November 10, 2009 11:43 AM PST

Dead battery? Just refill it

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 36 comments
Share

electric model car

This radio-controlled model car is powered by a battery that can be refilled with an electrolytic fluid.

(Credit: Fraunhofer Institute)

Imagine that you're driving your future electric car down the road, and it gives you a low battery warning. What do you do? Instead of spending a few hours at a recharging station, new battery technology being developed by the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany would let you pull into a service station and refill the battery with an electrolytic liquid.

The Fraunhofer Institute is using a redox flow battery, a type of cell that uses two electrolytic fluids exchanging protons through a membrane. This process generates electricity. Although this type of battery isn't new, the Fraunhofer Institute improved the energy density, making it equivalent to that of a lithium ion battery.

In production cars such as the Tesla Roadster, the lithium ion battery pack requires almost four hours from a quick charger to go about 200 miles. A redox flow battery service station would pump out the discharged electrolytic fluid from your car's battery, replacing it with charged fluid, most likely in a matter of minutes. Instead of getting new shipments of charged fluid, similar to how current service stations rely on tankers full of gasoline, the station could merely recharge the fluid on its premises, even using solar cells or a wind turbine.

Other companies are working on redox flow battery technology for stationary energy storage.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Mini the Beachcomber
BMW Z4 M, minus the M
Plugless power is coming
The 5 strangest car races
New Toyota hybrid concept teased for Detroit
SEMA News names the 2010 Most Accessory-Friendly Vehicles
Vote for the 2009 Tech Car of the Year
New Chevy chief's top to-dos: Key launches, marketing plan
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (36 Comments)
by DragonStab November 10, 2009 12:04 PM PST
Now that is something that should be developed as quickly as possible. Of course, one of the drawbacks of having a plug in car is the recharge time. Now instead of gasoline stations....... Insta-Charge Stations ! No more waiting hours before you can drive you car again !

Being able to recharge the fluid at the station using solar or wind would help keep costs way down and still provide a decent profit for the station. Re-use the fluid, greatly cut down the cost to ship in new "fuel" to replenish stock, etc.....

Of course there would be some small loss of fluid during the transfer to and from vehicles, but replacing that would be so much cheaper, and so much more infrequent that what it takes to continuously truck in gasoline.
Reply to this comment
by c|net Reader November 11, 2009 7:39 AM PST
This also reduces tanker truck traffic. It seems idyllic. I'm sure there's something missing in the equation, such as the difficulty of charging the electrolytes, or something, but if it comes close to this promise, it should be the wave of the future.
by b_baggins November 11, 2009 10:40 AM PST
What's missing is the toxicity and corrosiveness of the chemicals installed.
by jaguar717 November 11, 2009 12:33 PM PST
And what's conveniently left out, us usual, is that pesky thing called scale.

With an energy density several orders of magnitude below that of gas, that means you'll be pumping 10x as much of it into your car to see 1/10th the mileage.

Still waiting on somebody to pair those ultracapacitors with a turbo diesel--if you want a realistic way to boost mileage without paying an extra 5 grand and ending up with an anemic box, there it is. But it doesn't make for "green" small talk at your next political fundraising dinner.
by zyxxy November 10, 2009 12:10 PM PST
What is the toxicity of the fluid? Not only for handling reasons, but for crash protection as well.

Yes I know the dangers and toxicity of gasoline and diesel fuel. I am just asking about this. What are the electrolytes involved?
Reply to this comment
by paulreid99 November 10, 2009 1:23 PM PST
No more than standard battery acid that's already in the car and already spills in a collision...
by b_baggins November 11, 2009 10:41 AM PST
Except that battery acid usually doesn't spill, and when it does, it's only a pint or so, not 20 gallons.
by IceN9ne November 10, 2009 12:42 PM PST
That is very interesting. Agreed with the first and second poster. DEVELOP!!! and tells us the scary facts too.


ZYX. with electric cars there wouldn't be any crashes. They can't go that fast. (sarcasm)
Reply to this comment
by dbutters November 10, 2009 1:12 PM PST
It's got what cars crave...
Reply to this comment
by CorwinB November 10, 2009 1:34 PM PST
Aaaah, a Brondo reference.

It's go electrolytes!
by SpeedPsycho November 10, 2009 2:23 PM PST
hahah! How appropriate.
by Dalkorian November 11, 2009 12:17 PM PST
But what are electrolytes?
...
It's what cars crave!

LOL!
by Wiz Zee November 10, 2009 1:34 PM PST
LOL. Well played.
Reply to this comment
by CreatureBoy November 10, 2009 1:35 PM PST
Can you tell us what the two half-cell reactions are?
Reply to this comment
by CreatureBoy November 10, 2009 1:36 PM PST
Can you tell us what the two half-cell reactions are?
Reply to this comment
by Been_there_Saw_it_before November 10, 2009 1:37 PM PST
My freshman year physics teacher (Fresno City College) said that when in doubt, follow the enerty flow. Just like the cops follow the money flow.

OK, so its an old technology that needs current engineering. That does not make it bad, but why is it out of favor? Energy flow, energy losses, energy density, expense, hazards, etc. A gallon of gasoline has a lot more energy in it than a gallon of battery. How much energy is in this stuff and how much of this stuff do I need to travel 200 miles? This past week I traveled to Fresno and my Civic Hybrid reports a trip average of 42.7 MPG.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 November 10, 2009 1:53 PM PST
It's probably a vanadium redox battery with some new design. Supposedly they've reached energy densities in excess of lithium ion batteries. If this is the case that would be pretty cool. You can recycle the electrolytes, vanadium is pretty common, and its not a significant toxin and doesn't seem to be a carcinogen, and they can be recharged either by replacing the electrolyte or by plugging it in.

Let's hope the people that brought us MP3s can bring us better batteries.
Reply to this comment
by SpeedPsycho November 10, 2009 2:25 PM PST
Hear Hear!

No doubt the density is less than gasoline, but if it really can be reused and recharged then heck, it definitely has potential!
by TechnoMan475392 November 11, 2009 3:32 PM PST
At the thought of being re-used-think about this:

Imagine this fluid being used to make electricity to re-charge the "flat" fluid. Self-sufficiency!
by rapier1 November 12, 2009 8:49 AM PST
@Techno-man;

Please review the laws of thermodynamics and get back to us.
by November 10, 2009 2:04 PM PST
Hope they hurry before Haliburton drops a nuke on their research facility ;)
Reply to this comment
by kojacked November 10, 2009 2:32 PM PST
LOL! So true!
by NewsReader_ November 10, 2009 3:25 PM PST
Extremely cool. The applications will go beyond cars I hope.
Reply to this comment
by Wei_Zhu November 10, 2009 7:35 PM PST
Cool
Reply to this comment
by November 11, 2009 6:06 AM PST
INVEST!!! INVEST!!! INVEST!!! get this as efficient and cheap as possible as quickly as possible. If prices of such technology got down quickly it would be just as practical as gasoline while saving the environment... WHOA!
Reply to this comment
by Byteme2009 November 11, 2009 8:03 AM PST
The drawback is that every car that features this would have to look EXACTLY like the one shown.

On a more serious note though, I know technology reduces in price over time and with adoption, but you have to wonder what the production costs would be for vehicles themselves and the charging stations. It is an absolutely awesome concept though and I would love to see it as an everyday reality.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian November 11, 2009 12:23 PM PST
The production costs for the vehicles wouldn't change (except going down, as you correctly mentioned price reductions over time). It's an electric car powered by a new battery technology. You can buy electric cars now.

The charging stations would be a different story though. It would take a solid one-time investment to convert a refueling station to this technology (recovery of depleted electrolytic fluid and charging said fluid), but then the costs could be minimized quite easily (recharge recovered fluid with solar or wind technology feeding an energy storage array).

If they can make this viable, it would be a game changer.
by Byteme2009 November 12, 2009 6:08 AM PST
@ Dalkorian

I understand your point as far as vehicle cost, but like every new technology the cost is always premium until widely adopted. I just wonder how much this premium would be, particularly as you quite rightly state 'this would be a game changer' Lets hope so!
by ace_sempai November 11, 2009 9:18 AM PST
Wow this is really neat... Hope to see it in the future... and maybe they can shorten the time it takes to charge the electrolytes to minutes instead of hours
Reply to this comment
by tsinger254 November 11, 2009 10:04 AM PST
Sounds like a no-brainer. Okay: what's the catch?
Reply to this comment
by killarse November 11, 2009 10:09 AM PST
Does it freeze in winter? How to dispose it without the EPA giving you trouble? What is the manufacturing process to produce this? Oh yeah, cool cool cool, very cool, very cool ha ha.
Reply to this comment
by SteveChicago November 11, 2009 10:17 AM PST
This also has the benefit of not causing the thousands of "gas stations" that currently exist of becoming obsolete, as would be the case if people where charging at home. Granted this would only come into play for long drives. Most people would still charge over night at home, unless they forgot.

Now the only major "business" to rebel against EV are the auto mechanics and fluids (oil, coolant, trans, brake) industry. Think about all the things you do NOT need when you do not have an internal combustion engine.
Reply to this comment
by masonx November 11, 2009 11:31 AM PST
Typical CNET reporting - not enough information to conclude anything. Why bother reporting it if your reader is going to have to research it on their own to learn anything. Not too professional Cunningham. This is a technical news site - not FOX. If you were in my journalism class you would have to struggle to get a D.
Reply to this comment
by wcunning November 11, 2009 5:16 PM PST
CNET is not a technical news site, it is a news site about technology. There is a difference. You can read research journals that get much more technical than anything on CNET. And frankly I'm not sure what more you would like to know about the nascent technology mentioned in this posting. Specific electron flow? How many liters of electrolytic fluid it takes to fill one of these batteries? Any stats like that would be fluid (pardon the pun), as it is still very much a laboratory technology. There will have to be much more research before there is even the potential for production. The Fraunhofer Institute hasn't even speculated on a timeline.
by amoreno73 November 11, 2009 11:44 AM PST
Interesting tech, now lets get it up to practical use to see what happens. Talk is cheap.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (36 Comments)

Search Car Tech

advertisement
Click Here

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics