2010 Tesla Roadster Sport first drive
For 2010, Tesla updates its electric Roadster with a Sport version, featuring faster acceleration.
(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)
Tesla often emphasizes that it works more like a Silicon Valley technology company than a traditional car company. And the company just proved it by delivering a model update to the Tesla Roadster for 2010. Remember, the Roadster has only been in production for one year, but in that time Tesla completely redesigned the interior, while at the same time adding new materials to reduce cabin noise. Model updates from other automakers often take five years.
We spent a day with the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport, enjoying its unique driving experience and finding these updates made the previous generation car seem like something hacked together in a garage. Where the previous car had a fussy little lever for putting it in drive, the new car uses push buttons. To check battery statistics and change the drive mode, you had to use a touch screen by your left knee. That touch screen has been moved to the center of the dashboard. And in a real step toward convenience, the Tesla Roadster now comes with a glove box.
The rear air intakes get clear coat carbon fiber inserts.
(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)Externally, the casual observer won't see much difference. The Tesla Roadster uses the same Lotus-sourced body clad in carbon fiber. But the carbon fiber stands out more, as clear-coat panels make up the hood, spoiler, and even the insets in the rear air intakes. The suspension is now adjustable for comfort or sport, and the all-new Sport version of the Roadster uses an upgraded power train that rockets it to 60 mph in 3.7 seconds, faster than the standard Roadster's 3.9 second time.
Goes like a freight train
The Tesla Roadster Sport drives like nothing on the road today. If you've driven a bumper car you'll have some idea of how the Roadster Sport operates. You push the accelerator and it goes. But unlike bumper cars, the Tesla Roadster Sport gets pushed by a robust motor making 295 pound-feet of torque. That high torque figure comes on almost as soon as the motor starts spinning, and carries all the way up to 6,000 rpm.
To put it in nontechnical terms, when you hit the accelerator a ram slams into your back, pushing you inexorably forward, not letting up until your eyelids are peeled back by the wind and the first moments of your life come into vision.
The Roadster Sport has three different drive modes: Standard, Range, and Performance. The majority of the time we had the car, we left it in Standard mode. And while it won't achieve its full 3.7 seconds to 60 mph time in that mode, you would hardly know it, as it's still damn fast. But if you really want to blow the doors off a Porsche or Ferrari, a simple click forward with the key, as if you were starting the car, toggles Performance mode on the fly.
Cornering can also be dramatic in the Roadster Sport, but for the wrong reasons. Unlike Lotus cars using the same body and chassis, the Tesla Roadster Sport has a big, heavy battery pack sitting behind the passenger compartment, changing the weight distribution. During our short time with the car, we didn't get to test it thoroughly, but there seemed to be quite a bit of understeer.
While maneuvering through a parking garage, we found the turning radius wider than expected. And as the car lacks power steering, get ready to build some arm muscle cranking the wheel around.
Driving green
The Roadster Sport has Brembo brakes, but you won't need them much.
(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)Under normal driving conditions, the Roadster Sport is a champ, its passing power and small size making it easy to zip around traffic. We found ourselves monitoring the kilowatt gauge while driving, able to keep it at near zero while traveling on 35 mph urban roads. On the freeway, at speeds of 70 or 80 mph, the car pulled 25 to 50 kilowatts at steady speed, while an amp display under the speedometer frequently topped 100.
In a number of ways, Tesla really changes the driving paradigm. As soon as you lift off the accelerator, regenerative braking kicks in, slowing the car much more than simple air and road friction. The Roadster Sport doesn't coast like a gas engine car. When keeping a safe following distance in traffic, we found that the regenerative braking was ample to bring the Roadster Sport to an almost complete stop.
There is creep built into the system, and the car will continue to move along at a few miles per hour, at which point you need to use the friction brakes, Brembos on the Roadster Sport. The dual benefit of this system comes in electricity being pumped back into the battery, and very little wear and tear on the friction brakes.
The Roadster Sport is good for about 200 miles in normal driving.
(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)According to EPA numbers, the Roadster Sport goes 244 miles on a full charge. During our day with the car, we were looking at 150 to 200 miles of range. But another way Tesla changes the driving paradigm is that, instead of waiting for a near empty battery for recharging, you treat it like a cell phone, plugging it in whenever you have the opportunity. Where you wouldn't refill the tank on a gasoline-powered car at the end of each day's commute, you can plug in the Tesla whenever you get home.
Tesla includes a cord with the car to plug it in at any AC outlet, but using this solution only gets you five miles per hour of charging. A home charger available from the company will give it 56 miles per hour, running the battery to full from empty in less than four hours.
Single DIN cabin tech
The cabin of the Roadster Sport is tight, but a little easier to get into than a Lotus, as Tesla lowered the door sills. Expect to be rubbing shoulders with your passenger while on the road. But Tesla pretties up the cabin with leather, carbon fiber, and aluminum surfaces. It may not have the pure lushness of other high-end sports cars, but it passes well.
The JVC stereo is very capable, with navigation, iPod, and Bluetooth.
(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)We frankly didn't expect much for the car's cabin electronics, as Tesla currently relies on an aftermarket head unit for infotainment. But we applaud the company for picking the JVC KD-NXD505. This head unit provides navigation, Bluetooth, iPod connectivity, and even an internal hard drive for music storage.
Although we spent most of our time driving the Roadster Sport, we did have occasion to use the head unit's navigation feature. Surprisingly, it was intuitive and easy to input a street address using the minimal controls, all while stopped at traffic lights (the system doesn't allow input while the car is in motion). The screen is small, but nicely rendered, so we could see where to turn, while voice guidance also proved helpful.
Tesla mounts the iPod cable from this stereo on the console. There is no hatch or holder, but our iPhone rested easily on the flat surface, and didn't seem inclined to fall off as we drove.
In sum
Given the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport's $129,000 price tag and small cabin, it is a niche car for early adopters. But those early adopters will find a car suitable to drive to work every day while not spending a penny on gas. Engineering types can thrill to the car's statistics, such as the electric motor's 92 percent efficiency, while sporting types will get a kick out of the immense acceleration, if not the cornering. The bottom line is that this car has the most technically advanced power train in a production car today, with greater range and speed than any other electric car on the market.
On Sale Now:
$128,500.00
View the latest prices for 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport





good for you. but you can take any car in the world so grats make sure you charge the world in his name cowards.
Other than that he a a unit of measurement named after him and a few scientific instruments.
Tesla does have a sedan on the way. It'll still be fairly expensive but it's getting there.
Think about. The current "Roadster" is based on the current Lotus Elise, where it the body and suspension components are all made Lotus in England. All the "engineering" and "tooling" has already been paid for by Lotus, and Tesla now pays Lotus for using this Elise shell to stuff a few batteries and electric motors into it.
Originally, the Roadster supposed to come in at $85,000... but the price continue to creep-up as the car's production delayed. Now it's in the neighbourhood of $115,000 and Tesla justify it's cost due to the "new technology".
Well, building a brand new sedan from scratch requires "engineering" development and "tooling" money which Tesla doesn't have (it has difficult time funding projects as we speak). I don't think this Model-S will be anything that you and I want to use as our daily driver, because it will cost in the neighbourhood of $150,000+ before it's available to the general public. And then, it will join the roadster as another rich "green" car to show the little people that they care about the environement.
How is it one person can be so wrong and yet so vehement. Or rather -why is it these things seem to go hand in hand.
Both the body and frame are unique to Tesla.
There is no reason to put snarky quotes around "new technology". It is new technology - no one else has done before or since.
So what's left of your argument: "not much".
ICEs didn't start with the model T - neither has electric. So what?
Have you noticed why we don't have too many European cars here in North America? Because aside from basic engineering, the vehicles need to meet both Federal crash testing and emissions here that is unique to this location. That is very expensive, especially when the target continues to rise.
Now for emmissions, the Tesla Model-S may be excempt. But for crash testing, it's another story. Front impact, side impact, you name it... it needs to be done. And that cost further development money... money that Tesla does not have.
GM will most likely be releasing the Chevrolet Volt at a loss when it comes out into production next year, similar to the loss that Toyota had with early generations of the Prius. But unlike the Volt and Prius, the volume of the Model-S is probably forecasted to about 2,500 to 5,000 vehicles a year (given Tesla production capacity). No company will be able to recover their investment in the typical 4-5 year vehicle cycle and sell their new fully electrical 4-door sedan for under the claimed $50,000. No one... especially in these economic days.
Regarding your comment "new technology - no one else has done before or since. " Check AC Propulsion in San Dimas, CA, from whom Tesla licenses their core technology. ACP had cars on the road well before the Tesla Roadster came along. Then scope out the BMW Mini-E, the all-electric Mini Cooper. Every Mini E has a controller and motor designed and built by AC Propulsion. So, basically, AC Propulsion did it before AND since.
The electric car is called green because it uses electricity instead of gasoline. But where does the electricity come from? Coal burning power plants. Oil and natural gas are scarce and expensive, nuclear is banned, solar and wind are unreliable, only coal is abundant and cheap. Inefficent power plants burning coal to make electricity, the loss with the electricity traveling over long distance power lines and the inefficiency of the electric engine make the electric car less green than a gasoline powered car. Sorry!
And this is poor people subsidizing rich people in the name of saving the environment.
For the nation to produce enough juice to run millions of electric cars, we will have to invest heavily in more electron-farms, harnessing each available gust of wind, flow of water, and photon. But it is definitely possible with current technology. Don't **** on good ideas just because they're not fully worked-out yet.
Regarding convenience: A person buying a tesla knows going in what's up. Many of these issues can be solved down the road with better charging times and /or battery swapping.
Tesla was very smart in releasing a sports car as its first model. As a daily commuter or joy toy it succeeds very well. For long distance touring, concerns regarding charging time etc. become more relevant.
If your concern is with the poor subsidizing the rich, (and I don't know how you got there in this argument) consider the middle east wars, past and present, and think of how much blood and taxes goes into securing oil sources. Think of how much better your schools could be without that drain on the nation's treasury.
There is much to do in making power plants more efficient and cleaner. There's a lot of technology but little political will. Your conclusions on the ICE vs. the electric are wrong even as things stand now.
BTW: there are very few engines less efficient than an internal combustion. Around 70% of energy is lost to heat,noise, and friction. There are very few things more efficient than an electric motor although they lose some of this when in a steady state.
www.acuvueoasys.us
The Tesla is exactly the right kind of marketing -- If you used Ed Begley, all you would get would be the birkenstock crowd -- and hollywood types trying to prove a point -- or in the case of Ed, get a show. A DC motor with infinite torque at zero RPM sure gets the attention of those who want to smoke a million dollar McClaren. It's a brilliant beginning.
And the electricity doesn't necessarily have to come from burning coal -- it can come from water falling off a cliff, the sun, or (oh no! nuclear fission), But the commenter who mentioned time to charge has a point -- and there are those who are investigating "who says it takes that long to charge a battery" and succeeding. Wonder if they discovered how to do that in 1890?
I don't know about others, but I can't afford one car to drive to work and back, and another car to drive the rest of the time. Not to mention life is not so easily pigeon holed. How often do you go to work expecting only to return directly home, when life happens and you end up doing other things after work?
Again, the electric car will succeed only when it can directly replace the gasoline car.
-
by RobertT65
November 14, 2009 3:19 PM PST
- The US already has the ability to recharge 83% of all it's cars (given they were miraculously transformed into electric powered vehicles overnight) with its' current electric production during the off-peak night time hours when people would be most likely to be recharging their car. So we don't really need to produce a lot more energy to recharge an electric car nation. We could get rid of gasoline consumption and need very little increase in electrical output. The increase needed can easily be met with newer green sources; coal does not have to be used at all.
-
Like this
Reply to this comment
-
(36 Comments)As for range, Tesla is now looking at lithium-air battery technology, which could see ranges of 2000 miles between charges....