• On CHOW: Groundbreaking hangover cure
May 27, 2009 4:35 PM PDT

My Palm Pre first-gen fears

by David Carnoy

CNET News Poll

Are you comfortable buying version 1.0 of the Palm Pre?

Yes, it looks as good or better than the iPhone.
No, I'll wait for a later version.
No Palm Pre for me--I'm holding out for the new iPhone.



View results

I usually follow a simple rule when it comes to consumer electronics: I avoid buying any first-generation products. That doesn't mean I haven't ever done it, but I tend to wait for generation two or three before I plunk down my dough, particularly when it comes to heavily hyped stuff.

As I've written before, I'm a prime candidate to buy the Palm Pre. I'm a Sprint customer who has a contract conveniently expiring in June and I have a phone (the Mogul) that's on its last legs. Ideally, the Pre would cost $50 less and not have a mail-in rebate, but at least Sprint didn't price the thing at a pure $299, as I'm sure it would have preferred to do. Pricing aside, the biggest hurdle I'm facing is the fact that the Palm Pre is a first-gen phone--and platform--and I'm really not a first-gen guy.

By contrast, the iPhone will be on its third generation and its platform is already fairly mature. We'll find out exactly how the new third-generation iPhone specs out at next week's WWDC event, but it's safe to assume that many of the small, nagging kinks that were found in earlier editions of the iPhone will have been ironed out. I don't expect it to be perfect (no phone ever will be, because there's always something better around the corner), but I feel pretty good about getting a lot more iPhone for my $199 than those who purchased the original non-3G model (which was originally $599--with contract!) or even the iPhone 3G.

Sometimes, of course, a brand new product can come along that's so far ahead of the pack that even the introductory version is too tempting to avoid. In my book, the lack of a 3G data connection in the original iPhone was an instant deal breaker and made it easy to pass.

Future editions of the Palm Pre will assuredly have more than 8GB of memory.

(Credit: Palm )

The Pre, on the other hand, has only one glaring issue on the surface: it's got only 8GB of built-in memory and no memory expansion option. It's also unclear whether the platform will truly take off and attract the large number of developers--and have a robust app store--that the iPhone has. Not that apps are the end-all be-all for smartphones, but if everybody's out there developing cool stuff for the iPhone and not the Palm, you're potentially going to feel a little cheated.

The other thing I like about the iPhone is that it does allow for software upgrades. Yes, you're limited by the hardware feature set, but phones, like computers and game consoles, should be upgradeable. Say what you want about the early editions of the PS3, Wii, and XBox 360, which were plagued with reliability issues; at least those "old" machines can all run the new system software, and, in the case of the PS3, the first systems offered backwards compatibility for PS2 games.

Another beef with the Pre: it's not a world phone, so you're stuck with just Wi-Fi if traveling overseas. We know that a GSM version of the phone won't be far behind--so that's just another reason to wait.

From my personal smartphone experience, Microsoft and the carriers have always been woeful about offering upgrades for Windows Mobile phones (upgrading the firmware on my Mogul was always a chore and would be near-impossible for technophobes).

By contrast, newer smartphone OS outfit Google seems to be doing a pretty good job of offering updates to its Android-powered G1 T-Mobile phone, so I'm hoping that Palm has an upgrade plan for the Pre that helps potential buyers like me get over their first-gen fears--especially with riper platforms like Blackberry and Apple sitting out there alongside up-and-comers like Android. (I'm not forgetting about Nokia's Symbian or Windows Mobile, but the former has more of a European base and the latter--in the form of Windows Mobile 7 devices--should have been out six months ago).

Maybe I'm a sissy. But I have a gadget philosophy. I try to live by it. I try to show discipline. How 'bout you? Anybody else holding back on the Pre because it's a first-gen model? Or is switching to Sprint the bigger concern?

Hunkered down in New York City, Executive Editor David Carnoy covers the gamut of gadgets and writes his Fully Equipped column, which carries the tag line "The electronics you lust for." He's also the author of "Knife Music," a novel. E-mail David. Follow David on Twitter.
Recent posts from Fully Equipped
LED TVs: 10 things you need to know
15 worthy Blu-ray movies for less than $15
Top 30 must-have Blu-ray Discs
Is this your Kindle?
Will PSP Go keep pirates at bay?
Keyboard for Apple tablet already here?
Top 40 movies not out on Blu-ray
Name that Netbook: What should Apple call its rumored tablet PC?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 4 pages (96 Comments)
by djstewpac May 27, 2009 4:53 PM PDT
nope. no first gen fear(s).
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor May 27, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
I completely agree. No matter how much you test something, no matter how great it is, there will be bugs in the first gen and there is nothing to do about that. Make it easy to upgrade and it makes it a little better, but what about unforeseen hardware issues? I steer clear of 1st Gen products for that reason and the Pre will be no exception. If the features are worth the bugs, then go for it. A few products out there I would love to try 1st gen even with the bugs, but phones aren't one of those things.
Reply to this comment
by F_Cloud May 27, 2009 5:11 PM PDT
I'm not concerned about it being a first gen device, specifically because the OS can be updated with bug fixes, upgrades, etc. The only hardware revisions I could see would be a higher resolution screen, maybe an updated camera, and keyboard enhancements.
Reply to this comment
by cwheels4 May 27, 2009 5:15 PM PDT
I have been a loyal Verizon customer for 2 years now (Yes, I signed a new contract about a year before the iPhone 3G came out and sat and watched all my friends empty their wallets for their shiny machines of iJealousy) and I am currently sitting on my old phone with a month-to-month commitment to Verizon based on their fantastic service where I am. The runner up for service around here is Sprint. Now, while my iPhone friends have claimed to not have any service problems with AT&T, that has been the one reason I haven't jumped on an iPhone yet (and the pending update this summer). This week I just started researching what is out for the Pre and I am super excited for it. I have loved my iPod Touch (1st Gen :) ), and the apps are all really cool, useful, neat, trendy, I could go on, but I think that the webOS that Palm has developed in this thing is going to allow for such simple expansion and polishing, that developers will be all over it, much like the AppStore developers that saw how the iPhone 3G exploded. The only "1st Gen" problems that I think will plague Palm and Sprint is going to be the deluge of customers that want this device.
Reply to this comment
by FrostyTS May 27, 2009 5:51 PM PDT
I've used Palm phones for years. iPhone's are pretty, but there are die-hard Palm users that put their phones to real-world uses. I also took a look at the Apple App Store, and I wasn't too impressed with what I found. Don't get me wrong, there is a LOT of stuff there..and they were all pretty. But if I want a gaming system, I'll buy a gaming system with a larger screen. And if you ever catch me in the store checking my shopping list off on my phone..please hit me with a can of tuna...hard.

I've used my current Palm Treo to access servers (remote desktop and telnet) located in Texas while on vacation in Las Vegas. I was able to fix problems with a wireless broadband connection without having to dig out my laptop and get a connection. Palm phones are more then just a phone, and by more I don't mean an mp3 player, ;)

Another thing to note is that Palm has always offered software upgrades for their products. They know what they are doing because they've been doing it, and doing it right, for years.
Reply to this comment
by live4speakers May 27, 2009 9:02 PM PDT
Yeah that's why they are developing for CDMA first. They know what they are doing!
The rest of the WORLD (There is one outside the US) don't use CDMA!
by live4speakers May 27, 2009 9:13 PM PDT
And oh yeah I have used remote desktop from an iphone to connect to my servers on the West Coast while I was on vacation in India! Don't knock a product if you haven't tried it. I used to a own a series of Palm devices and phones as well. They were good at what they did. But, how come no one thought of developing easy to use touch screens before the iphone came out?
by nole4life80 May 28, 2009 6:00 AM PDT
It's funny you ask why didn't anyone come up with an easy to use touchscreen phone before the Iphone......
Palm did with the original Treo running Palm OS YEARS before Apple.
by merlefisher May 28, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
@ nole4life80
quote nole4life80 "Palm did with the original Treo running Palm OS YEARS before Apple".

Pardon me but have you ever used the iphone or an ipod touch? I've OWNED palms touch screen devices and the resistive touch technology that is used in Palm's and most other touch screen devices sucks big time, and doesn't compare at all to the capacitive touch technology used in the iphone and ipod touch. Capacitive touch is the touch technology of the future. (beginning with the iphone) Try an iphone someday buddy. The touchscreen really is that much better and easier to use than the Palm treo you mentioned.
by stoopered May 28, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
live4speakers Your lying. You did not use remote desktop to connect to servers from India... If so... how? Did you use their WiMax networks that aren't even completed yet? Did you download a 3rd party app onto a Jailbroken Iphone? How exactly did you manage to do this, please inform me? Give me the name of the program, and where in India you were. Its ok to admit you lied no one on here will hate you for it. By the way could you enlighten me and tell me how and can switch out the battery and open excel spreadsheets when I'm on my way to a business meeting? I mean it is a smart phone right? Your comparing it to a smart phone. You also know that CDMA has a much better voice quality when your on conference calls and also quicker internet. Those are business needs, which is where PALM kicks the crap out of APPLE when it comes to phones.
by b_baggins May 28, 2009 1:59 PM PDT
@stoopered

He probably either used a VNC client for the iPhone, or an SSH client for the iPhone, after tunneling in with the built-in VPN functionality of the iPhone.
by OscarWeb May 29, 2009 4:38 PM PDT
@stoopered:
Please do your research before personally attacking someone who actually owns an iPhone and knows what they are talking about. The iPhone is a GSM world phone so yes, it does work (and is sold) in India. I'm fairly certain that WiFi hotspots exist in India. Heck, Tata Indicom offers it for their broadband customers. In addition, there are a number of apps on the App Store for Telnet, SSH and VNC to allow anyone to remotely access a computer over the Internet. No, the battery cannot be removed but that's easily remedied using something like the Kensington Mini Battery Pack or the Mophie Juice Pack. Oh, and yes, you can easily open an Excel document in Mail or edit them using Quickoffice.
by DrewN June 1, 2009 2:57 AM PDT
Wow, an elitist who thinks phones are SERIOUS BUSINESS. Too bad you represent .00000005% of the population. There's absolutely nothing wrong with putting a shopping list on your smartphone, please get over yourself.

Or maybe this is a feeble attempt to reassure oneself that they made the right decision with the "not an iPhone"? How else would you explain someone explaining away the absolute brilliance and success of the App Store? Unfortunately the sheer numbers say otherwise.

BTW I'm not an Apple fanboy, I've been defending the Zune for years now. Apple nailed the iPhone and the App Store, there's no point denying it.
by strykernyc June 19, 2009 11:12 AM PDT
I dropped my palm treo a million times and even use it in the rain so much and the damn phone never die. I would never forget I dropped my treo on the subway track and lucky for me a mta employee was there and got it for me. broken battery cover and dirty screen but it was still running :)
by Hellcat May 27, 2009 5:54 PM PDT
No no real worries about the Pre. It looks like a pretty strong phone with features that are above and beyond the iphone and other phones. If you're scared to upgrade just get the HTC Touch Pro 2 and wait for the second or third gen Pre. AT&T's service and customer support and the iphone lousy phone signal, you'll probably be sorry you went to AT&T.
Reply to this comment
by ofmyony May 27, 2009 7:06 PM PDT
Best wishes if you jump now, Good luck with that Sprint support. Not for me
Reply to this comment
by nole4life80 May 28, 2009 6:16 AM PDT
That is the one thing I can agree on. I am fairly new to Sprint and I love their plans and the coverage (yeah I said the coverage), but I am worried that the customer service which already isn't the best won't be able to support the device. Per new articles, Palm JUST started sending stores a Pre last week so they can become familiar with it.
by JustNotEverybody May 28, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
I'm just curious... is there a company that just dazzles with their call centers 100% of the time?? People who throw this out usually feel super privileged and expect the world to be handed to them, and their only threat is going to another carrier who would never treat them that way.

The fact is that Sprint bases most their commission on customer service satisfaction, so you have better odds of being helped right, especially in stores, otherwise their paychecks get hit, and who ever wants that?
by NewMacAddict May 28, 2009 10:08 PM PDT
Sprint has gotten much better with their customer service. It's better than AT & T.
by sjcea0512 May 29, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
Guess you have not been around Sprint lately ?? There support is top notch as is there customer service and plans. I could not dump Verizon fast enough and will never go back !!! As for AT&T you can keep them and there ridiculous price plans and worthless network . yeah great there phones will work while I am in Afganistan or Iraq but who cares ????? Nextel works over seas, and last time I went to London Sprint gave me a phone to use so I would not be without !!! FOR FREE !!!
by maad0320 May 31, 2009 7:33 AM PDT
To be honest Sprint's customer service/support isn't that bad anymore. The last time I called in I had to wait about 5 minutes to get through to the department I wanted and it only took about 10 minutes to get my problem solved. After that I just started talking to there support online, which was even faster. So al in all their support is only so-so but definitely not bad.
by RemyLarue May 31, 2009 8:39 PM PDT
i've been with Sprint for 6 years now and haven't had any customer service issues. They've always been respectful and helpful with any problems i've had, and i haven't had many problems to begin with.

Maybe i've been lucky. Dan Hesse is well aware of the customer service issues and that has been his top priority since joining Sprint, and i think he's doing a pretty good job in that area. Think about it, Sprint has to do something to stop the bleeding, and customer service is their number 1 issue, along with the lack of new phones. So don't you think they would do everything in their power to make customers happy? so people would spread the word so others would join in? Especially with the cell phone industry the way it is(they're the new used car salesman of our generation), competition is cut throat and they're on their last leg. Give Sprint a chance,i think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

of course now that i've said all that, i'm sure i've jinxed myself for life. Go me.
by lgsf June 8, 2009 9:25 PM PDT
I have been with all three major carriers over the past eight years. Currently I am with Sprint and have made plenty of customer service and tech support phone calls. So far I have been very impressed with their phone support. I have also been impressed with the customer service at my local store on several occasions. If Sprint customer service was poor in the past, it seems they have made major strides to correct the problem.

Sprint also made me a Premier Customer which means I get to upgrade my phone at full discount every 12 months, and I occasionally get free stuff and even rebates. The signal in my neck of the woods is great, and the EVDO rev.A data speeds are fantastic. My family unlimited plan is WAY cheaper than comparable plans on both Verizon and AT&T. I also like the fact that their phone offerings are getting better (I like my Touch Pro and my new Pre is pretty damn awesome so far). Add all that up and I am pretty happy with Sprint.

There are so many phones out there for one reason: every one's needs are different. That being said, the Pre has some fantastic features including a real keyboard, and webOS is down right functional and cool. If you live in an area that has good Sprint coverage and are thinking about getting a Palm Pre, I would say go get it if you can find one.
by swimpunk May 27, 2009 7:09 PM PDT
My fears are with the hardware. Foxconn has said they're having problems with reliability on flexible circuit boards, and apparently they're having some issues w/ the TI processor as well. I'm still going to buy one, but I'm keeping my old phone around in case mine croaks and sprint has none none available to replace it.
Reply to this comment
by craigfroehle May 27, 2009 7:11 PM PDT
I don't really understand...how can you be so against new gadgets when it's your job to write about and appreciate new gadgets? Wouldn't that be like an Amish farmer writing a newspaper's Automotive column? Seriously...to write about this stuff, you have to have a passion for it, and if you're totally cool with getting stuff that's only on its 2nd or 3rd revision, you can't really be all that jazzed about the possibilities of the new.
Reply to this comment
by Masterface7 May 28, 2009 6:35 AM PDT
I agree with craig. I dont think enough can be said for jumping into somthing on the ground level. I sure did have a 64 MB rio back in the day. Its that faith in things that makes them sink or swim. If no one would have bought the 1st gen iphone then it wouldn't still be here. And being a columnist of a tech blog called crave one would think you should jump at the chance to be on the forefront of wanted gadgets. I guess what i am trying to say is this. If you are not willing to to take a leap of faith then don't expect to find the Grail.
by hameiri May 28, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
craigfroehle,

I disagree. You probably think a car lover should get a new car every year, too.

Now, I'll use an analogy that will put all of this in perspective. If you are a girl (woman, female) lover, should you get a new one the minute it comes out? No. Some do, some don't.

I love technology and cars. But, for me it's an art. Get the best for my pocketbook, and for what I want. One of the things I don't want is something not good. So, waiting is oftentimes the best policy.

After all, what if I love the car I have. Does keeping it make me some kind of non car lover? I don't think so. Actually, I think the people who get new cars all of the time like cars less than me.

So, there!
by dcarnoy May 28, 2009 2:14 PM PDT
Passion doesn't = buy. I'm always excited when a new, sexy device hits the scene. But my job is to point out its upsides and downsides and sort through the marketing hyperbole.
by alexacker May 29, 2009 2:16 AM PDT
@craig I disagree. David reports on technology products and brings a nice perspective to them. I appreciate this article more than the ones who are foaming at the mouth over the features.

@hameiri What does this mean? What a silly comparison -- women aren't products.

"If you are a girl (woman, female) lover, should you get a new one the minute it comes out? No. Some do, some don't."
by nreddyk May 27, 2009 7:20 PM PDT
FUD!
Reply to this comment
by Dan7637 May 27, 2009 9:05 PM PDT
palm pre is a cheap designed phone, plus the thing is a total rip off of the iphone with its dock like bar at the bottom, retarded curved design and its mad from palm- a company that gave up on its own os for windows mobile so what can you expect
Reply to this comment
by mamyint May 27, 2009 9:28 PM PDT
Windows Mobile was an attempt to cater more to their base of business users. I think we can all agree that Windows (any version) sucks, but at the same time, I think we can all agree that it is a necessary evil in this world.
by seven7dust May 28, 2009 4:13 AM PDT
it may or may not be a rip-off
but they are certain things the iPhone doesn't do while the palm pre does them quite efficiently and in a iPhone like fashion
atleast from wat I've seen in the demos !
iPhone users have been screaming for features like multi-tasking ,better notifications etc but Apple has decided to become complacent
and hence people are going to move on !
by nole4life80 May 28, 2009 6:14 AM PDT
I agree, many PC makers have had to conform to Windows just as Palm did.
by Hellcat May 28, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
Palm made one of the first smartphones. You can say that Apple copied thing from the earlier Palms. Palm had the first touch screens with their PDA's and then phones. The first iphone was crap and then they brought out the 3G one which just put 3G (just Apples way of getting more money because a lot of people who bought the first iphone went and bought the 3G before their contracts were over so AT&T and Apple made a bundle off of lemmings doing so) and its going to happen again.

The Pre is a totally different phone and the OS is way above and beyond anything Apple has come up with. Apple will now try and copy things from the Pre. The iphone doesn't multitask very well, the card system on the Pre alone is worth buying the Pre. Also being able to type in a search for people, web and on the Pre unit without having to open other programs is awesome. The Calender, being able to have your work and Google calender together is big. The address book where you can chat, or text or call, or email and see if the person is on Facebook is big.

There is so much to love about the Pre. This will be Palms middle finger to Apple.
by scottecher May 29, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
Dan, Dan, Dan...I think you are just JEALOUS of this phone that comes out. Besides, some of the Palm Pre developers created the ORIGINAL iPod...so why is it a ripoff if these developers are utilizing their own technology? Don't get into ethics with me on this one.

The "retarded" curve design was utilizied for better comfort; notice how it is supposed to contour to the natural curve of the human hand when the hand is holding an object.

Cheap? I doubt it..what evidence do you have that the phone is cheap? That is a laughable comment..

Again, you are just jealous..you know you are going to go out and look at this phone...and when you know someone who buys one, you are going to ask to look at it, and quietly be impressed with it. All the wihle, you will vocally say, "well my iphone can do this while your pre can't do this or that, ha!"
by phantomofsmartphone May 28, 2009 1:36 AM PDT
Palm products still rocks. Even old Palm OS capable to compete with major phone platforms. Palm came up with their touch screen functionality several years ahead of IPhone. I must admit though that Iphone revolutionized the mobile computing experience. I hope that new Palm Czar will correct the past mistakes of Palm by making Palm devices more innovative and affordable to wider public.
Reply to this comment
by nole4life80 May 28, 2009 6:11 AM PDT
I am not worried about getting the first gen Pre for several reasons.
First of all Palm is not new to the smart phone game. They are one of the creators of the smart phone and PDA, they know what they are doing. Where was Apple when the original Treo came out in like 2002?
Secondly, obviously they have taken a lot of time developing the Pre. It was in the works long before even the news of it in January which was still almost 6 months before it will be available.
Third, I had the G1 for a while and got it the day it came out. It did not have any problems that could not be fixed with updates. It was running a new OS also and HTC has not been making phones nearly as long as Palm.
Last, if you think about it.... Palm REALLY needs the Pre to do well and I am sure they have done everything in their power to make sure the first gen works.

And ppl, don't knock Sprint. I know thier phone's aren't world phones but they have done well just being a US carrier, also the same plan on other carriers cost almost 50% as much. I have the Treo Pro and the everything plan and I am VERY happy with it. I just left Tmobile because they are only good if you just want to talk and check emails on your phone. I love the navigation and watch Sprint TV without ever having to worry about my bill changing. My signal is actually better than my Tmobile phone too. Plus Sprint is the first US company even talking about 4G........
Reply to this comment
by Masterface7 May 28, 2009 6:28 AM PDT
I don't see how you can call the pre cheap designed when it is not even out yet. Also, alot of people like to slam windows mobile, but the unfortunate fact is it is not really for the common end user. For the power user who doesn't mind the time and challenge it is like heaven behind a screen, allowing a host of custom roms and tweaks to make it exactly what you want. For me the iphone's greatest strength is also kind of a weakness, it is great that the platform kinds of fades away and just becomes a collection of apps however so is the ipod touch minus the painfully high monthly fee. Also without background processes you cant have an active home screen like the htc touch flo with weather, stocks and rss right from your main home screen. I am hoping the palm pre can combine the pros from multiple platform and still garner some decent apps from developers, because i would be lying if i didn't say i was jealous that i cant play tap tower defense from my winmo phone. I just hope palm is open enough to let everyone develop for their phone cause i love me some opera mini and maybe opera 9.7 when it comes out.
Reply to this comment
by Eludium-Q36 May 28, 2009 9:24 AM PDT
Keep in mind there's a BIG difference between first shipped and first gen. I typically wait for the first ROM update before making the1st gen purchase because that resolves all the "how could they release this like this" complaints for those who bought v1.0 phones. I don't have the patience to wait an extra year for v2.0; v1.1 or 1.2 is fine for most everyone.
Reply to this comment
by Ksal005 May 28, 2009 11:24 AM PDT
AT&T's 3G (or lack thereof) is not worth any phone. iPhones are pretty for that what they are but it doesn't matter. It's ALL a moot point as long as they are on that terrible, terrible AT&T network. Let's not even get into the prices of the plans. I'll stay on Sprint. Thanks anyway.
[CNET editor's note: Personal attack deleted.]
Reply to this comment
by krollins83 May 28, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
Wait, was this an article on the iPhone or the Palm Pre? I get where you're going, and agree with your point, but I'd just drop the title to "First Gen Fears".
Reply to this comment
by bluelight421 May 28, 2009 12:17 PM PDT
Ok I dont know if my opinion matters seeing as how i am an iPhone 3G user with no plans to switch carriers or phones any time soon, but here it goes. I think anyone on the fence about buying the Pre should suck it up, get over their fears and just try it out. First of all, check and see what Sprint's coverage looks like in your area, and then jump in head first. I know it seems like a big risk to trust the hype, but lets face it... you wouldn't be reading this article unless you were somewhat interested in this d*mn phone! You obviously resisted the iPhone, Storm, and G-1, so its time to sink your teeth into the world of smartphones already!! trust me you wont ever go back to a normal cell phone again!
Reply to this comment
by triplearockstar May 28, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
same here. as a sprint customer, the pre is the no 1 option but i am worried about the limited memory. with sprint being so expensive, ill be stuck with the 1st gen whether ill liek ti or not. hope all goes well.
Reply to this comment
by molotov May 28, 2009 1:27 PM PDT
You'd be lucky if it can make decent phone calls. Don't expect anything else they promise.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 4 pages (96 Comments)
advertisement

About Fully Equipped

Executive Editor David Carnoy has been covering electronics for CNET since 2000, arriving at the company just as "that whole Internet bust thing" happened. Early on, he launched CNET's cell phone coverage, earning him the nickname "Wireless Dave," then moved on to bigger and broader things. Hunkered down in New York City, he oversees CNET's Home and Hardware reviews, which includes all things related to home theater, PC, and digital imaging. Fully Equipped covers the gamut of gadgets and gizmos and, to keep things lively, Carnoy likes to alternate between writing useful, advice-oriented pieces or thought-provoking columns with inflammatory headlines designed to elicit commentary from readers. Fully Equipped is the longest continuously running column on CNET.com.

For older columns, read the Fully Equipped archive (2002-2008).

Add this feed to your online news reader

Fully Equipped topics