• On CBS MoneyWatch: 4 Things You SHOULDN'T Buy at Target
July 30, 2010 4:35 PM PDT

We get a charge out of driving Nissan Leaf

by Wayne Cunningham

Nissan brought a preproduction version of its new Leaf electric car to San Francisco, letting us get our first drive in the car. As the lead vehicle in what could be a new generation of electric cars, Nissan has done a lot of things right.

The car feels very easy to drive, offering smooth and quiet acceleration. Leaf models will come standard with navigation, which Nissan also ties into the ever important range tools.

Most impressive is the price. At $32,780 it might sound on the pricey side, but a Federal tax credit knocks $7,500 off the price. A number of states also offer a $5,000 tax credit, putting the real price of the Leaf around $20k.

Check out our video as Brian Cooley gets his first taste of the Leaf.

Recent posts from The Car Tech blog
Garmin announces two new entry level GPS series
2011 Hyundai Equus: Playing in the big leagues
Mazda Shinari photos show devil in the details
Chevy to launch Cruze hatchback at Paris show
App gives Mercedes-Benz owners an out-of-car experience
Land Rover will get hybrids, smaller vehicles
Top-five overcharged repair jobs
Car Tech Live 184: Big change coming to MPG window stickers (podcast)
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (28 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by eeee July 30, 2010 5:29 PM PDT
New York has NO tax credit and way too many people live over 50 miles from where they work to avoid the huge taxes in the NYC and immediate suburb counties adjacent to NYC so a Leaf is pretty much useless unless a plug in station is available at both ends of the daily commuter trip.
Plus with so many other cars on our packed highways and local roads, as well as our hilly terrain, the 100 mile range on a charge is sure to create battery charge anxiety that a great many of us dont want for our $27,000 egg shaped car.
Reply to this comment
by lvfalcon July 30, 2010 8:31 PM PDT
So New York does not have a FEDERAL Tax credit? Did you consider that it is a FEDERAL tax credit, not from New York? Wonder why NY won't allow a FEDERAL tax credit. Is that even legal? Did NY become its own country and I missed it? Wow!!! I am not from NY but I always believed that a whole bunch of people live in NYC!! I did not realize that everyone lived over 50 miles away. What a drag to drive on such crowded, hilly highways and local roads. Sounds like a nightmare. UMMM, maybe you should move!! Why would one live some place where they are obviously miserable. Well my commute is 8 miles and with my solar panels at home, I won't be paying a dime for fuel!! Great idea. Also, 32,780 minus 7,500 is 25,280 for the price of the car.
2 people like this comment
by yimengh July 31, 2010 11:23 AM PDT
I thought most people live far from where they work to avoid huge rents..
by kormiko July 30, 2010 6:02 PM PDT
$12,500 tax credit is really great ... I just can't get over the styling though.
I like Nissan cars, but this one is a bit out there for me.

I try not to want the same cars that companies use to print their advertising on.
This looks like one of those cars.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by SteveW928 July 30, 2010 11:46 PM PDT
Yea, that is a great tax credit... the problem is that this means all the other people are paying people to buy these cars. I like to see this kind of technology advanced, but is it worth THAT much? Heck, a VW TDI (or hybrids, etc.) are pretty cool too, but don't get nearly as much (TDI only gets $850 max, I think). I guess giving some incentive to get the ball rolling on these things isn't a horrible idea, but I question the huge amount in this case.
by zeekaustin August 2, 2010 9:03 AM PDT
I purchased a VW Jetta TDI on June 30th and qualified for a $1500 credit. Not too bad. You're right though, after June 30th the credit dropped to $750.
by SteveW928 August 4, 2010 8:59 PM PDT
Unfortunately, I don't think we get any in Canada at the moment.
by Chimel31 July 30, 2010 6:42 PM PDT
Yeah, all their good designers are at Infiniti. Just compare the dull Murano to the Fx35. ^-^

Small form factors are for toys, you can't fit many batteries in them, so you can just play around a bit.
I'd prefer a more versatile light and sporty wagon with a few more batteries, but most importantly with the possibility to fill the whole floor of the wagon or part of it with extra battery packs for the longer trips.
The base autonomy should be around 200 miles, with the possibility to double that at least. Maybe with cheaper technology batteries, or the cost of the extra pack would be prohibitive. I'd willingly pay $30K for a wagon with bigger autonomy, without the optional extra battery packs. It should have carbon fiber bodies,, so we can sequestrate more carbon!

At least it's great to have a car available for EV enthusiasts, it will pave the way for the next generation of cars, once more charging points are available. It's a much better car than the Mitsubishi.
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ July 30, 2010 7:00 PM PDT
Laptop batteries degrade to about 80% the original capacity each year, what about these? Will they degrade as quickly?
Reply to this comment
by pulkit10 July 30, 2010 7:47 PM PDT
It would sure suck if they do. I'm sure that they're aware of this issue and I'm quite positive that they've worked on it cause most of them are offering a warranty on their batteries. Not sure what that warrant includes but I think this might be covered in there.
by SteveW928 July 30, 2010 11:05 PM PDT
I can't see how they would not degrade. It isn't like computer laptop manufacturers aren't utilizing the best in charging technology, etc. I think it is just a reality of this kind of battery technology. What I don't know, is how the car manufacturers intend to address it. Will they swap them (under warranty) if they drop below a certain percent? Also, whatever that percent and/or policy is, people need to calculate that into their distance. Also, what about heat and A/C? Those will draw extra energy. Is that included in that 100 miles?
by ellipses1 August 2, 2010 10:24 AM PDT
I believe that the batteries are software-restricted on the capacity of their charge. When you buy it new, a "full" charge is only 50% of the battery's actual capacity. I assume that this either reduces the degradation or the restriction is automatically scaled back to account for degradation... so by the end of the battery's life cycle, a "full" charge actually charges to full capacity, and you get the same range due to degradation. On a side note, I am two years out from buying a new car... and that car will absolutely be an E.V. car. With my commute and driving habits, there is no reason not to get an electric vehicle. I am really excited about this new era
by RaulLasVegas August 3, 2010 7:01 AM PDT
Laptops have crappy chargers, and the batterys are drained to zero. If you manage how the batterys are charged, and how much they are drained, you can get 10 years out of them. Nissan is providing the warrenty for the batteries of 8 year/100k miles.
by SteveW928 August 4, 2010 9:08 PM PDT
@ ellipses1 -

Do you mean that they are under-utilizing the capacity when new so that they can increase capacity to match degradation? Very interesting if true. I'd love a link to an article on that.

@ RaulLasVegas -

I don't believe the laptop chargers are that bad. Laptop makers are trying everything they can to get extra battery life. Also, with Li battery technology, you DO want to fully discharge the batteries once in a while (maybe once per month) to maintain optimal performance. I use mine at a desk often, so I run the opposite problem in charging mine too much and not fully draining it often enough. Sure, you can get 10 years, but not at 100% capacity.

I'd be curious to know if that warranty covers the batteries maintaining 'like new' capacity, or if that warranty only covers battery failure. I had one laptop battery stop holding any kind of reasonable charge after only like 6 months... which was considered a 'failure', so covered by warranty. However, about a year ago, I had to replace one (about 3-4 years old) that just didn't hold all that much charge any longer (maybe 40%). Again, I doubt these car makers have any kind of magic technology that computer makers don't.
by Desertstraw July 30, 2010 8:20 PM PDT
When will the media report the $7,500 income tax credit properly? Most buyers will not get it. You must owe more than $7,500 in income tax in one year. Any unused part of this credit cannot be carried over to future years.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by lvfalcon July 30, 2010 8:40 PM PDT
Desertstraw, you are wrong. It is not a tax deduction, it is a tax credit. Just like the first time homebuyers tax credit You will actually get a check for the $7500 if you do not owe any taxes. However, if you owed $2500 for 2010, that means you would get a refund of $5000. Good deal. In certain states like California, they give an extra $5000 also. So, you could actually get the car for about 20k. Not a bad deal and charging is a WHOLE lot cheaper that gas.
4 people like this comment
by The_Consummate_Skeptic August 2, 2010 3:11 AM PDT
To lvfalcon:

Where did you get your information? I got only $1900 out of a $2100 tax credit for my Civic Hybrid. I paid much more than $2100 in taxes that year. I used tax preparation software like Turbo Tax. If you do a search on Prius tax credits, you will see that some people got very little of their credit and some people got none (yes,the credit was still in place at the time).
by ellipses1 August 2, 2010 10:26 AM PDT
@ Skeptic- I think the credits are reduced as income increases. You could possibly have an income that is higher than the amount where you'd get a full credit. I am pretty sure that if you make a million dollars a year and buy one of these, you don't get the tax credit.
by wcunning August 2, 2010 6:19 PM PDT
It is true that you have to owe at least $7,500 to get the full credit. But if you make $50k a year, you are paying more than $7,500 in taxes.
by RaulLasVegas August 3, 2010 6:55 AM PDT
In the past, if you took too many credits, you hit alternative minimum tax, and you wouldn't be able to take the credits. AMT has been eliminated.
by randomandy July 31, 2010 12:32 AM PDT
If you want to see oil usage decline and don't like paying for subsidies for other people to buy these cars, your alternatives are to:
a) wait until buying better more efficient products becomes magically cheaper than buying old stuff, and gold dust rains from heaven on weekends
b) raise taxes on petroleum substantially so buyers see an efficiency differences pay off.
c) Hope that the Chinese and Indians abruptly decide they prefer walking and horses over machines and to concede their prospective wealth to Western nations.
Reply to this comment
by SteveW928 July 31, 2010 11:02 AM PDT
or
d) just keep letting oil prices rise as the world uses more (supply/demand will ensure this), and work on electric and other fuel sources (like bio-fuels) until we have real solutions that do compete on price.

There is little reason an electric car should cost more than a gas one. Other than the 'computer', it is considerably less complex in both design and manufacture than a gas vehicle. They should also cost WAY less to service if they are properly designed (ie: don't have longevity designed out of them purposely).

The big problem currently, is the batteries. Lithium-ion batters (or similar) just aren't the right technology for vehicles. They don't do great with temp extremes, and we all know how they act in our cell phones and laptops. In a couple years, you'd down to 60-70% capacity, and they are incredibly expensive (not to mention the environmental impact of manufacturing them).

Again, I'm all for electric vehicles. When properly done, we'll see a range of vehicles from ultra-efficient, so performance cars that will totally blow the doors off the best gas cars. And, when electricity is generated by things like solar concentrating plants, it will be extremely 'green' as well. It will happen, and not too long down the road. But, I'm not sure of this amount of subsidy, so people can feel good about their 'greenness' is going to really help. These technologies need to be able to stand on their own, not because they are paid for by the collective.
by angelinasokuntery July 31, 2010 1:39 PM PDT
For those angry people that are not happy with what federal gov't tries to for environment EV buyers, you must be happy that gov't gives $7500 federal and $5000 state back to EV buyers. I do not care gov't should give more to people who help improving environment. There is no need to be envy
Reply to this comment
by Chris7e August 2, 2010 8:41 AM PDT
this seems very inconvenient to own...when he talked about the effortlessness he hooked me in, but showing me the range and how few stations there were, made me extremely disinterested...i guess i'm the typical american though, if its not convenient for me, I don't want it (regardless of benefits).
Reply to this comment
by dml24 August 2, 2010 9:19 AM PDT
Many have pointed out the gotchas regarding the tax credits.

Even when one does qualify one must realize the money to pay for the tax credits comes from your fellow tax payers. Thank your neighbors, your co-workers and most every working person in your social network if you recieve any tax credits!
Reply to this comment
by pennmike August 2, 2010 9:53 AM PDT
Yeah, so?
by kabalah70 August 3, 2010 6:54 AM PDT
Mr. Cunningham,

I wish some reporter would do a story on the whole federal tax credit issue. Too many consumers are going to be *^%^& when they find out that the $7500 they were inticed with is a non-refundable credit and not a refeundable credit. As you yourself stated, this is indeed the fact and I have myself confirmed this with the IRS on the phone and their website. (http://www.irs.gov/businesses/article/0,,id=214841,00.html). Simply making $50K does not mean that you will get to use the full credit as this credit is applied to one's tax liability after all other deductions and credits have been applied. According to the Tax Policy Center (http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/encyclopedia/Adjusted-Gross-Income.cfm) peoples' taxable income is slightly less than 70% of their Adjusted Gross Income, so using 2009 tax rate single people would have to make around $65,244 and married couples (filing jointly) around $80,095.
Also, people are claiming a $2500 for electric motorcycles when it is the cap, the actual tax credit is 10% of the vehicle and it too is a non-refunable credit. I wish somone in the media would do a story on it.
Reply to this comment
by weegg August 18, 2010 7:21 AM PDT
The batteries are not at all like laptop batteries. They are laminated prismatic Li Ion Mg. Unlike the laptop batteries there is ample area for thermal venting and are better structurally to take a fast charge.

Nissan claims over 7 years they will go down to 80% SOC.

I'm stoked to get this car and dump my old car. I mostly ride my Harley, but this vehicle is a perfect second vehicle for me.
Reply to this comment
(28 Comments)
  • prev
  • next

Search Car Tech

advertisement

About The Car Tech blog

CNET's Car Tech blog covers the latest developments in the automotive industry, with commentary on car stereos, hybrid and concept cars, GPS, and much more. The Car Tech blog offers the latest news and reviews from CNET's Car Tech reviews channel.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Car Tech blog topics