• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
July 8, 2009 3:02 PM PDT

Want some kinetic energy with those fries?

by Sharon Vaknin
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 12 comments

It's been criticized for contributing to the obesity epidemic and condemned by PETA, but now a Burger King franchise in the New York metro area has announced that it wants in on the green movement. The high-traffic restaurant in Hillside, N.J., will install a speed bump designed to harness the kinetic energy produced by the hundreds of cars that pass through the drive-thru daily.

As they wait for their Double Whopper, customers will roll through a section of the drive-thru lane lined with metal plates that move down and up as cars head to the next window. The MotionPower technology developed by Burtonsville, Md.-based New Energy Technologies, could harness and capture the energy twice daily, the company reports.

"More than 150,000 cars drive through our Hillside store alone each year, and I think it would be great to capture the wasted kinetic energy of these hundreds of thousands of cars to generate clean electricity," said Andrew Paterno, co-owner of 12 N.Y. metro-area Burger Kings. In its report, New Energy Technologies said it is partnering with BK for "durability testing," so it may be awhile before energy is actually captured and put to use. Once active, it's possible that the energy would be routed directly to the power grid.

So how is Burger King benefiting from this? It's unlikely one "green" speed bump will attract more customers (unless it relieves the guilt of an unhealthy meal). Instead of offsetting the restaurant's already wasted energy, BK should focus on the many ways it can reduce its energy usage in the first place. For example, recycling used vegetable oil, installing solar panels on the roof and windows, or transporting their proteins on low-impact trucks, such as this one.

Will an energy-producing speed bump eclipse Burger King's bad rep with environmentalists? Probably not. But I'll give them credit for playing guinea pig. New Energy Technologies, which develops other renewable energy, has a larger plan to install speed bumps in toll booths, streets, border crossings, and other high-traffic areas.

Originally posted at Green Tech
Sharon Vaknin is the CNET Labs' go-to intern. When she's not testing MP3 players, blogging, or making the lab look presentable, she can be found playing computer games. Sharon formerly worked for Best Buy and is currently studying journalism at San Francisco State University. E-mail Sharon.
Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
144: GM says yes to the Cadillac of Volts
Badass Dodge Challengers rock SEMA Show
Chrysler's grand brand plan
Fiat Abarth 500 Trophy hits the track
eBay Motors offering free vehicle history reports through Experian
Custom Mustangs on Display at 2009 SEMA Show
TomTom app for iPhone getting major update, new features
Navigation screen is suppliers' window of opportunity
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Marcus Westrup July 8, 2009 3:35 PM PDT
This is such bull.
There is no such thing as a free lunch - to "capture" energy with this bump you must, by definition, be taking energy away from the cars. Which then has to be replaced by running the engines harder. Which burns more fuel.
How is Any of this better for the environment?
Reply to this comment
by servermaker July 8, 2009 3:37 PM PDT
no kidding ---- nice of Burger King to steal energy from their customers!
by jaguar717 July 8, 2009 3:48 PM PDT
Well, if it's replacing braking then it's capturing otherwise wasted energy. So putting these at the start of the drive-thru line would be capturing the car's momentum. Putting them at the middle or end would just be resistance to the car.

But the other suggestions are just as much of a joke. Put solar panels on the roof? So they can pay 10x as much to cover 1% of their power usage? Right.

As for the environ-whackos, nothing short of shutting down and returning to the dark ages will fix the "bad rep" with them. No amount of sacrifice will ever be enough: notice it's not better efficiency for the same or increased productivity they call for, but flat out ever-decreasing outputs (and as a result, quality of life). Grinding poverty or bust!
by kellymcgowan July 9, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
Dead on, Marcus, congratulations on hitting the nail on the head with the first post of why this is an absolutely lame idea . . . Gee let's spend capital and labor to inefficiently convert cars into 3,000 lb 10 watt generators. Burger king should just go out and buy a honda generator and put it out in the parking lot. At least it would waste less and hopefully be even more obvious that this is a dumb idea.
by cnetba11 July 8, 2009 3:51 PM PDT
Peter Gibbons: Um, the 7-Eleven, right? You take a penny from the tray.
Joanna: From the crippled children?
Peter Gibbons: No, that's the jar. I'm talking about the tray, the pennies for everybody. We're basically doing the same thing only we take it from a much bigger tray and we do it a couple of million times.
Reply to this comment
by cnetba11 July 8, 2009 3:56 PM PDT
Two improvements: 1) spikes. 2) jet dry and hot wax.
Reply to this comment
by Icaarus July 8, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
The problem is not the 'free lunch' as the cars are giving up the energy no matter whether they are running over a conventional or green speed bump. The real question is, after construction, installation, and maintenance, will this device produce more energy than has been invested into it. I think not. Please lets not waist the time trying to look green for the sake of publicity when the outcome is in fact detrimental.
Reply to this comment
by REOldtimer July 8, 2009 5:06 PM PDT
This is all about PR, and nothing else. Part of the misrepresentation of what is to be "green." In addition, this is not as big news as the guys that are proposing to have a kinetic system in all the highways in the USA as the mother of all solutions for energy independence. On the other hand, if they can displace some energy, is not bad regardless of the rate of the ROR on investment, since this, at least for Burger Kind, is a passive system.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar717 July 8, 2009 11:16 PM PDT
What about forcing everyone to pay for the energy to grow & process ethanol, and then pay again to subsidize its costs, and then pay for it at the pump, only to turn around and get 1/3 less power, torque, and mileage?

Oh wait, they already do, and the amount keeps increasing :-)
by shinelikeitdoes July 9, 2009 9:57 AM PDT
Not sure why mentioning the extremist group PeTA has anything to do with this article.
Reply to this comment
by HeavyJim July 9, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
I think some of cnets writers love peta. Oh well, peta does not matter anyhow.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian July 10, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
"More than 150,000 cars drive through our Hillside store alone each year, and I think it would be great to capture the wasted kinetic energy of these hundreds of thousands of cars to generate clean electricity," said Andrew Paterno, co-owner of 12 N.Y. metro-area Burger Kings.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I threw up a little in the back of my throat when I read that one. Yeah, 3,000 pound cars idling through a drive-thru lane is really "clean". All they're doing here is finding a way to steal electricity from their customers. It seems a common theme lately, rape the customer and sell them on the idea that it wasn't an act of aggression and hatred, but an act of love instead.
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics