• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
April 23, 2009 1:47 PM PDT

Indecent Exposure 46: Incompressible expanses

by Lori Grunin

Why higher ISO sensitivity bloats your boat (and all your other photos), attempting to print big on a pittance, and sharing your skewed world views.


Listen now: Download today's podcast

Episode 46

Today's links:
News


Contests

To convert text to clickable links, at least in Firefox, install Linkification. We apologize for the lack of HTML link support in our comments; we had excessive spamming with link capability.

Last topic: Strange perspectives

Honorable mentions: Too many to list! Check them all out on last week's podcast page

Next topic: Toys
To enter, please use the blog comments to provide a link to your entry, plus any background information you'd like to share with us and other listeners.

Today's questions
Big prints on a budget

I am fresh out of school and I have a TON of unprinted photos. Seeing as I do not have access to my school's printing and framing equipment...where do I go? I can make 11x19 prints on my printer, but I want to go larger.
Looking forward to the next show,
Isaiah


High sensitivity = bigger files?

Hopefully you'll remember me. I am the guy that fell backwards & had the run-in with the security/police shooting picts of the hotel. All of that was preparation for my trip to Disney (the real reason to get the new Canon XS. I managed to do 7 days in the parks on only a 4G memory card. I edited every day & managed 756 photos in 7 days. It could have been more, but the family got tired of my obsession.
I noticed something different. I am sure it is old news to you, but it was a revelation to me. I started to use the ISO selection a lot (sunny, cloudy, night, fireworks, indoor, flash). This really threw me for a loop for the first 2 days until I realized that on 100 speed, I was able to get a lot more photos on the card than if I was using 400 speed. At first, I thought there was something wrong with the camera as my remaining number of shots (which I watched very closely) changed radically. It seemed random, until the epiphany.
I am totally fine with this now & keep it in mind as I shoot. Can you explain why the higher speeds need more space on the card.
Thanks.
Mark


Senior Editor Lori Grunin has been covering digital imaging for two decades, but her memory's kind of sketchy on the details. You can hear about it every week on Indecent Exposure, the podcast she co-hosts with Matt Fitzgerald.
Recent posts from Indecent Exposure Podcast
Indecent Exposure 67: Interrupting experiences
Indecent Exposure 66: Inferred extracurriculars
Indecent Exposure 65: Insights exhausted
Experiment 3: Break out of your box
Indecent Exposure 64: Incongruous expressions
Indecent Exposure 63: Intentional exhaustion
Indecent Exposure 62: Individuality exercised
Indecent Exposure 61: Ineffable extinction
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (27 Comments)
by atfr April 23, 2009 4:54 PM PDT
Hello guys,

This is my submission for this week's contest:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/allex/3469768718/

I went with creepy toy theme this week.

Allex Radu
Reply to this comment
by Lazymonkey44 April 23, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
I see you point, and I re-named the photo to "What's that Dog Looking at?" Better? :D
Reply to this comment
by robertstandridge April 24, 2009 11:44 AM PDT
Hello,

Here is my submission for this week's contest:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rjkstandridge/3342853143

This photo was taken at our local museum which had a lot of Christmas display items back in 2007. When I saw this display setup, it only made sense to shoot this setting in Sepia, of course I could have always shot it normally, then adjusted later but heh what do you do.

Thanks,

Robert
Reply to this comment
by pabica April 25, 2009 8:17 AM PDT
Their Toys.... For this week's contest...


http://www.flickr.com/photos/24405770@N05/3473670082/

Thanks,
Bill....
Reply to this comment
by homebrandcola April 26, 2009 12:03 AM PDT
G'Day all.

This is my entry for this weeks contest.

The Race

http://www.flickr.com/photos/timhughes/3474771191/in/set-72157617236631641/

After hearing the topic for this week I was really excited :-)

This is the first time I have taken a photo specifically for the contest, and I have fun playing around and setting different things up.

Cheers, Tim.
Reply to this comment
by lee_adc April 26, 2009 4:10 AM PDT
Hi,

Here's my favourite toy photograph for this week contest.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/timhughes/3474771191/in/set-72157617236631641/

Cheers, Lee.
Reply to this comment
by homebrandcola April 26, 2009 4:23 AM PDT
Hi Lee,

While I am flattered, I think you must have copied and pasted to look at my photo, and then accidentally pasted my link instead of yours. ;-)

Tim.
by atfr April 28, 2009 6:15 AM PDT
That's why you should use that firefox plug-in.
by operator99 April 27, 2009 8:16 AM PDT
My toy submission is here - Yikes, he came out of nowhere - http://www.flickr.com/photos/operator99/2572456217/in/set-72157614119518961/

Love the show.
Bob
Reply to this comment
by bob.mcclenahan April 27, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
This one is totally pandering to Lori:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobmcclenahan/3480886474/sizes/o/
Reply to this comment
by kelvsmith April 27, 2009 1:55 PM PDT
Hi Lori and Matt,

Thought I would go with Cat Toys this time, had to act fast as they dont last too long.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kdotdotdot/3480416897/sizes/l/

Thanks

Kelvin
Reply to this comment
by RevPiper April 27, 2009 2:04 PM PDT
In reference too..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/28817565@N03/3459497615/sizes/l/

Just FYI,..I did not use a wide angle lens,that shot is stitched from about twenty 18mm shots,each shot is also a three exposure HDR so "Panoramic HDR".The reason I choose this method was because wanted to get beyond 180 degrees,and I wanted a massive print,the original is nearly 250 mega pixels.Love the shows,thanks.
Reply to this comment
by pabica April 27, 2009 4:08 PM PDT
Interesting... if you look closely at the sky, you can see the slightly different HDR processing on the different images... What HDR tool did you use? anybody have any idea on how to get the same exact processing from frame to frame? I use Photomatix and even with the same tool positions, I get markedly different sky processing... which makes panoramas very difficult to do...

Good job...
Bill..
by homebrandcola April 28, 2009 5:38 AM PDT
I really hate to use a twitterism, but as this comment system doesn't allow for replies of replies.

@pabica

I have tried to do a panoramic HDR before, it didn't turn out as well as this. I made sure I shot in full manual mode so each set of 3 exposures (0-+) were the same for each tile of the stitch. What was really hard for me was getting the same output from HDR process. So I did the stitching and created 3 panos that were all the same image, just with different exposures, and then HDR'ed it as one large image.

You really need to make sure you use a tripod with this :-) Need it for the HDR and makes the stitching better.

The pano tool I use is Kolor Autopano, and Photomatix for exposure blending / HDR.

Cheers, Tim.
by jsanua April 28, 2009 4:38 AM PDT
Hi, heres my submission for this week
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28817565@N03/3459497615/sizes/l/
Its a little toy tiger, a few inches long, and i used the reverse lens teqnique to get a macro.

keep on with the show!
Reply to this comment
by IanLivesey April 28, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ianlivesey/3483986736/sizes/l/

It's a small world.........

.... taken today, for the TOY competition.

You must view this immediately afterwards to get the full impact! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APmHR2bmQgw

:)
Reply to this comment
by KeithMac2007 April 28, 2009 3:38 PM PDT
Hello All,

For this week I went in close. It is a set of toy Indians in a setting. I zoomed in with a 75 - 300 mm on a Canon 40D.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kmacke/3483810361/

Good luck to All!
Keith :)
Reply to this comment
by graceraven April 28, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
These miniature metal toys are the last mementos of my Dad's full size Lionel train set up. The little man looks ominous due to worn away paint spots on his face. He looks more like Freddie Krueger now.
Reply to this comment
by graceraven April 28, 2009 6:50 PM PDT
Oops, here is the link for above comment. http://www.flickr.com/photos/30978872@N03/3482220408/
Thanks, grace
Reply to this comment
by lovethatnixter April 28, 2009 10:40 PM PDT
I think this is a little more than a toy or toys...it is fun and ment for kids...I figure it is worth submitting so here it is...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stankus/3482359994/
Thanks...

Nick
Reply to this comment
by sbono13 April 29, 2009 2:06 PM PDT
I tried to give this little guy the full portrait treatment (soft focus, flattering diffuse side lighting, etc). Has he ever looked better?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/44124369108@N01/3485937506/
Reply to this comment
by grapemac April 30, 2009 6:18 AM PDT
Hey Lori & Matt...

So 'Toys' then...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/grapemac/3487978211/

And now, on with the notes:

Took an age to come with a concept this week that wasn't either unattainably grandiose or unutterably dull...

Then my mate and creative collaborator Andy happened to mention that he had a 'Paper-Plane-Per-Day' Desk calender and as a consequence had an abundance of paper planes laying around that he wasn't using (and was willing to set on fire in the name of art!) and thus the idea for 'Dog Fight' was born... This morning... At work... Just before break...

Some jerry rigging and messing around with Ethanol later the basic picture was in camera, the idea being to simulate an areal shot using macro to cheat the depth of field.

I decided to add the 'Pop-Frame' in post to both emphasize the dynamic of the shot and to try and echo those old '80's board game or 'Airfix' model kit boxes (Toys!).

Hope you like!

As an addendum: We/I usually end up with at least two or three candidates for submission each week and the unenviable task of choosing the final candidate usually falls to my friend and office-mate Kay. This week however we liked the attitude of the 'hero' plane in one shot (Dog Fight 2) and the flames of the 'baddie' plane in the other (Dog Fight 3), incidentally Andy and I both felt these (the flames of DF3) echoed the Mid-air collision of to Russian Mig29s at International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford in 1993 (Google it the footage is amazing), and couldn't really decide... Anyhoo Kay liked 'Dog Fight 2' best but Andy and I have decided to ignore her this week and have plumped for 'Dog Fight 3', feel free to let us know wether you agree with us or want to shout at us for how wrong we are (Both images available in the Photoset)...

Laters peeps : Andy
Reply to this comment
by grapemac April 30, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
:::Ahem::: *aerial* and *two* Russian Mig29s... Andrew Sleepy
by dgroszek April 30, 2009 4:51 PM PDT
Hi Again,

Here is my entry for this week. Visited relative in Florida and found the tip of the (toy) iceberg.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/35413458@N03/3488755404


Dane
Reply to this comment
by kmcrober May 1, 2009 7:37 AM PDT
Could any readers recommend a digital frame that integrates with Flikr? I know some Kodak models do, but the reviews on those seem mixed. Anyone have an off-brand winner?
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (27 Comments)
Subscribe to the Indecent Exposure podcast

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

advertisement

About Indecent Exposure Podcast

Kick back and listen to Lori and Matt's weekly chat about what's new, interesting, useful--and occasionally irritating--in the world of digital photography and imaging.

Got questions? Drop us a line at indecentexposure@cnet.com.


Add this feed to your online news reader

Indecent Exposure Podcast topics

More on Indecent Exposure
Digital camera forums
Digital camera news
Digital camera reviews
The hosts of Indecent Exposure
Lori Grunin Lori Grunin has been an avid photographer for almost 30 years, and spent the past 15 attempting to master every aspect of technology.
Matt Fitzgerald Matt Fitzgerald has been involved with digital camera technology and the photo industry for more than 15 years. Matthew's background includes work as a professional photographer, a technical representative, and a repair technician.