May 29, 2009 1:45 PM PDT
Indecent Exposure 50: Inverting expectations
Camcording stereo vs. surround and photo contestants go for the gold.
Listen now:
Download today's podcast
 |
Episode 50 |
Today's links:
News
Contests
To convert text to clickable links, at least in Firefox, install Linkification. We apologize for the lack of HTML link support in our comments; we had excessive spamming with link capability.
Last topic: Gold
Winner: Untitled
Honorable mention: Roaarrr!
Next topic: Portraits
To enter, please use the blog comments to provide a link to your entry, plus any background information you'd like to share with us and other listeners.
Today's questions
To enter, please use the blog comments to provide a link to your entry, plus any background information you'd like to share with us and other listeners.
5.1 sound on a camcorder
First of all I want to say I think you do an excellent job reviewing the current camcorders on the market. I wanted to know if you are planning on reviewing the Sony HDR-XR100 and the Sony HDR-XR200. I've been looking at these two camcorders and I'm curious if they are as good as the new Canon camcorders on the market. Also I wanted to know your opinion on Sony's 5.1 mic. Is it worth getting a Sony camcorder over a Canon camcorder for this feature? Thank you so much for your time!
Karl K.
Senior Editor Lori Grunin has been covering digital imaging for two decades, but her memory's kind of sketchy on the details. You can hear about it every week on Indecent Exposure, the podcast she co-hosts with Matt Fitzgerald.
Lori Grunin has been an avid photographer for almost 30 years, and spent the past 15 attempting to master every aspect of technology.
Matt Fitzgerald has been involved with digital camera technology and the photo industry for more than 15 years. Matthew's background includes work as a professional photographer, a technical representative, and a repair technician.
Here is my submission for the portraits contest:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/allex/3576595959/
Allex Radu
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lukedebruijn/3556510207/
Thanks, Luke deBruijn
http://www.flickr.com/photos/damienfranco/2083629117/
Of course there are more if you want
http://www.flickr.com/photos/damienfranco/sets/72157603661031819/
I just like this one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/traing33k/3572830325/
(Was tempted to submit something like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/traing33k/3531902515/in/set-72157618162246068/ )
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobmcclenahan/3579216319/
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3136/3558545325_3c6b556fd5_b.jpg
And here's his wife, Ethel:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3362/3559312672_14edab0f3e_b.jpg
Guess she shouldn't have had that third cup of expresso :)
taken with a total of £100 of equipment.
A canon eos 300, 50mm 1.8 mk2 and ilford XP2 film, digitised.
All photography is digital photography thanks to scanners.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/happybird101/3583022607/
still love the show!
--Jacob
http://newportpreacher.smugmug.com/photos/551365806_onLTj-L.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30978872@N03/?saved=1
Grace
Here is my submission:http://www.flickr.com/photos/22756141@N06/3583364617/
I took several pictures to get this effect. My friend pictured here can no longer see. His eyes work, but he can no longer understand what the eyes see.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kmacke/3584300782/sizes/o/
Keith Macke
Here's my entry for this weeks contest...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/leeadc/3147921195/
Also you previously discussed running longer contests or assignments. Have you thought about trying one? I often don't have the time to shoot for the weekly contest and would like to have a monthly objective...
Lee.
Here is my entry for this weeks contest. This was shot at the spur of the moment.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38413087@N02/3584908013/in/photostream/
I have a couple of questions
Do we get more zoom with a sensor smaller than 35mm camera with the same lense ? For instance if I use a 18-55mm lense on a body like D90 would it give have a different optical zoom D700? If that is the case then would it not be better to getter a smaller sensor so we get more zoom with the same lense. Or is that the bigger sensor would compensate for the lack of optical zoom with digital zoom as the pixel size is bigger?
The second question pertains to film cameras. I am curious to know are there any new film DSLR camera out there in the market?
Thanks
Karthik
Thanks for the mention last week.
Here is this week's submissions "Goggle Me"... the things some people will do for a little attention (er! him, not me).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ianlivesey/3538519350/sizes/l/
TTFN
Ian.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37791728@N07/3587905078/
highgloss
http://www.idy.dk/cpg149/displayimage.php?pid=24&fullsize=1
It's a self portrait composite, background is 2 pairs of black pants
Great show :-)
Return Of The Rocker Chick
http://www.flickr.com/photos/walakazoo/3299516982
It's a shot of my most photographed subject, my daughter Annabelle. This is one of my very favorite shots of her. I have a really nice 11x14 of this shot hanging in my office at work.
-
by dazza1734
June 3, 2009 4:56 PM PDT
- My entry
-
Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (50 Comments)http://www.flickr.com/photos/82742117@N00/3547995748/
Cheers
Daryl