This week's New Yorker cover created on iPhone
Brushes, paints, canvas: unnecessary.
Computers, software, tablets: superfluous.
These days, all you need to create magazine cover-worthy artwork is an iPhone and Steve Sprang's $4.99 Brushes app. Oh, and insane talent.
Those were the ingredients that produced this week's dazzling New Yorker cover, a traditional-looking blurred street scene that looks like an authentic brush-and-canvas painting.
In reality, artist Jorge Colombo finger-painted the image while standing outside Madame Tussauds Wax Museum in Times Square. (Side note: I have vivid memories of practicing sleight-of-hand with a quarter while at Madame Tussaud's in London. Guess we all use our downtime differently.)
You can witness the creation of this exceptional piece of artwork in the above video. Although it took Colombo roughly an hour to complete, this accelerated version lasts all of 51 seconds.
No, Colombo didn't hold his iPhone in front of a camcorder for an hour: the Brushes app can record the artist's brush strokes, then replay them using the free Brushers Viewer utility (Mac OS X only).
If you've ever questioned the iPhone's viability as a bona-fide computing platform, this should remove all doubts. How long before someone authors a novel on one? Or composes a symphony? (Actually, a keyboard would really help with both. I'm thinking something Bluetooth. Anyone?)
Personally, I just wish I had a fraction of this guy's artistic talent. Watch the video and see if you share my awe.
Rick Broida, a technology writer for nearly 20 years, is the author of more than a dozen books. In addition to writing CNET's The Cheapskate blog, he oversees BNET's Business Hacks. Rick is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CBS Interactive. Disclosure. Deals found on The Cheapskate are subject to availability, expiration, and other terms determined by sellers. Follow Rick on Twitter at cheapskateblog.

As long as the software exists.
A bit of irony eh?
-
by blish
May 28, 2009 5:52 AM PDT
- Interesting, but is the final image as good as he would have produced in-studio, or is this just a stunt?
-
Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)I'm guessing stunt, but it's a neat display of what can be done, not necessarily what should be done.