• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
February 17, 2009 6:47 AM PST

Universal cell phone chargers coming soon

by Marguerite Reardon

Update: This story has been updated to clarify that Apple was not named in the list of handset makers that have agreed to use a new universal charger standard.

BARCELONA--After I've spent years scrounging through drawers looking for the right charger and kicking myself every time I forgot my charger while traveling, the mobile industry has finally decided to make one device that can juice up any cell phone.

The Micro-USB connector used on this Motorola cell phone charger will soon be the standard for all chargers.

(Credit: Motorola)

On Tuesday, the GSMA trade association announced at its 2009 Mobile World Congress here that it has brokered a deal with the world's leading handset makers to come up with a standard for charging cell phones.

All the major handset makers, including, LG, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson, have agreed to use the Micro-USB technology as the common universal charging interface, Rob Conway, GSMA CEO, said during the opening keynote speech Tuesday. By 2012, the GSMA promises, most cell phones will use the same kind of connector to charge their batteries.

Seventeen mobile operators, including Vodafone, Orange, and Telofonic, announced they are committed to implementing the standard for the universal mobile phone charger.

The GSMA said that going to this single standard will not only make life easier for the more than 3 billion mobile phone users in the world today, but it will also help the environment.

Conway said that the GSMA will push cell phone manufacturers to develop chargers that consume about 50 percent less power. The organization also believes that eliminating the need for people to replace lost chargers will significantly reduce greenhouse gases emitted in the manufacturing and transporting of these extra chargers. It will also mean less waste in landfills because people won't simply throw away chargers when they stop using their old phones.

All in all, it's huge win for the planet and for me--the consumer. It's such a no-brainer. It makes you wonder why no one thought of this sooner.

UPDATE: One mobile phone maker is conspicuously missing from the GSMA's list of partners: Apple, maker of the popular iPhone. It shouldn't come as a shock that Apple isn't following the rest of the industry on this one, considering that the company has been marching to the beat of its own drummer in mobile from the beginning.

The good news for iPhone users has always been that the connector that's used to recharge the device is the same one used for some Apple iPods. But annoyingly many iPod docking stations and accessories made by third parties for previous generations of iPods don't work with the iPhone.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from 3GSM blog
Adios, Barcelona: GSMA 2009 wrap-up
Photos: Windows Mobile smartphones you can't have
Q&A: Verizon's CTO digs into 4G
Finally...something interesting in Skymall
GSMA: Sights from the show floor
Android skips Barcelona's mobile-phone party
Nokia 5630 Xpress Music on video
Google shows Web-based offline Gmail on iPhone
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (46 Comments)
by cmstratton February 17, 2009 7:27 AM PST
How about Apple - will they be going along with the standard?
Reply to this comment
by tdreher February 17, 2009 7:29 AM PST
HAHAHA!
by Chapmaniac February 17, 2009 7:58 AM PST
Apple marches to the beat of their own drummer.
by Someone-else February 17, 2009 8:38 AM PST
The way Apple is they will now patent Micro-USB and sues everyone that uses it.
by mikehartigan February 17, 2009 8:39 AM PST
Apple
Standard

-- my keyboard wouldn't even let me type those words on the same line!
by celticbrewer February 17, 2009 10:16 AM PST
If they follow past trends, they'll have a proprietary charger, it'll charge the battery slower than mini-usb, Apple will sell it for twice what the mini-usb charger costs, and apple fanboys will proclaim how superior it is.
by tcr071 February 17, 2009 11:01 AM PST
No. Apple does not do anything standard.

What you can be assured that they WILL do is replace the charging connection every two product life cycles so that all the accessories you purchased become worthless and you must re-purchase them. Thats about all you can count on for sure as far as charging goes though.
by skladek February 17, 2009 11:20 AM PST
tcr071, Apple has been using the dock connector since the 3rd gen iPod. They stuck with the dock connector for the iPhone/touch's first and second generations. The MagSafe adapter for the MacBooks had been in use for 2 years and it doesn't look like it's going anywhere soon. Eventually these chargers will be changed, but both have been around for more than 2 generations without being changed.
by tcr071 February 17, 2009 5:01 PM PST
That is funny. Because it seems to me I can't plug my iPhone 3g into the same adapter I plugged my iPhone 2g into.

I also can't seem to find a firewire port on my new aluminum MacBook.

Weird.... guess it just must be me...
by Monahan92 February 19, 2009 4:21 PM PST
This will be one of the dumbest things Apple does if they don't go with the standard. I'm not saying it would be a surprise if they don't but Apple, It is not always good to be different. These kinds of things don't change your beloved device's appearance and you don't always have to make things proprietary so you can charge extra for it SO JUST GO WITH IT. Make it easier on the people. I'm sure the people don't care...or even notice, many people probably don't even even know what a micro-usb plug is. All of the other mobile phone makers are being smart and this is just a good idea...i can't believe no one thought of this before. I hope this happens so or at least by the time i buy my next phone.
by yanchineseguy February 17, 2009 7:30 AM PST
Hooray!
Reply to this comment
by egghead1619 February 17, 2009 7:35 AM PST
No one thought of this sooner because it has been a huge money maker. The phone is given away practically free with a single wall charger and the consumer is then forced to purchase a new car charger and any other accessories they used to have with their old phone.
Reply to this comment
by timber2005 February 17, 2009 8:00 AM PST
That and maybe because all the copper was cheeper.
by robwhelan February 17, 2009 1:39 PM PST
It HAS been thought of before. Of course it has, over and over again. But they always ignored the requests because all of that crap is such a money-maker (you hit the nail on the head with that one).

And this is still only just the tip of the iceberg of what they could (and should) be doing; what about chargers that don't draw current unless they are actually charging something?

See http://www.iwantmygreenplug.com to help push for a universal charger for *all* small electronics that doesn't wast power or overflow the landfills.
by perry-crann February 17, 2009 7:45 AM PST
This seems like a great idea. Millions less cables in landfills and only one charger to keep track of. But it is one of those things that seems like it makes so much sense that it will be practically impossible to implement.

Perry Crann
Reply to this comment
by Chapmaniac February 17, 2009 7:56 AM PST
This is a great day for consumers and the environment! Not only will the mini USB standard help everyone charge their phones easily, you can (most likely) use that same port to charge your phone via USB 2.0 computer ports. Taking it one further, all phone manufacturers employing this new standard should allow data access and transfer through that port to a computer. This should also allow contact/calendar/etc. synchronizing through Microsoft's ActiveSync technology - or something proprietary but not hair-pulling <grin>.
Reply to this comment
by timber2005 February 17, 2009 8:02 AM PST
Good luck on that. My bet is MOST will use it for power only, but Microsoft's Device Center MIGHT just do what you are wanting, and even make it easy when the company chooses to use a proprietary software.
by rbz275 February 17, 2009 2:54 PM PST
Please note, micro USB is the upcoming standard. It is NOT the same as the mini USB on your current phone or camera. Micro has a smaller plug and isnt symetrical.
by myles taylor February 17, 2009 7:57 AM PST
"It's such a no-brainer, it makes you wonder why no one thought of this sooner."

It's probably not thinking of it; but the implementation of it that had people stalled. It requires collaboration and companies don't like to do that.
Reply to this comment
by demner February 17, 2009 8:19 AM PST
Well, I have a phone charger that fits in my other phones but don't actually charge any but the original!Maybe because the newer phones need more juice than the adaptor could supply? Regardless, shape is only one factor.
Reply to this comment
by sjohnson29 February 17, 2009 8:24 AM PST
There are several companies already doing this. Look at Blackberries. They use the USB standard now. As do other phones and peripherals I've seen and own. We have 2 blackberries in house that use the same chargers as do different brands of a bluetooth speakerphone and headset that we have. All can be charged with the same AC Adapters, USB computer cables, and USB connector car chargers. So hopefully many other vendors will do the same and it won't take until 2012 for this to happen.
Reply to this comment
by hafenbrack February 17, 2009 8:33 AM PST
Have you ever tried charging a MOTO phone (with mini USB) with one of those RIM shargers, you'll get an error saying "Unable to Charge" Just because this is the same form factor doesn't mean that the charge will work. This new standard charging should help to alleviate that.
by oakie51 February 17, 2009 8:26 AM PST
that photo's caption is wrong... the pictured charger is MINI-USB, not "micro-USB". the two connectors are not the same.
Reply to this comment
by oakie51 February 17, 2009 8:28 AM PST
do they also plan on making batteries standard? maybe at least operating voltage and amperage? because without that, this will do more harm than good... just because the plug fits doesnt mean the charger is compatible for the device and/or battery's needs.
Reply to this comment
by ThatGuy2-1 February 17, 2009 8:39 AM PST
THANK GOD!!!! I've HATED LG because of this. Their chargers don't even work with other LG phone models 'cos it's a cradle type unit that came with the phone ... it was the most annoying this EVER! Atleast with the iPhone and most other phones, if you're at a friend's house and they have a "similar" phone or iPod, you're good to go; with LG you were out of luck unless they had the EXACT SAME PHONE 'cos of the stupid cradles ... will never buy another LG again until this charger issue gets worked out.
Reply to this comment
by CountryClubRepublican February 17, 2009 8:54 AM PST
"It's such a no-brainer. It makes you wonder why no one thought of this sooner."

Uh, it was thought of years ago. The problem was that every cell phone maker made tons of money selling proprietary chargers for the aftermarket which they didn't want to give up.

I'm surprised but glad this went through. Now if they can do the same thing for laptop chargers and printer ink cartridges!
Reply to this comment
by raehl311 February 17, 2009 9:32 AM PST
Don't think they gave up the money - they just realized that once chargers are standard, they can stop including them for free with the phone and sell you one for $60 instead - just like they do with printers and USB cables.
by celticbrewer February 17, 2009 10:19 AM PST
True, raehl311, but then another company (probably from China) will come along and make a cheap charger for $15. It may die within a year, but consumers will still buy them because they're a fraction of the cost.
by BigGuns149 February 19, 2009 6:15 PM PST
I honestly would prefer that they didn't include redundent cables like they they do with USB printers. The reality is that most of the time we are buying these devices to replace an older unit that died or we decided to upgrade. Very few consumers are buying a phone for the first time much like the vast majority of people aren't buying a printer for the first time. Why would I want to buy a cable that I already own that works? While the cables are cheap they aren't free. Either you are paying more for that cable or they are cutting corners in the quality somewhere else so that you can have a cable that you don't need and probably don't want anyways.
by mlissner February 17, 2009 9:46 AM PST
This is good, but it doesn't do very much unless they stop giving away chargers with every phone. I already have three of these mini USB chargers.

A change needs to be made where they ask you after you buy your phone something like, "Here's your phone. Do you need a charger? You probably don't."
Reply to this comment
by darkmerkaba February 17, 2009 10:13 AM PST
Umm, the igo chargers from Radio shack are the best ones out there. all you do is buy a $10 tip every time you get a new device and plug it into the wall/car charger. their travel kit is the best thing ever. i have tips for my ipod, psp, cell phone, camera, and gps.
Reply to this comment
by renGek February 17, 2009 1:44 PM PST
I used to use igo until I realize there are lots of manufacturers that sell portable batteries that comes with literally
50-100 different tips for a price of $30. Kinda made me wonder why I bothered with igo.
by probell February 17, 2009 10:31 AM PST
Another benefit omitted from the article is that every USB port on a computer becomes a charging port for hand-held devices. As a result different AC power connectors for different countries will be unnecessary and handsets can be charged from notebook computers on battery power when away from an AC power grid.
Reply to this comment
by AL-Graphic February 17, 2009 10:46 AM PST
Be aware, the Micro USB standard(MICRO USB not regular USB2) is only for Wall unit electricity charger not for the compurter USB charger, because virus issue, if your computer equiped with Micro USB connector, it is for data input/output, your Anti-virus will need to scan first then act as I/O function, the GSMA standard is a Micro USB and a 110 volt plug in, not bothsides as USB connection. Of course, you will be able to find adapter later, but be aware the computer virus issue!
Reply to this comment
by BigGuns149 February 19, 2009 6:19 PM PST
I've never heard of said issue and there are already USB A to Micro USB cables on the market. Besides the device isn't taking 110V! The power adapter steps down the voltage to the appropriate voltage for the device. Do you know what you are talking about? I can't tell.
by Jack_McSlay October 27, 2009 9:39 AM PDT
That's a big load of ********. The standard is to input the EXACT voltage that regular USB does, and the virus will NOT affect your cell phone by any means, not to mention that being USB-powered doesn't necessarily mean the divice is capable of receiving/transmitting data through the USB connection.
by Spodyody February 17, 2009 11:23 AM PST
"It's such a no-brainer. It makes you wonder why no one thought of this sooner."

Um, universal chargers have been around in East Asia for at least 5 years. You can go to any convenience store and get your phone charged for a buck.
Reply to this comment
by cyberdog433 February 17, 2009 12:21 PM PST
About time, only the picture of the Motorola charger shown is MINI-USB and not MICRO-USB. Also noticed that nowhere does the article mention Verizon and AT&T, the two largest carriers in NA, as going along with it. While I can attach any Mini-USB to my AT&T phones, my wife's Verizon phone displays 'Unauthorized charger' when I connect one of mine to her phone......they're the same brand and model phone, other than she has the Verizon CDMA version. (Lets hop on board Verizon!)
Reply to this comment
by Zen-Masta February 17, 2009 12:39 PM PST
I'm a little late chiming in on this but, it's ABOUT TIME. Ever since I got my first phone with mini USB I've vowed not to get another phone or bluetooth headpiece that does not use it. For one it's great not needing multiple charges, and for 2 I can charge it on my computer OR even data transfer easier (if the device supports it). To many phones have these ridiculous data cables it's such a racket.
Reply to this comment
by fazalmajid February 17, 2009 1:31 PM PST
Actually, the Chinese government not only thought about it earlier, but even mandated USB power connectors for all cell phones designed after June 2007.

Then again they're eeveel communist furriners, what do they know?
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (46 Comments)
advertisement

About 3GSM blog

The GSMA 3GSM World Congress show highlights the latest in hot cell phones, accessories, services, and industry trends. CNET brings you the top wireless news from the conference.

Add this feed to your online news reader

3GSM blog topics