• On CHOW: Can girls use the guys' bathroom?
advertisement
June 10, 2008 12:00 AM PDT

How Apple is killing the unlocked iPhone market

by Ben Wilson
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

During Apple's introduction of the iPhone 3G, CEO Steve Jobs quipped that the company had debuted the iPhone in six countries, but knew the device was being used in "many more," drawing subdued laughter from his keynote audience. Jobs was referring to the massive, hitherto unstoppable market for iPhone unlocking -- a proces that allows the devices to be run on unauthorized wireless carriers. With the debut of the iPhone 3G, however, Apple is using multi-pronged leverage to sharply mitigate the utility of and access to unlocked devices from this point forward.

Apple's relationship with the unlocking community has been ambivalent. Unlockers cost Apple millions in subscription-derived revenue that the company shares with authorized carriers, but have also played a vital part in growing the iPhone market. Owners of unlocked, first-generation iPhones represented the epitome of early adoption -- customers who try current technology ahead of the wave, influencing buying decisions in their peers and stoking demand ahead of Apple's official entry into a given market. They were, collectively, an international beacon of sorts, offering Apple market assessment and revenue with no associated marketing or support costs.

Both Apple COO Tim Cook and CFO Peter Oppenheimer have acknowledged this benefit, even though each "locked" first-generation iPhone brought Apple somewhere between $288 - $432 in monthly subscriber fees from the worldwide mobile carriers with which Apple partners.

The unlock market also proved lucrative for grey-market entrepreneurs who bought dozens of iPhones to resell as carrier-agnostic in international markets.

With the iPhone 3G, however, Apple has transitioned its partnership model to a more traditional format: wireless companies pay an up-front subsidy to Apple, allowing iPhones to be sold at a discounted rate, and eschew the monthly stipend, instead keeping the entire monthly subscriber yield to themselves.

This arrangement results in what is presumably a smaller profit for Apple on each iPhone (the company previously charged full price for each unit in addition to reaping the monthly stipend) and requires an up-front financial commitment from wireless carriers, but will also allow deeper market penetration because of the reduced price point. The iPhone 3G will start at $199, compared with $399 for the first-generation phone.

The new carrier model has also forced a different method of acquisition for customers, who must now activate iPhones at the time of purchase rather than at their leisure through iTunes as with the first-generation devices. This, in theory, means that would-be unlockers will have a much tougher time getting their hands on contract-free devices to unlock.

In the case of first-generation phones, Apple used a technical tack to thwart unlockers. Each successive firmware revision for the devices included revisions that undid or nullified extant unlock methods. The hacker community dutifully responded, however, in some cases unlocking new firmware revisions before Apple had a chance to release the updates to the general public. Eventually the unlock process was refined to a single-click mechanism that worked with all iPhone firmware revisions.

In the case of the iPhone 3G, the hurdles for unlockers are of a wholly different nature. In addition to the aforementioned contractual roadblock, unlockers face more serious foes: supply and demand. Apple plans to make the iPhone 3G available in over 70 countries in the next few months, largely eliminating the need for unlocked devices in those markets. While some users will undoubtedly still desire unlocked devices for their ability to utilize different carriers in different countries at reduced voice and data expense, the insatiable demand for contract-free phones will be no more.

There's another reason unlocked iPhone 3Gs will be prove less desirable, at least in the US. T-Mobile, which has seen a flood of unlocked, first-generation iPhones move to its network, uses a one-of-a-kind 3G spectrum that (upon initial analysis) will not be compatible with the iPhone 3G. That means an iPhone 3G might be able to work on T-Mobile's slower data networks but not take advantage of the faster data rates afforded by other carriers.

"It's a cat-and-mouse game," Jobs said last year, referring to the iPhone unlock market. "We try to stay ahead. People will try to break in, and it's our job to stop them breaking in."

It seems certain that hackers will immediately begin work on methods of overcoming the iPhone 3G's technical locking mechanisms. Apple's carefully orchestrated market pressure, however, may make their efforts for naught.
Recent posts from iPhone Atlas
Motorola, RIM leading, with Apple on the rise
Tales2Go: Get on-demand audiobooks for children
iCatchall: 27 apps for free--Monday only
Caps lock--David's iPhone tip of the week
HouseKeeper app reminds you to do forgotten chores
App Genie: 27 apps for 99 cents
Apple extends iTunes Web previews to apps
Possible proof surfaces that iPad supports a camera
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by yfrontdude June 12, 2008 9:40 PM PDT
If only the folks in Cupertino spent as much time figuring out how to get cut and paste on this device . . .
www.freeiphone3gtoday.info
Reply to this comment
by MoonBase July 11, 2008 1:20 AM PDT
I agree completely. Apple is becoming a greedy company.
Another point I would like to mention is how Apple is ripping consumers in europe. iPhone 3G 8MB, a phone that is sold by $199 (= 126 euros) in the USA, is sold in europe for $790 (500 euros). Apple is trying to milk users in europe. I bought an 20" iMac in february for 1500 euros ($2,400 USD). Two months later Apple cut off 400 euros ($650) in the price, without any reason, punishing those who believed in the company and bought their products soon after launch. For $650 less than the price I have paid for my 20" iMac I could have a 24" iMac. In other words: if instead of buying the iMac in february I had bought two months later, I would buy a 24" imac, instead of the 20" imac I bought and still had saved $650! IT IS A SHAME! I am pissed off!
Reply to this comment
by ryoaska July 12, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
"If only the folks in Cupertino spent as much time figuring out how to get cut and paste on this device . . ."

That has to be the funniest and most true statement i've heard about the iphone in a long time! Seriously, there are a lot of little very simple software based features that they could be adding instead of wasting time on fighting a gray market that only helps grow the popularity of the device... And (for U.S. customers) at&t's price gouging isn't helping much either.

If anybody is greedy I would say it's AT&T, not really Apple, although I guess any company is greedy if that just means they want as much money as they can get. Apple is (usually) just smart enough to realize that they get more in the long run by catering to the customer experience and not doing things to **** people off just to make the short buck. I agree that it sucks when you buy a new piece of technology right when it comes out, and then the price drops soon after that, but hey...that's one of the many risks we take as early adopters.
Reply to this comment
by andrew.julian July 12, 2008 10:25 PM PDT
I completely disagree with your article. First of All I just got an iphone 3G 16GB for $600! no contract or anything (craigslist). This iphone is being sold everywhere in the internet now, there are many hackers working on it as I write this comment, some of them ALREADY unlocked/jailbreak the latest firmware on both iphones (2G/3G).
Reply to this comment
by ttanida July 18, 2008 4:38 PM PDT
Funny how Steve Jobs is quick to say music companies should distribute music DRM-free (e.g. early 2007 comments), but now when it's his $$$ at stake, he's all in favor of adding protection.
Reply to this comment
by MacMgr August 3, 2008 9:46 PM PDT
>> available in over 70 countries in the next few months, largely eliminating the need for unlocked devices in those markets

Well, not really. If you check out the data charges for Telcel in Mexico, and their rip-off price for unlimited data at fast and then low speeds, you will see why the unlocked device market is still alive. If there were reasonable options in those 70 countries, the unlock market would effectively die. The usual dose of corporate greed in Mexico as shown by Telcel, means that there are thousands of people who STILL want an iPhone, but cannot bend to Telcel's rates.

If there were another way to get iPhones here, they would fly off the shelf like flies at a barbecue.
Reply to this comment
by wwwxiphoneorg December 12, 2008 7:22 AM PST
Unlocker iPhone 3G!!!!!!!

http://www.xiphone.org
Reply to this comment
by Nick0723 July 28, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
What stinks is ATT service is horrible. Would be nice to have on Verizon.
Reply to this comment
by shanghaiply August 16, 2009 2:51 PM PDT
I suggest there is a major antitrust issue emerging with the way Apple and the various Telcos are playing around here. Essentially the vendors - manufacturers and service companies - don't really care because by the time they have to turn up for any decisions (possibly after years of legal paper throwing and the current court backlog) they have skinned the public and moved on to something else. I am still amazed at how each new generation of suckers gets hung out to dry.
Reply to this comment
by Kidnkorner February 8, 2010 11:11 PM PST
Apple - Pay more, get less.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • next

Search iPhone Atlas

advertisement

About iPhone Atlas

iPhone Atlas helps you navigate the ins and outs of Apple iPhone ownership with how-tos, troubleshooting information, news, reviews, and more. Got a tip? Want to contact us? E-mail iphoneatlas@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

iPhone Atlas topics