• On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
November 25, 2009 2:20 PM PST

Looking under Nissan's Leaf

by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 29 comments

Nissan Leaf

Nissan's all electric Leaf goes into mass production next year.

(Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

Automakers tend to agree that the electrification of the car is inevitable, but Nissan is leading the way by readying a mass-market, affordable electric car for production. The Leaf is a midsize hatchback with a range of a little more than 100 miles, according to Nissan. Although Nissan didn't let us drive it, the company brought the Leaf to CNET's headquarters so we could get a close look at what might be the future of driving.

When Nissan first released pictures of the car, commenters found it ugly, with its bulbous headlights giving it a frog-like appearance. But in person, the length of the car mitigates that criticism. And looking over those headlights, we could see that they are longer, and more fin-shape than bulbous. The lights are LEDs, used because of their low power draw. The shape of the headlight casings has an aerodynamic purpose, splitting airflow around the side mirrors.

A hatch in front of the car conceals two plug-in points, one a standardized socket for electric vehicles and the other a proprietary Nissan design that can charge the batteries to 80 percent in 30 minutes. The Nissan plug, which would only work with very specific charging stations, uses DC power so that the onboard inverter doesn't have to convert external AC power for the DC batteries. The standardized plug will work with more sources, taking AC power from the grid and running it through the inverter, lengthening the time it takes to charge the batteries.

Nissan developed the lithium ion batteries for the Leaf in conjunction with NEC. The batteries are flat slabs that fit in the chassis of the car. Weighing about 500 pounds, the battery placement and distribution helps to lower the Leaf's center of gravity. Beyond charging from a plug, the Leaf also incorporates regenerative braking. Similar to the Tesla, as soon as you lift off the accelerator, regenerative braking kicks in, sending juice to the batteries and slowing the car.

The Nissan Leaf goes on sale in December of 2010 as a 2011 model. Nissan is counting on 20,000 preorders for the car, and will initially build them in Japan. By the third model year, the company expects to start producing them from its plant in Smyrna, Tennessee.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Nissan Juke set to debut in New York
Buick LaCrosse surprises with luxury, value
A Toyota Prius owner waits for the recall
Navigon iPhone GPS app to get social media, panoramic 3D view
Ford to debut all-electric Transit Connect van
A look at 2010 Audi A3 2.0 TDI
Toyota adds 2010 Prius to global recall list
Ford will fix software in hybrids
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (29 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by cbscowards November 25, 2009 3:03 PM PST
So how much is it expected to sell for?
Reply to this comment
by kormiko November 25, 2009 3:19 PM PST
It's expected to sell?<br /><br />Well, if they do sell one, they haven't officially announced a price, but some say that it should cost around $30,000.
by norcalrivercat November 25, 2009 3:23 PM PST
It's a start
Reply to this comment
by TechnoMan475392 November 25, 2009 8:27 PM PST
It's electric so we won't know when it's started. We'll have to take HAL's word for it.
by b_baggins November 30, 2009 11:04 AM PST
Since global warming has been shown to be a hoax, and we have plenty of untapped oil reserves in the U.S., the need for this vehicle no longer exists.<br /><br />Buy one if it makes you feel better, but don't think you're saving the planet.
1 person likes this comment
by josh672 November 30, 2009 2:10 PM PST
To: B_Baggins<br /><br />First of all global warming has never been "proven" to be a hoax, though the oil industry has paid for numerous studies to be done to try to make it seem like one. In fact all you have to do is look at the average temperature over the past 40 years or so, and the melting of the polar ice caps, and you would see that the real proof indicates that global warming is very real indeed. However, global warming isn't the only reason that the mass burning of petroleum products isn't good, it's the number one cause of air polution. You know what? I don't even know why I'm wasting my time talking to someone who calls themselves Bilbo Baggins..<br /><br />L8r
by rsheffield99 November 25, 2009 4:39 PM PST
I had a chance to drive the Leaf this past weekend in San Diego. I owned an Escape Hybrid and an Accord Hybrid previously. Neither vehicle was programmed as I would have liked. The experience driving the Leaf was much like the Escape up to 20 mph. It was much better over 20 mph as no gas motor kicked in. I failed to ask about the two styles of charging and am excited about the DC mode. There is way too much resistance to pure electric cars; all of my around town driving can be done in the Leaf. I personally feel that longer trips are also manageable with a little planning and some ingenuity.
Reply to this comment
by GadgetGav November 25, 2009 5:13 PM PST
It's a year away. The pre-sale hype of the Leaf and the Volt is ridiculous.<br />If they're so sure people want them, get on and sell them. It's working for Tesla... Why this endless, focus-grouping, national tours, etc? Toyota had the nerve to build and sell the Prius. It took a while to really take off, but look at it now - they can't keep them on the lot.
Reply to this comment
by MauiGuy November 25, 2009 6:30 PM PST
The article refers to the standard charging system as using "an inverter" to convert AC to DC. An inverter converts D.C. to A.C. to allow, for example, the powering of an A.C. TV or blender from the car's D.C. battery supply (in the parking lot at the game). What they presumably meant is "rectifier", which converts A.C. to D.C. Every gas automobile uses a rectifier in its battery charge circuit to convert the A.C. energy generated by the alternator to D.C. needed to charge the battery.<br /><br />And all electric cars designed to be charged from A.C. line voltage also have a rectifier in their charge circuit, just like their gas automobile counterparts. What is novel in the Leaf is that there is a D.C. charge plug that bypasses the rectifier allowing for a direct charging of the batteries-much more efficient energy transfer.<br /><br />But no electric car, including the Leaf, has an inverter in its charge circuit. Weird that a technical site like this one would miss such a fundamental element of the technology used in electric cars. What else did they get wrong?
Reply to this comment
by eeee November 27, 2009 5:24 AM PST
huh !
by DemonDuck000 November 25, 2009 9:28 PM PST
This is how to entrench electric cars into our society. <br /><br />You give electric cars to teenagers when they get their license. Your first car is like your first woman, you always remember...<br /><br />And all their next cars will always be compared to their first. <br /><br />The car makers have to start at the bottom of society and work their way up to the top levels and that will take social engineering. You change society to fit the car. And to do that you start with the first car a person has. And you build on that by making electric cars cheaper than any other car.<br /><br />Making electric cars so expensive that the average person can't afford one is not going to build the foundational attitudes necessary to make the electric car ubiquitous.
Reply to this comment
by weegg November 30, 2009 6:28 AM PST
Well, my women was butt ugly. I had a gremlin for over 20 years.
by b_baggins November 30, 2009 11:06 AM PST
That's actually a great recipe for ensuring the continuation of IC automobiles, since the teen will see that all adults are driving cars that have more pep and five times the range and can refuel in 5 minutes.
by sartor1 November 26, 2009 10:00 AM PST
BUMPER!<br />Where is the bumper in this nice car?
Reply to this comment
by gsmiller88 November 26, 2009 4:42 PM PST
It's the big plastic piece that goes halfway up the front. And if you think about it, bumpers are really pointless these days.<br /><br />But that thing is oooogly, even if it was less than $20,000 I still wouldn't want it.
by Mr_fleabite November 30, 2009 7:41 AM PST
No kidding, why do they have to make EV's so butt ugly. I find it hard to believe that efficient designs need be so damn ugly. I get that they want them to stand out and maybe some buyers really want to be seen in these but come on.
by eeee November 27, 2009 5:16 AM PST
It is not something that would inspire pride in its styling. it is designed as a rocket nose cone is designed and Yes, it is fugly and not something a young attitude male would aspire to buy. <br />Who is the intended market buyer for this thing?
Reply to this comment
by eeee November 27, 2009 5:24 AM PST
PS: is AC part of the standard eqpt or is it available at all and how is it powered while underway and does it switch off while on regenerative braking to allow maximum recharging of the batteries. <br />Is the 100 mile range estimate with all electornics and lights off as well as the AC off? <br />What is the range with AC on in a humid climate such as Florida at night with lights on? <br />Many unanswered questions and a real review is needed. This was a photo op.
Reply to this comment
by idriveahummer November 27, 2009 12:25 PM PST
What an ugly car. It looks like a catfish. I wouldn't even classify it as a chick car it's so sad looking. Why are it's headlights bulging like that? Aside from it's appearance, it's range is pathetic and the batteries take too long to charge. I drive 80 miles a day and some days I use up half a tank of gas. At least I won't have to call AAA to get a tow with a Chevy Volt. I don't like having to worry if I'm going to make it to work or back home. This is the most impractical electric vehicle that has ever come off the drawing board. If you own nissan stock, I strongly urge you to sell immediately as they have clearly lost their mind.
Reply to this comment
by QA_Tester November 30, 2009 10:34 AM PST
@idriveahummer <br /><br />Put down the bottle of jack Daniels and the blunt. This car is ugly, but that's besides the point. The point is that you spend half a tank of gas to commute 80 miles is because you drive a gas gazzler to compensate for your shortcomings. This car will allow a large number of people to commute to work and back every day. And that would include a stop at the grocery store.Your point about the stock price demonstrates complete lack of knowledge of how stock market works. The only good notion that you had was that the range is not all that good compared to most "conventional" engines. But then your Hammer is not exactly a picture of a great range. You probably get 15mpg mixed use in best case scenario.
by b_baggins November 30, 2009 11:06 AM PST
@QA_Tester<br /><br />Whereas you buy an electric car to feel all smug and morally superior.
by weegg November 30, 2009 6:32 AM PST
If the Leaf could do 150 freeway miles I would buy one in a sec. Until they get the range up to match my commute requirements (110 miles) electrics are not there yet. Guess I will have to hold out for a Tesla S model. I refuse to go hybrid because the maintenance costs will be excessive since you will be maintaining 2 power systems instead of one.
Reply to this comment
by QA_Tester November 30, 2009 10:59 AM PST
@weeg<br /><br />Reality check "Life is what happens when you make plans." 150 mile range is great for city dwellers who want to use "ecologically friendly" car. Reality is a lot of our electricity comes from fossil fuels like oil, gas and yes coal. Even Nuclear power is limited to amount of nuclear material produced by nature long time ago. We need to focus on renewable (biofuels) and so called alternative sources of energy like solar and wind. <br /><br />And oh by the way whoever called wind and solar alternative energy sources is dumber than a brick or brilliant at marketing. Either way anyone who truly believes that sun and with are alternative sources of energy should never post on the subject. If not for the energy of the wind Christopher Columbus wouldn't have discovered America. He (just like all of the European captains and sailors) harnessed energy of the wind using sails. The wind as we know it existed even before than. It was around when the fossils that were the source for fossil fuels still walked the Earth.<br /><br />Come on count until a billion and if you still can remember what you wanted to say then post it instead of putting up mindless blubber.
by ark_v2 November 30, 2009 9:32 AM PST
These are OK for commuting, but in reality the fuel cell is the future of cars.
Reply to this comment
by 00Spyder November 30, 2009 11:12 AM PST
Electric cars are great, but if we are still generating electricity from coal or other pollutants, then does it really matter if we're driving gas-powered or electrc cars?
Reply to this comment
by Lambert John November 30, 2009 3:05 PM PST
Rock on Nissan! Glad somebody else is taking the ball and forwarding our grasp on electric vehicles. We need it! Our kids kids need it. And the world needs it. So what if there's still plenty of oil in the ground. Have you ever stood behind a gasoline powered vehicle and taken deep breath? Now multiply that by 600,000,000. That's what's spewing into the air every day. Take it all away and what do you have? You have something we can all breathe without worrying about all the carbon dioxide that's polluting our bodies. Keep on keepin on Nissan!! Long live electric!
Reply to this comment
by jarrodbrown1 November 30, 2009 5:59 PM PST
I'd have to disagree. When Henry Ford invented his first car only the highclass wealthy American could afford them. After years of high prices, production perfections, and higher demand, the cost of the gasoline car went down to where it is today, everyone can afford some type. Same goes for electric cars, the rich will be the first to buy them, after a few years costs will go down it becomes cheaper to manufacture the cars, and the middle class, lower income folk will be able to afford and want them, because, hey it'll make you seem rich.<br /><br />Nuf Said
Reply to this comment
by spacelord-mf December 1, 2009 3:37 AM PST
The fast charge socket is a proprietary Nissan plug. if there ever is a network of quick charge stations, shouldn't the car makers adopt a standard plug design? This would help the range by allowing quick top up of the battery when on the road. 500 pounds of batteries is also an hindrance. Battery technology still isn't where it needs to be. A full tank of gas is a lot lighter, with a longer range. The range to weight ratio of batteries is where the next tech leap needs to be. The lower the weight, the less power wasted by pushing all that extra mass around, hence increasing range. Oh, yeah, forgot to mention, the car is Butt ugly! The electric Ford Focus that Jay Leno has on his show looks a lot better. Nissan really hit the front of the Leaf with their ugly stick!
Reply to this comment
by Tinkaboutit January 3, 2010 11:02 AM PST
We have had a rope around our neck by the oil companys forever. All electric cars and solar pannel units will break that strangle hold. Buy an electric car to help your Grandchildren, the future, the rest of us. Don"t be selfish. Don't prtend that you have all the answers. Stupid is as stupid does.
Reply to this comment
(29 Comments)
  • prev
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics