• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
advertisement
October 17, 2007 12:00 AM PDT

Developers react to Apple's iPhone SDK announcement

by Ben Wilson
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 1 comment

Apple's announcement today that it would deliver an official, full-blown software development kit for the creation of third-party, native iPhone applications was a surprise to some, a relief to others and mere event course for still others. We spoke with two individuals who have been instrumental in the unofficial third-party iPhone application scene:

Miksam Rogov of Nullriver Software, whose Installer.app for the iPhone (an easy-to-use method for download and installing native binaries directly on the device itself) has been perhaps the largest catalyst for development thus far, says an official SDK was inevitable.

"It's what I expected," he told iPhone Atlas.

Rogov also believes that most current third-party applications (available through Installer.app) will simply need to be recompiled once the new Apple system is in place. "The apps will all still run, just possibly need a recompile. So pretty much everything will get ported, or it will run in some sort of restricted environment."

He also thinks it should be the user, not Apple, who decides what applications can run on their devices. In his post to Apple's Web site, Steve Jobs said that Apple was considering the use of a "digital signature that can be traced back to a known developer," similar to a scheme currently in use by Nokia.

"It's the user that should be deciding whether to give authorization," said Rogov.

As for the future of Installer.app, Rogov says he'll likely be talking with Apple. "I'm going to speak with (Apple) and see what their plan for distribution is."

Lucas Newman, who who worked to develop the first third-party native game for the iPhone ("Lights Out!") and put together an informal, unofficial SDK for the device, is excited by the news.

"I think it is great news, of course," he said. "They are going to have some amazing third party developers spring to life. I think we are going to see some really creative applications."

For those who can't wait until February for third-party, native iPhone applications, see our guide to jailbreaking and installing native binaries on phones right now.

Feedback? info@iphoneatlas.com.

Recent posts from iPhone Atlas
Motorola, RIM leading, with Apple on the rise
Tales2Go: Get on-demand audiobooks for children
iCatchall: 27 apps for free--Monday only
Caps lock--David's iPhone tip of the week
HouseKeeper app reminds you to do forgotten chores
App Genie: 27 apps for 99 cents
Apple extends iTunes Web previews to apps
Possible proof surfaces that iPad supports a camera
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by valentinedv October 17, 2007 2:41 PM PDT
Rashiv is slightly nuts.

What Jobs is talking about is registered developers. If you are not registered, then an app will not run for everyone. You can probably run it on your own iPhone, but not everyone's iPhone.

What Rashiv is talking about is a trust based system. A trust system is doomed to failure. Users get used to clicking OK. This was demonstrated by Microsoft and Internet Explorer ActiveX plug-ins.

A trust system is not sufficent for a portable phone. People depend on thier phones. You can't have virused running around.

I'll wait for Feb. Hopefully, Apple puts out an OS version that does not run everything as root.
Reply to this comment

Search iPhone Atlas

advertisement

About iPhone Atlas

iPhone Atlas helps you navigate the ins and outs of Apple iPhone ownership with how-tos, troubleshooting information, news, reviews, and more. Got a tip? Want to contact us? E-mail iphoneatlas@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

iPhone Atlas topics