October 20, 2009 5:25 PM PDT
Windows 7's Aero in pictures
Introduced for Vista, the translucent Aero skin has been heavily developed and expanded in Windows 7. See what this key design and interface feature looks like and behaves like in the new operating system.
Seth peers into the deep, dark corners of software so that you don't have to. He has yet to suffer a single nightmare about OS/2. You can follow him on Twitter.







"a computer for whilest I am away from my main unit" - two PCs are better (more expensive) than one.
I do really like the way it groups similar item together, but i wish that the system tray was more like vista's and XP (auto0hiding less used icons)
its not bad, but i prefer ubuntu's UI over Seven's
To me it was a major selling point for Windows 7.
I rather pay and get things working out of the box then to use the POS known as Linux
Distros I tried:
Ubuntu 8.04
Ubuntu 8.10
Ubuntu 9.04
Kubuntu 8.04
Kubuntu 9.04
OpenSUSE 11.0
OpenSUSE 11.1
OpenSUSE 11.2
All of them sucked horribly vs Windows.
first of all OSX started the same as windows they looked very similar, your just trying to get under peoples skin. But OSX does look good and I am glad that windows copied the good parts of OSX style and kept the good parts of vista. Years ago Apple copied windows, now Windows is copying Apple nothing wrong with that.
Crazy, their performance test says this brand new machine is smokin' for everything, including 3d games and graphics, but only sub-middle for Aero... ***???
Aero is NOT all that. It's GARISH.
Overkill on the shimmers & translucencies.
Seriously.
Apple never went THAT far w/shimmer OR translucency and they toned it down due to users' complaints in 10.5 Leopard...
Irony,
Turn OFF Aero ( use windows Classic )
Machine IS smokin' fast!
This is sort of RETARDED.
How can the GUI be more intense than games??
Why??!!
Shouldn't the GUI be more optimized....??
Oh wait, that's OS X. (AppKit rocks your socks)
Also, irony is a noun, just fyi.
Obviously Windows 7 is faster on your dual core mac vs XP on your quad-core. Windows XP is significantly slower and less efficient then 7. Windows 7 and even Vista are exponentially better then XP on high end PC's.
As for OSX's UI being perfect, well lol. There's no such thing as perfect and even then Apple would have a long way to go. Don't get me wrong, it's very sleek and shiny and has some very nice useability features but there are also many things that need improvement. Same goes with Windows before anyone accuses me of bias.
And here's another two words for ya: mommy, daddy. Can't count how many liberal arts majors I see walking around with their overpriced iMac mama and dada so kindly provided them. They're soooo cool. Just like that guy in the mac commercial. Right.
Thanks for reinforcing my opinion that apple users are insecure about their purchase, though - you're yet another troll commenting on a story with nothing to do about apple. Mac forums a little slow today? Got to admit those new Mac all-in-ones they released today really put me to sleep, until I saw the price on those beasts. Boggles my mind how someone would pay so much for so little.
and PS I'm neither an M$ or APPL fan. Just stating how insecure you apple dweebs make yourselves look with every successive post.
Its more of a downgrade, or a poor attempt of emulation.
I understand you point. :)
I guess the key feature to Win7 as opposed to Vista is that it does not render the windows that are not displayed. Vista was suppoosed to do that (I believe) but never really did it well.
And this is ocming from a guy who runs XP in classic mode of the old Win2k at work.
As for as Aero goes, I think it is perfect and like anything in Windows if it isn't too you liking you can simply tweak it so it is.
Thanks!
I'm really glad Windows users will get an interface similar to what OS X users have been enjoying for quite some time now.
But it behoves you to not imply this was a MS innovation (since they like that word), to compete they had to capitalize on OS X's success and follow what user's like.
It's not a derogatory statement towards MS, it's actually a compliment from MS towards Apple's engineering and design. This is no big secret or revelation, it's been that way for quite some time.
So stop your arguing and fighting people.
Everyone wants to kill another company's products and success, truth be know that is room on this planet for all these products to exist in harmony. The sad part is MS's willing to make their product work worst on OS X hoping they would sell another seat of Windows, while Apple strives to make their products work seamless and equal on both products (iTunes, Safari, iPod, and iPhone) They even make a small program that can be installed on Windows to allow Windows system to share their CD/DVD drives wirelessly to other computers.
It would be nice if MS would not think they need to rule the world like some communistic dictator and play nice letting people decide which product they prefer to use. Some will like Windows some will like OS X. It's all about personal choice.
-Your ignorance is showing.
ignorance? Hardly... arrogance.. maybe... but what he said was true. The XP GUI is horribly outdated.. unless you actually like your memory usage displayed in kilobytes.
It's funny how you guys made fun of OS X for its eye candy.... and now that MS finally updates it's OS with a modern GUI.. you think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I was referring to his statement that Areo is a copy of OS X, which correct me if I am wrong uses that ugly grey ****.
"The XP GUI is horribly outdated.. unless you actually like your memory usage displayed in kilobytes. "
REALLY? a 10 year old operating system is outdated??? Shocking. You do realize a new OS has come out since XP?
"It's funny how you guys made fun of OS X for its eye candy"
Actually PC fanboys make fun of Mac (the system) due to the eye candy (shiny!). OS X is nothing nice to look at.
-
by HyraxX
October 21, 2009 9:53 AM PDT
- Sweet tom Waits!
-
Like this
Reply to this comment
-
-
-
by srosenblatt
October 21, 2009 11:10 AM PDT
- Was wondering if anybody was going to see that... :)
-
Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (62 Comments)