• On The Insider: Robert Pattinson's New Leading Lady
August 6, 2009 9:46 AM PDT

Top 40 movies not out on Blu-ray

by David Carnoy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 106 comments

One of the reasons people like to give for not buying a Blu-ray player is that there just aren't that many Blu-ray discs out there and that a lot of great movies haven't come out on Blu-ray. That's not totally true. There are a lot of movies out on Blu-ray--over 2,000, in fact--and more are being released every month, including "Gladiator" and "Braveheart" in September and the "Lord of the Rings Trilogy" in November.

That said, plenty of movies have yet to be given the Blu-ray treatment. A good portion of those movies are bad or inconsequential, and you probably don't care whether they make it to Blu-ray or not (or they're fine on DVD). But we're concerned about the good stuff that's not available, which is why I've put together this list of key movies that aren't out yet on Blu-ray.

To be sure, some of you may take issue with my picks. And I probably missed a few that should have made the list. But like I do with my Top 25 must-have Blu-rays list, feel free to express your opinions and if you have a legitimate case, I will gladly update the list with new picks.

Click on any image to start the slideshow see the picks. The movies are listed in alphabetical order, and we didn't include any TV shows. (Note: there's a link on the last slide that will return you to this article to post or read comments).

More:

  • Top 25 must-have Blu-ray discs
  • The decade's 25 biggest tech flops
  • Hunkered down in New York City, Executive Editor David Carnoy covers the gamut of gadgets and writes his Fully Equipped column, which carries the tag line "The electronics you lust for." He's also the author of "Knife Music," a novel. E-mail David. Follow David on Twitter.
    Recent posts from Fully Equipped
    Top 15 Black Friday tech deals
    Top 40 must-have Blu-ray Discs
    Does the new Kindle have better contrast?
    LED TVs: 10 things you need to know
    15 worthy Blu-ray movies for less than $15
    Is this your Kindle?
    Will PSP Go keep pirates at bay?
    Keyboard for Apple tablet already here?
    Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (106 Comments)
    by ibeetle August 6, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
    While not "out" as of this very second a third of the films on the list have dated release dates between October '09 and end of 2010.
    Reply to this comment
    by dcarnoy August 6, 2009 10:13 AM PDT
    We noted that certain films should be coming out on Blu-ray in the not so distant future. They will be removed from the list (and replaced with other movies) when they actually arrive.
    by kalel130 August 6, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
    The industry is hoping to lure late adopters with big name releases; as player price drops the industry needs ways to make sure people buy them - and what better way then to dangle these movies in front of consumers?
    Reply to this comment
    by cvaldes1831 August 6, 2009 10:18 AM PDT
    Why is Showgirls not on this list?
    Reply to this comment
    by DMAN3k August 6, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
    +1
    by dcarnoy August 6, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
    Underrated movie. So bad it's good.
    by August 10, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
    I have to agree, a guilty pleasure that stands up to repeated viewings. And it might actually make a nice transfer, picture-wise.
    by faghouse August 10, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
    I agree! The BD better include the "camp" commentary though.
    by faghouse August 10, 2009 2:46 PM PDT
    I agree! The BD better include the "camp" commentary though.
    by DMAN3k August 6, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
    Robin Hood: Men in Tights

    or some Mel Brooks collection
    Reply to this comment
    by repete66211 September 24, 2009 6:58 AM PDT
    Your wish will be granted 12/15/09.
    by Police_States_of_America August 6, 2009 10:38 AM PDT
    most of my picks are foreign films. some of these picks are decent, but i dont see why anyone would be so eager to see movies with average cinematography on blu
    Reply to this comment
    by Lizardfueler August 6, 2009 10:49 AM PDT
    Many of these movies were made before it was possible to shoot in HD. Many of them are old enough that a full digital restoration would not improve the looks of the film much. Personally, I tend to save my Blu-ray purchase dollars for movies that would look and sound MUCH better than on DVD. Quite frankly, this list has few movies like that.

    Also, it really sucks to have to click through 40 pages of one-sentence per page to see the list. Consider having a list separate from the slide show. Seriously.
    Reply to this comment
    by dcarnoy August 6, 2009 11:00 AM PDT
    35mm film has plenty of resolution to create a hi-def transfer.
    by Jester_Paul August 6, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
    Beware, useless or informational comment to follow:

    In film school, we learned that there are about 100 lines (+/- 10 lines) of resolution per mm of film. So, you need only to shoot on 16mm to get HDTV level quality.

    This is why you never see any big screen movies being shot on prosumer cameras, with exception of a few (28 Days Later, for example).
    by DarkHawke August 7, 2009 4:46 AM PDT
    If you've seen the remastered Original Star Trek episodes on an HDTV, you should know that pretty much ANYTHING shot on film can look SPECTACULAR on Blu-ray. The new effects are wonderful, but the live-action shots are quite stunning, even to the point of revealing defects in how the sets really looked (which they never expected anyone to notice given 1960s television tech)!
    by traxx09 October 1, 2009 6:37 AM PDT
    Some people should not be aloud to post. I mean, really, Lizardfueler?

    It's a pet peeve that gets under my skin. People think that just because it's HD and/or digital that it's better than an older technology. 35mm film has way more resolution than HD can handle and film SLRs have more resolution than DSLRs. There's a reason that movies have been shot on film for over 100 years, they have yet to find anything better. Film was there before videotape and there after videotape and is still here in the age of hard drives and H.264 and MPEG 2 etc.

    Get your facts straight before you post!
    by TomPhilo August 6, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
    this is a case where a SIMPLE LIST of movies is a LOT easier to read than having to go through 40 clicks and waiting for graphics to download to view the information. Bad design.
    Reply to this comment
    by Nataku4ca August 6, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
    lol, even though i didnt like clicking 40 times but the picture gave me a better idea of what a list would've given me, hell some of the movies wont be recongnizeble with out the picture (thats just me though)
    by ricmor555 August 6, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
    What about Heat?
    Reply to this comment
    by dcarnoy August 6, 2009 1:13 PM PDT
    Coming out very soon.
    by shanedr August 6, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
    Was this article written a few months ago? Unless something dramatic happens Blu-Ray is going to be history in a few short years.

    Pay more attention to the news!
    Reply to this comment
    by dcarnoy August 6, 2009 1:14 PM PDT
    We write the news. http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-18438_7-10142913-82.html
    by viper396 August 6, 2009 4:10 PM PDT
    Why? How many years? 5 yrs-10 yrs? What would replace Blu-ray then? And what makes you think that replacment would take off better then Blu-ray? Or are you one of this naive inidividuals who thinks everyone has unlimited bandwidth, a universal internet connection, and no desire to actually own any movies but just stream or rent them?

    Obviously you aren't paying attention to the news either since Blu-ray sales are in fact steadly rising. With broadcast TV transitioned to digital and everyone buying HD televisions why wouldn't blu-ray sales also rise?
    by hakeis1 August 9, 2009 11:40 AM PDT
    I highly doubt Bluray is going to be Dead in a few short Years. Matter of fact i am willing to
    bet that in a few years Bluray will be as strong as anything else on the market. Regular DVD's
    made it 15 years and still running strong so Bluray has at least 20 years left. Less than 30 percent
    of the consumers are going to buy into the streaming Video because you never own any movies and
    the quality just isn't the same specialy if you have a big 55 inch HD TV. Bluray is the winner, sony
    bashers just have to learn to deal with it, it's here to stay wheather you like Sony or Not, they put the
    best product on the table and won.
    by swamprat August 10, 2009 6:31 PM PDT
    anything to help bankrupt sony and hurry please.
    by RemFreeman August 6, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
    Personally, one movie I'd really like to see on this list is "Fight Club". All those dark scenes, not to mention the blood and guts close up factor would really make for a great reference movie. At least that's my opinion. I could be wrong.
    Reply to this comment
    by dcarnoy August 6, 2009 1:12 PM PDT
    We had Fight Club on initially, but it comes out in October, which one reader felt was too soon to be on the list.
    by mderby05 August 6, 2009 8:33 PM PDT
    yeah, fight club! hate to start a sub thread, but has anyone ever looked at that movie as a study of the emasculation of men???

    hehe
    by n3rdh3rd3r August 10, 2009 6:24 AM PDT
    Bob...Bob had ....Robert Paulson.... His name was Robert Paulson :)
    by alloyd50 August 6, 2009 1:51 PM PDT
    Pretty solid list. Chinatown, Lebowski, Thin Red Line & LOTR extended versions are egregiously missing from the available list. Star Wars we knew would take time.

    I would add other movies by these same directors (Polanski, Coens, Malick) like Rosemary's Baby, Miller's Crossing, Barton Fink, and Badlands.

    They have done right by Stanley Kubrick, though, after utterly f*ing up the awful, original mono DVDs...
    Reply to this comment
    by Josh Schwartz August 6, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
    What about the Matrix Trilogy?
    Reply to this comment
    by Rorix08 August 6, 2009 2:16 PM PDT
    I'm pretty sure that already came out a while ago...
    by Rorix08 August 6, 2009 2:19 PM PDT
    Here it is:
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9022693&st=The+Matrix&lp=13&type=product&cp=1&id=1895869
    by screamapillar August 6, 2009 3:46 PM PDT
    Anyone who buys Blu-ray is just supporting a completely anti-competitive, single provider setup. Boycott them until we can have a distribution system not owned by one of the most anti-competitive power hungry companies out there. why fall into this trap again? why let sony own your souls again?
    Reply to this comment
    by darkpoet25 August 8, 2009 2:42 PM PDT
    What are you talking about? You do know that the Blu Ray Group is made up of more than just Sony right? It includes Denon, Hitatchi, Samsung, Pioneer, Panasonic, Phillips, etc. I take it you are just mad that M$ didn't win the high def format war. Sounds like you were an Hd-Dvd supporter and are just mad the format lost and are now spreading FUD.
    by paulvos August 11, 2009 1:34 AM PDT
    Why do so many people insist BD is a Sony invention? It actually comes from the Philips labs and Sony decided to support it, just as with the CD's back in the 70's.

    Is having one standard not just great? Or do you prefer the mess with Betacam, V2000 and VHS? Don't blame the carrier, but the film rights owners. They don't want to be paid for the rights, but over paid and they're the people with the crazy rules on viewing in a group, lending, regions etc.
    by blusky08 August 6, 2009 4:04 PM PDT
    The people that I talk to are more interested in seeing obscure movies, television series and cult classics on BD. Unfortunately, only very recently have many older, worthy titles finally found their way onto DVD after many, many years of patiently waiting---and now the studios expect us to instantly embrace Blu-ray and wait another 10 years for such great titles to appear? No thanks--BR will be replaced before that ever happens!
    Reply to this comment
    by SeniorTec August 6, 2009 6:24 PM PDT
    I'd endure 10 plauges to see Cecil B. Demille's "The Ten Commandments" on BD. I get excited every time I see a listing for it only to come crashing back down when I realize it's the terrible remake from a few years ago. If they can put that garbage on BD you should certainly have Demille's classic.
    Reply to this comment
    by softwarewillalwaysbebuggy August 7, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
    I assume you mean DeMille's 50s Heston/Brynner version. Personally, I'm waiting for his original silent version. Just imagine the experience in full Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD!
    by n3rdh3rd3r August 10, 2009 6:28 AM PDT
    LOL software.... Ben Hur way overshadows Ten Commandments though.
    by August 10, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
    It was shot in VistaVision, so if they can get a good source print it should be beautiful. I'm curious how the effects shots will stand up to the sharpness of HD, though.
    by rothjd27 August 6, 2009 6:38 PM PDT
    Schindler's List and LOTR the extended versions are at the top of my list that needs to come out on Blu-ray. Also Snatch, but that's coming out soon so I guess that doesn't count. Also I'm really glad they finally decided to do Gladiator along with Forrest Gump and Braveheart.
    Reply to this comment
    by the_iceman August 6, 2009 6:52 PM PDT
    I dont know how much an HD transfer actually matters on older movies (vs. DVD quality), but I'd like to see the following on Blu-ray: the blues brothers, the green mile, black hawk down unrated extended cut, & das boot original uncut version.
    Reply to this comment
    by blusky08 August 6, 2009 11:04 PM PDT
    As mentioned above, even old film is higher in resolution than 1080p. It is the equipment that can't display the true resolution of film.
    by the_iceman August 6, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
    as far as some sony haters here predicting Blu's death in a few years. A blu-ray player is really versatile by playing not only Blu-rays, but also DVDs & CDs. (Personally I wish something new like Blu-ray audio would replace the ancient CD format.) I really like the disc format, so maybe HVD will replace it? I see that as being 10-15 yrs out though.
    Reply to this comment
    by Gorifyny August 7, 2009 9:10 PM PDT
    There were (unfortunately) two competing candidates to replace CD: SACD and Audio-DVD (I think that was the name). Of the two, SACD was closest to true high-definition analog of CD. Unfortunately, the silly competition contributed to the collapse of both formats. That, and the deterioration of the public's taste for audio quality, killed by the rush to collect as much garbage as possible through inferior-quality MP3 downloading. Myself, I really appreciate the quality of SACD and hate that it has declined to a niche format which probably will not continue to be supported by music publishers even at its current trickle rate.
    by reynoldbot August 6, 2009 7:23 PM PDT
    More than a few people have noticed the seemingly strange selection of blu-ray titles that are available and immediately upcoming (if someone had told me that "Being There" would get a release before Alien or LOTR I would have probably called the men in white shirts to pick you up), but there is some logic to it. Nearly all the titles available on blu-ray are either new movies just getting released or catalog titles also getting a simultaneous dvd reissue. So, unless there is significant demand (or a franchise tie-in to be had) you won't see some of the more obvious blu-ray catalog titles being released for a while.
    Reply to this comment
    by macksumum August 6, 2009 8:10 PM PDT
    i would love to see platoon on blu-ray.i wonder why E.T. was not on the list,a lot of people love that movie but i really don't see anything special about E.T. myself.
    Reply to this comment
    by dcarnoy August 7, 2009 3:46 AM PDT
    I did think about E.T. for a minute but it didn't make the cut. There's also A.I. to consider.
    by DarkHawke August 7, 2009 4:52 AM PDT
    @dcarnoy: And you'd consider A.I. because...? Not that great of a flick. I'm no fan of E.T. either (never saw it, never will), but that's the far more logical choice between the two. And not that CG-wussified version Spielberg tried to pass off on the public a few years ago. Walkie-talkies instead of guns indeed!
    Showing 1 of 3 pages (106 Comments)
    advertisement

    About Fully Equipped

    Executive Editor David Carnoy has been covering electronics for CNET since 2000, arriving at the company just as "that whole Internet bust thing" happened. Early on, he launched CNET's cell phone coverage, earning him the nickname "Wireless Dave," then moved on to bigger and broader things. Hunkered down in New York City, he oversees CNET's Home and Hardware reviews, which includes all things related to home theater, PC, and digital imaging. Fully Equipped covers the gamut of gadgets and gizmos and, to keep things lively, Carnoy likes to alternate between writing useful, advice-oriented pieces or thought-provoking columns with inflammatory headlines designed to elicit commentary from readers. Fully Equipped is the longest continuously running column on CNET.com.

    For older columns, read the Fully Equipped archive (2002-2008).

    Add this feed to your online news reader

    Fully Equipped topics