• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
May 22, 2009 11:16 AM PDT

Best hybrid: Prius or Insight

by Wayne Cunningham

2010 Honda Insight
2010 Toyota Prius


When people think hybrid, they think Toyota Prius. This iconic car popularized hybrid powertrains more than any other model. This week, the newest version, the 2010 Toyota Prius, starts to show up at dealers. Although not a radical update, the 2010 Prius gets more power and improved fuel economy over the previous model, a double-win by any measure.

But Honda attempted to usurp the Prius' place as premier hybrid earlier this year by letting loose the 2010 Honda Insight. Although coming in 8 mpg lower in fuel economy than the 2010 Prius, the new Insight undercuts its price by $2,200, leading Honda to advertise the Insight as a hybrid for everyone.

The Prius comes with baggage, and not the kind you put your golf clubs in. Celebrities and environmentalists endorsed the car, leading to backlash, such as a South Park episode claiming the Prius had excessive smug emissions. Although Honda had an earlier car called the Insight, a long break in production lets the 2010 Insight enter the fray with a clean slate.

Of course, there are other excellent hybrids, such as the Ford Fusion Hybrid, Lexus RX 450h, and Nissan Altima Hybrid. But these aren't dedicated hybrids, having gasoline equivalents. None go head-to-head with the Prius as much as the Insight.

Check out the cars and tell us which most embodies the hybrid ideal.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
143: Ford puts airbags where? Hybrid Humvees, and a ride in the X5 M.
Award-winning tech at the 2009 SEMA Show
Peugeot's funny, little, electric concept
Dartz Kombat T-98 vs. Hummer H-1
Denso eyes standard hybrid parts
Rolls Royce Drophead, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano spotted in Paris
Tuners embrace Hyundai Genesis at SEMA
Matte black Lexus LF-A is stealthy super car
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (82 Comments)
by MyRightEye May 22, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
They both still look ugly.
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ May 22, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
I dont know what it is with people, i think they both look decent.



Then again, i also thought the Pontiac Aztec was decent looking, and its generally considered to be one of the ugliest cars in recent memory ;-)
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 12:58 PM PDT
Yeah, I agree with tipoo (except about the aztek =P ). It's just kind of an unusual design, but I like it.

And I have to admit, its extremely practical: low drag coefficient (probably the original reason it was designed that way), all four doors are easy to get in and out of with leg and headroom for even very tall people (front and back seats), and of course the hatchback design (which I don't think I need to explain the advantages of)
by bartszyszka May 22, 2009 1:29 PM PDT
I think this is part of the reason why the auto industry is in trouble. Doing anything new or creative is risky because people think anything unlike the cars they have now is "unusual". The styling differences with these hybrids is incremental, not revolutionary, yet people still take issue with them.

(I also didn't think the Aztek was all that bad. I'd rather have Azteks on the street instead of all the other boring SUVs that are there now.)
by SlimGem May 22, 2009 6:11 PM PDT
All I can say about the Aztec is that it can't begin to compare to an Edsel. Now that was classic ugly. With chrome. Lots o' chrome!
by rrod182 May 23, 2009 12:28 PM PDT
The design is part of what makes them so efficient. I just wish Toyota would bring the freakin' hybrid mini-van here already!
by streamline35 May 23, 2009 3:42 PM PDT
rrod - agreed. That, and I just can't imagine why they haven't made a hybrid rav4 yet. I mean hell, half the components in the rav4 and camry are they same, and they've had the hybrid camry forever.
by tipoo_ May 24, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
I think they should have a hybrid version of the Venza as well, since it is competing with the Edge after all.
by kwhsy82 May 22, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
Umm, Ford fusion?
Reply to this comment
by steve3717 May 22, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
I test drove a Ford Fusion yesterday, and the sticker listed it as 21 MPG average. Sounds like another V6 gas guzzling mess to me.
by descottdc May 22, 2009 12:53 PM PDT
Have to agree, early reviews of the Fusion hybrid have been very positive and has better performance and mpg than either the Toyota or the Honda. Plus it's gotta be the best since both Adam and Kris were given one, lol.
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 1:05 PM PDT
descottdc - performance? Yes. Mileage? Not quite -
Fusion Hybrid: (41/36)
Insight: (40/43)
Prius: (51/48)
(city/highway)

The fusion hybrid is a good car, but don't mar its good name by making up stuff about it.
by Spartan_458 May 22, 2009 2:28 PM PDT
Yeah, Fusion by far.
by DJOmega6 May 22, 2009 3:41 PM PDT
steve3717:
That's the MPG for the non hybrid Fusion.
by make_or_break May 28, 2009 12:31 AM PDT
The Fusion Hybrid's a significant car, but it's also a bigger car as well. Its more direct competitor is Toyota's Camry Hybrid, not the Prius.

Ironically, with Toyota's own hybrid technology the Fusion Hybrid gets better fuel economy than the Camry Hybrid (33/34).
by firsttenor June 5, 2009 7:07 AM PDT
Actually if you click on the Fusion Hybrid link above and read the article you will find that streamline35 is correct: 41/36
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
If you were to factor out price, of course it's the prius. Better mileage, more advanced hybrid system, plus some pretty impressive options usually reserved for luxury vehicles (dynamic cruise control, lane assist, self parking). Plus it's got a bit more room on the side. But the downside of course is that it's a bit more expensive ($22k to $32k).

Of course I'm certainly not knocking the Insight. It's pretty impressive that they pulled that kind of mileage out with thier more simple "electric assist" type hybrid system (GM could barely manage an extra 5 mpg on thier cars with that type of system). And of course it's quite a bit cheaper ($20k to $24k) than the prius, making a good option for someone who still wanted a 40mpg+ car at $20k. I've read that it's a bit funner to drive too, though I doubt many people buy hybrids for their driving dynamics.

Overall the are both great hybrids, and the direct comparison seems a little unfair, considering their price differences (which puts them at different levels), but I'm going to have to vote for the prius, even if it has the unfair advantage of costing more.
Reply to this comment
by ucffool May 22, 2009 11:01 PM PDT
"more advanced hybrid system" Yeah, you lost me there. Different, sure, but not more advanced. FYI, the original Honda Insight, with that less advanced system, as you put it, gets 60-70MPG through regular driving. So frankly, Shhh.
by streamline35 May 23, 2009 1:15 AM PDT
I don't think it's even debatable which hybrid system is more advanced. But don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the insight isn't. I find it impressive it can pull that kind of mileage with such a simple hybrid system (the "assist" system rather than dual mode)

BTW, the original insight got such amazing mieage because of its micro-car size and 3 cylinder engine.
by SOLE2000 May 25, 2009 7:53 AM PDT
ucffool, sorry but the Prius does have a more advanced system. It's a parallel-series (gas and electric can work separately), while all Hondas (including the new and old Inisight) use a parallel (electric can only assist the gas engine). The reason the first gen insight managed such impressive numbers, aluminum construction, dinky gas engine (1 liter 3 cilinder) and a 2 seater. That's also the reason of it's demise.
by patrick_i May 25, 2009 3:11 PM PDT
It's not that one is more advanced than the other. Either Honda really prefers the "motor assist" method or Toyota has a patent for their system and Honda would rather not pay for it. Nissan has a similar system to Toyota's because, well Toyota helped them with it. With the Honda's motor assist system you get a whole lot of push with a very little gas motor. With Toyota's system you get just enough push to move the car without the gas engine, but it isn't much fun. Honda usually prefers to provide the more entertaining driving experience.
by make_or_break May 28, 2009 12:45 AM PDT
"Advanced" tech is relative, as always. The new four-door Insight is already surprising evaluators. Real world tests are getting mileage well above the official Honda numbers (60+ MPG).

http://www.hybridcars.com/gas-mileage/honda-60-mpg-surprise-25564.html
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/01/11/abg-first-drive-2009-honda-insight-63-4-mpg/

Personally, I think the new Prius is a tad nicer looking--though neither is going to shake off that cliche 'hybrid greenmobile' look--and according to Automobile Magazine it drives more like a "driver's car" than the previous Prius...or the new Honda Insight. Frankly, I'm surprised how 'invisible' the current Prius has become to my eyes; I never liked the look of the car, but with the thousands and thousands of these things on the road they just seem to fade into the background; the 21st century version of the '70s Ford Squaremont...er, I mean....Fairmont.
by krzemien May 22, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
The Ford Fusion Hybrid (and the others) are not being considered because they each have a gasoline equivalent? Or maybe it's better and it was excluded for that fact?
Reply to this comment
by antuan.goodwin May 22, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
The Prius and the Insight are two vehicles that, despite the difference in price, compete directly with one another. It's no secret that the Insight was designed to be a Prius fighter. I mean, just look at it!

On the other hand, the Fusion is in the slightly larger class of midsize sedans. While many may may find themselves cross-shopping the midsized Fusion Hybrid against the compact Prius, it would actually be better compared to the Toyota Camry Hybrid and the Nissan Altima Hybrid.

In the interest of fairness, we have to compare apples to apples.
by ianlayton May 22, 2009 12:28 PM PDT
If better you mean more expensive. The lowest end Ford Fusion hybrid is more expensive than either one ($27,270) and only gets comparable mileage to the Insight.
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 12:30 PM PDT
The fusion is probably the best hybrid larger sedan out there right now, but as far as cost goes, it starts another $5,000 above the prius ($27k). But compare it price wise to the prius, at $32k (fully loaded for each car), the prius gets another 10mpg (roughly) and comes with some luxury options that are way out of it's price range (dynamic cruise control, lane assist, parking assist, and solar panels).
A $32k fusion is more closely compareable to a fully loaded insight ($24k). The insight still has the edge in mileage, but the fusion has sync + leather seats.
by patrick_i May 25, 2009 3:16 PM PDT
@antuan.goodwin: "It's no secret that the Insight was designed to be a Prius fighter. I mean, just look at it!"

The Prius looks like the old Honda Insight (except with 4 doors) which looked like the old Honda CRX. So who's copying who? This shape that they share is the most efficient and practical design in terms of aerodynamics.
by ewsachse May 22, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
Neither.

The Chevy Volt is #1.
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ May 22, 2009 11:59 AM PDT
Yes, considering its out and all



:-/
by Regulator7 May 22, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
Neither. I'll take a Jetta TDI, thank-you-very-much. I haven't driven an Insight, but I have driven a Prius. Sooooooo slow. At least the Jetta retains something of an enthusiast glint. The Prius.... well.... no.

And about the Fusion... you do know that you can get one of FOUR engine choices in it, right? A normal inline 4, a choice of V6's, and the Hybrid.
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
I hate to dissapoint you, but consumer reports clocked the jetta tdi from 0 to 60 at 9.8 seconds (the prius was clocked at 10.6 seconds). I wouldn't call either car particularly fast. The one thing I would certainly enjoy about the TDI though is that you can get it in a stick shift (which hybrids don't offer). Unfortuantly, if I were shopping for a fuel efficient car, I'd still probably go with a prius or an insight for two reasons. 1) The TDI gets great highway mileage, but the city mileage is still lacking (CR rated the highway mileage at 47mpg, prius territory, but only 23mpg in the city. 36mpg overall). And 2) The TDI is still too new to predict the reliability, but jettas, and volkswagons overall, aren't the most reliable cars (jettas are about average), where as the prius is one of the most reliable cars out there right now, and both Toyota and Honda lead the pack in overall reliability.
To its credit though, consumer reports (whose reviews I hold in the highest regard) rated the jetta tdi very highly in their test of it. If I were looking in the realm of a civic/corrola, I'd definitely give the jetta tdi a look as well.

(all information above from consumer reports).
by EXrider00 May 22, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
@streamline35

The TDI's 0-60 may be lacking, but the torque allows you to easily pass people in higher gears like they're standing still. Car and driver marks 50-70 in the new 09 CRD TDI at 6 seconds. This is faster than quite a few 7 sec 0-60 cars. As far as reliability, the TDI has been around since 89, there have been many revisions of the engine since then, but all of them are generally regarded as extremely reliable when cared for properly. I myself have an 04 TDI, the main difference in my engine "Pumpe Duse" being the injectors are unit injectors instead of the Common Rail type found in the 09's. It's stock 0-60 was about 10 seconds, 100HP/177lb/ft, I've got it chipped now and I can pull 0-60 in a low 8sec with about 130HP/247ft/lb. Also with a diesel, all of the torque is immediately available at around 1,800 RPMs. It makes the car feel very quick, and you don't find yourself shifting as much.

Don't knock the TDI till you test drive one!
by EXrider00 May 22, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
Oh, I forgot to mention the most important part about my TDI experience. I typically drive like a banshee, about 90% highway, with the cruise set at 80 and the A/C on, and I average 46MPG and go ~670MI between fillups.
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 2:23 PM PDT
Oh no worries, I'm not trying to knock it (thought I do try and take a balanced perspective) and I would certainly love to test drive one sometime.

I might point out that electric engines have 100% of their torque available at 0 rpms, which makes the prius alot zippier than you'd think off the line. I've never driven a jetta tdi, so I can't compare personally, but here are CR's numbers for the 09 prius (last gen - they put up the review or the 2010 yet) and the 09 jetta tdi.

Prius:
0 - 30: 3.8 seconds
0 - 60: 10.6 seconds
45 - 65: 6.2 seconds

Jetta TDI:
0 - 30: 3.6 seconds
0 - 60: 9.8 seconds
45 - 65: 5.9 seconds

They seem pretty similar to me, though no doubt the jetta is a bit funner to drive. They gave them both 4/5 for routine handling, but the prius was 3/5 vs the jetta's 4/5 for emergency handling. They posted the exact same speed through the emergency handling course (53.5 mph), and the prius stopped a few feet shorter in the wet and dry stops (133 vs 137 ft, and 140 vs 147 ft).

Anyway, those are just the numbers, like I said, I've only driven the prius, so I can't directly compare. And to its credit, they commented on how they liked the jetta tdi's handling, while they didn't like the prius's steering feel (from driving it myself, I would say it's just kind of numb - point it and it goes).
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 2:25 PM PDT
haven't put up the review for the 2010 yet*
by Renegade Knight May 26, 2009 9:34 AM PDT
Jetta TDI Hybrid. That would be something.
by terminalblue May 22, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
neither, they are both failmobiles designed to keep you under the thumb of oil companies. no journalistic outlet should devote coverage to them like they are the savior of anything but the oil companies.
Reply to this comment
by justinf79 May 22, 2009 5:34 PM PDT
errr, *** are you talking about??
by stevepo67 May 22, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
As a current (2008) Prius owner, I'm pretty underwhelmed by the changes to the 2010. While it would have affected the price a little, doubling the size of the battery (which I think is currently about the size of 10 standard laptop batteries, albeit with older NiMH technology) would have significantly increased the fuel mileage. With my car, the system never lets the battery go below about 30-40% which leads to bleeding energy from the gas engine to charge the batter more often that I think is necessary. With a large batter, the system would run on batteries more and charge less often, increasing the efficiency of the gas engine. And, of course, moving to an entirely different system, like the Volt's, is ideal and, frankly more like what I had hoped for. Oh well.

That said, I didn't see anything exciting about the Insight and a lot of the interior trim and displays were, in my opinion, gaudy and video-game like. I love the fact that the Prius has a direct competitor, however, as it will push both companies to make better and cheaper products. In fact, I remember reading that Toyota was reducing the price of the Prius to better match the Insight. Score one for capitalism.

So .. I think the 2010 Prius still looks like the top hybrid for those looking for a high-mileage car at a reasonable price .. I just wish Toyota had pushed the envelope a little more. I see no need to trade-in my 2008 for the 2010. Maybe the 2013 or so model...
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 1:12 PM PDT
I can certainly see where you're coming from here. I think we were all hoping for the next gen prius to be a plugin (or at least have the option) and use lithium ion batteries. I suppose the only consolation is that when Toyota does hybrid, it usually does it right. It's probably better to wait a few more years and do it right, rather than jumping in too early and coming out with a crappy product.
For a great example of that, see GM and the volt: They've been talking about it for years and years, and still have no product to show for it. Supposedly it'll be out in a year or two, but we've been hearing that for a long time... I guess the lesson there is don't build up consumer expectations until you can actually match them. And to their credit, toyota and honda have a habit of staying pretty silent about their products until within a year of launch.
by markb1967 May 25, 2009 6:40 AM PDT
they already have a prius that does even better, but they smartly release the improvements year by year so that people keep coming in to buy new ones. Yes, having honda competing will force toyota to push out these new improvements quicker. I bet the next model will have a dramatic improvement due to the honda knocking on the door.

I still thing the 90's EV-1 today could outsell both these cars. Too bad GM shot themselves in the foot.
by brucerobinson31245 May 31, 2009 7:35 AM PDT
I've been driving a 2004 Prius since 2/04 and I'm very satisfied. For the last couple of years I've awaited a lithium-ion battery pack powered Prius [even better with plug-in capability] and I am extremely disappointed that the 2010 lacks this upgrade. When I buy a new hybrid, it will have a lithium-ion pack [and much closer to my price range than the two high-end $80-100K+ sporty cars now available]. I was very interested in the Fusion [because it was American] but the mileage needs to be much closer [47+ mpg] to that of the Prius for me to switch.
by whitt123 May 22, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
OK. So just who designed the Ford 1st Hybrid System? (hint....not Ford) They hopefully learned a lot from it as it was not the designers first Hybrid...
Reply to this comment
by queticomn May 22, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
*FUSION*

Bias cnet as usual.
Reply to this comment
by xemoman May 22, 2009 1:56 PM PDT
The honda is about 2/3 the size of the prius. I use the prius to lug around a 58cm bike. I can fit the bike into the prius without removing the wheels. I just took an 11' umbrella back to costco in my prius. Size Matters.
Reply to this comment
by queticomn May 22, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
Not a hybrid Fords 2005 Ranger E-controlled electric vehicle reaches 78mpg. The ford fiesta in Europe burns clean diesel and attains 60mpg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Ranger_EV

Ford Hybrid Goes 1,400 Miles on Single Tank of Gas. http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/ford-hybrid-goes-1400-miles-on-single-tank-of-gas/

Also it was ford that engineered the hardware components of the Fusions hyrid green technology, not toyota. they did the software.
Reply to this comment
by TCLB001 May 22, 2009 4:32 PM PDT
http://abc.go.com/primetime/sharktank/index?pn=index

LIFEBELT feature seat belt safety for teens etc
Reply to this comment
by TCLB001 June 8, 2009 5:06 PM PDT
Lifebelt looks like a real winner!
by feverboy777 May 22, 2009 4:57 PM PDT
Both of these cars are great for the environment only problem is the the rear end on both of these cars looks something like the rear end of a baboon. Nice try but no cigar.
Reply to this comment
by wusupjohn May 22, 2009 5:36 PM PDT
To the 46% of you that voted for the insight, you need to check out Jeremy Clarkson's hilarious review on the times online. He's the guy from the show Top Gear.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_clarkson/article6294116.ece
Reply to this comment
by clashboard May 23, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
I love his review. Everything he said is spot on! Thus, the Prius FTW.
by  Brian May 22, 2009 6:46 PM PDT
The Prius is not just ugly, but looks unsafe in a collision with a Mac Truck or a Dodge Ram.

Those hybrids should come with a warning: unsafe in a collision. Passengers might not survive.

Ugly has a new definition when it comes to these hybrids.
Reply to this comment
by danshes27 May 22, 2009 8:46 PM PDT
What IS safe in a collision with a Mac Truck? Plus, I bet in the next decade or 2 your Dodge Ram will be chugging enough fuel to bankrupt you. The combustion engine is heading to extinction. Hybrids are the right step toward the future. You should support them even if you feel they look ugly.
by streamline35 May 22, 2009 10:07 PM PDT
Agreed danshes27 - this is one of the dumbest arguements I've heard, and obviously applies not only to hybrids, but any small cars (and the prius isn't exactly a small car anymore).

This arguement is so ridiculous though that it's hard to take seriously anymore. Why? Because taken to the Nth degree, we should all be driving semi trucks to stay safe. Compact cars are unsafe in a collision with a large sedan. Large sedans are unsafe in a collision with a large pickup truck. Large pickup trucks are unsafe in a collision with a semi truck. Should we all drive semi trucks? Should dodge rams come with warning stickers that they don't fare well in collisions with semi trucks?
Or here's a better solution: Everyone just buys the size of vehicle they need (which for most people isn't much more than a midsized sedan), and we continue to develop include new safety features on all cars, like seatbelts, airbags, antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability control, stronger materials, pre-collision systems, etc...

What about the fusion/camry/altima hybrids? Do you think those are ugly too?
by 40list04 May 25, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
A Dodge RAM cannot compete with a Mack truck in a collision. And a Mack truck cannot compete with a speeding railroad locomotive. No matter what you are driving there is almost always going to be something that can do severe damage to whatever you happen to be driving at the time.
by lexusallen May 22, 2009 9:01 PM PDT
I joined a friend today as she test drove a Camry(non hybrid) to replace her aging Solara.I decided to use my Ford - Susan Korman drive for cancer support at the dealer next door. Test drove the Fusion Hybrid after reading so many very favorable reviews. Wasn't expecting much owning two Lexus over the last 7 years.

This car rocks!! Styling updates were better in person and the interior upgrades while not luxo were certainly better then I thought for a middling domestic sedan(used to drive Accords for 20yrs). The ergonomics were nicely done except for climate controls buried too low in the stack. The new dash display was VERY impressive only outshined by the improved Toyota based synergy drive. It was silent and easily drove faster and longer on just electric motors, with an easy to read display that encouraged me to try and prolong it. The acceleration was equally impressive feeling much like my V6 ES with more sound due to the CVT/engine wail. Back country road handling was a huge shocker being nicely tied down and feeling much like a sprty sedan, not economy family car(btw, the leather seats were comfortable with nice bolsters). It reminded me of my last Accord after the suspension mods, competent not harsh. The brakes were a real revalation as they felt nothing like the awlful pulsing of the Prius and Lexus hybrids, they were near normal.

Returned to the dealer and the trunk was adequate considering the battery pack shares space behind back of seat. Underhood nicely done but not much space to spare there. The backup camera in the reaview mirror was very cool as was the synch system for the audio system(non nav car). The changing ambient lighting added another nice upscale fun touch. This test drive so blew away the Camry 4cyl/6spd auto my friend had just driven, even she acknowledged being a big Toyota loyalist. The only real negative was the approx 30k price point on this car( comparable to it's direct competition) but the firm, 'this is the selling price', we only have two here.I Ahh, I recall the hey day when I used to do the same when the Lexus 400h first arrived.

Ford should get many kudos on this car, it's knockout redesign and I'm happy it's homegrown. If they should do the same with Euro Fiesta coming next year, they could have real segment dominating car, can you say Prius killer?
Reply to this comment
by eeee May 23, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
that is what all the reviews say; Car and Driver picked it as No 1 in Hybrid comparison
by eeee May 23, 2009 5:44 AM PDT
both prius and insight are expensive cars considering they are small cars
Reply to this comment
by theobstruction May 23, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
What bugs me is they look exactly the same. Come on Honda, you totally redesigned it. Why redign it into a Prius?
Reply to this comment
by mdulcey May 25, 2009 6:39 AM PDT
Why? Drag coefficient. These cars are designed to be as efficient as possible while still remaining practical as cars, and that requirement dictates the shape. It's not new to Honda, either; the original Insight had a similar silhouette on a smaller scale.
by bennetts77833 May 23, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
Drove an Insight and a Fusion Hybrid and a VW Jetta TDI yesterday. All good cars. The Fusion was the biggest surprise. Agree with above comments. Ford has engineered this hybrid to drive on battery into the high 40 mph. Texas heat was moderate but automatic air was comfortable. The car is a true midsized sedan and our test driver was optioned with moon roof and a very good GPS $33,000. It has moved to the top of my considerations list. TDI was very nice and easiest of the three to get into the back seat. None were difficult. The friend I was with test drove a VW Passat with the turbo 2 liter gas. Peppier than anything else we drove, Fusion was second. Easiest to get into back seat of all. Comparable in size to the mid-sized Fusion; but not as economical as any of the others. Best driver's seat (12 way power) Ford had good power options. My friend did not like the head rests on the Insight, could not get her shoulders back on the seat?

Need to drive Camry and Prius Hybrids.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (82 Comments)

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics