• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
April 23, 2009 5:30 PM PDT

2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid first look

by Wayne Cunningham

Ford Fusion Hybrid

Ford's new Fusion Hybrid drives better than we expected.

(Credit: CNET)

After seeing the Fusion Hybrid at the 2008 Los Angeles Auto Show, we've wanted to find out how it drives. This week we finally got the chance, and found it one of the best cars coming out this year. In fact, we find it far better than the 2010 Honda Insight or 2010 Toyota Prius. Although it might come up a little short for fuel economy, the driving experience is so much better, while the cabin technology is unparalleled.

The car's 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is aided by a full hybrid system, giving it a net 191 horsepower. That number becomes plain when you drive the Fusion Hybrid and compare it with its hybrid competitors. But this story isn't all about power--the Fusion Hybrid delivers it seamlessly, and performs the hand-off from electric to gas without fuss. The car can purportedly get up to 47 mph under electric power alone, a figure we will test in the full review. Fuel economy is rated at 41 mpg city and 36 mpg highway.

Ford uses its Lincoln and Mercury brand for more upscale models, and the Fusion Hybrid gets a sister in the Milan Hybrid, but we didn't feel the cabin of the Fusion Hybrid lacked for luxury. Leather seats and a leather-wrapped steering wheel enhanced this feeling, but quality fit and finish anchored it. There are plastics on dash and doors, but they are the soft kind.

Ford Fusion Hybrid SmartGauge

The SmartGauge is an innovative LCD instrument cluster.

(Credit: CNET)


What really sets the Fusion Hybrid apart from other cars on the road is its instrument cluster, a customizable LCD featuring well-designed graphics to let you know how the car is performing. There are four presets showing different types of virtual gauges and information. We found it easy to switch between different modes without having to consult a manual. There is really nothing like it on the road, and we applaud Ford for taking such a bold step, which will surely get some backlash from purists who favor analog gauges. But those people probably wouldn't be interested in a hybrid, anyway.

For the last couple of years, we've been praising Ford's cabin technology, most of which is available in the Fusion Hybrid. That means an optional hard drive-based navigation system integrated with Sirius Travel Link, letting you find gas prices, avoid traffic congestion, get weather alerts, and even look for movie times. And Sync, which provides an excellent connection for MP3 players and cell phones, comes standard. Ford also has several new technologies available in the Fusion Hybrid, such as a blind spot warning system.

Our short drive in the Fusion Hybrid has us eagerly anticipating a longer review period with the car.

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $27,625.00
View the latest prices for 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Award-winning tech at the 2009 SEMA Show
Peugeot's funny, little, electric concept
Dartz Kombat T-98 vs. Hummer H-1
Denso eyes standard hybrid parts
Rolls Royce Drophead, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano spotted in Paris
Tuners embrace Hyundai Genesis at SEMA
Matte black Lexus LF-A is stealthy super car
2010 BMW X5 earns its M badge
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (43 Comments)
by bakedpatato April 23, 2009 6:07 PM PDT
O.M.G. if sync wasn't bad enough,that panel is even more geekasm. at least I can see the pr0n-ish stats of the Prius panel w/o taking my eyes off the road. kudos Ford.
this car is serious business. This kind of thinking is why Ford doesn't need bailout funds.
yeah I'm with you, I want to see a full review.
more pictures or this there an embargo?
Reply to this comment
by jcombalicer April 23, 2009 6:08 PM PDT
http://ashinomori.blogspot.com/2009/04/cold-fusion-ever-so-hot-science.html

I wish this cold fusion technology could power our car in the future.
Reply to this comment
by net40 April 23, 2009 6:30 PM PDT
Any foreign car can get 38mpg already. I was expecting a Ford hybrid could do much better, after all its been under development for nigh on 40 years now. Other people are hooked to the Ford logo like its a church I guess. I just want fuel efficiency ... this century.
Reply to this comment
by Tiburon-JT April 23, 2009 7:43 PM PDT
Your first sentence is incorrect. I am so sick of people talking about foreign vehicles getting great mileage and domestic vehicles getting horrible mileage without knowing the facts. Detroit obviously still has a huge perception problem. Looking at EPA estimates, since that is what the Fusion MPG numbers are, you will see that the Fusion easily beats the Camry Hybrid by 8 mpg in the city and Altima Hybrid by 6 mpg in the city and beats the regular gas versions of both even more (beats the gas Camry by 20 mpg in the city). Try looking at EPA estimates for 2009 at fueleconomy.gov (2010 estimates are not out yet). The Fusion Hybrid even beats the Civic (small car) hybrid in city mileage.

Ford Fusion Hybrid 41/36
Nissan Altima Hybrid 35 city/33 highway
Toyota Camry Hybrid 33/34
by Mr. Dogers2U April 23, 2009 7:47 PM PDT
ANY foreign car? This is a decent sized 4 door sedan with all the required safety crap. You obviously have no idea how much energy it takes to move a vehicle down the road. Want fuel econmy, get a 125cc moped.
by bsharkey April 23, 2009 9:00 PM PDT
yeah OK moron... go ahead post the names of all those foreign cars, any of which get 38mpg+

what a stupid stupid statement.
by kltron April 24, 2009 5:34 AM PDT
Moron? OK, I'll be that moron: My Civic (1.8L 5-speed, non hybrid) returned just over 39mpg in its first year. It'll do 41+ in the warmer weather.

By "foreign car" I am assuming that net40 means the little jobbies they scoot around Europe in. Americans just wouldn't be happy in a lot of them. Many Europeans have such a different view of their vehicles: In Europe a car is just transport, whereas in America the car is a statement. So Americans can't drive an Opel unless GM brings it here, slaps in a huge engine, raises the horsepower, kills the gas mileage, and raises the price (which they do for one of the Saturns). Something is wrong there.

Do we "need" more than 68 horsepower? Maybe...A Geo Metro has trouble in a headwind on the highway, and in America highways are a reality. So maybe we in America can start accepting a little over 100 horses as in the Insight with higher horsepower for work vehicles that need to tow. But that's a cultural shift I do not see happening.
by jz33040 June 24, 2009 9:38 PM PDT
Yes, your honda may get 39mpg highway, but the Ford Fusion is more car. More room, more safety features, more modern, more comforts and more functionality and it beats your car by a lot in city driving. So trying to stick up for the guy who said, "any foreign car can get 38mpg already" is a bit of a weak argument. Also the car you are talking about can't even compare when you count city driving. Not to mention it's a pointless comparison considering it lacks the modern design of the newer non-hybrid civics which already get lower gas millage. And if it's an older one, then it's really lacking. The older ones remind me of what high school or college kids drive around. And if they get hit, they get squashed faster than the beer cans they drink out of.. Don't get me wrong. The honda civic is a great car in a sense, but you can't fairly compare it to the fusion here as there are some differences.

IN fact you can't really compare it to a modern 2009 or 2010 Honda Civic either. The reason is that newer Honda Civics get poorer gas millage because they have modern safety equipment in them which weighs things down. So the 2009 isn't really doing as hot unless it's the hybrid. Also don't forget the Fusion is also a full foot longer which does mean something since the civic is nearly too small. Car manufacturers try to make them smaller and smaller until the point people start to hate them. That's why it's good to have the extra foot. Point is they said the original guy was a moron for making it sound like any foreign car was as just as good. They aren't and the Fusion clearly has some advantages that have never been seen before.

In the future, I don't expect cars to make huge leaps in economy beyond 40 to 45mpg. At least until they come out with some new invention. Then it won't be a typical hybrid anymore. But they have managed to get a little more room and did good on the gas millage which is an improvement.
by SlimGem April 23, 2009 6:33 PM PDT
Attractive design - looks European. And expensive. At least it's not a hybrid SUV.
Reply to this comment
by bsharkey April 23, 2009 8:58 PM PDT
to say it comes up short in fuel economy is almost comical if it weren't so dumb. not only is the Fusion hybrid the highest-rated midsize sedan for fuel economy (approx 5mpg ahead of the Camry, and also the Altima) it's not a direct competitor to the Prius "hybrid only" models so to give them higher marks for slightly better mileage is ignorant (or disingenuous or both).

at least you gave it high marks besides that, and noted that it's a better car all around than the others you mistakenly compared it to. but that also justifies the somewhat higher pricepoint.
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 April 24, 2009 12:05 AM PDT
Ah yes, because the EPA estimates are oh-so accurate. I'm going to wait until reviews start coming out before I judge the fuel economy (consumer reports has very standardized and realistic fuel economy measurements). The camry hybrid is known for getting a very realistic 35 mpg (CR gave it 28/41 city/highway, 34 overall). I notice on that instrument gauge that it is only getting 34.5 mpg (we don't know how it was driven, but that's still at least a clue to it's realistic mileage). Anyway, it's stupid to criticize them for mentioning the mileage was a little low considering that they've actually driven the car and you're just looking at the EPA numbers. Just wait until official reviews are out with more realistic fuel economy tests before you make a decision either way.

On a more positive note, a car like this from an american company is long overdue. This hybrid system looks to be catching up with Toyota's and Honda's hybrid systems (well to be fair, Honda's hybrid system is simpler, but it's fuel economy is still up there with Toyota's), rather than those POS "mild" hybrid sedans from GM that were barely more fuel efficient than non-hybrid Japanese sedans. I look forward to reviews of this car from both cnet and CR.
by gfedder April 23, 2009 10:18 PM PDT
How is this progress? These consumption figures are moronically bad compared to european diesels (audi, bmw to name a few). Even jaguar trumps them with it's 275HP diesel XF

http://www.jaguar.co.uk/Microsites/UK/eFacts/XF/index.html?route=_uk_en_xf_highlights_highlights_performance@__link__FlashGraphicPromo_1


Also
"Want fuel econmy, get a 125cc moped"

That's precisely what's wrong with the American automotive industry. Europe's moved on to efficient engines, USA manufacturers stuck to their guns and look where that got them.
Reply to this comment
by Sourdust April 23, 2009 10:48 PM PDT
I don't think Mr. Dogers2U, who made the comment about mopeds, is speaking for the American automobile industry.

And regarding the European makers (you mentioned Audi, BMW, Jaguar), their comparable cars are significantly more expensive than the Focus. Also, their diesels aren't all available in the US so I don't think you can compare their mileage claims to the US formula for mileage used by Ford.
by ikramerica--2008 April 24, 2009 1:06 AM PDT
Sorry, but this is a common misconception. The EU standard for measure fuel economy is NOT the same as for the USA, nor is the Standard in England the same.

Those models, if rated using the EPA standard, would NOT get the mileage you quote.

Do some research on this...
by TogetherinParis April 23, 2009 10:21 PM PDT
Ford could have saved millions of dollars on development if it had made this car aerodynamic instead of 'cool lookin' and just used a smaller engine. Detroit needs a science lesson on aerodynamics. Cover the wheel wells, put a boat tail on the back, and a belly pan underneath. It makes the car bigger, faster, heavier AND more fuel efficient. Dearest Lord, please give someone else some sense about this! Do not watch us all throwing gasoline against the wind and do nothing to help us. Change the hearts, change the minds of automotive people from fashion to freedom. Amen.
Reply to this comment
by Sourdust April 23, 2009 10:42 PM PDT
Most automakers must need a science lesson because none of the other hybrids made today follow your advice.
by ikramerica--2008 April 24, 2009 1:09 AM PDT
The fusion is aerodynamic.

The trade off that makes one hybrid more or less efficient is often the tires. Thin (small contact patch) + hard (rough ride, bad in some conditions) + small diameter give the best mileage.

Many of the early hybrids "cheated" in the way they got better mileage, by attributing the advantage of these tires (and wheel well covers) to the hybrid technology, when they could have been applied to any car, as you point out.

The problem is, the ride stinks, the handling is bad, and they are less safe. I'll take the more capable tires even if it costs a few MPG, because I value my safety and my back (bumps take a toll on your spine).
by jaydubbula April 24, 2009 6:42 AM PDT
My first car was a Ford, ever since a BMW - I swore I would never buy a Ford again. Been looking at trying to do my part and this might just change my mind. Still though, holding out to see the stats on the Volt.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease April 24, 2009 9:05 AM PDT
Back in the '70s I started buying Japanese autos. but my most recent one was a Ford Ranger. I have been driving it for six years now and am pleased with it. I am very interested in this Fusion hybrid and will give it serious consideration when it comes time to replace the wife's Camry.
by RNSII April 24, 2009 7:32 AM PDT
With all things considered, the Fusion Hybrid could've been better built with EU areodynamics in mind but is still a solid move forward for domestic design in the hybrid section. Now where's GM (Pontiac) with the G8 Hybrid...;-P
Reply to this comment
by kwhsy82 April 24, 2009 7:56 AM PDT
I've owned an Escape Hybrid for four years and been super happy. Somehow it gets better mileage than my old super-mileage Volvo wagon :).
For more info on the fusion

:http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/fusion/
Reply to this comment
by Peteostro April 24, 2009 7:56 AM PDT
I picked up a Ford Fusion Hybrid a few weeks ago and I love it. It really is a great car. I have had Honda's all my life and so far the fusion compares very favorably. I test drove both the prius and insight and they just felt to "young" to me (great for first time car buyers) I wanted my new car to be nice in side and out and have great fuel economy and the fusion hit it right on the nail. Ive got 48.2 mpg on my last 80 mile trip and i was barely even trying. The smart gauge is great and makes it pretty easy to drive efficiently . The hypermilling guys over at cleanmpg.com are getting around 50-60 mpg, even up to 70mpg's. They are also doing a 1,000 mile Challenge with the 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid. They are trying to drive the FFH 1,000 miles on one tank of gas (they need an average of 57mpgs to do this)
http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/showthread.php?p=202955

So to sum it up: the car is great, Probably one of the nicest rides you will have in any current hybrid.
Reply to this comment
by MHChap September 27, 2009 6:43 AM PDT
My 2010 Fusion Hybrid is a really great car in every respect but one, the rear suspension jolts and whacks as though it has no springs. The local Ford dealer told me that it might loosen up a bit with a lot of miles, but that a stiff ride was dialed in due to the two hundred and fifty pound battery pack behind the rear seat. My second car is a '71 Ford T-Bird that floats over bad road (kiddy talk), never jolts or whacks. It is difficult for me to get used to the rough ride that seems to be the norm nowadays in all but a few cars..
Please note that a bunch of whacked out environmentalist are forcing everyone into smaller cars when it is not necessary. There is enough oil available to the US to drop the price back to well under a dollar. We are the only country in the developed world that is blocked from producing it. I still am waiting for wind farms to power a car....BEAM ME UP.
Note: my hybrid chews up gas rigs in town...the electric motor gives instantaneous torque and plenty of it.
by jamgolf April 24, 2009 8:27 AM PDT
I actually own a 2010 Fusion Hybrid and as a former Prius owner I am impressed. This car is simply great. As much as I liked the Prius, Fusion Hybrid is just in a different category.
It drives better, I feel much more safe and secure in this vehicle, it looks much better, I got it at a great price (plus there is a rebate on it), it has a ton of features that I am just loving. This is just a perfect family sedan (in my opinion).

I have owned numerous Lexus and Mercedes cars in the past and this is "the best" value for money I have ever got. The fit and finish is not quite on par with the big guys but to be very honest it is really really nice. It feels like a near luxury vehicle.

Awesome job Ford.
Reply to this comment
by josethetiger April 24, 2009 3:31 PM PDT
Lets compare apples to apples... Compare this to the Camry hybrid please. Comparing it to the Civic or Prius isn't fair. The Fusion is a full sized car. I'm sure it compares closer to the Camry, and vice versa, than the Economy class vehicles.
Reply to this comment
by ILBCNUL8TR April 24, 2009 5:24 PM PDT
Although the Ford Fusion seems like America can produce a Hybrid that can compete with foreign manufacturers, has anyone noticed that the car is made in Mexico? Yes, made in Mexico with Mexican Steel, and by Mexican workers! While Ford continues to slash jobs here in America!
This may be a fine automobile, but it is not made in America and does nothing to keep jobs here. When will we stop outsourcing everything? So if I want one of these fine automobiles it will be a foreign auto.
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 April 24, 2009 7:27 PM PDT
Interesting, I didn't realize this. So in this case, perhaps buying a 2011 prius is buying more american than a fusion hybrid (a prius plant is opening in mississippi in 2010)
by GibletMcNiblet April 26, 2009 12:07 PM PDT
Over 65% of the components are made in the USA. The design and product management are also US based. The car is assembled in Mexico in part because Ford sells them in North and South America, not just the USA, and tariffs make it cheaper to do so.
by GibletMcNiblet April 26, 2009 12:09 PM PDT
P.S. - The Prius is currently made entirely in Japan.
by faxmonkey12 May 1, 2009 1:36 PM PDT
Assembly/production type jobs are a very small percentage of the total employed workforce at Ford. The "meat" of the jobs are in other sectors such as engineering. If your buying something because it's "American" take the vehicle assembly (country) out of your equation.
With the way the economy is affecting "American" jobs.... Everyone should at the very least give "American" companies a chance.
by drrc April 26, 2009 6:13 PM PDT
Just bought a 2010 Fusion Hybrid. My first trip included city driving, freeway, and a stretch of winding country road, was just over 70 miles, and used 1.6 gallons gas...do the math: that's a wopping 43 mpg! It's fun to drive, the leather interior looks and feels great, the SYNC and Navigation system pretty seamless once I began to get used to it. The Sony sound system does absolute justice to the music. And the numerous safety features: cross traffic alert, blind spot warnings, back up camera, and 911 Assist huge pluses. This is an all around great car, couldn't be happier, and find myself eagerly anticipating my next commute to work...now that's impressive!
Reply to this comment
by JM1983 April 27, 2009 7:13 PM PDT
This is the second time we have visited a dealer to buy a hybrid. The first, a couple of years ago, was to test drive a Honda Civic hybrid, which the dealer dissuaded us from buying. This week, we test drove the Ford Fusion Hybrid and really liked it. Great acceleration! Unfortunately, our local dealer did not have one with a moon roof. The salesman said it would take 2-6 months to order one because he couldn't predict when it would be manufactured, etc. etc. He never even tried to pressure us to take one without the moonroof off the lot. Plus the financing rate was 6.9%, if we could even get that. He couldn't have cared less and let us walk out the door. Much as we really liked the Ford, we are now going to test the Toyota Camry Hybrid, where I can buy under an employee purchase plan (and the service dept. picks me up and drops me off at the office). I guess the Ford dealers are able to be independent with their hot hybrid.
Reply to this comment
by glpursley May 2, 2009 2:38 PM PDT
Hate to burst your bubble but the Ford Fusion Hybrid IS A FOREIGN CAR!!! IT'S MADE IN MEXICO!!
Reply to this comment
by GibletMcNiblet May 29, 2009 4:38 PM PDT
It is designed in the U.S. and the majority of the parts are made in the U.S. Final assembly takes place in Mexico, but to say it's "made in Mexico" is misleading. The Prius and Insight, however, can safely be called foreign cars since they are built in Japan of almost entirely Japanese components.
by wmayo444 May 12, 2009 4:49 AM PDT
I also just purchased the Fusion hybrid. It's WONDERFUL. It drives so great ... corners on rails, floats along all the time. I LOVE the instrument panel and feedback. This is a totally fun car to drive.
GPS is nice feature with a large display, though POI list isn't long enough on search. Brakes are a little grabby, esp. if wet, but that may fade with little time.
It is QUIET on the road ... MUCH more than the Prius I test drove.
Getting 40 mpg average, with range of 37-55 mpg ... and it should climb a little after break-in according to materials.
I am so glad I waited until this came out. Consumer Reports indicated Fusion on par or better than Camry and Accord for reliability.
I loved my Civic (38 mpg highway), my 2 Accords (28 highway), but having a mid-size with super mileage is GREAT!
Reply to this comment
by dragontsd May 20, 2009 1:45 AM PDT
This is amazing, most of you dont even know what you're talking about, but the percentage of you who are anti-american car maker is staggering. I am a mechanical engineer, and I can tell you that comparing foreign automobiles as a whole against american automobiles is an exercise in futility, worse, stupidity.

At least they're trying, this is a bold step and it's a step in the right direction. I dont want to hear about foreign car companies doing better...the two systems of transportation are practically mutually exclusive. Our highways are different, our transportation demands are different...it's a completely different system. Apples and oranges.

You should be ashamed of yourselves, especially in today's economy, where faith and good consumership are going to be the key ingredients of any turnaround. You're making it worse, so shut your collective pie holes, you sorry bunch of automotive misanthropes.

Think long and hard before you go slinging mud at American ingenuity. It's going to be what saves us, if people like you dont bring us down first.
Reply to this comment
by motownmalaise June 2, 2009 6:39 AM PDT
What ingenuity might you be referring to? The Fusion made in Mexico, or the overwhelming foreign part content versus transplant-manufactured vehicles, or could it be the Toyota Synergy Drive technology that Ford licensed form its competitor 3-4 years ago. Better yet could it be the assertion by Billy Ford some five years ago that we will be the green car company and 20% of our vehicles will be hybrid only to renege on this promise two months later. Or could it be the $1B loss that Ford took from speculating in Palladium futures, while at the same time their engineers two miles away were designing out Palladium from the catalytic converters

Harsh and sobering realism is the phrase of the day for the big three. To Ford's credit the reason that they find themselves in a better position relative to its cross town rivals is that by chance or necessity they mortgaged the farm while the credit markets were still open. We cannot change that which we refuse to recognize.

The Big Three have perverted the ?Buy American? mantra into the definitive oxymoron. What they mean to say is support our outdated and broken business model. Say something good about Detroit..."Go Red Wings"
by GibletMcNiblet June 4, 2009 8:14 AM PDT
motownmalaise, Ford does not use Toyota's Synergy Drive technology. This idea has been debunked time and time again.

Ford develops and builds it's own hybrid technology. The two companies do, however, share some patents, because some of the in-house developed technologies were similar enough that they felt patent sharing was warranted and mutually beneficial.

And interestingly enough, the mileage in the Ford Fusion Hybrid far exceeds the mileage in the Toyota Camry Hybrid. So Ford's hybrid technology is not just different but better than Toyota's in that regard.
by Luckyu2c June 8, 2009 5:14 AM PDT
I have to agree with motownmalaise, Ford did in fact license their hybrid system from Toyota a few years back. However, you have to give Ford credit for improving on the hybrid system since they have license it from Toyota. GibletMcNiblet, I don't know where you got your info from or I don't know who the idea is debunked, but you can just google it to find out, or here on March 10, 2004 The New York Times article (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/10/business/ford-to-use-toyota-s-hybrid-technology.html).

However, Ford did not use the exact same hybrid system as Toyota, but they improve on the design and made it better, as in the case of the Ford Fusion Hybrid.

I have own and driven my Toyota Camry XLE since I got it in 1993 (brand new), and its still driving like a champ. I have about 150,000 miles on it with no major repair. I have never been a American car fan since back in the 90s and early 2000, the car they made were bad quality. Nevertheless, I am glad Ford is finally designing some with good quality and better mpg. My 1993 V6 Camry gets about 23 mpg on average, so I looking for a replacement car soon. Its not that my Camry is breaking down, but I'm paying a few hundred dollars a months for gas since I live the city and it only gets about 16mpg all city driving.

I have research for a while now, and the Ford Fusion Hybrid gets my vote. It really came down to the Camry or the Fusion. While the Camry Hybrid is cheaper base price and it have some better technology I like in the car, the total cost after you add the option, it become more than the Fusion Hybrid.

So for now 2010, it hands down the Ford Fusion Hybrid wins. And this will be my next car to buy. I might look into the Ford Escape Hybrid, but its kind of ugly in my opinion since it looks very box like, and I hate that....
by VTAndrea July 1, 2009 6:36 PM PDT
I bought my 2010 Fusion Hybrid in May and absolutely love it. Now that it's broken in, I'm getting 40 mpg around town. On a recent long trip, mileage was 42-44 mpg. All the techie stuff is fine, although I'm not totally familiar with it yet. It's a great, comfortable car and I smile when I go 2-3 weeks before I need to buy gas.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (43 Comments)

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics