• On BNET: Vote: How will Apple blow it?
August 2, 2009 11:42 AM PDT

Nissan turns over a new Leaf

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 65 comments

Nissan Leaf

The Nissan Leaf is an electric car going into production in 2010.

(Credit: Nissan)

This weekend Nissan released photos and details of the electric car it intends to put into production in 2010. The Nissan Leaf is a purpose-built, pure battery electric vehicle. Nissan previously let us test-drive the Leaf's power train using the Cube as a test model. The Nissan Leaf has its own distinct look; it's a more conventional car than the Cube, with four doors and a hatchback. Although it hasn't announced pricing, Nissan says the Leaf will be affordable, priced as a C-segment car. The company also notes that the Leaf will cost less to operate than a gasoline-powered car, both in energy and maintenance, as there are fewer moving parts. Also, many governments offer incentives in the form of tax credits or rebates to purchase an electric car.

The Leaf uses a laminate lithium ion battery pack with an output of over 90 kilowatts. The car's drive motor puts out 80 kilowatts of power, substantial enough to give it performance equivalent to a gas-powered car. Nissan claims the Leaf has a range of over 100 miles, fairly typical for electric car projects from other automakers. The Leaf uses regenerative braking, and has a recharge time of 30 minutes to get the battery pack up to 80 percent using a quick charger. From a 200-volt source, the Leaf takes 8 hours to recharge.

One of the more innovative elements of the car is its onboard computer. Along with typical functions such as charge level and range, this computer is connected to a data center that will receive diagnostic information from the car. It will also keep the driver informed of local recharge stations. Although not specifically mentioned, this onboard system could easily show navigation with traffic conditions. Nissan says the computer will also provide entertainment for passengers.

The Leaf will originally be built in Japan, and sold in Japan, the United States, and Europe. As demand dictates, Nissan will build additional units in its Smyrna, Tennessee plant.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
24 Hours of Dayton with the Porsche Panamera
To thwart speculators, Lexus to lease, not sell, 500 LFAs
Car Tech Live Podcast 146: The deal unravels - Is Saab dead?
BMW debuts the new 5-series online
GoPro HD Hero Motorsports sacrifices simplicity for flexibility
On the production line with the 2010 Porsche Panamera
Infiniti quality effort features a woman's touch
Xtreme Mustang: Verts in a concrete jungle
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (65 Comments)
by monkeyfun14 August 2, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
And its actually somewhat attractive (:
Reply to this comment
by Dalmatian28 August 2, 2009 5:10 PM PDT
"somewhat attractive"....not going to gas station makes this car very very very attractive!!!! I want one now.... and if they keep it around 20 K price tag, I am getting one! This car will make Volt very hard sell!
by originalchael August 3, 2009 1:33 AM PDT
hee hee.
Why is it that green cars have to be ugly? Look at the Prius and the Insight and the G-Whiz.
by celticbrewer August 3, 2009 5:26 AM PDT
except those bug-eyed lights in the front. Reminds me of a yaris, kinda.
by Spiraling_Shape August 3, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
Yeah those headlights can't possibly be aerodynamic
by badasscat August 4, 2009 7:41 AM PDT
The headlights actually could be aerodynamic - "bulges" actually often are. The 747 is the most aerodynamic non-supersonic airliner ever made, for example, and the fastest, specifically because of its bulge.

If they keep this at $20k or so, I'll probably get one.
by eniosan August 2, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
I has a cool design!
I am actually waiting to get one of these electric cars soon next year.
The Japanese are once again leading the trend in the car industry.
Reply to this comment
by ibeetle August 2, 2009 5:40 PM PDT
Sense Nissan is a division of French auto maker Renault there is a wonderful irony in your statement.
by badasscat August 4, 2009 8:17 AM PDT
ibeetle:

Nissan is not a division of Renault. Renault owns 44.3% of Nissan, and Nissan owns 15% of Renault. They are independent companies with a working alliance (similar to the Chrysler/Mitsubishi alliance of a few years back). I believe a former head of Renault is now the CEO of Nissan, but that does not mean Nissan is owned by Renault anymore than Howard Stringer being CEO of Sony means Sony is owned by CBS.

Nissan's global headquarters is in Yokohama, Japan.
by PulSamsara November 24, 2009 11:16 PM PST
Who ever owns whatever... the designs Nissan has been incorporating definitely have a French flair.

For those who may have eaten to many 'Liberty Fries' that might be a bad thing.

Me ? I like it. I like a lot of auto styles... certainly not exclusive to a French flair - not by a long shot.
But it is nice to see one company putting out a 'flavor' that certainly doesn't look like everybody else.
by jkcouch August 2, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
More peanut cars? I bet it?s as light as a leaf... Nissan should shoot for making an electric Xterra like vehicle, and then I might think about buying one.
Reply to this comment
by ibeetle August 2, 2009 5:45 PM PDT
This is why, what the Germans are doing with Diesel is much better. Give me a safer full size Diesel Jetta any day compared to these Coke can death traps on wheels.

.
by ATX101 August 3, 2009 4:29 PM PDT
i totally agree with you ibeetle. i would never make a tradeoff of zero-emission over safety. sure, it may get a five star crash test rating, but that is in a controlled environment, where the impacts are on specific areas.
by badasscat August 4, 2009 7:55 AM PDT
SUV's are statistically much less safe than compact cars. You may feel safer in an SUV, but it is a false sense of security.
by PulSamsara November 24, 2009 11:19 PM PST
Like almost everything you Deutcheophiles have to say - the reviews, testing, reliability and ratings just don't add up.

But you keep deluding yourselves... if it makes you feel better next to the Jones ... I prefer reality.
by theantibush August 2, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
Unlike the Chevy Volt, Its apparently not a range-extended EV, that is, without an on-board gas powered electric generator to charge the batteries when on extended trips (100+ miles). Please correct if I am mistaken.

Yes, cool design and compelling range...very cool!

The auto makers, I believe, and seriously underestimating demand.
Almost every person I know is hanging on to their gas burners, refusing to buy anything
not a plug-in electric.

I can't wait to 'gas' my car from my solar panels : )
Reply to this comment
by birdtford August 2, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
CNET cant even get the grammar correct "Nissan turns a over new Leaf" Come on CNET, check what you are putting on the web!
Reply to this comment
by squished August 3, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
I don't see the problem. it's a clever headline. Headlines afford some creative license.
by mremple August 2, 2009 2:51 PM PDT
Wow birdtford. Does the grammar really bother you that much??? I think most logical people know what they meant and don't get angry about it.

Relax.
Reply to this comment
by michael_j_x August 2, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
what does it mean its zero emissions? Does it run on air? The electricity has to come from somewhere doesn't it. And unless its air or sun or wave generated, then there will be emissions produced in order to move that car. And don't get me started on those batteries...
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 August 2, 2009 4:09 PM PDT
And at the same time they are in the process of building cleaner power generation methods.
by BogusBasin August 3, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
And less emissions will be produced to create the electricity to run the car than if you ran the car on gasoline.
by squished August 3, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
Yes yes yes... everyone knows it's a not a free lunch but we can simultaneously apply innovation to the production and consumption of energy and in the long term drastically reduce emissions from where they are with today's petrol burners. And even better we'll stop being an ATM for the middle east, Venezuela, and other difficult to manage countries.
by Slvrshot August 2, 2009 5:10 PM PDT
It's a point zero emissions vehicle meaning from the car itself you won't be creating emissions.

It would be a source zero emissions vehicle if you knew that the electricity it is using to charge doesn't require fossil fuels.

I think you are trying to be too technical. It is what it is.
Reply to this comment
by lordmorgul August 3, 2009 12:43 AM PDT
Nevertheless, due to the very misleading propaganda out there about electric vehicles there are LOTS of people who really are not considering the source emissions when they think that buying this car is going to do wonders for the environment. The fact is, that is not a simple thing to determine, and in many areas where coal burning plants generate most of the electrical grid power supply... it is possibly worse for the environment to consume more electricity than burn a small portion of gasoline in a super-high efficiency motor.

It is not 'being too technical' to ask reporters, bloggers, and especially car companies and politicians to be more clear about the NET GAIN of greenhouse gas emissions for electric vehicles. It is the least we can expect for some legitimate statistics and science to be applied to the situation.
by michael_j_x August 3, 2009 4:03 AM PDT
@ lordmorgul
My point exactly. It is a general misconception that going electrical is an immediate benefit for the environment. A study done in Europe actually proved that unless 20-30% of electricity is generated by green power plants, then the situation actually becomes worse. Then there is the matter with all those toxic batteries, that will need to be changed every few years.
by jokayhn August 3, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
@ lordmorgul
At least once the vehicles are electric, work can be concentrated on fewer sources of pollution. If cars in an area are being powered by a coal plant then that one plant can be upgraded, cleaned up, altered to fix all of those vehicles at once. One big power plant is a lot easier to manage than millions of little ones. We have to start somewhere and its going to take a long time to get all the gas powered vehicles finally off the roads. Too many people are trying to confuse people by talking about all the points in the life cycle of a vehicle where energy is used. Yes, its all important, but just because a coal power plant is the ultimate source of energy for an electric car doesn't make the electric car a bad idea. We have to start somewhere. All the other issues with the energy system will be resolved in due time.
by kormiko August 3, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
I'm signed up for Green Power with my electricity. It's a little more expensive each month (about 3 cents more per kilowatt hour), but I feel like it's worth it. This means the money I pay on my bill goes toward non-coal, non-oil power sources.

I think more people would do the same thing if they knew it existed in their area and they knew how easy it was to make the switch. I'm hoping that when they create these recharge stations, they will use green power as well. I also think that Nissan should add a solar panel option for the roof, or better yet ... make it a standard.
by paindoc66 August 3, 2009 2:51 PM PDT
We should be aware of where the electricity is coming from... If it's taxing dirty coal than statistically it would be worse for the environment vs. an efficient traditional gasoline engine. People need to be aware that plug in hybrids are not the environmental answer unless it's coming from a clean energy source.
by squished August 3, 2009 3:00 PM PDT
It's a chicken and egg problem. We need a certain proportion of the cars to go electric in order to pressure utilities to clean up. The more electric driven cars, the more pressure. It's that simple, the devil's in the details.
by badasscat August 4, 2009 8:02 AM PDT
Kormiko: a solar roof would be nice, but the problem is they don't generate enough power to run a car with this level of performance. (You'd need one of those purpose-built cars with a *giant* roof that still takes 2 minutes to get up to 30mph.)

Obviously every little bit makes a difference, but there is one major manufacturer (and I forget who) that offers a solar roof on one of their cars (maybe the Prius?) and all it's used for is to run the air conditioning. That's as much power as you get out of that.

And obviously, since most people would be charging their cars at night, it's not going to help a lot there.
by Slvrshot August 2, 2009 5:11 PM PDT
Oh it would look better if they made the front lights more attractive. They make the car look like a big blue green tree frog.
Reply to this comment
by Ian_Joyner August 2, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
I agree. It's ugly. Nissan make cars that look out of date in just two years - that's probably deliberate marketing. What's that nose on the front - some carbuncle on the face? Their badges are getting ridiculously large. I know it's some marketeers idea of branding. Unfortunately, Nissan tries forcing its brand down people's throats and that gets irritating. They also make flimsy (hi-tech) cars that aren't driven by experts, but by boy racers who wrap themselves around a tree racing off a Subaru.
by kormiko August 2, 2009 8:36 PM PDT
I really don't like the headlights popping up like that and I'm not crazy about the back either. I'm glad that they chose that blue over a lime green for the press because people would instantly call it the Kermit car with those headlight eyes. Maybe if I see it in black or gray, I might like it better, but I'm probably gonna wait for something else to be my first electric vehicle.

I don't like the name "Leaf" either.

"So, what do you drive?" "I drive a Leaf." "Oh."

I do like the interior though and 100 miles is pretty good for city drivers.
I'm ready for the next decade.
Reply to this comment
by Ian_Joyner August 3, 2009 1:05 AM PDT
Well you'll be blown away! And what's with the SHIFT_some garbage advertising? Trying to be trendy and look pseudo-technical like some Windows junk. Well Steve Jobs' Microsoft epithet of "Tasteless" could equally be applied to Nissan.
by kormiko August 3, 2009 2:22 AM PDT
@ Ian_Joyner

Uh ... what?
by monkeyfun14 August 3, 2009 6:34 AM PDT
Ian_Joyner

Is this what Apple fanboys are coming too bashing Microsoft in articles that are not even in the same industry?
by kormiko August 3, 2009 3:38 PM PDT
I just did a quick Photoshop color change from that blue and it doesn't look as bad in darker shades. I know that they will probably have a bunch of bright colors for more impact, but a charcoal gray (or a black with a hint of color) would be much more appealing to me.

One thing that bothers me is that this is the kind of car that companies will use to advertise their pizza place or other product. They always go for the cars that look different than most others. Like the Prius, the MINI, the Scions and Cube, the LEAF will certainly be on the advertisers list.
by natedogg0511 August 2, 2009 8:44 PM PDT
I love this but where is someone going to let me plug this in at while I am on the road going long distance. Driving from TX to FL in this would suck. Driving back and forth to work would be amazing.
Reply to this comment
by kormiko August 2, 2009 9:10 PM PDT
Better get a long extension cord or wait until they have many quick charge electric stations. The Tesla supposed to get 300 miles, but that's still not enough for that distance. This Leaf car is mainly for to and from work (shopping, going to the movies etc.) within a city.
by BogusBasin August 3, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
Republican
by squished August 3, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
Ya and if it can't travel through time and spew kettle corn from the tailpipe, well then forget it!

Not every problem needs to be solved at once for there to be a market.
by badasscat August 4, 2009 8:08 AM PDT
This car is not intended for long trips. I think that's implicit.

Most people own cars these days for a specific type of use. If you're a traveling salesman who drives 50,000 miles per year, you're going to buy a different car than somebody who commutes by train to work every day. That's true even when comparing gasoline cars to each other.

This is a commuter car. You can drive it around town, to your job, to the mall on weekends, etc. For many people, that's 90% of their driving. Since most families these days have 2 cars, you can still have a second car for long trips if you need it. And if you're a real eco-friendly family, that can still be a hybrid.

Myself, I am actually interested in the Leaf more for the cost savings than the environmental factors, although the latter is a nice bonus. But I suspect most people who buy this will do it so they don't need to worry about $4 gas again. Even $3 gas is pretty crazy when you've got a 22 gallon tank to fill. Who wants to spend $60 filling their gas tank every few days? I'd much rather spend $20 on electricity instead and know that that amount is regulated and will not increase without government approval.
by wannaelectriccar August 2, 2009 9:11 PM PDT
I absolutely love the technology but I only wish that Nissan would have mated the electric motor and batteries with their Cube . . . essentially what they were using as a test bed for an electric concept car these past couple of years.

The Leaf looks like a warmed-over Prius with no grill. :-( The Japanese make very well built cars but, with precious few exceptions, they're not much to look at . . . especially 4-door sedans, which are always bumpy and sculpted where they should have been rounded and smooth. Or maybe it's that the innovative styling (the aforementioned Cube) only occasionally makes it to US shores and the boring looking stuff is what most Americans with middle-of-the-road tastes will end up buying.

In any event . . . I'm just glad that a major car company is going to offer an electric car like this.
Batteries will only get better and the average range on these vehicles will improve. The power grid will get greener and less electricity for these things will have the heavy carbon footprint that is attached to it today. It won't happen overnight but it WILL happen. Just like computers, early adopters will help make electric cars into better products and economies of scale will concurrently make them more affordable to buy. Then, several years into the future, everyone will have/want one.

I'll just wait until there are more body styles to choose from and for "a charging station on every corner" (the latter of which , apparently, Nissan/Renailt has already been giving a lot of careful planning towards in the cities where these cars will first be sold.)
Reply to this comment
by badasscat August 4, 2009 8:12 AM PDT
The problem with the Cube is that it's hardly aerodynamic, which makes a big difference in range. The Leaf is obviously much more aerodynamic.

Also, I hate the new Cube anyway. The previous-gen Cube was really cute, but the new one, which was redesigned for its American introduction, is bigger and uglier, contoured in all the wrong places. It's the same thing Toyota did with the new Scion xB, which was also redesigned for Americans to the detriment of the car's unique styling.
by kelmon August 3, 2009 3:17 AM PDT
Well, that's actually not a bad looking Nissan, which is unusual for the company.
Reply to this comment
by 2centsbook August 3, 2009 10:31 AM PDT
An affordable, normal-looking, 100% electric car? This is a dream come true. Electric cars are safe, clean, efficient. This is a really big step towards reducing greenhouse gases, lessening the impact of peak oil, and saving money in the process. American auto companies need to learn from Nissan on this one! I just finished reading ?Two Cents Per Mile? by Nevres Cefo, which is the most informative book I?ve read on the topic, and I suggest it to anyone interested in electric cars. http://www.twocentspermile.com
Reply to this comment
by DJOmega6 August 3, 2009 11:52 AM PDT
I can't believe that the electric car revolution might finally get going! I know Ford is working on one similar to the Leaf in terms of driving distance before recharging that is suppose to be out in 2011. Really exciting times.
Reply to this comment
by belchmelch August 3, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
i live in an apartment... how am i suppose to charge my Leaf... or whatever competing model Toyota/Honda has waiting in the wings...
Reply to this comment
by badasscat August 4, 2009 8:20 AM PDT
chicken/egg problem... if electric cars become popular, there will be a way for you to do it.

For now, it's going to be mostly homeowners who will be able to take advantage of this. This is nothing new; there are a lot of things homeowners can do that apartment renters can't (and some things vice versa; you can call the landlord when you need something fixed, whereas homeowners have to do it themselves, or pay for someone else to).

If electric cars take off, though, then you'll start to see outdoor power outlets popping up as an amenity in apartment buildings...
by chrisx1 August 3, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
The Volt is better because you can drive the Volt cross country with no distance limitations.

If you buy this you need two cars. The Nissan for commuting and local errands and another vehicle for road trips over 40 miles or so from home.
Reply to this comment
by squished August 3, 2009 3:11 PM PDT
Shouldn't be a problem. http://www.autospies.com/news/Study-Finds-Americans-Own-2-28-Vehicles-Per-Household-26437/. Just replace one of your 2.28 cars.
by RememberEZ August 3, 2009 1:43 PM PDT
When will the car owner be given the opportunity to manage their own car keys, at little or no additional cost?

Software to facilitate owner management of their own keys can be available for free (e.g. RememberEZ.blogspot.com). Is there someone in management saying that the consumer is not smart enough to manage her/his own keys? Is there an owner that would reject the opportunity to have a car whose keys are unique from all other cars in the world? Is there a car owner that would reject the opportunity to make/remake their own keys anytime/anyplace they want, at no additional cost to them?
Reply to this comment
by squished August 3, 2009 3:16 PM PDT
Dude that looks way more complicated than the current solution. And haven't hotel locks already solved this problem?
by fuzzybomber1 August 3, 2009 2:15 PM PDT
I am wondering where people think the power to charge the cars is going to come from. The power is going to come from coal plants mainly because alternate ways are still at a very low percentage of the total power created. Since people are against nuclear power this is just a way for people to feel better about themselves and show off to other people. It is just like the fraud of recycling. Think if recycling really helped anything then way aren't we payed to recycle. The only product recycled that is cost productive and doesn't create waste is recycling aluminum.
Reply to this comment
by SilentSkies2889 August 3, 2009 3:17 PM PDT
Finally someone has a brain on CNET instead of some teenage ********* acting like he can solve World Hunger *rolls eyes*, I totally agree with you, Obama wants to put coal power plants out of business and is refusing to let contractors design and develop NEW nuclear power plants. If ANY of you numbnuts had a BRAIN, France uses almost 90% nuclear power for their entire country with almost NO mishaps!
by squished August 3, 2009 3:22 PM PDT
This horse was already beat to death in earlier posts.
by kormiko August 3, 2009 10:58 PM PDT
@ SilentSkies: "almost NO mishaps"? I don't know about you, but I don't want to be around any mishap.
Weren't there like four nuclear leaks in less than a month last year in France? People couldn't shower or drink the water. Oh, and France uses about 78% nuclear. Although that is a lot, that's hardly "almost 90%."

What is the deal with Republicans liking everything that is dirty when it comes to energy?
There is no such thing as "clean coal." Coal power plants actually produces 100 times the radiation as nuclear power plants of the same size. And we all know the problems with Oil. So why shouldn't we continue with Nuclear Power?

With nuclear power, there is nuclear waste. Yes, there is a way to reprocess that waste, but the more you refine uranium, the more it becomes useful as a weapon and that is something that we don't want to have laying around. And even then, there is still going to be waste that won't go away for hundreds of thousands of years. It might be better than what we have now with Coal and Oil, but that is short term fixes. France will someday see the error in their ways. We need clean, renewable energy from several sources. If you think that is too hard, you aren't trying hard enough.

Do you research! Don't just listen to what news stations tell you! Stop watching Fox News! Or why don't you move next door to a Nuclear power plant. I bet that you wouldn't.
by creative36 August 3, 2009 5:18 PM PDT
awe it looks cute. So much better than stinky gassers.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (65 Comments)

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics