting the cost from the pump to the grid. Not really gaining anything.
by willdryden April 3, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
I'll take one at $20,000. and they can forget the 240V charging. 120V will work fine. All I need to do is charge it every third day instead of once a week.
Reply to this comment
by regulator1956 April 3, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
Just plug it in every night and never worry.
by regulator1956 April 3, 2009 1:22 PM PDT
"that the vehicles will be optimized for the climate"

Like for Chicago; 90 to -9

Like for Los Angeles; 95 in the valley, 10 in the hills.
Reply to this comment
by zeekaustin April 4, 2009 1:49 PM PDT
Chicago gets nasty heat waves with 100+ temperatures for days on end. Deadly stuff.
by tadbittipsy April 3, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
This thing is a huge box on wheels... but where's the solar panels on the top??? Why aren't more car companies looking toward self charging vehicles. If I could get 25 more miles on a charge because my car sat in the sun all day, I'd be happy and it would use nothing from the grid... aka coal power.
Reply to this comment
by carlhage April 3, 2009 6:58 PM PDT
The reason there aren't solar panels on the top is there isn't much area there (though more on this car than others), and if the car isn't in the sun, the solar panel isn't useful, so why add weight and cost. A car solar panel would only get a few extra miles per day at best. On the other hand, it could be parked in the shade under a solar covered carport, where there is much more area and can be placed where there is no shade no matter where the car is. A carport (or parking lot) has enough area per car to generate typical use for an EV. However, it's still better to charge the car overnight and use the solar panel to reduce peak demand during the day. The purpose of solar panels on a Prius, etc. is to run the air conditioner not to charge the battery.
by zeekaustin April 4, 2009 1:47 PM PDT
Solar manufacturers have a lot of work to do in the efficiency area before solar panels convert enough energy per square inch of surface area to make a rooftop solar panel dent the charge level of an automotive-sized battery pack. You could probably charge your laptop battery or run a small fan to exhaust heat from the car (I think toyota is doing this) while it is parked.
by PoiDog2 April 3, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
Hold up a minute... Let's think this through. Nissan and all you other manufacturers that are in the process of creating battery-powered cars: Standardize the batteries and make them easily removable!! That way you can create an industry that takes discharged batteries and, for about the cost of about the price of a tankful of gasoline, exchange it for a fully charged one! No waiting 26 minutes, four hours or 14 hours for a battery to be recharged! Problem solved. Send your patent royalty payments to me via CNET. And thanks.
Reply to this comment
by paperlessme April 29, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
No question about it. However, historically, efforts to "Standardize" have brought us at least 31 flavors and royalty payments to the greedy...
by Dalmatian28 April 3, 2009 7:29 PM PDT
Even my grandma will come up with electric car before GM, Ford and Chrysler do. This just shows how "retarded" they really are. Instead of giving them a bailout, US government should buy Tesla or Fisker and just give them technology so that those retards can catch up with everyone else.
Reply to this comment
by spothannah April 4, 2009 4:20 AM PDT
I live in Kansas and we have lots of wind. (Not just hot air.) If you had a wind turbine small enough to fit in your yard, could you charge this vehicle or am I just thinking pie in the sky stuff. I don't know the energy or economics of this. Just wondering.
Reply to this comment
by zeekaustin April 4, 2009 1:44 PM PDT
You'd most likely charge a bank of batteries with the turbine and then discharge the batteries into the car (this way it's not wasting as much energy while the car isn't charging but the wind is blowing).
by zeekaustin April 4, 2009 1:50 PM PDT
Bring it on Nissan - I love the competition that is developing in this (future) market segment. May the best product win.
Reply to this comment
by jemiller0 April 29, 2009 6:52 PM PDT
I like the way they named it the EV2. Now, if idiotic GM ever really does decide to create another fully electric vehicle the name will already be taken. Of course GM probably doesn't want to remind people of the EV1 anyways and how they squandered what could have been.
Reply to this comment
by vanraj1 May 17, 2009 8:37 PM PDT
nice posting.
Reply to this comment
by keyless1967 November 2, 2009 9:04 AM PST
i hear i these talks, wishing we can benifit of these vehicals. but there three words that`s stoped all this from happening,and may keep it from happening ...greed! power! respect!
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics