• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
advertisement
Click Here
April 30, 2009 3:17 PM PDT

AT&T reintroduces anti-video-streaming terms

by David Martin
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments
(Credit: AT&T)

Earlier this month, AT&T modified its wireless terms of service (TOS) to ban Slingbox activities on mobile devices attached to its network. Less than a week later, the company retracted these changes due to public outcry over the matter and explained that the changes were made "in error."

Unexpectedly, the AT&T TOS has changed again within the past 24 hours. The new TOS language targets and prohibits the place-shifting activities from Slingbox or similar devices to "Personal Computers" using AT&T's wireless network. The changes are:

While most common uses for Intranet browsing, e-mail, and Intranet access are permitted by your data plan, there are certain uses that cause extreme network capacity issues and interference with the network and are therefore prohibited. Examples of prohibited uses include, without limitation...downloading movies using P2P file sharing services, redirecting television signals for viewing on Personal Computers, Web broadcasting, and/or for the operation of servers, telemetry devices....

Clearly, AT&T is seeking to keep its wireless network from being overwhelmed by heavy video use, but the restriction is surprising given that it comes during a time of growth for AT&T. Apple is rumored to be releasing a next-generation iPhone with video capabilities this summer, and AT&T is performing network upgrades that are supposed to double download speeds to 7Mbps and eventually higher.

It remains to be seen what effect AT&T's new restrictions might have on the availability of the iPhone SlingPlayer app in the iTunes App Store. As of press time, it still has not been approved for distribution in the store. However, we suspect that the app will eventually be approved, considering that the new TOS does not completely forbid video streaming and does not mention the iPhone or SlingPlayer directly.

Recent posts from iPhone Atlas
Facebook iPhone app gets address sync, push
Do prices matter for iPod games? (poll)
FLO TV to bring live mobile TV to iPhone
Effin Genius is like Pandora's smart little brother
Apple's App Store tops 3 billion downloads
BMW launches free M Power iPhone application
Cheap GPS: Gokivo app drops to 99 cents
Nokia: We will match Apple, RIM
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by clynx April 30, 2009 8:05 PM PDT
Experts are saying there is no proof these activities are effecting the network. They are trying to change the way we use the internet to benefit them for hyper profits. This and data caps should be looked at as what it is, censorship. I am canceling my AT&T account and will do without it, can't wait. I hate being lead around like a horse with a carrot dangling in front of me.
Reply to this comment
by jskrenes May 1, 2009 5:38 AM PDT
Good for you for canceling, but short of wifi, where are you going to go? VZW has a 5GB cap. Sprint does too, though I hear they don't enforce it strictly (why should they when half the time you're roaming off of someone else?), and Alltel is starting to bottleneck your speed pretty bad after 5GB. Not sure about TMobile.

Hopefully this will change when 4G launches. I hear the throughput speeds are going to be nothing short of miraculous. A 5GB limit would be exceeded even more quickly on 4G.
Reply to this comment
by Wannabe Actuary May 1, 2009 6:48 AM PDT
Given the exact wording is "redirecting television signals for viewing on Personal Computers" I don't see how SlingBox feeds would be in violation with the (hopefully arriving soon SlingPlayer for the iPhone). In those cases, you're not redirecting the television signal for viewing on a personal computer, but rather redirecting the television signal for viewing on the iPhone.

My verizon contract is up and I've been waiting for the iPhone SlingPlayer to be approved (as well as waiting until June/July in case there is a new iPhone as rumored) before making the switch to AT&T. If the app is approved as wi-fi only, or AT&T clarifies that Slingbox feeds being viewed on the iPhone are prohibited, I won't bother switching at all. Honestly, the iPhone requires an unlimited data plan. Don't call it unlimited if you're going to cap it or prohibit certain uses of it.
Reply to this comment
by bigboots2007 May 1, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
unlimited is never unlimited whether it is att or cox or comcast.
Reply to this comment
by B-Ri May 1, 2009 1:42 PM PDT
The unfortunate reality is that these companies haven't kept up with infrastructure improvements. Instead they are playing games with the terms of the agreements they've made with consumers like say caps on "unlimited" internet service. I suspect that if things did balloon, as far as bandwidth consumption goes, they would be in trouble as the normal services would be seriously affected. Just like when the South by Southwest conference was killing the ATT network. Eventually they'll catch up but we have to keep an eye on them so they don't force us into terms that do nothing but line their pockets.
Reply to this comment
by SeizeCTRL May 2, 2009 8:38 AM PDT
Amazing! So with these high priced data plans, shouldn't mobile carriers be busy increasing infrastructure for an increasing data world? Don't sell me a phone with unlimited data if you limit how I use that data.
Reply to this comment
by flametrick May 2, 2009 8:24 PM PDT
The App Store already sells Orb and it streams video. What 's the big difference between it and Slingbox? Or are Orb users about to get hit with huge usage charges?
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Search iPhone Atlas

advertisement

About iPhone Atlas

iPhone Atlas helps you navigate the ins and outs of Apple iPhone ownership with how-tos, troubleshooting information, news, reviews, and more. Got a tip? Want to contact us? E-mail iphoneatlas@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

iPhone Atlas topics