• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
November 9, 2009 5:53 PM PST

2010 Tesla Roadster Sport first drive

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 36 comments

2010 Tesla Roadster Sport

For 2010, Tesla updates its electric Roadster with a Sport version, featuring faster acceleration.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)


Tesla often emphasizes that it works more like a Silicon Valley technology company than a traditional car company. And the company just proved it by delivering a model update to the Tesla Roadster for 2010. Remember, the Roadster has only been in production for one year, but in that time Tesla completely redesigned the interior, while at the same time adding new materials to reduce cabin noise. Model updates from other automakers often take five years.

We spent a day with the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport, enjoying its unique driving experience and finding these updates made the previous generation car seem like something hacked together in a garage. Where the previous car had a fussy little lever for putting it in drive, the new car uses push buttons. To check battery statistics and change the drive mode, you had to use a touch screen by your left knee. That touch screen has been moved to the center of the dashboard. And in a real step toward convenience, the Tesla Roadster now comes with a glove box.

Tesla air intake

The rear air intakes get clear coat carbon fiber inserts.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

Externally, the casual observer won't see much difference. The Tesla Roadster uses the same Lotus-sourced body clad in carbon fiber. But the carbon fiber stands out more, as clear-coat panels make up the hood, spoiler, and even the insets in the rear air intakes. The suspension is now adjustable for comfort or sport, and the all-new Sport version of the Roadster uses an upgraded power train that rockets it to 60 mph in 3.7 seconds, faster than the standard Roadster's 3.9 second time.

Goes like a freight train

The Tesla Roadster Sport drives like nothing on the road today. If you've driven a bumper car you'll have some idea of how the Roadster Sport operates. You push the accelerator and it goes. But unlike bumper cars, the Tesla Roadster Sport gets pushed by a robust motor making 295 pound-feet of torque. That high torque figure comes on almost as soon as the motor starts spinning, and carries all the way up to 6,000 rpm.

To put it in nontechnical terms, when you hit the accelerator a ram slams into your back, pushing you inexorably forward, not letting up until your eyelids are peeled back by the wind and the first moments of your life come into vision.

The Roadster Sport has three different drive modes: Standard, Range, and Performance. The majority of the time we had the car, we left it in Standard mode. And while it won't achieve its full 3.7 seconds to 60 mph time in that mode, you would hardly know it, as it's still damn fast. But if you really want to blow the doors off a Porsche or Ferrari, a simple click forward with the key, as if you were starting the car, toggles Performance mode on the fly.

Cornering can also be dramatic in the Roadster Sport, but for the wrong reasons. Unlike Lotus cars using the same body and chassis, the Tesla Roadster Sport has a big, heavy battery pack sitting behind the passenger compartment, changing the weight distribution. During our short time with the car, we didn't get to test it thoroughly, but there seemed to be quite a bit of understeer.

While maneuvering through a parking garage, we found the turning radius wider than expected. And as the car lacks power steering, get ready to build some arm muscle cranking the wheel around.

Driving green

Tesla front wheel

The Roadster Sport has Brembo brakes, but you won't need them much.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

Under normal driving conditions, the Roadster Sport is a champ, its passing power and small size making it easy to zip around traffic. We found ourselves monitoring the kilowatt gauge while driving, able to keep it at near zero while traveling on 35 mph urban roads. On the freeway, at speeds of 70 or 80 mph, the car pulled 25 to 50 kilowatts at steady speed, while an amp display under the speedometer frequently topped 100.

In a number of ways, Tesla really changes the driving paradigm. As soon as you lift off the accelerator, regenerative braking kicks in, slowing the car much more than simple air and road friction. The Roadster Sport doesn't coast like a gas engine car. When keeping a safe following distance in traffic, we found that the regenerative braking was ample to bring the Roadster Sport to an almost complete stop.

There is creep built into the system, and the car will continue to move along at a few miles per hour, at which point you need to use the friction brakes, Brembos on the Roadster Sport. The dual benefit of this system comes in electricity being pumped back into the battery, and very little wear and tear on the friction brakes.

Tesla battery gauge

The Roadster Sport is good for about 200 miles in normal driving.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

According to EPA numbers, the Roadster Sport goes 244 miles on a full charge. During our day with the car, we were looking at 150 to 200 miles of range. But another way Tesla changes the driving paradigm is that, instead of waiting for a near empty battery for recharging, you treat it like a cell phone, plugging it in whenever you have the opportunity. Where you wouldn't refill the tank on a gasoline-powered car at the end of each day's commute, you can plug in the Tesla whenever you get home.

Tesla includes a cord with the car to plug it in at any AC outlet, but using this solution only gets you five miles per hour of charging. A home charger available from the company will give it 56 miles per hour, running the battery to full from empty in less than four hours.

Single DIN cabin tech

The cabin of the Roadster Sport is tight, but a little easier to get into than a Lotus, as Tesla lowered the door sills. Expect to be rubbing shoulders with your passenger while on the road. But Tesla pretties up the cabin with leather, carbon fiber, and aluminum surfaces. It may not have the pure lushness of other high-end sports cars, but it passes well.

JVC head unit in Tesla

The JVC stereo is very capable, with navigation, iPod, and Bluetooth.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

We frankly didn't expect much for the car's cabin electronics, as Tesla currently relies on an aftermarket head unit for infotainment. But we applaud the company for picking the JVC KD-NXD505. This head unit provides navigation, Bluetooth, iPod connectivity, and even an internal hard drive for music storage.

Although we spent most of our time driving the Roadster Sport, we did have occasion to use the head unit's navigation feature. Surprisingly, it was intuitive and easy to input a street address using the minimal controls, all while stopped at traffic lights (the system doesn't allow input while the car is in motion). The screen is small, but nicely rendered, so we could see where to turn, while voice guidance also proved helpful.

Tesla mounts the iPod cable from this stereo on the console. There is no hatch or holder, but our iPhone rested easily on the flat surface, and didn't seem inclined to fall off as we drove.

In sum

Given the 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport's $129,000 price tag and small cabin, it is a niche car for early adopters. But those early adopters will find a car suitable to drive to work every day while not spending a penny on gas. Engineering types can thrill to the car's statistics, such as the electric motor's 92 percent efficiency, while sporting types will get a kick out of the immense acceleration, if not the cornering. The bottom line is that this car has the most technically advanced power train in a production car today, with greater range and speed than any other electric car on the market.

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $128,500.00
View the latest prices for 2010 Tesla Roadster Sport

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Cadillac CTS blows off its own doors
VW Up Lite: Small car, smaller carbon footprint
2011 Audi A8 gets handwriting recognition
Mazda shows off U.S.-spec Mazda2
The 2011 Audi A8 is looking good
2009 San Francisco International Auto Show: The Mix Tape
Mazda, Think, EnerDel partner on electric rentals
Chevy Volt to cruise into California next year
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (36 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by highguard01 November 9, 2009 6:26 PM PST
You know you put his name on that car he doesnt even like it. you use his inventions to make money.
good for you. but you can take any car in the world so grats make sure you charge the world in his name cowards.
Reply to this comment
by Ed_Jeter November 9, 2009 8:09 PM PST
What was highguard01 trying to say? It was incomprehensible. Someday there will be a lighter battery with more energy density then you will have a car that will handle like a Lotus chassis should. Not to mention it will need fewer KW for the same performance.
by htcstech November 10, 2009 4:40 AM PST
Tesla is dead and he worked/Invented AC. The only thing the car has that was Tesla is his name.
Other than that he a a unit of measurement named after him and a few scientific instruments.
by stevedice November 9, 2009 6:46 PM PST
i wonder if the carbon fiber body absorbs radar? that would frustrate the police now , wouldn't it?
Reply to this comment
by expatincebu November 9, 2009 7:14 PM PST
This car is nothing but an irrelevant distraction. It is a toy for the few. Where is the affordable electric economy sedan for the masses?
Reply to this comment
by ObsceneZen November 9, 2009 7:55 PM PST
Such things as these certainly won't see mass production, but they are definitely useful. Electric cars are still in the infant stages, and expensive cars like this fuel the innovation needed to produce the technology that will bring about your "affordable electric economy sedan for the masses."
by richard.watson November 9, 2009 8:59 PM PST
This work brings down the eventual price of the sedan, similar to how F1 racing benefits the real world. It's a research platform used to bed down what works and what doesn't, while reducing the price of the technologies as scale kicks in.

Tesla does have a sedan on the way. It'll still be fairly expensive but it's getting there.
by PdxThom November 9, 2009 11:21 PM PST
This car is as irrelevant as race cars are to the development of production cars. They gave us more safety features, better control, better engines and so much more. Tesla has done what the big three have not been able (or refused) to do. They have more than just a roadster, they have a very affordable sedan that is just beautiful. If I needed another car, that would be first on my list. Not only is it practical but it's responsible.
by ittesi259 November 10, 2009 12:20 PM PST
40-50k is not VERY affordable....who are you kidding.
by Ed_Jeter November 9, 2009 8:15 PM PST
Expatincebu, you need to have a little patience. Tesla has taken the right path. It will be a matter of time before economy of scale can kick in.
Reply to this comment
by trbjr November 9, 2009 8:17 PM PST
My only question is what happens when you're driving, drop your phone, and accidentally hit that neutral button while speeding by the Porsche?
Reply to this comment
by tektaktyks November 10, 2009 5:50 AM PST
its against the law to use your cellphone while driving
by streamline35 November 10, 2009 7:21 AM PST
um, same thing that happens to any other car shifted into neutral? the engine stops powering the wheels until you put it in drive
by jezzur November 11, 2009 1:16 AM PST
No it is different with electric cars, you just get rocketed skywards, turn into a whale and a bunch of flowers, and then make a mess.
by James Anderson Merritt November 9, 2009 8:22 PM PST
I remember when the "computer for the rest of us" was a toy for the well-off few of us. Then Apple traveled up and down the learning and price curves, and now people carry around computers more powerful than many Apple made in the 80s and 90s in their pockets as iPods and iPhones. It will take a while for the high-end-toy to become a mass-market product, but it will happen. Tesla is going about this the right way: doing the key research and getting the bugs out for the well-heeled early adopters, so they can produce robust vehicles in quantity via production lines for everyone else. The forthcoming Model-S is half the price of the Roadster and holds twice as many people (and their luggage) in greater comfort as a hard-top sedan. A more affordable sedan is planned after that. If they can travel that distance in just ten years of operation, they will have pulled off a miracle. So far, they seem on track. So cut 'em some slack. Apple took over 20 years to get to the iPod/iPhone, and they didn't have to deal with nearly the government red tape that the manufacturer of a freeway-qualified car does.
Reply to this comment
by PiCASSiMO November 9, 2009 8:59 PM PST
I call Tesla's bluff on the Model S sedan to sell it under $50,000.

Think about. The current "Roadster" is based on the current Lotus Elise, where it the body and suspension components are all made Lotus in England. All the "engineering" and "tooling" has already been paid for by Lotus, and Tesla now pays Lotus for using this Elise shell to stuff a few batteries and electric motors into it.

Originally, the Roadster supposed to come in at $85,000... but the price continue to creep-up as the car's production delayed. Now it's in the neighbourhood of $115,000 and Tesla justify it's cost due to the "new technology".

Well, building a brand new sedan from scratch requires "engineering" development and "tooling" money which Tesla doesn't have (it has difficult time funding projects as we speak). I don't think this Model-S will be anything that you and I want to use as our daily driver, because it will cost in the neighbourhood of $150,000+ before it's available to the general public. And then, it will join the roadster as another rich "green" car to show the little people that they care about the environement.
by JimBob88--2008 November 9, 2009 11:51 PM PST
Picassimo:

How is it one person can be so wrong and yet so vehement. Or rather -why is it these things seem to go hand in hand.

Both the body and frame are unique to Tesla.

There is no reason to put snarky quotes around "new technology". It is new technology - no one else has done before or since.

So what's left of your argument: "not much".

ICEs didn't start with the model T - neither has electric. So what?
by PiCASSiMO November 10, 2009 5:07 AM PST
JimBob88--2008:

Have you noticed why we don't have too many European cars here in North America? Because aside from basic engineering, the vehicles need to meet both Federal crash testing and emissions here that is unique to this location. That is very expensive, especially when the target continues to rise.

Now for emmissions, the Tesla Model-S may be excempt. But for crash testing, it's another story. Front impact, side impact, you name it... it needs to be done. And that cost further development money... money that Tesla does not have.

GM will most likely be releasing the Chevrolet Volt at a loss when it comes out into production next year, similar to the loss that Toyota had with early generations of the Prius. But unlike the Volt and Prius, the volume of the Model-S is probably forecasted to about 2,500 to 5,000 vehicles a year (given Tesla production capacity). No company will be able to recover their investment in the typical 4-5 year vehicle cycle and sell their new fully electrical 4-door sedan for under the claimed $50,000. No one... especially in these economic days.
by RussBinder November 15, 2009 7:40 AM PST
To JimBob88--2008 -
Regarding your comment "new technology - no one else has done before or since. " Check AC Propulsion in San Dimas, CA, from whom Tesla licenses their core technology. ACP had cars on the road well before the Tesla Roadster came along. Then scope out the BMW Mini-E, the all-electric Mini Cooper. Every Mini E has a controller and motor designed and built by AC Propulsion. So, basically, AC Propulsion did it before AND since.
by James Anderson Merritt November 9, 2009 8:29 PM PST
Also, it was a little weird to see the torque unit given as "pound-feet": my whole life it was "foot-pounds." Did the change to "force-first" order happen in response to the SI unit of torque, the newton-meter? If so, how very politically correct of CNET, to express American/Imperial units in a way that matches up with the metric equivalents. Oh well. Thanks for covering the car. I enjoyed the article.
Reply to this comment
by senderista November 9, 2009 9:41 PM PST
Perhaps this is to distinguish torque from work/energy. The two have the same units (force * distance), but are conceptually distinct.
by SJKenneth November 10, 2009 2:27 AM PST
The electric car will only become a reality when it can be refueled in about the same time as a gasoline car, less than 10 minutes. Your out doing errands and run low on electrons. So you stop into your local filling station to fill up. You plug in your car and wait for 4 hours so you can continue your drive home. I think not!

The electric car is called green because it uses electricity instead of gasoline. But where does the electricity come from? Coal burning power plants. Oil and natural gas are scarce and expensive, nuclear is banned, solar and wind are unreliable, only coal is abundant and cheap. Inefficent power plants burning coal to make electricity, the loss with the electricity traveling over long distance power lines and the inefficiency of the electric engine make the electric car less green than a gasoline powered car. Sorry!

And this is poor people subsidizing rich people in the name of saving the environment.
Reply to this comment
by PiCASSiMO November 10, 2009 5:09 AM PST
I couldn't agree with you more... sadly, these pet projects for the rich will continue to be made as everyone believes that being green is to drive electrical cars where the raw energy source comes from "the wall".
by man_w_balls November 10, 2009 7:04 AM PST
there are near-infinite ways to produce electricity. Take a look at Daryl Hannah's home, where she lives off the grid.
For the nation to produce enough juice to run millions of electric cars, we will have to invest heavily in more electron-farms, harnessing each available gust of wind, flow of water, and photon. But it is definitely possible with current technology. Don't **** on good ideas just because they're not fully worked-out yet.
by JimBob88--2008 November 10, 2009 10:25 AM PST
There are issues but your argument shifts between convenience issues and environmental.

Regarding convenience: A person buying a tesla knows going in what's up. Many of these issues can be solved down the road with better charging times and /or battery swapping.

Tesla was very smart in releasing a sports car as its first model. As a daily commuter or joy toy it succeeds very well. For long distance touring, concerns regarding charging time etc. become more relevant.

If your concern is with the poor subsidizing the rich, (and I don't know how you got there in this argument) consider the middle east wars, past and present, and think of how much blood and taxes goes into securing oil sources. Think of how much better your schools could be without that drain on the nation's treasury.

There is much to do in making power plants more efficient and cleaner. There's a lot of technology but little political will. Your conclusions on the ICE vs. the electric are wrong even as things stand now.

BTW: there are very few engines less efficient than an internal combustion. Around 70% of energy is lost to heat,noise, and friction. There are very few things more efficient than an electric motor although they lose some of this when in a steady state.
by RussBinder November 15, 2009 7:54 AM PST
The key to the argument between is that gasoline powered cars HAVE to burn a fossil fuel - no choice. With electric cars, the nation has a choice, as the car runs just as well on electricity generated from, say, dams - a proven clean source.
by Acuvue00 November 10, 2009 7:39 AM PST
Still though, this car is very sweet to look at and if Toyota's legendary relaiability and build quality is anything to go by, this may just rattle a few cages.
www.acuvueoasys.us
Reply to this comment
by ittesi259 November 10, 2009 12:27 PM PST
What the crap does Toyota have to do with the Tesla Roadster?
by TomMariner November 10, 2009 12:37 PM PST
I used to make electronic kids toys -- the prototypes were worth hundreds of thousands of dollars while the build cost of the 500,000 unit run was like $4.00. It's called economy of scale. Couple that with the fact that once we relearn what car manufacturers knew in 1890 and you also climb up the learning curve.

The Tesla is exactly the right kind of marketing -- If you used Ed Begley, all you would get would be the birkenstock crowd -- and hollywood types trying to prove a point -- or in the case of Ed, get a show. A DC motor with infinite torque at zero RPM sure gets the attention of those who want to smoke a million dollar McClaren. It's a brilliant beginning.

And the electricity doesn't necessarily have to come from burning coal -- it can come from water falling off a cliff, the sun, or (oh no! nuclear fission), But the commenter who mentioned time to charge has a point -- and there are those who are investigating "who says it takes that long to charge a battery" and succeeding. Wonder if they discovered how to do that in 1890?
Reply to this comment
by RussBinder November 15, 2009 7:56 AM PST
It's an AC motor. That's the core trick to the whole thing.
by richard993 November 10, 2009 10:58 PM PST
Perhaps we are forgetting that electric vehicles are already a proven technology that works? The technology is there, but the larger manufacturers are dragging their feet leaving the smaller manufacturers like Tesla to do all the hard work on their own (at a much higher cost). Perhaps we are forgetting that General Motors already produced a successful electric vehicle in 1996 called EV1. It's viable, it works and its ready for most Americans (who use the car primarily to drive to work and back). The only thing that's slowing down the process are large corporations who have a stake in ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, etc... It's time to move on, stop funding terrorists and stop sending money overseas!
Reply to this comment
by SJKenneth November 13, 2009 2:49 AM PST
" it works and its ready for most Americans (who use the car primarily to drive to work and back). "

I don't know about others, but I can't afford one car to drive to work and back, and another car to drive the rest of the time. Not to mention life is not so easily pigeon holed. How often do you go to work expecting only to return directly home, when life happens and you end up doing other things after work?

Again, the electric car will succeed only when it can directly replace the gasoline car.
Reply to this comment
by mfmckenna November 13, 2009 7:10 PM PST
WE HEAR BUBBLINGLY EFFERFESCENT REVIEWS OF THE AFTERNOON DRIVE AND ACCELERATION...WHAY ABOUT THE RANGE IN SUMMER WITH THE AIR CONDITIONER AT FULL BLAST...WHAT IS THE 'REVISED RANGE'?...WHAT IS THE RANGE DURING WINTER WITH THE LIGHTS, WINDSHIELD WIPERS AND HEATER GOING...WHAT IS A REALISTIC RANGE UNDER THESE CONDITIONS/...MFM
Reply to this comment
by doverton November 13, 2009 8:34 PM PST
I think the people worried about how long it takes to charge are missing the point. You plug it in when you get home and you leave fully charged. 200 to 250 mile range. It is not a car for 400 mile road trips, that is the limitation. Within that limitation, it should work just fine.
Reply to this comment
by bertico1 November 14, 2009 7:07 AM PST
Who needs 0 to 60 that fast? It is more important 400 miles on a charge.
Reply to this comment
by RobertT65 November 14, 2009 3:19 PM PST
The US already has the ability to recharge 83% of all it's cars (given they were miraculously transformed into electric powered vehicles overnight) with its' current electric production during the off-peak night time hours when people would be most likely to be recharging their car. So we don't really need to produce a lot more energy to recharge an electric car nation. We could get rid of gasoline consumption and need very little increase in electrical output. The increase needed can easily be met with newer green sources; coal does not have to be used at all.

As for range, Tesla is now looking at lithium-air battery technology, which could see ranges of 2000 miles between charges....
Reply to this comment
(36 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics