• On Metacritic: Are January movies really so bad?
July 29, 2009 4:49 PM PDT

Volvo's very safe XC60

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments


In line with its safety focus, Volvo is pioneering some very cool electronic-driver-aid technology. The 2010 Volvo XC60 can be had with lane departure warning, following-distance warning, and blind-spot detection. But while these safety gadgets are optional, Volvo takes the impressive step of making its City Safety feature standard. This feature automatically jams on the brakes when it detects an imminent low-speed collision, which should make insurance companies happy.

Read our review of the 2010 Volvo XC60.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Sony announces XAV-70BT, XAV-60 in-dash A/V centers
Could this be the world's heaviest drag race?
Garmin's Voice Studio will get me into trouble
Garmin debuts Zumo 665 motorcyle GPS
Pioneer offers AVIC-U220 nav upgrade for DVD receivers
Ease into navigation with TomTom's new entry-level GPS
In-car electronics prep for CES 2010 (photos)
MVH-P8200 is Pioneer's first mech-free receiver
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by streamline35 July 29, 2009 6:07 PM PDT
Too bad they can't manage better than 17mpg out of it (same mileage consumer reports got) - pretty lousy for a vehicle that size. Other vehicles in that class managed fuel economy up in the 20's.
Reply to this comment
by bryan.teague July 30, 2009 8:58 AM PDT
With safety comes added weight, I am happy to pay more in fuel for that.
by streamline35 July 30, 2009 11:16 AM PDT
Actually, the three most fuel efficient SUVs in that category (compact sporty SUVs - consumer reports) which were the RAV4 V6, the Subaru Forester XT, and the VW Tiguan, all got nearly perfect safety ratings. The ratings for the XC60 aren't up yet, but even if it got perfect scores, it still wouldn't be any safer. Besides, the only thing it has over other SUVs is the radar system - there's no way that adds the extra 500 to 800 lbs that thing is carrying over other SUVs.

BTW, heavier doesn't mean safer. It tends to mean that it has the upper hand in a crash. And it is more likely to get in a crash, compared to a lighter vehicle with better handling. If volvo could do a better job with their engines and shave off some of that excess weight, they could still get more reasonable mileage without sacrificing safety.
by kormiko July 30, 2009 2:07 PM PDT
The XC60 has an 18 city / 27 highway (16 city / 22 highway for the Turbocharged AWD) according to Volvo's specification numbers. I'm fairly certain that Consumer Reports tested the Turbocharged AWD version. The non-AWD version probably would get around 21-22 mpg on average (give or take depending on how you drive), which is still not great, but it's much better than 17.

I don't know which version is considered "more safer," but AWD probably is safer during snow/rain/mud areas. Seems to me Volvo should kick it into hybrid territory sooner than later.
Reply to this comment
by rlabarca July 31, 2009 6:41 AM PDT
Cooley's review of this gave me a good laugh this morning. You always feel he's restraining his commentary in these videos but someone had the brains to just let him loose with this one.

I think it's about time for a CNetTV CarTech "Late Night" channel where Brian curses out cars and their manufacturers in a glorious stream of expletives. He might even give Clarkson a run for his money if he learns how to powerslide some of these demo cars while he narrates.

Being completely serious for a second - American TV and even American-produced video podcasts rarely dole out hard criticism for cars these days, much less with the flourish Cooley likes to put in. Have you ever watched MotorWeek on PBS? They must have a rule where if their criticism exceeds a slight downward inflection, they can't air it. Most likely it's due to a fear of being blacklisted by manufacturers or sponsors. Regardless, Brian bringing the heat the way he does is refreshing.

So kudos Mr. Cooley. You have won me over as a fan - so what if Volvo doesn't want to send you demo cars anymore.
Reply to this comment
by streamline35 July 31, 2009 11:05 AM PDT
And that is exactly why I highly respect consumer reports above any other viewer. They accept money from no one but their subscribers (the only ads in magazine are for their own services, and there are very few). They also do not accept test cars - they go out and anonymously buy cars from dealships to test. The tests are extremely methodical and systematic, as is their scoring system for cars. Every car gets the exact same tests, treatments, and scoring system. They are the ultimate in impartiality.

In contrast, cnet reviews are fun to read, but I feel more like I'm reading anecdotes about the car with an opinion about the car attached as a score (which isn't really consistent across reviesws)
by kevinm6 August 3, 2009 3:11 AM PDT
Don't forget the "$17,000.00 Tech Package." I appreciate his honesty in this review too. An informed consumer will poll multiple review sources to weed out the bias. I'm not quite sure he's better than Clarkson though. But he's a perfect candidate if there is ever a Top Gear America.
by frantaylor August 2, 2009 6:25 PM PDT
Wow, Volvo is still using the same crummy inline 6 that was in my 1974 wagon, and now it gets even worse mileage than it did back then. This is progress?

Their RWD just stinks in the snow, and the AWD adds hundreds of pounds of weight and much more opportunity for mechanical problems.

I consider my Saab 9-5 wagon to be a much safer car because its FWD is much more capable in the snow, and its much lighter weight means I can dodge things that the Volvo tank would just plow right into. Besides, it gets almost twice the mileage of the Volvo.
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics