• On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
June 12, 2009 2:28 PM PDT

Caterpillar D7E: Move earth and save the Earth

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments

Caterpillar D7E

This big dozer, the Caterpillar D7E, is the first to use a hybrid power train.

(Credit: CNET)

On the way to a demonstration of Caterpillar's first hybrid dozer, I was expecting it would be one of the little ones, the kind used to dig pools and landscape suburban back yards. But looming up in the middle of Holt of California, a Caterpillar dealer outside Sacramento, Calif., was a huge beast, a massive yellow earth mover, the metal tracks of which came up to my waist. The Caterpillar D7E was a lot bigger than the little hybrid I was expecting.

A Caterpillar representative jumped in the cab and, metal tracks scraping up the clean concrete floor, pivoted the big dozer around and drove it out to the demonstration area, a field of dirt with one big hill, and strategically placed holes and trenches--not to mention a slalom course marked by orange pylons. As a dramatic start to the demonstration, the driver took the 56,669 pound D7E over the steepest section of the hill, the dozer's blade pointing up toward the sky. At the top, it neatly balanced on the crest before making its descent, demonstrating how easily it maintained control on this loose ground.

The D7E differs from traditional earth-moving equipment in that it uses a locomotive-style series hybrid drivetrain. It still has a big diesel engine in front of the cab, but it merely serves as a generator, powering two electric motors. The 9-liter diesel engine runs at a steady 1,500rpm to 1,800rpm, its most efficient power band. That engine is smaller by a liter than the D7R, Caterpillar's comparable diesel dozer. Net power output from the electric drive is 235 horsepower, and the D7E has almost 100,000 pounds of pulling power. As one of Caterpillar's engineers pointed out, the fact that it only weighs 56,669 pounds, it will exceed its grip before it maxes out on pulling power.

A quieter ride and efficient operation

Some of the advantages of the hybrid system became apparent at the beginning of the demonstration. Where a conventional tractor has gears, and has to rely on the changing power of a revving diesel engine, the electric motors give the D7E a smooth torque curve, creating steady power for moving dirt or just traveling around a work site. And the constant speed of the engine means less noise, for both bystanders and the driver. It's far from quiet, but a lot less noisy than other tractors.

D7E powertrain

The D7E's power train uses a diesel engine to generate electricity, powering drive motors.

(Credit: Caterpillar)

During our demonstration, the driver stopped the D7E on the hillside and stepped out of the cab, showing how its seat sensor automatically puts on the electronic parking brake. Getting back in, the driver proceeded to pivot it on the hill side, the loose dirt letting the dozer slide down a little, but demonstrating a turning radius that beats smaller tractors, and is 50 percent better than the D7E's nonelectric counterpart.

Unlike a hybrid car, the D7E doesn't carry batteries to store excess electricity--it would take a huge battery stack to turn the motors. However, it does use a kind of mechanical regeneration when it turns, sending power from the track that's slowing down through a differential to the outside track.

The demonstration proceeded, showing the D7E using its ripper to loosen up hard dirt. It used its blade to fill in a trench, making a number of quick maneuvers to work its way down, then pushed dirt up and over the hill in the demonstration area. Finally, the driver ran it through the pylon slalom, showing the dozer's maneuverability.

Caterpillar used these maneuvers to tout the D7E's advantages. The trench-filling exercise uses up to 30 percent less fuel than with a conventional dozer, while other fuel economy gains were in the 10 to 20 percent range. The most important numbers for the contractors in attendance at the event were the D7E's gains of 25 percent more material moved per gallon of fuel than a comparably sized nonelectric dozer, and 10 percent more material moved per hour.

Novice at the controls

Finally, the Caterpillar representatives let me get in the cab, a dream realized from way back when I used to play with Tonka trucks. Although the size of the dozer seemed overwhelming, I was encouraged, as a woman contractor who took an earlier test drive got out of the cab literally squealing with joy.

D7E steering lever

This lever steers the 56,000 pound D7E.

(Credit: CNET)

After a quick run-through with the controls, and after I assured the Caterpillar rep that I wouldn't attempt to rearrange the demonstration area, I set the speed and pushed the forward switch. The D7E started moving slowly, and the rep flagged me. Oh yeah, I forgot to raise the engine speed so the diesel could generate enough electricity to get the thing moving. OK, turn up the engine speed with a dial, set the engine speed with a roller switch, then press the forward switch. The D7E easily got underway. The cab is pretty high tech, with a rearview monitor and an electrically powered air conditioning unit to fend off the Central Valley heat. Steering the beast amounted to pulling or pushing a big lever on the left side of the driver seat.

Given the size of the D7E and the ground I was covering, it wasn't exactly a smooth experience, but it would be a lot rougher and noisier in a pure diesel tractor. In fact, Caterpillar claims 50 percent less noise in the cab. More impressive was the fact that I, a real novice, could drive it after just a couple minutes of instruction.

Some people might figure that the extra complexity of a hybrid system would be a problem for heavy equipment like the D7E, but they would be wrong. The fact that the engine runs at a steady speed means less stress, and Caterpillar engineered it without belts, the parts that wear the quickest. The cables from generator to motors are all armored, and use military grade connectors. The electric drive itself has fewer moving parts than a conventional gearbox.

Then, of course, there are the environmental gains. The D7E's greater fuel economy means lessened greenhouse gas emissions. It meets the EPA's Tier 3 standard regulating nitrogen oxide, hydrocarbons, and particulate matter for nonroad diesel equipment. Caterpillar is also working toward future Tier 4 regulations, taking effect in 2010.

Caterpillar begins production of the D7E this October, and will offer it as a replacement for its existing D7R diesel dozer in the United States and Europe.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
144: GM says yes to the Cadillac of Volts
Badass Dodge Challengers rock SEMA Show
Chrysler's grand brand plan
Fiat Abarth 500 Trophy hits the track
eBay Motors offering free vehicle history reports through Experian
Custom Mustangs on Display at 2009 SEMA Show
TomTom app for iPhone getting major update, new features
Navigation screen is suppliers' window of opportunity
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by carlhage June 14, 2009 12:56 PM PDT
While saving 25% of fuel (and emissions) using hybrid technology is great, what matters more to me (as a breathing human) is the mention, "Caterpillar is also working toward future Tier 4 regulations". Too bad it doesn't already meet the 2010 emissions limits! Are they going to sell a lot of high-polluting dozers from October to December? Off-road engines (construction equipment, trains, and ships) are becoming a major source of urban pollution, especially as new regulations recently taking effect remove vehicle pollution. FYI, the Tier 4 rules lower emissions for NMHC+NOX to 0.19+0.4 from 4.0 and PM to .02 from .2 (all g/kWh), about 10x difference in pollution. It's great for new equipment, but we really need a program to retrofit existing equipment. [Heavy duty trucks are limited to .19 NMHC, .27 NOX, .013 PM, already cleaner than the future off-road equipment.]
Reply to this comment
by Dr_Zinj June 15, 2009 10:21 AM PDT
I'm a bit ambivalent about this article.

I'm happy to see that there are significant improvements in fuel burned to material moved ratios.

However, I've known for about 4 decades that electic motors out-torqued internal combustion engines. I was privy to overhearing conversations of General Electric's Elec-Trac tractor engineers during their development and testing. As long as they can maintain traction, electrics will outpull any similar sized gas or diesel. Nice to see that Catepillar also figured that out, and figured out an efficient means of powering their electric motors.
Reply to this comment
by gmhendo June 15, 2009 3:01 PM PDT
Beautiful piece of spin writing! Caterpillar, arguably the best heavy equipment maker in the world, dredges up technology that has been used in diesel-electric trains since steam finished, and holds it out as earth shattering (OK, pun intended).
Carlhage (see above post) is right. To make a difference we need a retrofit program. I also struggle to believe that Cat could not meet the 2010 emissions target with less than a year to go before they are mandatory.
Reply to this comment
by wcunning June 15, 2009 6:01 PM PDT
I agree that serial hybrid technology isn't knew, but you have to give Caterpillar credit for being the first construction equipment company to use it.

The company also has a program to retrofit older tractors with modern, more efficient engines, although not hybrid powertrains. Check out the photoshow linked to the article. The last slide shows a 40 year old tractor refitted with a new, less-polluting engine.
by idesignstuff July 28, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
You guys have no idea what it takes to cut emissions by 10X. And that's from where this machine is at. Take an older machine and it might be more like 1000X. You should see the backflips engine mfr's are doing to try to squeeze all the emissions gear in under these hoods! Not to mention cost. Any gains in clean burn are by new tech, and added gizmos. mfr's need to figure out how to pimp the new models out so that the added emmissions equipment costs will be easier to swallow. Really, guys, I think a better alternative is to do a junker exchange with heavy equipment like we're doing with cars. That would get newer tech and lower emissions out there.
by DozerLarry June 17, 2009 9:14 PM PDT
Solid-state switching technology has only recently grown reliable enough under the loads required to power a dozer this size through the many changes in direction necessary to do its job dependably and cost effectively. See an interview with Caterpillar's engineering director on the D7E project here: http://www.constructionequipment.com/index.asp?layout=nocclamp&articleid=CA6551310

The retrofit program for in-use machines is in effect in California, and that program will likely be copied in many states with air-quality non-attainment areas. More on that here: http://www.constructionequipment.com/articleDetail/CA6657603.html

Hope this is useful,

Larry
Reply to this comment
by roadbase June 20, 2009 6:28 AM PDT
I may have missed it, but where is the cost comparison?
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics